Loading...
98-250� LL CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER zsi the Matter of COUNC FILE NO. 1� �ZS� � By J���%��/'�'� � File No. _597104, 597105 Voting Ward_6&7 597104 - Construct curb on the north side of E Wheelock Pkwy at 1445 Arcade St only. 597105 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Earl St from Thorn St to Mounds Blvd. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPEI2SONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey �ostrom i/C`o l eman �rris � ntry �iter DIIRi Ifiu� �►. •r� � � In Fa �Agaix Adopted by Council: Date_�--��Q Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public Hearing Date - May 27, 1498 RE 3-20-48 DEPAR11AEfJTK3FFICH68UNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. 38567 Pubfic Works Sidewalks 1-2-98 � � CONTACT PEFSON a PHONE pEpAqTyEMDIqEC70R �' ppUry�� Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �N cm �rrow+Er cm cxE�uc MUSTBEONCdUNCILAGENDABY(OATEI !}—$— $ N��UiBIl�IG� �g17pGE7piflECiOA FW.EGGT.SERVICESDIfl. Must be in Council Research Office � yAYOP(OflAS315TANT) 7 Counal Researeh b Frida 3-27— ❑ TOTALlOFSIGNATUpEPAGES 1 _ (CUPALLlOCA7pNSFOR9IGNATURq ASSOCIA'fE MbLACCWNTIWT ACTWNREWESTED - _ _ j_� Construd Curb & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7(See aitached list) F�tE. #�5 5 5 � 5 °�8�a� REWMMENDATqNS: A{pure (A7 a RejeC (Rj pEqgpµp� g CONTRACTS MU$Y ANSWEii T}lE FOLLOWING pLlESTWN4: _ P1.ANNM7G COMMISSION _ CNiI SERVICE C�MM4SSqN 1. Hds dlis EY S NOYer wOfked under a CofrtrdC[ (of it1iS dBD3rCnent? CIB CoMMI77EE 2 iias fiia evei baen a erty employee? — '— ES NO A ST�FF 3. Does this peraonl6rm possess a sk71 �ot rormely possesead by ary atrent eiry — � �� oyeB? DISTRICTCWNCIL � YES NO SIIPPORTS WH�H COUNCIL 08JECTNE9 �P��� aN y�s ansvwl8 at slp9nta fhM and attfeh to g»M shaat INITIATING P BLEM. ISSUE, OPPOflTUNfiY (WHO, NTIAt. WHEN, WHEpE, WHY�: The probtem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, alternating fraeAhaw cycles, service 1'rfe lim@s, chemicai additives, extreme temperature variatbns, etc. These problems occur on a ckywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES iF APPRDVED: The community wilf banefft from this project because ft witl provide safa detect frse sidewalks ior its many citizens. The sidewalk contracis are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. 4��t,ztC«i .��2S2GfC�' �°�t�'r f��n 2 � ��98 DISADYANTMaES IF APPROVE4: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment ia City subsidized, it still remains controversial. . __,__ OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would a11ow the irrFrastructure of sidewa& stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wifl generate more personal injury sufts, uftimately resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSAGTIONS 2 �,7&7.J8 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCI.EONE) YES No FUNDfNGSWFCE 97^M-4667 A, PtA 97 = 557,000 ppRyRyNUMBER �97'2T72g-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPUIM 6 � �{Sj a 3�� � OOQ C, Ct6 97 = 50;000 � LL CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER zsi the Matter of COUNC FILE NO. 1� �ZS� � By J���%��/'�'� � File No. _597104, 597105 Voting Ward_6&7 597104 - Construct curb on the north side of E Wheelock Pkwy at 1445 Arcade St only. 597105 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Earl St from Thorn St to Mounds Blvd. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPEI2SONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey �ostrom i/C`o l eman �rris � ntry �iter DIIRi Ifiu� �►. •r� � � In Fa �Agaix Adopted by Council: Date_�--��Q Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public Hearing Date - May 27, 1498 RE 3-20-48 DEPAR11AEfJTK3FFICH68UNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. 38567 Pubfic Works Sidewalks 1-2-98 � � CONTACT PEFSON a PHONE pEpAqTyEMDIqEC70R �' ppUry�� Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �N cm �rrow+Er cm cxE�uc MUSTBEONCdUNCILAGENDABY(OATEI !}—$— $ N��UiBIl�IG� �g17pGE7piflECiOA FW.EGGT.SERVICESDIfl. Must be in Council Research Office � yAYOP(OflAS315TANT) 7 Counal Researeh b Frida 3-27— ❑ TOTALlOFSIGNATUpEPAGES 1 _ (CUPALLlOCA7pNSFOR9IGNATURq ASSOCIA'fE MbLACCWNTIWT ACTWNREWESTED - _ _ j_� Construd Curb & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7(See aitached list) F�tE. #�5 5 5 � 5 °�8�a� REWMMENDATqNS: A{pure (A7 a RejeC (Rj pEqgpµp� g CONTRACTS MU$Y ANSWEii T}lE FOLLOWING pLlESTWN4: _ P1.ANNM7G COMMISSION _ CNiI SERVICE C�MM4SSqN 1. Hds dlis EY S NOYer wOfked under a CofrtrdC[ (of it1iS dBD3rCnent? CIB CoMMI77EE 2 iias fiia evei baen a erty employee? — '— ES NO A ST�FF 3. Does this peraonl6rm possess a sk71 �ot rormely possesead by ary atrent eiry — � �� oyeB? DISTRICTCWNCIL � YES NO SIIPPORTS WH�H COUNCIL 08JECTNE9 �P��� aN y�s ansvwl8 at slp9nta fhM and attfeh to g»M shaat INITIATING P BLEM. ISSUE, OPPOflTUNfiY (WHO, NTIAt. WHEN, WHEpE, WHY�: The probtem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, alternating fraeAhaw cycles, service 1'rfe lim@s, chemicai additives, extreme temperature variatbns, etc. These problems occur on a ckywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES iF APPRDVED: The community wilf banefft from this project because ft witl provide safa detect frse sidewalks ior its many citizens. The sidewalk contracis are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. 4��t,ztC«i .��2S2GfC�' �°�t�'r f��n 2 � ��98 DISADYANTMaES IF APPROVE4: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment ia City subsidized, it still remains controversial. . __,__ OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would a11ow the irrFrastructure of sidewa& stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wifl generate more personal injury sufts, uftimately resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSAGTIONS 2 �,7&7.J8 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCI.EONE) YES No FUNDfNGSWFCE 97^M-4667 A, PtA 97 = 557,000 ppRyRyNUMBER �97'2T72g-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPUIM 6 � �{Sj a 3�� � OOQ C, Ct6 97 = 50;000 � LL CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER zsi the Matter of COUNC FILE NO. 1� �ZS� � By J���%��/'�'� � File No. _597104, 597105 Voting Ward_6&7 597104 - Construct curb on the north side of E Wheelock Pkwy at 1445 Arcade St only. 597105 - Sidewalk reconstruction on both sides Earl St from Thorn St to Mounds Blvd. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27th day of May, 1998, at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPEI2SONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey �ostrom i/C`o l eman �rris � ntry �iter DIIRi Ifiu� �►. •r� � � In Fa �Agaix Adopted by Council: Date_�--��Q Certified Passed by Council Secretary or Public Hearing Date - May 27, 1498 RE 3-20-48 DEPAR11AEfJTK3FFICH68UNCIL DATEINRIATED GREEN SHEET No. 38567 Pubfic Works Sidewalks 1-2-98 � � CONTACT PEFSON a PHONE pEpAqTyEMDIqEC70R �' ppUry�� Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �N cm �rrow+Er cm cxE�uc MUSTBEONCdUNCILAGENDABY(OATEI !}—$— $ N��UiBIl�IG� �g17pGE7piflECiOA FW.EGGT.SERVICESDIfl. Must be in Council Research Office � yAYOP(OflAS315TANT) 7 Counal Researeh b Frida 3-27— ❑ TOTALlOFSIGNATUpEPAGES 1 _ (CUPALLlOCA7pNSFOR9IGNATURq ASSOCIA'fE MbLACCWNTIWT ACTWNREWESTED - _ _ j_� Construd Curb & Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7(See aitached list) F�tE. #�5 5 5 � 5 °�8�a� REWMMENDATqNS: A{pure (A7 a RejeC (Rj pEqgpµp� g CONTRACTS MU$Y ANSWEii T}lE FOLLOWING pLlESTWN4: _ P1.ANNM7G COMMISSION _ CNiI SERVICE C�MM4SSqN 1. Hds dlis EY S NOYer wOfked under a CofrtrdC[ (of it1iS dBD3rCnent? CIB CoMMI77EE 2 iias fiia evei baen a erty employee? — '— ES NO A ST�FF 3. Does this peraonl6rm possess a sk71 �ot rormely possesead by ary atrent eiry — � �� oyeB? DISTRICTCWNCIL � YES NO SIIPPORTS WH�H COUNCIL 08JECTNE9 �P��� aN y�s ansvwl8 at slp9nta fhM and attfeh to g»M shaat INITIATING P BLEM. ISSUE, OPPOflTUNfiY (WHO, NTIAt. WHEN, WHEpE, WHY�: The probtem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, alternating fraeAhaw cycles, service 1'rfe lim@s, chemicai additives, extreme temperature variatbns, etc. These problems occur on a ckywide fevel and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES iF APPRDVED: The community wilf banefft from this project because ft witl provide safa detect frse sidewalks ior its many citizens. The sidewalk contracis are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. 4��t,ztC«i .��2S2GfC�' �°�t�'r f��n 2 � ��98 DISADYANTMaES IF APPROVE4: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment ia City subsidized, it still remains controversial. . __,__ OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would a11ow the irrFrastructure of sidewa& stock to deteriorate, which in tum, wifl generate more personal injury sufts, uftimately resufting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSAGTIONS 2 �,7&7.J8 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCI.EONE) YES No FUNDfNGSWFCE 97^M-4667 A, PtA 97 = 557,000 ppRyRyNUMBER �97'2T72g-0784-27012 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPUIM 6 � �{Sj a 3�� � OOQ C, Ct6 97 = 50;000