Loading...
98-372. �� z7 C2TY OF ST. PA� 0 R 1 G 1 N A L COUNC-��� vvin 9�-37Z PRfiLIMINARY ORDER By File No__598029,S98033 voting Ward_6 In the Matter of 598029 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jenks Ave. from Greenbrier St. to walsh St. 598030 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side E_ Magnolia Ave, from Atlantic St_ to Magnolia Lane. 598031 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Nevada Ave. from Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. & the east side Greenbrier St. from E. Nevada Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. 598032 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Wheelock Pkwy from Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. 598033 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Wheelock Pkwy from Walsh St. to Weide St. , 9� �37Z *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures} Reaonstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5j foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordinqly_ New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 [�3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 8th day of July, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom c o 1 eman s- (�`ps��� ✓Harris �antry t�eiter � In Favor � Against ! (�`QS e v�� By Mayor PltRrleuen Adopted by Council: Date��_� �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUN 27 1998 Public Hearin� Date — Public Works Sidewafks H. Lueth - 26&6083 OF SIGNATURE PAGES __ 1 1998 RE 5-1-98 OATE MRIATEO G R E E N o �n_no 9���37Z SHEET �o.�5�g _INITIAVDATE INITIAVDATE� ��FPAflTMENTDIPECTOR �CfiYCAUNC0. ASSIGN �CRYATfORNEY �CffVCLEFK NUMBER FOR � AOUTING �gUOGETDIRECWR �FIN. b MGT. SEPVICES DIR_ O�f1C2 �RDER �Maroa�oeassisr�wn iQCoundl Research _(CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOq SIGNATURE) n ASSOCUlTE �9�P�tTh1ENTAL ACCOUNTANT Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) MMENDATIONS: Apprare (A) or Fajert (R) PEHSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCAMMISStON _CIVIL SERVICE CAMMi5S10N L Has this peES Nfi� Ne worked under a contrac[ tor ihis depar6nent? CIB COMMITTEE _ Z � µas �� yES ��� NO ��en a ciry employee? S7AFF _ 3. �oes this parsonifirm possess a skill no[ normally possassed by any current ciry empioyee? DISTRICTCAUNCIL YES NO _ _ __ ___ _— Explsin ali yas answers on separate shael and eUach to green shoet WHERE. WHY): The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life Iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annua� basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fal{s and possible titigations. The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe detect iree sidewalks tor iis many citizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuii of ihis activity. iADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historical�y, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, propeKy owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half t as���sr�sa�,is-City�su.bsidtzed, it still remains coniroversial. � �'?':. ";1 , A�f� 2 3 i3v� This option would allow the infrastructure o( sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of farger doffar amounts in eventual repairs and7or replacement, as well as claim payouts. PUNDING SOURCE 7�^n^vvov N� � �� 70 = o � u� v�v FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPIAIN) B� AST � 3 f OOO C, C�s 98 = 50,000 COST/pEVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES No ACITVITYNUMBEq C98-2T751-0784-00000 . �� z7 C2TY OF ST. PA� 0 R 1 G 1 N A L COUNC-��� vvin 9�-37Z PRfiLIMINARY ORDER By File No__598029,S98033 voting Ward_6 In the Matter of 598029 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jenks Ave. from Greenbrier St. to walsh St. 598030 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side E_ Magnolia Ave, from Atlantic St_ to Magnolia Lane. 598031 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Nevada Ave. from Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. & the east side Greenbrier St. from E. Nevada Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. 598032 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Wheelock Pkwy from Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. 598033 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Wheelock Pkwy from Walsh St. to Weide St. , 9� �37Z *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures} Reaonstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5j foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordinqly_ New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 [�3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 8th day of July, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom c o 1 eman s- (�`ps��� ✓Harris �antry t�eiter � In Favor � Against ! (�`QS e v�� By Mayor PltRrleuen Adopted by Council: Date��_� �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUN 27 1998 Public Hearin� Date — Public Works Sidewafks H. Lueth - 26&6083 OF SIGNATURE PAGES __ 1 1998 RE 5-1-98 OATE MRIATEO G R E E N o �n_no 9���37Z SHEET �o.�5�g _INITIAVDATE INITIAVDATE� ��FPAflTMENTDIPECTOR �CfiYCAUNC0. ASSIGN �CRYATfORNEY �CffVCLEFK NUMBER FOR � AOUTING �gUOGETDIRECWR �FIN. b MGT. SEPVICES DIR_ O�f1C2 �RDER �Maroa�oeassisr�wn iQCoundl Research _(CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOq SIGNATURE) n ASSOCUlTE �9�P�tTh1ENTAL ACCOUNTANT Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) MMENDATIONS: Apprare (A) or Fajert (R) PEHSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCAMMISStON _CIVIL SERVICE CAMMi5S10N L Has this peES Nfi� Ne worked under a contrac[ tor ihis depar6nent? CIB COMMITTEE _ Z � µas �� yES ��� NO ��en a ciry employee? S7AFF _ 3. �oes this parsonifirm possess a skill no[ normally possassed by any current ciry empioyee? DISTRICTCAUNCIL YES NO _ _ __ ___ _— Explsin ali yas answers on separate shael and eUach to green shoet WHERE. WHY): The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life Iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annua� basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fal{s and possible titigations. The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe detect iree sidewalks tor iis many citizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuii of ihis activity. iADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historical�y, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, propeKy owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half t as���sr�sa�,is-City�su.bsidtzed, it still remains coniroversial. � �'?':. ";1 , A�f� 2 3 i3v� This option would allow the infrastructure o( sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of farger doffar amounts in eventual repairs and7or replacement, as well as claim payouts. PUNDING SOURCE 7�^n^vvov N� � �� 70 = o � u� v�v FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPIAIN) B� AST � 3 f OOO C, C�s 98 = 50,000 COST/pEVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES No ACITVITYNUMBEq C98-2T751-0784-00000 . �� z7 C2TY OF ST. PA� 0 R 1 G 1 N A L COUNC-��� vvin 9�-37Z PRfiLIMINARY ORDER By File No__598029,S98033 voting Ward_6 In the Matter of 598029 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Jenks Ave. from Greenbrier St. to walsh St. 598030 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the south side E_ Magnolia Ave, from Atlantic St_ to Magnolia Lane. 598031 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Nevada Ave. from Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. & the east side Greenbrier St. from E. Nevada Ave. to E. Nebraska Ave. 598032 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Wheelock Pkwy from Greenbrier St. to Walsh St. 598033 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side E. Wheelock Pkwy from Walsh St. to Weide St. , 9� �37Z *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures} Reaonstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5j foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordinqly_ New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100g of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 [�3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 8th day of July, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom c o 1 eman s- (�`ps��� ✓Harris �antry t�eiter � In Favor � Against ! (�`QS e v�� By Mayor PltRrleuen Adopted by Council: Date��_� �� Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUN 27 1998 Public Hearin� Date — Public Works Sidewafks H. Lueth - 26&6083 OF SIGNATURE PAGES __ 1 1998 RE 5-1-98 OATE MRIATEO G R E E N o �n_no 9���37Z SHEET �o.�5�g _INITIAVDATE INITIAVDATE� ��FPAflTMENTDIPECTOR �CfiYCAUNC0. ASSIGN �CRYATfORNEY �CffVCLEFK NUMBER FOR � AOUTING �gUOGETDIRECWR �FIN. b MGT. SEPVICES DIR_ O�f1C2 �RDER �Maroa�oeassisr�wn iQCoundl Research _(CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOq SIGNATURE) n ASSOCUlTE �9�P�tTh1ENTAL ACCOUNTANT Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) MMENDATIONS: Apprare (A) or Fajert (R) PEHSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOILOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNINGCAMMISStON _CIVIL SERVICE CAMMi5S10N L Has this peES Nfi� Ne worked under a contrac[ tor ihis depar6nent? CIB COMMITTEE _ Z � µas �� yES ��� NO ��en a ciry employee? S7AFF _ 3. �oes this parsonifirm possess a skill no[ normally possassed by any current ciry empioyee? DISTRICTCAUNCIL YES NO _ _ __ ___ _— Explsin ali yas answers on separate shael and eUach to green shoet WHERE. WHY): The probiem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service life Iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annua� basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fal{s and possible titigations. The community will benefit from this project because it wiil provide safe detect iree sidewalks tor iis many citizens. The sidewalk conVacts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuii of ihis activity. iADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historical�y, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, propeKy owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half t as���sr�sa�,is-City�su.bsidtzed, it still remains coniroversial. � �'?':. ";1 , A�f� 2 3 i3v� This option would allow the infrastructure o( sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure of farger doffar amounts in eventual repairs and7or replacement, as well as claim payouts. PUNDING SOURCE 7�^n^vvov N� � �� 70 = o � u� v�v FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPIAIN) B� AST � 3 f OOO C, C�s 98 = 50,000 COST/pEVENUE BUDGETED(CIRCLE ONE) YES No ACITVITYNUMBEq C98-2T751-0784-00000