98-185�L
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER 0 R I G! N A L
Adopted by Council: Date }„ 1\ ��g
In the Matter of improving the alley in Block 5, St.Anthony Park North (bounded by
Dudley, Grantham, Hoyt and Chelmsford) by grading and paving with bituminous
material,
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and
that the estimated cost thereof is $5,940.00 financed by assessments only.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22nd day of Anril.
1998.at 5:30 o'clock P.M.. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court
House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating tYte time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓!3'lakey
+�ostrom
veoleman
�tarris
tr�antry
(�R'eiter
P�Nitleucn
COUNCIL FILE O_ ( '' tA� '.
BY �-/
FIL 0. _18867
VOT G WARD 2
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
t In Favor By
0 Against �
Mayor
NtAR 219998
Public Hearing Date
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION
ontact Person and Phoqe Namber:
AUL ST.Me1HTIN (PUB.WKS) 266-6115
: Apri122,1998
Date:
RE 2-2598
Green Sheet Number:
ATfORNEY
;E't DIItECIOR
ConncilAgendab�•: 3-II-9S ( fAYOR(ORASSLSfAIV"n
.# OF SIGNATURE PAGES _� (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATORE)
G'�
' S0086
.nri_14
Ci.ERK
:E OF NTNANCIAL SVCS
VCII.RFCFeuCg
the alley in Block 5, St. Anthony Park North (bonnded by Dudley,Grantham, Hoyt & Cheimsford) wit6 a
us material. TMS Pro_iect File 18867
�RSONAL SERViCE CONTRAGTS M[JS7' ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
Aas the persao/firm ever worktd under a conhact for this depsrtmenY.+ YES NO
PLANNING COMDUSSION
A SfAL•F
Has t63s persod5rm ever beeo a City employee?
CI1'II. SERV/CE COrAOSSION
YES NO
. Dces this person/firm possess a skiil oot normatly possessed by any YES NO
cm convmaee currcnt City employee?
F�plain a)1 YES answers on a separate sheet and attacL.
)RTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
COUNCIL WARD(S) 4 � DISTRICTPLANNING COUNCIL ZZ
�TING PROBLEMI, LSSUE, OPPOR'CUNITY (Who, Whay W hen, Where, Why?):
improvement was initiated by a petition signed by 57% of the property owners.
)VANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The improvement will be coordinated with the DoswelUChelmsford Street Paving & Lighting Project.
TAGESIFAPPROVED:
probiems associated wiYh construction, such as noise, dust and general disruptions.
7SADVANTAGES IF NOT AYPROVED:
Alley wili coatinue to deteriorate.
rI0U1�T OF TRANSACTION: $ S�94O. 0 0 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIIiCLE ONE)
SOURCE: ASS@SSIll@IItS ACTIVITYN[JMBER:
A'FORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
�� , �
Cour�cil Rese2rch Ct�tt�r
�L
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER 0 R I G! N A L
Adopted by Council: Date }„ 1\ ��g
In the Matter of improving the alley in Block 5, St.Anthony Park North (bounded by
Dudley, Grantham, Hoyt and Chelmsford) by grading and paving with bituminous
material,
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and
that the estimated cost thereof is $5,940.00 financed by assessments only.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22nd day of Anril.
1998.at 5:30 o'clock P.M.. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court
House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating tYte time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓!3'lakey
+�ostrom
veoleman
�tarris
tr�antry
(�R'eiter
P�Nitleucn
COUNCIL FILE O_ ( '' tA� '.
BY �-/
FIL 0. _18867
VOT G WARD 2
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
t In Favor By
0 Against �
Mayor
NtAR 219998
Public Hearing Date
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION
ontact Person and Phoqe Namber:
AUL ST.Me1HTIN (PUB.WKS) 266-6115
: Apri122,1998
Date:
RE 2-2598
Green Sheet Number:
ATfORNEY
;E't DIItECIOR
ConncilAgendab�•: 3-II-9S ( fAYOR(ORASSLSfAIV"n
.# OF SIGNATURE PAGES _� (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATORE)
G'�
' S0086
.nri_14
Ci.ERK
:E OF NTNANCIAL SVCS
VCII.RFCFeuCg
the alley in Block 5, St. Anthony Park North (bonnded by Dudley,Grantham, Hoyt & Cheimsford) wit6 a
us material. TMS Pro_iect File 18867
�RSONAL SERViCE CONTRAGTS M[JS7' ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
Aas the persao/firm ever worktd under a conhact for this depsrtmenY.+ YES NO
PLANNING COMDUSSION
A SfAL•F
Has t63s persod5rm ever beeo a City employee?
CI1'II. SERV/CE COrAOSSION
YES NO
. Dces this person/firm possess a skiil oot normatly possessed by any YES NO
cm convmaee currcnt City employee?
F�plain a)1 YES answers on a separate sheet and attacL.
)RTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
COUNCIL WARD(S) 4 � DISTRICTPLANNING COUNCIL ZZ
�TING PROBLEMI, LSSUE, OPPOR'CUNITY (Who, Whay W hen, Where, Why?):
improvement was initiated by a petition signed by 57% of the property owners.
)VANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The improvement will be coordinated with the DoswelUChelmsford Street Paving & Lighting Project.
TAGESIFAPPROVED:
probiems associated wiYh construction, such as noise, dust and general disruptions.
7SADVANTAGES IF NOT AYPROVED:
Alley wili coatinue to deteriorate.
rI0U1�T OF TRANSACTION: $ S�94O. 0 0 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIIiCLE ONE)
SOURCE: ASS@SSIll@IItS ACTIVITYN[JMBER:
A'FORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
�� , �
Cour�cil Rese2rch Ct�tt�r
�L
CITY OF ST. PAUL
PRELIMINARY ORDER 0 R I G! N A L
Adopted by Council: Date }„ 1\ ��g
In the Matter of improving the alley in Block 5, St.Anthony Park North (bounded by
Dudley, Grantham, Hoyt and Chelmsford) by grading and paving with bituminous
material,
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and
that the estimated cost thereof is $5,940.00 financed by assessments only.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22nd day of Anril.
1998.at 5:30 o'clock P.M.. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court
House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating tYte time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓!3'lakey
+�ostrom
veoleman
�tarris
tr�antry
(�R'eiter
P�Nitleucn
COUNCIL FILE O_ ( '' tA� '.
BY �-/
FIL 0. _18867
VOT G WARD 2
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
t In Favor By
0 Against �
Mayor
NtAR 219998
Public Hearing Date
T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DIVISION
ontact Person and Phoqe Namber:
AUL ST.Me1HTIN (PUB.WKS) 266-6115
: Apri122,1998
Date:
RE 2-2598
Green Sheet Number:
ATfORNEY
;E't DIItECIOR
ConncilAgendab�•: 3-II-9S ( fAYOR(ORASSLSfAIV"n
.# OF SIGNATURE PAGES _� (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATORE)
G'�
' S0086
.nri_14
Ci.ERK
:E OF NTNANCIAL SVCS
VCII.RFCFeuCg
the alley in Block 5, St. Anthony Park North (bonnded by Dudley,Grantham, Hoyt & Cheimsford) wit6 a
us material. TMS Pro_iect File 18867
�RSONAL SERViCE CONTRAGTS M[JS7' ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
Aas the persao/firm ever worktd under a conhact for this depsrtmenY.+ YES NO
PLANNING COMDUSSION
A SfAL•F
Has t63s persod5rm ever beeo a City employee?
CI1'II. SERV/CE COrAOSSION
YES NO
. Dces this person/firm possess a skiil oot normatly possessed by any YES NO
cm convmaee currcnt City employee?
F�plain a)1 YES answers on a separate sheet and attacL.
)RTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
COUNCIL WARD(S) 4 � DISTRICTPLANNING COUNCIL ZZ
�TING PROBLEMI, LSSUE, OPPOR'CUNITY (Who, Whay W hen, Where, Why?):
improvement was initiated by a petition signed by 57% of the property owners.
)VANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The improvement will be coordinated with the DoswelUChelmsford Street Paving & Lighting Project.
TAGESIFAPPROVED:
probiems associated wiYh construction, such as noise, dust and general disruptions.
7SADVANTAGES IF NOT AYPROVED:
Alley wili coatinue to deteriorate.
rI0U1�T OF TRANSACTION: $ S�94O. 0 0 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIIiCLE ONE)
SOURCE: ASS@SSIll@IItS ACTIVITYN[JMBER:
A'FORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
�� , �
Cour�cil Rese2rch Ct�tt�r