Loading...
97-717�L CITY OF ST. PAUL PRSLIMINARY ORDER ��-��� �� In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Arbor St from Jef£erson Ave to Grace St. *ESTSMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MLTLTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. � i The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 E 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey �strom Collins �arr i s I�✓€gard- Phscv�� ��M9rton ✓Thune PIIRi ieuc� JUL m 51997 �.r�...:. - Nw. � In Favor � Against i (�bs �r� Adopted by Council: Date�'��� x Certified Passed by Council Secretary gy a-. Mayor _Public Hearing Date — Au ust 6� 1997 RE 5-30-97 bFPAOTMENi/O�FICFICOUNCiI OATF.INIt1ATEb GREEN SHEET No. 32247 Public Works Sldewalks $-2�-97 INITIAVDATE INRIAUpATE CONTACTPERSONbPHONE �DEPARTMENTOIRECTOF �CIIYCAUNCIL Robert A. lissick - 266-6121 A3316N CITY ATTORNEY � CfiY CLERK NUMBFR FOp MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) 6_ig_97 pOUTING �gUDGETDIRECTOfl �FIN.8MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �R MAYOR(OflASSISTANn � Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 � � TOTAL �! OF SIGNATUflE PAGES 1 _(GLJP ALL LOCAilON3 FOR SIGNATUHE) � ASSOCIA?E TMENTALACCOUN7ANT ACTION REOUESTED -- � 'l �t �� Gb` Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) F � �f � - �1 I r7 RECOMMENDATIONS: Appruve (A) w ReJea (q� PERSONAL SEHVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UE4TIONS: _ PInNNirlG COMMISSION _CNIL SERVICE CAMMISSION 1. Has �his peEs Ne�ver worked under a con[ract for this depaNnen[? Y CIB CoMMRrEE 2. Ffas Ihis persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee? — � YES NO A S7AFF 3. Doea tliia parson/firm possess a skill not normally possesaed by arry curren[ ciry — /� ` employee? _DISTftICTCOUNCiL� 7 __ YES NO SUPPoflTS NMICN COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 Explein ail yos enswora on separata shaat ard a�taeh to greon shoot 1AIY�D Z INITIATING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, ex[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom tails and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APpRpVED: The communfty will benefit from this project 6ecause it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contrac[s are executed by privata contractors, so it toliows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. ���.:fl�+�� S� er n�1 �l�iS �`�' {`:Dy� DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: „ .��rar.?� � Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have crea4ed negative feedback in the a�ea of consiruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiil remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow th� infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expsnditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION i � 3 j OZ �. C)5 COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIflCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9]�M A�PIA 97 = 557.000 ACRVRYNUMBEH C9J^ZT�Z9�O�H�F O�2 FINANCIAIINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM B� AST = 300,000 C, CIB 97 = 50,000 �L CITY OF ST. PAUL PRSLIMINARY ORDER ��-��� �� In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Arbor St from Jef£erson Ave to Grace St. *ESTSMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MLTLTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. � i The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 E 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey �strom Collins �arr i s I�✓€gard- Phscv�� ��M9rton ✓Thune PIIRi ieuc� JUL m 51997 �.r�...:. - Nw. � In Favor � Against i (�bs �r� Adopted by Council: Date�'��� x Certified Passed by Council Secretary gy a-. Mayor _Public Hearing Date — Au ust 6� 1997 RE 5-30-97 bFPAOTMENi/O�FICFICOUNCiI OATF.INIt1ATEb GREEN SHEET No. 32247 Public Works Sldewalks $-2�-97 INITIAVDATE INRIAUpATE CONTACTPERSONbPHONE �DEPARTMENTOIRECTOF �CIIYCAUNCIL Robert A. lissick - 266-6121 A3316N CITY ATTORNEY � CfiY CLERK NUMBFR FOp MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) 6_ig_97 pOUTING �gUDGETDIRECTOfl �FIN.8MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �R MAYOR(OflASSISTANn � Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 � � TOTAL �! OF SIGNATUflE PAGES 1 _(GLJP ALL LOCAilON3 FOR SIGNATUHE) � ASSOCIA?E TMENTALACCOUN7ANT ACTION REOUESTED -- � 'l �t �� Gb` Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) F � �f � - �1 I r7 RECOMMENDATIONS: Appruve (A) w ReJea (q� PERSONAL SEHVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UE4TIONS: _ PInNNirlG COMMISSION _CNIL SERVICE CAMMISSION 1. Has �his peEs Ne�ver worked under a con[ract for this depaNnen[? Y CIB CoMMRrEE 2. Ffas Ihis persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee? — � YES NO A S7AFF 3. Doea tliia parson/firm possess a skill not normally possesaed by arry curren[ ciry — /� ` employee? _DISTftICTCOUNCiL� 7 __ YES NO SUPPoflTS NMICN COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 Explein ail yos enswora on separata shaat ard a�taeh to greon shoot 1AIY�D Z INITIATING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, ex[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom tails and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APpRpVED: The communfty will benefit from this project 6ecause it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contrac[s are executed by privata contractors, so it toliows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. ���.:fl�+�� S� er n�1 �l�iS �`�' {`:Dy� DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: „ .��rar.?� � Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have crea4ed negative feedback in the a�ea of consiruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiil remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow th� infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expsnditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION i � 3 j OZ �. C)5 COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIflCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9]�M A�PIA 97 = 557.000 ACRVRYNUMBEH C9J^ZT�Z9�O�H�F O�2 FINANCIAIINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM B� AST = 300,000 C, CIB 97 = 50,000 �L CITY OF ST. PAUL PRSLIMINARY ORDER ��-��� �� In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): Both sides Arbor St from Jef£erson Ave to Grace St. *ESTSMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MLTLTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. � i The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 E 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 6th day of August, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �lakey �strom Collins �arr i s I�✓€gard- Phscv�� ��M9rton ✓Thune PIIRi ieuc� JUL m 51997 �.r�...:. - Nw. � In Favor � Against i (�bs �r� Adopted by Council: Date�'��� x Certified Passed by Council Secretary gy a-. Mayor _Public Hearing Date — Au ust 6� 1997 RE 5-30-97 bFPAOTMENi/O�FICFICOUNCiI OATF.INIt1ATEb GREEN SHEET No. 32247 Public Works Sldewalks $-2�-97 INITIAVDATE INRIAUpATE CONTACTPERSONbPHONE �DEPARTMENTOIRECTOF �CIIYCAUNCIL Robert A. lissick - 266-6121 A3316N CITY ATTORNEY � CfiY CLERK NUMBFR FOp MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) 6_ig_97 pOUTING �gUDGETDIRECTOfl �FIN.8MGT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Council Research Office �R MAYOR(OflASSISTANn � Coundl Research b noon Frida 6-6-97 � � TOTAL �! OF SIGNATUflE PAGES 1 _(GLJP ALL LOCAilON3 FOR SIGNATUHE) � ASSOCIA?E TMENTALACCOUN7ANT ACTION REOUESTED -- � 'l �t �� Gb` Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) F � �f � - �1 I r7 RECOMMENDATIONS: Appruve (A) w ReJea (q� PERSONAL SEHVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UE4TIONS: _ PInNNirlG COMMISSION _CNIL SERVICE CAMMISSION 1. Has �his peEs Ne�ver worked under a con[ract for this depaNnen[? Y CIB CoMMRrEE 2. Ffas Ihis persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee? — � YES NO A S7AFF 3. Doea tliia parson/firm possess a skill not normally possesaed by arry curren[ ciry — /� ` employee? _DISTftICTCOUNCiL� 7 __ YES NO SUPPoflTS NMICN COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 Explein ail yos enswora on separata shaat ard a�taeh to greon shoot 1AIY�D Z INITIATING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNITV (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freerthaw cycles, service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, ex[reme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries irom tails and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APpRpVED: The communfty will benefit from this project 6ecause it will provide sate detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contrac[s are executed by privata contractors, so it toliows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. ���.:fl�+�� S� er n�1 �l�iS �`�' {`:Dy� DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: „ .��rar.?� � Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have crea4ed negative feedback in the a�ea of consiruction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stiil remains controversial. DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow th� infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expsnditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTAL AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION i � 3 j OZ �. C)5 COST/HEVENUE BUDGETED (CIflCLE ONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9]�M A�PIA 97 = 557.000 ACRVRYNUMBEH C9J^ZT�Z9�O�H�F O�2 FINANCIAIINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM B� AST = 300,000 C, CIB 97 = 50,000