The URL can be used to link to this page

97-757� � �� CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCTL FILE NO. PRBLIMINARY ORDBR By ,� /' YI, � File o. 597090-597095 Voting Ward,6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s); S97090 - Both sides E Arlington Ave from N White Bear Ave to N Haze1 St 597091 - Both sides Germain St from E Seventh St to Stillwater Ave 597092 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Atlantic St to Chamber St 597093 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St & the South side of E Idaho Ave from Germain St to Kennard St. 597094 - Both sides E Montana Ave from I3 White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597095 - Both Sides Stillwater Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St 9 �� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family struCtures), NON-RE5IDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 PubliC Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey � s trom �llins �rris �gard � In Favor �rton �e � Against Adopted by Council: Date L t�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary � Mayor PIIRI �SU�n JUL ° 51997 Public dearin Date - Au ust 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 �Z=i�� DEPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNGIL pATE1N17U1TE0 GREEN SHEET No. �8551 Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 iNirinwarE �ryR�p�/pp� CONTACTPERSONLPi50NE �pEPAqTMENT01F1ECiOq �CfiYCOUNCII RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEV �CIT'CLEFK NUMBEA WR MUSTHEpNCOUNCILAGENDABY(�ATE) 6-25-97 pOUT��+ BIIDGET�IFEGTOq FIN.BMOT.SEPVGESDIR Must be in Council Research Office °�� MAYOA(OHASSISTAN'f� t Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-13- 7 � ❑ TOTAL! OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 __ (CLIP ALL LOGATIONS FOH 9IGNA7UR� � ASSOCIATE PA EMAL ACCOUNTANT ACTION PEWIESIED �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) °� I RECOMMENDqTqNS: Appo�a py w paje�x (Fry pERSONAL $ERYICE CONTRACTS MU3T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UE3TION3: _PLANNINGCON{MISSION _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION i. Has thi5 peBS � NO� worked Under a contfaci for tliis departrnent? VE _CIB COMMRTEE � Z � � �� ES� NO ef �en a ciry employee? A S7AFF 3. Does mis persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessed by any current ciry — employee? ,_DISTRICTCWNCII �5 _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL JECTNE9 ExP�afn all yes anawers on separate aheet aM attach to greon sheet INRIATING PROB EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemica4 additi�es, eztreme temperature variations, etc. Thesa problams occur on a cftywide leve! and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subjed to increasad pedestrian injuries from fails and possible 1'digations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The corfimunfty will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe datect free sidewalks for its many cBizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it iollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISAD4AN7AGES IF APPROYED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still �emains controversial. CiOUfICC1� �.�.fidfCfl �tEi; � JUN a 6 1997 D�SADVANTAUES If NOT APPROVED: 4 ..�___,.,..._,.._. _ ...neub� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiB generate more personal injury suits, uftimately rasufting in the axpanditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTFiANSACTIONf 3C),H3S�7H COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES� No FUNDWGSOUHCE 97-tq�0667 q; PtA 97 � 557,000 ACINiTYNUMeER C97^2T729 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIf� B� AST � 3OO � OOO C, C16 97 = 50,000 � � �� CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCTL FILE NO. PRBLIMINARY ORDBR By ,� /' YI, � File o. 597090-597095 Voting Ward,6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s); S97090 - Both sides E Arlington Ave from N White Bear Ave to N Haze1 St 597091 - Both sides Germain St from E Seventh St to Stillwater Ave 597092 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Atlantic St to Chamber St 597093 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St & the South side of E Idaho Ave from Germain St to Kennard St. 597094 - Both sides E Montana Ave from I3 White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597095 - Both Sides Stillwater Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St 9 �� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family struCtures), NON-RE5IDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 PubliC Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey � s trom �llins �rris �gard � In Favor �rton �e � Against Adopted by Council: Date L t�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary � Mayor PIIRI �SU�n JUL ° 51997 Public dearin Date - Au ust 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 �Z=i�� DEPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNGIL pATE1N17U1TE0 GREEN SHEET No. �8551 Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 iNirinwarE �ryR�p�/pp� CONTACTPERSONLPi50NE �pEPAqTMENT01F1ECiOq �CfiYCOUNCII RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEV �CIT'CLEFK NUMBEA WR MUSTHEpNCOUNCILAGENDABY(�ATE) 6-25-97 pOUT��+ BIIDGET�IFEGTOq FIN.BMOT.SEPVGESDIR Must be in Council Research Office °�� MAYOA(OHASSISTAN'f� t Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-13- 7 � ❑ TOTAL! OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 __ (CLIP ALL LOGATIONS FOH 9IGNA7UR� � ASSOCIATE PA EMAL ACCOUNTANT ACTION PEWIESIED �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) °� I RECOMMENDqTqNS: Appo�a py w paje�x (Fry pERSONAL $ERYICE CONTRACTS MU3T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UE3TION3: _PLANNINGCON{MISSION _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION i. Has thi5 peBS � NO� worked Under a contfaci for tliis departrnent? VE _CIB COMMRTEE � Z � � �� ES� NO ef �en a ciry employee? A S7AFF 3. Does mis persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessed by any current ciry — employee? ,_DISTRICTCWNCII �5 _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL JECTNE9 ExP�afn all yes anawers on separate aheet aM attach to greon sheet INRIATING PROB EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemica4 additi�es, eztreme temperature variations, etc. Thesa problams occur on a cftywide leve! and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subjed to increasad pedestrian injuries from fails and possible 1'digations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The corfimunfty will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe datect free sidewalks for its many cBizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it iollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISAD4AN7AGES IF APPROYED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still �emains controversial. CiOUfICC1� �.�.fidfCfl �tEi; � JUN a 6 1997 D�SADVANTAUES If NOT APPROVED: 4 ..�___,.,..._,.._. _ ...neub� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiB generate more personal injury suits, uftimately rasufting in the axpanditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTFiANSACTIONf 3C),H3S�7H COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES� No FUNDWGSOUHCE 97-tq�0667 q; PtA 97 � 557,000 ACINiTYNUMeER C97^2T729 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIf� B� AST � 3OO � OOO C, C16 97 = 50,000 � � �� CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCTL FILE NO. PRBLIMINARY ORDBR By ,� /' YI, � File o. 597090-597095 Voting Ward,6 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s); S97090 - Both sides E Arlington Ave from N White Bear Ave to N Haze1 St 597091 - Both sides Germain St from E Seventh St to Stillwater Ave 597092 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Atlantic St to Chamber St 597093 - Both sides E Idaho Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St & the South side of E Idaho Ave from Germain St to Kennard St. 597094 - Both sides E Montana Ave from I3 White Bear Ave to N Hazel St 597095 - Both Sides Stillwater Ave from Hazelwood St to Germain St 9 �� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family struCtures), NON-RE5IDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 PubliC Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �akey � s trom �llins �rris �gard � In Favor �rton �e � Against Adopted by Council: Date L t�� Certified Passed by Counci Secretary � Mayor PIIRI �SU�n JUL ° 51997 Public dearin Date - Au ust 13, 1997 RE 6-6-97 �Z=i�� DEPARTMENT/OFFICElCOUNGIL pATE1N17U1TE0 GREEN SHEET No. �8551 Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 iNirinwarE �ryR�p�/pp� CONTACTPERSONLPi50NE �pEPAqTMENT01F1ECiOq �CfiYCOUNCII RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ASSIGN �CITYATTORNEV �CIT'CLEFK NUMBEA WR MUSTHEpNCOUNCILAGENDABY(�ATE) 6-25-97 pOUT��+ BIIDGET�IFEGTOq FIN.BMOT.SEPVGESDIR Must be in Council Research Office °�� MAYOA(OHASSISTAN'f� t Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-13- 7 � ❑ TOTAL! OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 __ (CLIP ALL LOGATIONS FOH 9IGNA7UR� � ASSOCIATE PA EMAL ACCOUNTANT ACTION PEWIESIED �� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 6(See attached list) °� I RECOMMENDqTqNS: Appo�a py w paje�x (Fry pERSONAL $ERYICE CONTRACTS MU3T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UE3TION3: _PLANNINGCON{MISSION _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSION i. Has thi5 peBS � NO� worked Under a contfaci for tliis departrnent? VE _CIB COMMRTEE � Z � � �� ES� NO ef �en a ciry employee? A S7AFF 3. Does mis persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnalty possessed by any current ciry — employee? ,_DISTRICTCWNCII �5 _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL JECTNE9 ExP�afn all yes anawers on separate aheet aM attach to greon sheet INRIATING PROB EM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "detective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aflernating free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemica4 additi�es, eztreme temperature variations, etc. Thesa problams occur on a cftywide leve! and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusabie and subjed to increasad pedestrian injuries from fails and possible 1'digations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: The corfimunfty will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe datect free sidewalks for its many cBizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it iollows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity. DISAD4AN7AGES IF APPROYED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still �emains controversial. CiOUfICC1� �.�.fidfCfl �tEi; � JUN a 6 1997 D�SADVANTAUES If NOT APPROVED: 4 ..�___,.,..._,.._. _ ...neub� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wiB generate more personal injury suits, uftimately rasufting in the axpanditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTFiANSACTIONf 3C),H3S�7H COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES� No FUNDWGSOUHCE 97-tq�0667 q; PtA 97 � 557,000 ACINiTYNUMeER C97^2T729 FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIf� B� AST � 3OO � OOO C, C16 97 = 50,000