The URL can be used to link to this page

97-622� � CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE N0. `�l �'�'� PRELIMINARY ORDBR By �� f!- � //1-��'�� O Fi1e No_ 597�64 � Voting Ward 4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): South side of W Hoyt Ave from N Albert St to N Snelling Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 10�� of the actual cost estimatefl to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side° of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 EE [c3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey � s trom Collins �rris 7/�egard �orton �i'fiune Adopted by Council: Date a ��l P11R1 i�ucn � Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUN 141997 ! In Favor By t V Against � Mayor Public Hearing Date — July 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 q'�t DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCAUNCIL DATEINITIAiED GREEN SHEET No. 32242 Public Works Sidewalks S-'L-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE GONTAGT PERSON 8 PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CIiV CAUNGL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 NUM9FAPofl �GINATfORNEY �CITYCLEHK MUSTBEONCqUNGLAGENDAeV(OqT� y_q_g qOUTN(i �BUO(3ETOIRECTOfl aFIN.dMGT.SERVICESDIq Must be in Council Research Of£ice �A MAYOR(ORASSISTANn 1 Coundl Research b noon Frida 5-23— 7 0 � TOTALROFSIGNANHEPAGES 1 _ (CLIPALLIOCATONSFOpSIGNATUHE) �ASSOCIATE �DEPAPT TPLACGOUt�RANT ACTION REOUESTED � rS �R' Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4 jSee attached list) `� rlrT�� RECOMMENOA7ioNS:App.ave (A) w aeJee (fp PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION CIVIL SEflVICE CAMMISSION i. Haz ihis persoNfirm ever vrorked under a con[ract tor this department4 — — YES NO CIB COMMfiTEE 2. Has this personRirm e�er been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill no[ normaily possessed by arry current ciry — — employee? __DISTRIGTCOUNGIL�'D _ YES NO SUPPORTS WH7CH COUNCtL08JECTNEI Explafn all yes answers on separate sheet aM attach to green sheet W INITWTING PflOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNIN (NMO, WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addTessed and conected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foliows that private sector jobs are created as a tesuft of this aciivity. OISAOVANTAGES IF PPPR�VEO: Histor'rcafly, the sidewafk reconstructions have created negative Seedbeck in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpfy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remalns controversfal. ��1(��{1;i� �?'lr:a^r: � �`r jf . c, r�.r..�C � i�'i � 1 .3 �JJ� OISM1QVANTAGES IF NOT APPRQYED: •..r t,_ 9 This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn; Will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure ot larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTA�AMWMOFTFiANSACTIONS 22 CE>Z,�QO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9I^M q, P 97 ° SSJ,OOO ACITVITYNUMBER C *Z Z rO H�I— FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� /�ST ° 3OO OOO e C, CIB 97 = 50,OD0 � � CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE N0. `�l �'�'� PRELIMINARY ORDBR By �� f!- � //1-��'�� O Fi1e No_ 597�64 � Voting Ward 4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): South side of W Hoyt Ave from N Albert St to N Snelling Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 10�� of the actual cost estimatefl to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side° of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 EE [c3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey � s trom Collins �rris 7/�egard �orton �i'fiune Adopted by Council: Date a ��l P11R1 i�ucn � Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUN 141997 ! In Favor By t V Against � Mayor Public Hearing Date — July 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 q'�t DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCAUNCIL DATEINITIAiED GREEN SHEET No. 32242 Public Works Sidewalks S-'L-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE GONTAGT PERSON 8 PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CIiV CAUNGL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 NUM9FAPofl �GINATfORNEY �CITYCLEHK MUSTBEONCqUNGLAGENDAeV(OqT� y_q_g qOUTN(i �BUO(3ETOIRECTOfl aFIN.dMGT.SERVICESDIq Must be in Council Research Of£ice �A MAYOR(ORASSISTANn 1 Coundl Research b noon Frida 5-23— 7 0 � TOTALROFSIGNANHEPAGES 1 _ (CLIPALLIOCATONSFOpSIGNATUHE) �ASSOCIATE �DEPAPT TPLACGOUt�RANT ACTION REOUESTED � rS �R' Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4 jSee attached list) `� rlrT�� RECOMMENOA7ioNS:App.ave (A) w aeJee (fp PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION CIVIL SEflVICE CAMMISSION i. Haz ihis persoNfirm ever vrorked under a con[ract tor this department4 — — YES NO CIB COMMfiTEE 2. Has this personRirm e�er been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill no[ normaily possessed by arry current ciry — — employee? __DISTRIGTCOUNGIL�'D _ YES NO SUPPORTS WH7CH COUNCtL08JECTNEI Explafn all yes answers on separate sheet aM attach to green sheet W INITWTING PflOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNIN (NMO, WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addTessed and conected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foliows that private sector jobs are created as a tesuft of this aciivity. OISAOVANTAGES IF PPPR�VEO: Histor'rcafly, the sidewafk reconstructions have created negative Seedbeck in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpfy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remalns controversfal. ��1(��{1;i� �?'lr:a^r: � �`r jf . c, r�.r..�C � i�'i � 1 .3 �JJ� OISM1QVANTAGES IF NOT APPRQYED: •..r t,_ 9 This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn; Will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure ot larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTA�AMWMOFTFiANSACTIONS 22 CE>Z,�QO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9I^M q, P 97 ° SSJ,OOO ACITVITYNUMBER C *Z Z rO H�I— FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� /�ST ° 3OO OOO e C, CIB 97 = 50,OD0 � � CITY OF ST. PAIIL COUNCIL FILE N0. `�l �'�'� PRELIMINARY ORDBR By �� f!- � //1-��'�� O Fi1e No_ 597�64 � Voting Ward 4 In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): South side of W Hoyt Ave from N Albert St to N Snelling Ave. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 10�� of the actual cost estimatefl to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side° of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 EE [c3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 23rd day of July, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Blakey � s trom Collins �rris 7/�egard �orton �i'fiune Adopted by Council: Date a ��l P11R1 i�ucn � Certified Passed by Council Secretary JUN 141997 ! In Favor By t V Against � Mayor Public Hearing Date — July 23, 1997 RE 5-16-97 q'�t DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCAUNCIL DATEINITIAiED GREEN SHEET No. 32242 Public Works Sidewalks S-'L-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE GONTAGT PERSON 8 PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CIiV CAUNGL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 NUM9FAPofl �GINATfORNEY �CITYCLEHK MUSTBEONCqUNGLAGENDAeV(OqT� y_q_g qOUTN(i �BUO(3ETOIRECTOfl aFIN.dMGT.SERVICESDIq Must be in Council Research Of£ice �A MAYOR(ORASSISTANn 1 Coundl Research b noon Frida 5-23— 7 0 � TOTALROFSIGNANHEPAGES 1 _ (CLIPALLIOCATONSFOpSIGNATUHE) �ASSOCIATE �DEPAPT TPLACGOUt�RANT ACTION REOUESTED � rS �R' Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4 jSee attached list) `� rlrT�� RECOMMENOA7ioNS:App.ave (A) w aeJee (fp PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PLANNING COMMISSION CIVIL SEflVICE CAMMISSION i. Haz ihis persoNfirm ever vrorked under a con[ract tor this department4 — — YES NO CIB COMMfiTEE 2. Has this personRirm e�er been a ciry employee? — — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill no[ normaily possessed by arry current ciry — — employee? __DISTRIGTCOUNGIL�'D _ YES NO SUPPORTS WH7CH COUNCtL08JECTNEI Explafn all yes answers on separate sheet aM attach to green sheet W INITWTING PflOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORNNIN (NMO, WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addTessed and conected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it foliows that private sector jobs are created as a tesuft of this aciivity. OISAOVANTAGES IF PPPR�VEO: Histor'rcafly, the sidewafk reconstructions have created negative Seedbeck in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simpfy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remalns controversfal. ��1(��{1;i� �?'lr:a^r: � �`r jf . c, r�.r..�C � i�'i � 1 .3 �JJ� OISM1QVANTAGES IF NOT APPRQYED: •..r t,_ 9 This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn; Will generate more personal injury suits, ultimately resulting in the expenditure ot larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTA�AMWMOFTFiANSACTIONS 22 CE>Z,�QO COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE 9I^M q, P 97 ° SSJ,OOO ACITVITYNUMBER C *Z Z rO H�I— FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� /�ST ° 3OO OOO e C, CIB 97 = 50,OD0