The URL can be used to link to this page

97-755�L CITY OF ST. PATTL COUN FI E NO �� PRELIMINARY ORDfiR By � � File No._597082-597085 Voting Ward_3 � Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597�82 - East side o£ Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave. 597083 - Both sides of S Howell St from Palace Ave to James Ave. 597084 - North side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave. 597085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reaonstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New aonstruction (where no walk existed} - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: i� � 3_ That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof i5 *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �strom �/Eo l l ins �I�arris �gard �I6rton �une p�g{�� Adopted by Council: Date �. c�U� - 5;i997 Certified Passed by Council Secretary __[_In Favor By 1 /_.�/�� v Against � �S Mayor 'Public Hearing Date - Au ust 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 ��_ ��j�'j DEPAftTMENTrOFFICElCOUNCIL OATEINITIATEO GREEN SHEET NO.�� Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 INITIAUDATE INRIAUDATE CONiACTPERSONBPHONE _ �pEpqp7MENTDIRECTOR �CINCAUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 A59CN �cRVnnoaNEV �C{iYCAERK NUMBEIt FOA MUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DA1E)6 ROUT(NG ��gpppETDIRECTOfl �FIN.bMGT.SEflVN:ESDifj, Must be in Council Research Office �R MAYOF(ORASSISTANT) t Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 - ❑ ❑ iOTALftOF4lGNATUREPAGE9 1 _ (CL1PAlLLOCATIQNSFOF9fGNATUAEJ �ASSOCI0.TE ARTMENTAL/�CCOUNTANT ACTION FiEWESTED G.. ']a � Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) .� os ' a �- r � 5�7 1.- RECOMMENOA71oNS: ayp.v.e �/q «He�ea (Fq pERSONAI $ERYICE CONiFACTS AIUST ANSWER THE FOL�OWING QUESTiON3: PLANNING COMMISSION CNIL 3EflVICE COMMISSION 1. Ha4 Ihlspe BalVfirtn Evef WOrked undef H ConVaC[ fof Ihis deparintBn[? — Y NO __pB COMMITTEE _ 2 � Hag �� yES�� NO er been a city employeeY A SiACF 3. Doas this persoNfirm possess a skill not normaiy pogsessed by arry current cfry t employea? __DISTpICTCOUNCIL^'� �J _ YES NO SUPPORTS VMICH COUNCR �&IECTNE7 �P�ain all y�s answars on eaps�ate aheet atd attach to graen shoat IN T PROBIEM.ISSUE.OPPOR7UNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�: The problem "defective sidewalk^ was cseated because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service lite limits, chemical additivas, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom falls and possible litigations. ADVAN7AGES 1F APPAOVED: The community will beneSit from this project because 8 wifl provide safe detect iree sidewa{ks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it Ioilows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPqOVED: Histor'�cally, ihe sidewafk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property awners detest assessments, and despRe the tact up to one-half the assessme�t is City subsidized, k still remains controversial. ��1C� (��j� G�y�t�r JUI�d �2 iJ97 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aAow tha i�rastcucture af sidewalk stxk to deteriorate, which in turn, wifl g�nerate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of la�gar dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts, TOTALAAIWMOFTRANSACTIONf 1q.975.�A COST/FiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUACE 9] �{�-0667 A:. PtA 97 = 557 ACENITCNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIM B �, AST ° 3OO � OOO C, C�B 97 = 5d,o0o �L CITY OF ST. PATTL COUN FI E NO �� PRELIMINARY ORDfiR By � � File No._597082-597085 Voting Ward_3 � Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597�82 - East side o£ Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave. 597083 - Both sides of S Howell St from Palace Ave to James Ave. 597084 - North side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave. 597085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reaonstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New aonstruction (where no walk existed} - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: i� � 3_ That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof i5 *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �strom �/Eo l l ins �I�arris �gard �I6rton �une p�g{�� Adopted by Council: Date �. c�U� - 5;i997 Certified Passed by Council Secretary __[_In Favor By 1 /_.�/�� v Against � �S Mayor 'Public Hearing Date - Au ust 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 ��_ ��j�'j DEPAftTMENTrOFFICElCOUNCIL OATEINITIATEO GREEN SHEET NO.�� Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 INITIAUDATE INRIAUDATE CONiACTPERSONBPHONE _ �pEpqp7MENTDIRECTOR �CINCAUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 A59CN �cRVnnoaNEV �C{iYCAERK NUMBEIt FOA MUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DA1E)6 ROUT(NG ��gpppETDIRECTOfl �FIN.bMGT.SEflVN:ESDifj, Must be in Council Research Office �R MAYOF(ORASSISTANT) t Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 - ❑ ❑ iOTALftOF4lGNATUREPAGE9 1 _ (CL1PAlLLOCATIQNSFOF9fGNATUAEJ �ASSOCI0.TE ARTMENTAL/�CCOUNTANT ACTION FiEWESTED G.. ']a � Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) .� os ' a �- r � 5�7 1.- RECOMMENOA71oNS: ayp.v.e �/q «He�ea (Fq pERSONAI $ERYICE CONiFACTS AIUST ANSWER THE FOL�OWING QUESTiON3: PLANNING COMMISSION CNIL 3EflVICE COMMISSION 1. Ha4 Ihlspe BalVfirtn Evef WOrked undef H ConVaC[ fof Ihis deparintBn[? — Y NO __pB COMMITTEE _ 2 � Hag �� yES�� NO er been a city employeeY A SiACF 3. Doas this persoNfirm possess a skill not normaiy pogsessed by arry current cfry t employea? __DISTpICTCOUNCIL^'� �J _ YES NO SUPPORTS VMICH COUNCR �&IECTNE7 �P�ain all y�s answars on eaps�ate aheet atd attach to graen shoat IN T PROBIEM.ISSUE.OPPOR7UNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�: The problem "defective sidewalk^ was cseated because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service lite limits, chemical additivas, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom falls and possible litigations. ADVAN7AGES 1F APPAOVED: The community will beneSit from this project because 8 wifl provide safe detect iree sidewa{ks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it Ioilows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPqOVED: Histor'�cally, ihe sidewafk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property awners detest assessments, and despRe the tact up to one-half the assessme�t is City subsidized, k still remains controversial. ��1C� (��j� G�y�t�r JUI�d �2 iJ97 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aAow tha i�rastcucture af sidewalk stxk to deteriorate, which in turn, wifl g�nerate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of la�gar dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts, TOTALAAIWMOFTRANSACTIONf 1q.975.�A COST/FiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUACE 9] �{�-0667 A:. PtA 97 = 557 ACENITCNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIM B �, AST ° 3OO � OOO C, C�B 97 = 5d,o0o �L CITY OF ST. PATTL COUN FI E NO �� PRELIMINARY ORDfiR By � � File No._597082-597085 Voting Ward_3 � Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597�82 - East side o£ Edgcumbe Rd from Juliet Ave to Palace Ave. 597083 - Both sides of S Howell St from Palace Ave to James Ave. 597084 - North side of James Ave from S Fairview Ave to S Howell Ave. 597085 - Both sides Sumner St from Bayard Ave to Eleanor Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reaonstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per £ront foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New aonstruction (where no walk existed} - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: i� � 3_ That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof i5 *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Blakey �strom �/Eo l l ins �I�arris �gard �I6rton �une p�g{�� Adopted by Council: Date �. c�U� - 5;i997 Certified Passed by Council Secretary __[_In Favor By 1 /_.�/�� v Against � �S Mayor 'Public Hearing Date - Au ust 6, 1997 RE 5-30-97 ��_ ��j�'j DEPAftTMENTrOFFICElCOUNCIL OATEINITIATEO GREEN SHEET NO.�� Public Works Sidewalks 5-21-97 INITIAUDATE INRIAUDATE CONiACTPERSONBPHONE _ �pEpqp7MENTDIRECTOR �CINCAUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 A59CN �cRVnnoaNEV �C{iYCAERK NUMBEIt FOA MUSTBEONCOUNCIIAGENDABY(DA1E)6 ROUT(NG ��gpppETDIRECTOfl �FIN.bMGT.SEflVN:ESDifj, Must be in Council Research Office �R MAYOF(ORASSISTANT) t Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 - ❑ ❑ iOTALftOF4lGNATUREPAGE9 1 _ (CL1PAlLLOCATIQNSFOF9fGNATUAEJ �ASSOCI0.TE ARTMENTAL/�CCOUNTANT ACTION FiEWESTED G.. ']a � Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list) .� os ' a �- r � 5�7 1.- RECOMMENOA71oNS: ayp.v.e �/q «He�ea (Fq pERSONAI $ERYICE CONiFACTS AIUST ANSWER THE FOL�OWING QUESTiON3: PLANNING COMMISSION CNIL 3EflVICE COMMISSION 1. Ha4 Ihlspe BalVfirtn Evef WOrked undef H ConVaC[ fof Ihis deparintBn[? — Y NO __pB COMMITTEE _ 2 � Hag �� yES�� NO er been a city employeeY A SiACF 3. Doas this persoNfirm possess a skill not normaiy pogsessed by arry current cfry t employea? __DISTpICTCOUNCIL^'� �J _ YES NO SUPPORTS VMICH COUNCR �&IECTNE7 �P�ain all y�s answars on eaps�ate aheet atd attach to graen shoat IN T PROBIEM.ISSUE.OPPOR7UNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�: The problem "defective sidewalk^ was cseated because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freefthaw cycles, service lite limits, chemical additivas, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom falls and possible litigations. ADVAN7AGES 1F APPAOVED: The community will beneSit from this project because 8 wifl provide safe detect iree sidewa{ks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it Ioilows ihat private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPqOVED: Histor'�cally, ihe sidewafk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property awners detest assessments, and despRe the tact up to one-half the assessme�t is City subsidized, k still remains controversial. ��1C� (��j� G�y�t�r JUI�d �2 iJ97 DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would aAow tha i�rastcucture af sidewalk stxk to deteriorate, which in turn, wifl g�nerate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of la�gar dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts, TOTALAAIWMOFTRANSACTIONf 1q.975.�A COST/FiEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOUACE 9] �{�-0667 A:. PtA 97 = 557 ACENITCNUMBER C97-2T729-0784-27012 FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIM B �, AST ° 3OO � OOO C, C�B 97 = 5d,o0o