The URL can be used to link to this page

98-429LL CIfiY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMTNARY ORDER In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at COUNCI . FILE NO. � 7Z By Fi1e No. 59803 thru S98036 Voting Ward_1,4,& 7 the following locations: 598034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue £rom N Syndicate St to N Griggs St S98035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave 598036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wakefield Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RFSIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of oid sidewalk) -$7.65 per Pront foot for a five {5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed} - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will.receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[7LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NQN-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. L� The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June 1998 at 5�30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner p'rovided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays i�enanav +�lakey �ostrom r/�`o 1 eman �rris ,�antry �iter ,� Pt�alreuen � 13199� L In Favor (� Against Adopted by Council: Date_��, �_c,�__`�q8' c Certified Passed by Council Se retary �� P�ei� wo� sdaw�� GREEN SHEET winnuonre_ NTACSPERSON 8 PFIDNE OEPASi7MEMD�RECTOR irry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��N cnr nTror�v NUMHER PoR STBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(pA7E) S R ��' 811IX'+ETDIREL'TOF For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) lAL+OF SdNANNE PAGES �_ 1 _(GLfP ALL LOGATONS PoR 9GNATUN� � ASSOC77+lE Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 1, 4& 7(See attached lis[s) �5 s�t��! — a STAFF __GNR SERVICE COlAMLSSION Wr4N:F1 COUhCLL 08JECTPJE? a MGT. SEAYICE$ PERSONAlSERVICE CONTRACTS MU5i ANSWEH 7HE WLLON7NG QUESTIONS: 7. H25 7hi5 perS Ne wotked untle! a cottttaCt fOr this dBpaftrnent? 2 Has Nis Y pe s�rm eve� been a cay employee? YES NO 3. Dnes this persontfirm possess a skitl not mmWy possessed by acy current ary emploYee? YES NO Explain all yas answere on sepeMe sheet end attach to groon sheet WHAT. WHEN. WHERE. WHY�: The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of trea roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating freefthaw cycSes, service liFe IirtsRs, chemica! additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These pro6lems accur on a citywide tevel and must he addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefi uncorrected, the sidewalk cond8ion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable arid subject to increased padestrian injuries from talls and possible titigations. The community wiil benefR from this project because ii will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewefk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tolbws that private sector jobs are created as a resuft ot this activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions fiave created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains corrtroversial. This option woufd allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wnioh yarwra#amorepersonal inj�ry suils, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as ciaim payouts. Cour�f Research Ce�rfer MAY 111998 3fALANOUMOFTRANSACTiONS 9��F�S:SH � COST/REVENUEBUDGEfED(CIRCLEONE) YES No 1NDNJGSWRCE g$'�'S A Pt{i }8 = 61B �.�� ACRVRYNUMBER C98�'ZT7�1"078�4^Q�O�� JANCIAI iNFORMATION: {EXPLAIN) 8 � � AST = 325 �y060 --°- - - - —.---�. - _. --...--� C, Ct6 98 = 50;000 LL CIfiY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMTNARY ORDER In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at COUNCI . FILE NO. � 7Z By Fi1e No. 59803 thru S98036 Voting Ward_1,4,& 7 the following locations: 598034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue £rom N Syndicate St to N Griggs St S98035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave 598036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wakefield Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RFSIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of oid sidewalk) -$7.65 per Pront foot for a five {5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed} - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will.receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[7LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NQN-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. L� The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June 1998 at 5�30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner p'rovided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays i�enanav +�lakey �ostrom r/�`o 1 eman �rris ,�antry �iter ,� Pt�alreuen � 13199� L In Favor (� Against Adopted by Council: Date_��, �_c,�__`�q8' c Certified Passed by Council Se retary �� P�ei� wo� sdaw�� GREEN SHEET winnuonre_ NTACSPERSON 8 PFIDNE OEPASi7MEMD�RECTOR irry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��N cnr nTror�v NUMHER PoR STBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(pA7E) S R ��' 811IX'+ETDIREL'TOF For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) lAL+OF SdNANNE PAGES �_ 1 _(GLfP ALL LOGATONS PoR 9GNATUN� � ASSOC77+lE Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 1, 4& 7(See attached lis[s) �5 s�t��! — a STAFF __GNR SERVICE COlAMLSSION Wr4N:F1 COUhCLL 08JECTPJE? a MGT. SEAYICE$ PERSONAlSERVICE CONTRACTS MU5i ANSWEH 7HE WLLON7NG QUESTIONS: 7. H25 7hi5 perS Ne wotked untle! a cottttaCt fOr this dBpaftrnent? 2 Has Nis Y pe s�rm eve� been a cay employee? YES NO 3. Dnes this persontfirm possess a skitl not mmWy possessed by acy current ary emploYee? YES NO Explain all yas answere on sepeMe sheet end attach to groon sheet WHAT. WHEN. WHERE. WHY�: The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of trea roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating freefthaw cycSes, service liFe IirtsRs, chemica! additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These pro6lems accur on a citywide tevel and must he addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefi uncorrected, the sidewalk cond8ion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable arid subject to increased padestrian injuries from talls and possible titigations. The community wiil benefR from this project because ii will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewefk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tolbws that private sector jobs are created as a resuft ot this activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions fiave created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains corrtroversial. This option woufd allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wnioh yarwra#amorepersonal inj�ry suils, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as ciaim payouts. Cour�f Research Ce�rfer MAY 111998 3fALANOUMOFTRANSACTiONS 9��F�S:SH � COST/REVENUEBUDGEfED(CIRCLEONE) YES No 1NDNJGSWRCE g$'�'S A Pt{i }8 = 61B �.�� ACRVRYNUMBER C98�'ZT7�1"078�4^Q�O�� JANCIAI iNFORMATION: {EXPLAIN) 8 � � AST = 325 �y060 --°- - - - —.---�. - _. --...--� C, Ct6 98 = 50;000 LL CIfiY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMTNARY ORDER In the Matter o£ sidewalk reconstruction at COUNCI . FILE NO. � 7Z By Fi1e No. 59803 thru S98036 Voting Ward_1,4,& 7 the following locations: 598034 - Both sides Dayton Avenue £rom N Syndicate St to N Griggs St S98035 - West side N Hamline Avenue from W Nebraska Ave to W Hoyt Ave 598036 - Both sides Cypress Street from Wilson Ave to Wakefield Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RFSIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of oid sidewalk) -$7.65 per Pront foot for a five {5) foot wide walk and 59.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed} - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will.receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[7LTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NQN-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. L� The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE £or estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 24th dav of June 1998 at 5�30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner p'rovided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays i�enanav +�lakey �ostrom r/�`o 1 eman �rris ,�antry �iter ,� Pt�alreuen � 13199� L In Favor (� Against Adopted by Council: Date_��, �_c,�__`�q8' c Certified Passed by Council Se retary �� P�ei� wo� sdaw�� GREEN SHEET winnuonre_ NTACSPERSON 8 PFIDNE OEPASi7MEMD�RECTOR irry H. Lueth - 266-6083 ��N cnr nTror�v NUMHER PoR STBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(pA7E) S R ��' 811IX'+ETDIREL'TOF For Public Hearing on 6-24-98 �MAYOR(ORASSISTANT) lAL+OF SdNANNE PAGES �_ 1 _(GLfP ALL LOGATONS PoR 9GNATUN� � ASSOC77+lE Reconstruct Sidewaik in Wards 1, 4& 7(See attached lis[s) �5 s�t��! — a STAFF __GNR SERVICE COlAMLSSION Wr4N:F1 COUhCLL 08JECTPJE? a MGT. SEAYICE$ PERSONAlSERVICE CONTRACTS MU5i ANSWEH 7HE WLLON7NG QUESTIONS: 7. H25 7hi5 perS Ne wotked untle! a cottttaCt fOr this dBpaftrnent? 2 Has Nis Y pe s�rm eve� been a cay employee? YES NO 3. Dnes this persontfirm possess a skitl not mmWy possessed by acy current ary emploYee? YES NO Explain all yas answere on sepeMe sheet end attach to groon sheet WHAT. WHEN. WHERE. WHY�: The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of trea roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating freefthaw cycSes, service liFe IirtsRs, chemica! additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These pro6lems accur on a citywide tevel and must he addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Lefi uncorrected, the sidewalk cond8ion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable arid subject to increased padestrian injuries from talls and possible titigations. The community wiil benefR from this project because ii will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewefk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tolbws that private sector jobs are created as a resuft ot this activity. Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions fiave created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains corrtroversial. This option woufd allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wnioh yarwra#amorepersonal inj�ry suils, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as ciaim payouts. Cour�f Research Ce�rfer MAY 111998 3fALANOUMOFTRANSACTiONS 9��F�S:SH � COST/REVENUEBUDGEfED(CIRCLEONE) YES No 1NDNJGSWRCE g$'�'S A Pt{i }8 = 61B �.�� ACRVRYNUMBER C98�'ZT7�1"078�4^Q�O�� JANCIAI iNFORMATION: {EXPLAIN) 8 � � AST = 325 �y060 --°- - - - —.---�. - _. --...--� C, Ct6 98 = 50;000