The URL can be used to link to this page

98-252i � CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCI I E NO. �O 'aS oZ PRSLIMINARY ORDER By � � �/I�� o R� G� �vA � Voting�Ward98004&798005 In the Mattes of 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Eiowell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 .+� 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1498, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated_ 9�r�t iau�� Dat e�� COUNCILPERSObiS Yeas Nays ✓enanav ✓�lakey �ostrom �.�"oleman �Ffarri s �ntry vIFeiter J ►: i, :�, �. �. � a.. r ��, � In Favo. � Against Adopted by Council in the manner the nature of Certified Passed by Council Secretary . ,., ,.� OEPARTMENTttsb'FICF.lC�UNCiI OATEWRIAIEO GREEN SHEET v NO. 3gs�3 Public Works Sidewalks 3-598 Miriawa� x�rrwmnre COMACTPEHSONdPHONE ❑DEPAfiTMENTDIflECTOR CRYCOUNGIL L8(fY H. LU62I7 • ZBEf-GOS$ ASSIGN ❑C(tY ATfORNEY CI7Y CLERK NUMBEq R7R 1At15T8EONCOUNCN.AGENDRBY(DATE)( pOUiING �g�p�E7DIRECTDR �FIN.dMOT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �R Maronrop�ssisrarq t Cour�il Researeh b Frida 3-27-98 ❑ TOTAL f OF 81GIMTUNE PAGES j _(CIJP ALL LOCATONS FOR 9IGIUNR� � ASSOCIATE RTMENTAL ACCOU AM OCTIONREWESTED . � Reconstruct SideNapc in Wards d& 7(See attached tist) _ �� _ � �a,5� aECqnMENDaTpNS: aFpwe (N a�(Po pERSpNAL g�ER��YICE CONTRACTS MllST AN4WER T#{E FOLLOWING �UE3TION3: _ PLANNB7G CORIRi75510H _CMQ SERYICE CdAMlSSIQY 1. Has this EY S NOer worked under a�ontract for this deD��ent? _.c18 CaAdtrrEE 2. Has this Pe�rm ever been a dry emqoyce? — YES NO A STAFF 3. Doe5lYns persoNfirtn possess a sktlt not riormaily posseased try arc� wneni ciry employee? DISTR�CTC0UNC1� YES NO SuPPORTS xH�CH CoUNC0. o&tECiNE? E1tWstn aIl ya aruwaR on wperats shoat and attaeh to gnen aheM INITIATING PqOBLEM. lSSUE.OPPORTUNiTY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk' was craated because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiaf, afternating freeRhaw cycles, service life limi[s, chemical addRives, extreme temperature variafrons, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and correded on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion wouW worsen to a state where it would be rerniered unusab{e and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fa41s and possible litigatioris. ADYANTAGES K APPPOYED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide sate detect fsee sidewalks fos its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contradore, so B follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this ac[ivity. DISADVANTAGES IF MPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construc[ion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, propeRy owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, R stiU remains controversial. ��L;: :i ��`��`�� `�� P�,�� 2 0 1998 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT MPpOVED: This option woutd a{bw the iMrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wil4 generate more personai injury suits, uBimateFy resufting in the expendfture of larger dotlar amourrts in eventuat repairs andlor. replacemer+t, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUM OFTRANSALTION S Z.I1 J.2 $ CO5T/pEYENUE BUDGETED (C1RCI.E ONE) YES No RlNDWGSOURCE 98-M-ob68 A, PIA g8 � 6�8�00� AORYITYNUMBER C9 8 -2T75�-o78k-00000 FINANCIALNJFORH,ATfON:(EXPIAIN) B, AST � 325,000 C, Cis 98 = 50,000 i � CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCI I E NO. �O 'aS oZ PRSLIMINARY ORDER By � � �/I�� o R� G� �vA � Voting�Ward98004&798005 In the Mattes of 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Eiowell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 .+� 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1498, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated_ 9�r�t iau�� Dat e�� COUNCILPERSObiS Yeas Nays ✓enanav ✓�lakey �ostrom �.�"oleman �Ffarri s �ntry vIFeiter J ►: i, :�, �. �. � a.. r ��, � In Favo. � Against Adopted by Council in the manner the nature of Certified Passed by Council Secretary . ,., ,.� OEPARTMENTttsb'FICF.lC�UNCiI OATEWRIAIEO GREEN SHEET v NO. 3gs�3 Public Works Sidewalks 3-598 Miriawa� x�rrwmnre COMACTPEHSONdPHONE ❑DEPAfiTMENTDIflECTOR CRYCOUNGIL L8(fY H. LU62I7 • ZBEf-GOS$ ASSIGN ❑C(tY ATfORNEY CI7Y CLERK NUMBEq R7R 1At15T8EONCOUNCN.AGENDRBY(DATE)( pOUiING �g�p�E7DIRECTDR �FIN.dMOT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �R Maronrop�ssisrarq t Cour�il Researeh b Frida 3-27-98 ❑ TOTAL f OF 81GIMTUNE PAGES j _(CIJP ALL LOCATONS FOR 9IGIUNR� � ASSOCIATE RTMENTAL ACCOU AM OCTIONREWESTED . � Reconstruct SideNapc in Wards d& 7(See attached tist) _ �� _ � �a,5� aECqnMENDaTpNS: aFpwe (N a�(Po pERSpNAL g�ER��YICE CONTRACTS MllST AN4WER T#{E FOLLOWING �UE3TION3: _ PLANNB7G CORIRi75510H _CMQ SERYICE CdAMlSSIQY 1. Has this EY S NOer worked under a�ontract for this deD��ent? _.c18 CaAdtrrEE 2. Has this Pe�rm ever been a dry emqoyce? — YES NO A STAFF 3. Doe5lYns persoNfirtn possess a sktlt not riormaily posseased try arc� wneni ciry employee? DISTR�CTC0UNC1� YES NO SuPPORTS xH�CH CoUNC0. o&tECiNE? E1tWstn aIl ya aruwaR on wperats shoat and attaeh to gnen aheM INITIATING PqOBLEM. lSSUE.OPPORTUNiTY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk' was craated because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiaf, afternating freeRhaw cycles, service life limi[s, chemical addRives, extreme temperature variafrons, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and correded on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion wouW worsen to a state where it would be rerniered unusab{e and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fa41s and possible litigatioris. ADYANTAGES K APPPOYED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide sate detect fsee sidewalks fos its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contradore, so B follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this ac[ivity. DISADVANTAGES IF MPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construc[ion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, propeRy owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, R stiU remains controversial. ��L;: :i ��`��`�� `�� P�,�� 2 0 1998 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT MPpOVED: This option woutd a{bw the iMrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wil4 generate more personai injury suits, uBimateFy resufting in the expendfture of larger dotlar amourrts in eventuat repairs andlor. replacemer+t, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUM OFTRANSALTION S Z.I1 J.2 $ CO5T/pEYENUE BUDGETED (C1RCI.E ONE) YES No RlNDWGSOURCE 98-M-ob68 A, PIA g8 � 6�8�00� AORYITYNUMBER C9 8 -2T75�-o78k-00000 FINANCIALNJFORH,ATfON:(EXPIAIN) B, AST � 325,000 C, Cis 98 = 50,000 i � CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCI I E NO. �O 'aS oZ PRSLIMINARY ORDER By � � �/I�� o R� G� �vA � Voting�Ward98004&798005 In the Mattes of 598004 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Goodrich Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Eiowell St 598005 - Sidewalk reconstruction on the north side of E Third St from Barclay St to Hazelwood St & the west side Hazelwood St from E Third St to Fremont Ave at 1535 E Third St only. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three £amily structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $9.18 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.42 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1�0� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.62 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 .+� 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1498, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated_ 9�r�t iau�� Dat e�� COUNCILPERSObiS Yeas Nays ✓enanav ✓�lakey �ostrom �.�"oleman �Ffarri s �ntry vIFeiter J ►: i, :�, �. �. � a.. r ��, � In Favo. � Against Adopted by Council in the manner the nature of Certified Passed by Council Secretary . ,., ,.� OEPARTMENTttsb'FICF.lC�UNCiI OATEWRIAIEO GREEN SHEET v NO. 3gs�3 Public Works Sidewalks 3-598 Miriawa� x�rrwmnre COMACTPEHSONdPHONE ❑DEPAfiTMENTDIflECTOR CRYCOUNGIL L8(fY H. LU62I7 • ZBEf-GOS$ ASSIGN ❑C(tY ATfORNEY CI7Y CLERK NUMBEq R7R 1At15T8EONCOUNCN.AGENDRBY(DATE)( pOUiING �g�p�E7DIRECTDR �FIN.dMOT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �R Maronrop�ssisrarq t Cour�il Researeh b Frida 3-27-98 ❑ TOTAL f OF 81GIMTUNE PAGES j _(CIJP ALL LOCATONS FOR 9IGIUNR� � ASSOCIATE RTMENTAL ACCOU AM OCTIONREWESTED . � Reconstruct SideNapc in Wards d& 7(See attached tist) _ �� _ � �a,5� aECqnMENDaTpNS: aFpwe (N a�(Po pERSpNAL g�ER��YICE CONTRACTS MllST AN4WER T#{E FOLLOWING �UE3TION3: _ PLANNB7G CORIRi75510H _CMQ SERYICE CdAMlSSIQY 1. Has this EY S NOer worked under a�ontract for this deD��ent? _.c18 CaAdtrrEE 2. Has this Pe�rm ever been a dry emqoyce? — YES NO A STAFF 3. Doe5lYns persoNfirtn possess a sktlt not riormaily posseased try arc� wneni ciry employee? DISTR�CTC0UNC1� YES NO SuPPORTS xH�CH CoUNC0. o&tECiNE? E1tWstn aIl ya aruwaR on wperats shoat and attaeh to gnen aheM INITIATING PqOBLEM. lSSUE.OPPORTUNiTY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk' was craated because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiaf, afternating freeRhaw cycles, service life limi[s, chemical addRives, extreme temperature variafrons, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and correded on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion wouW worsen to a state where it would be rerniered unusab{e and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from fa41s and possible litigatioris. ADYANTAGES K APPPOYED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide sate detect fsee sidewalks fos its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contradore, so B follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this ac[ivity. DISADVANTAGES IF MPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construc[ion procedure and assessment. Simply stated, propeRy owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, R stiU remains controversial. ��L;: :i ��`��`�� `�� P�,�� 2 0 1998 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT MPpOVED: This option woutd a{bw the iMrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wil4 generate more personai injury suits, uBimateFy resufting in the expendfture of larger dotlar amourrts in eventuat repairs andlor. replacemer+t, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUM OFTRANSALTION S Z.I1 J.2 $ CO5T/pEYENUE BUDGETED (C1RCI.E ONE) YES No RlNDWGSOURCE 98-M-ob68 A, PIA g8 � 6�8�00� AORYITYNUMBER C9 8 -2T75�-o78k-00000 FINANCIALNJFORH,ATfON:(EXPIAIN) B, AST � 325,000 C, Cis 98 = 50,000