Loading...
97-756�L C2TY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCYL FILE NO. �� ��� PRBLIMINARY ORDER B � � F' No._597089 V t'ng Ward 5 In the Mattar of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): East side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family Structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per frozat foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor,upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, liereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day o£ August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ✓Bostrom �ollins Harris �egard �rton �une Adopted by Council: Date_rt� q� PIIR{lSUen ` Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUL � � i997 �In Favor By �-1 QAgainst Mayor ruviic nearing uaca — augus[ 13, lyy/ K� b—b—y/ G1�-=- ���p DEPARTMEM/OFFICFRpUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32250 Public Works Sidewalks &21-97 wmawnre iNrtuwnr¢ CANTACTPERSON6PHONE �pEpppTMEIfrOIRECTOfl �CfiVCOUNdI RobartA.Lissick-266-6121 ASSIGN �CRYATfORNEY �CINCLERK NVMBFA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA'fE) 6-ZS- � qOVnNG �g�p�ETDIflECTOfl ❑FIN.fiMG7.SERVICES0IP. Must be in Council Research Office �� b noon Frida 6-13-97 �MAYOR(OflASSISTANn � Councii Research TOTAL R OF SIGNATUAE PAGES 1 _(CIJP ALl LOCAtIONS POA SIGNATUFiE) � ASSOCtAiE DEPARTMEMAL ACGOUNT�3T ACTIONpEWESiED � �!7��y� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) °' � (iECAMMENDATIONS: Pppm.e ({� or RejetS (R) PERSONAL SEFVICE COMFACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOCLOWfNG �UESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMA(ISSION ^ CNR SERVICE COMMISSION �� H � �� �5 � NO� Worked under a convact for ihis departrnent? _CIB COMM(T7EE _ 2. Has Ihfe �ES� NO er been a ciry employee7 g. BTAFF _ 3. Aoee G�le penonl�rm poeeeea e ak111 not normelty poeeaeeed by any current dty amployee7 DISTflIC7C9UNCIL� YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL �OBJECiNE? �p��ln all y�s �n�wen on sapard� shwt and �tlach to grwn sfioot INITIA71 P LEM,ISSUE.OPPORTUNfN (YMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemfcal additives, extreme tsmperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addresssd and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADYANTAGESIF APPROVED: The communBy will benefit irom this project because ft wi�l provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so k follows that private sactor jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. OISADVANTAGES {F AFPSiOYED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it st111 remains controversial. Counc� Ac�trch C�ttilP JUN p6 1997 DISPDVANTAGES IF NOT APPiWVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which iri iurn, wili ��rterate more persortai injury suits, ukimatefy resuRing in the expanditure of Varger doffar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMW1f�OFTHANSACTIONS � Z�Sa3.24 CO3TIREVENUEBUpGE7E0(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE g7 � ,0667 A r, PFA 97 ^ 7 pCRVITYNUMBER C97-2T72 -0784-27072 FiNANC1AL 1NFORMATION: (EXPLAIM B,, AST � 3OO � OOO c, cta 97 = 5o,aoo �L C2TY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCYL FILE NO. �� ��� PRBLIMINARY ORDER B � � F' No._597089 V t'ng Ward 5 In the Mattar of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): East side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family Structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per frozat foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor,upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, liereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day o£ August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ✓Bostrom �ollins Harris �egard �rton �une Adopted by Council: Date_rt� q� PIIR{lSUen ` Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUL � � i997 �In Favor By �-1 QAgainst Mayor ruviic nearing uaca — augus[ 13, lyy/ K� b—b—y/ G1�-=- ���p DEPARTMEM/OFFICFRpUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32250 Public Works Sidewalks &21-97 wmawnre iNrtuwnr¢ CANTACTPERSON6PHONE �pEpppTMEIfrOIRECTOfl �CfiVCOUNdI RobartA.Lissick-266-6121 ASSIGN �CRYATfORNEY �CINCLERK NVMBFA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA'fE) 6-ZS- � qOVnNG �g�p�ETDIflECTOfl ❑FIN.fiMG7.SERVICES0IP. Must be in Council Research Office �� b noon Frida 6-13-97 �MAYOR(OflASSISTANn � Councii Research TOTAL R OF SIGNATUAE PAGES 1 _(CIJP ALl LOCAtIONS POA SIGNATUFiE) � ASSOCtAiE DEPARTMEMAL ACGOUNT�3T ACTIONpEWESiED � �!7��y� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) °' � (iECAMMENDATIONS: Pppm.e ({� or RejetS (R) PERSONAL SEFVICE COMFACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOCLOWfNG �UESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMA(ISSION ^ CNR SERVICE COMMISSION �� H � �� �5 � NO� Worked under a convact for ihis departrnent? _CIB COMM(T7EE _ 2. Has Ihfe �ES� NO er been a ciry employee7 g. BTAFF _ 3. Aoee G�le penonl�rm poeeeea e ak111 not normelty poeeaeeed by any current dty amployee7 DISTflIC7C9UNCIL� YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL �OBJECiNE? �p��ln all y�s �n�wen on sapard� shwt and �tlach to grwn sfioot INITIA71 P LEM,ISSUE.OPPORTUNfN (YMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemfcal additives, extreme tsmperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addresssd and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADYANTAGESIF APPROVED: The communBy will benefit irom this project because ft wi�l provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so k follows that private sactor jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. OISADVANTAGES {F AFPSiOYED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it st111 remains controversial. Counc� Ac�trch C�ttilP JUN p6 1997 DISPDVANTAGES IF NOT APPiWVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which iri iurn, wili ��rterate more persortai injury suits, ukimatefy resuRing in the expanditure of Varger doffar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMW1f�OFTHANSACTIONS � Z�Sa3.24 CO3TIREVENUEBUpGE7E0(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE g7 � ,0667 A r, PFA 97 ^ 7 pCRVITYNUMBER C97-2T72 -0784-27072 FiNANC1AL 1NFORMATION: (EXPLAIM B,, AST � 3OO � OOO c, cta 97 = 5o,aoo �L C2TY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCYL FILE NO. �� ��� PRBLIMINARY ORDER B � � F' No._597089 V t'ng Ward 5 In the Mattar of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): East side of N Hamline Ave from W Arlington Ave to W Nebraska Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family Structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per frozat foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New canstruction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor,upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, liereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereo£ is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 13th day o£ August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey ✓Bostrom �ollins Harris �egard �rton �une Adopted by Council: Date_rt� q� PIIR{lSUen ` Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUL � � i997 �In Favor By �-1 QAgainst Mayor ruviic nearing uaca — augus[ 13, lyy/ K� b—b—y/ G1�-=- ���p DEPARTMEM/OFFICFRpUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET No. 32250 Public Works Sidewalks &21-97 wmawnre iNrtuwnr¢ CANTACTPERSON6PHONE �pEpppTMEIfrOIRECTOfl �CfiVCOUNdI RobartA.Lissick-266-6121 ASSIGN �CRYATfORNEY �CINCLERK NVMBFA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA'fE) 6-ZS- � qOVnNG �g�p�ETDIflECTOfl ❑FIN.fiMG7.SERVICES0IP. Must be in Council Research Office �� b noon Frida 6-13-97 �MAYOR(OflASSISTANn � Councii Research TOTAL R OF SIGNATUAE PAGES 1 _(CIJP ALl LOCAtIONS POA SIGNATUFiE) � ASSOCtAiE DEPARTMEMAL ACGOUNT�3T ACTIONpEWESiED � �!7��y� Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list) °' � (iECAMMENDATIONS: Pppm.e ({� or RejetS (R) PERSONAL SEFVICE COMFACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOCLOWfNG �UESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMA(ISSION ^ CNR SERVICE COMMISSION �� H � �� �5 � NO� Worked under a convact for ihis departrnent? _CIB COMM(T7EE _ 2. Has Ihfe �ES� NO er been a ciry employee7 g. BTAFF _ 3. Aoee G�le penonl�rm poeeeea e ak111 not normelty poeeaeeed by any current dty amployee7 DISTflIC7C9UNCIL� YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL �OBJECiNE? �p��ln all y�s �n�wen on sapard� shwt and �tlach to grwn sfioot INITIA71 P LEM,ISSUE.OPPORTUNfN (YMO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemfcal additives, extreme tsmperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addresssd and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADYANTAGESIF APPROVED: The communBy will benefit irom this project because ft wi�l provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so k follows that private sactor jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. OISADVANTAGES {F AFPSiOYED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it st111 remains controversial. Counc� Ac�trch C�ttilP JUN p6 1997 DISPDVANTAGES IF NOT APPiWVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which iri iurn, wili ��rterate more persortai injury suits, ukimatefy resuRing in the expanditure of Varger doffar amounis in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMW1f�OFTHANSACTIONS � Z�Sa3.24 CO3TIREVENUEBUpGE7E0(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE g7 � ,0667 A r, PFA 97 ^ 7 pCRVITYNUMBER C97-2T72 -0784-27072 FiNANC1AL 1NFORMATION: (EXPLAIM B,, AST � 3OO � OOO c, cta 97 = 5o,aoo