The URL can be used to link to this page

97-482� CITY OF ST. PADL ORDER S In tha ASatter o£ Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597043 - Both sides of Fairmount Ave from S Victoria St to 5 Milton St 597044 - South side of W Ninth St £rom St Soseph's Lane to Main St 597045 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Milton St to S Chatsworth St 597�46 - South side of E Seventh St from N Robert St to Jackson St 597047 - Both sides of St Joseph's Lane from W Seventh St to W Exchange St, Both sides W Exchange St from St Joseph's Lane to St Peter St & North side W Seventh St from St Peter St to St Joseph's Lane. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M?7LTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. i . The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3, That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPER50NS Yeas Nays Blakey �ostrom �rris �egard �orton ii2`hune �C� \ \: v�s �� Adopted by Council: Date a �O ��°�� MAY 17 1997 Certified Passed by Council Secretary l In Favor By � vAgainst • Public Hearin Date - June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 DEPARTMENY/OFFICFKOUNCIL DATEINIilA1ED GREEN SHEET µo. �2235 Pubiic Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 INITUUlDATE IN(�IpUDAiE CONTACT PEFSON E PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOfl � CtlY CAUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �aN cm arroaNer �crrr c�aK xurecA wa MUSTBEONCOUNGLAGENDABY(OATE) 5 80U71NG gpppETDIRECTOR �FIN.aM(3T.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office �A MAYOH(ORASSISTAtJp � Coundl Research no later than noon Frid 4-2 - � � SOTAL t OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CUP ALL LOGAS10N4 FOA 90NANA� � RSSOCIASE -9EPA ENTAL ACCWMANi ACT70NREOUESTED 1��-, -G�7 Reconstruc3 Sidewaik & Raconstruct Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Ward 2(Sae attached list) � -�� REGOMMENDATIONS: Appow (/U or Rejxt (R) pEHSONAI SEHVICE CONTpACT3 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OVESTION3: _ PIANNING COMMISSION _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSKKI 7. Ha3 tltis pBlson/Gr NB Worked UMat e conifaC[ fw N�is depaNnentl Y CIB COMMI77EE 2. Has ihis per�rm ever been a dty employee? — — YES tJ0 A STAFF 3. Does ihis parson/fittn possess a skill not rmrmalty possessed by arry current ciry ! I �� n — employea? DISIRICTCOUNCRr � YES NO SUPPORTSNMICH C/JUNGI a[-etNEt E�cP�aln ali ys enew�ro on separete aheei aM atlach to green sheet Z � INITIRTINO PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR'NNIIY (WHO, YhiAT, WHEN, WHEAE. WHiJ: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service i'rfe limRs, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communRy will benefft from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaffy, the sidewafk reconstructions have creaied negative teedback in the area oi construction procedure and assessment. Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half tha assessment is City subsidized, it sti11 remains controversiai. �,�� f�s f? 1 � 19�7 DISADVANTAGES IF NOi APPflOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorata, which in turn, wiil generafe more personal injury suits, ukimately rasulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS S9.�i67.SH COST/REVENUEBUDGETEDjCIpCLEONE) YES No FUNDWGSWRCE 97-f�1-0667 p , P�/j 9] = r j5].0�0 ACRVITYNUMBER C97-2T729-o784-2 oi2 FINANCIAL INFORMqTION: (EXPUIIN) B�, AST ° 3OO r OOO C, Ct6 97 = 50,000 � CITY OF ST. PADL ORDER S In tha ASatter o£ Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597043 - Both sides of Fairmount Ave from S Victoria St to 5 Milton St 597044 - South side of W Ninth St £rom St Soseph's Lane to Main St 597045 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Milton St to S Chatsworth St 597�46 - South side of E Seventh St from N Robert St to Jackson St 597047 - Both sides of St Joseph's Lane from W Seventh St to W Exchange St, Both sides W Exchange St from St Joseph's Lane to St Peter St & North side W Seventh St from St Peter St to St Joseph's Lane. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M?7LTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. i . The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3, That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPER50NS Yeas Nays Blakey �ostrom �rris �egard �orton ii2`hune �C� \ \: v�s �� Adopted by Council: Date a �O ��°�� MAY 17 1997 Certified Passed by Council Secretary l In Favor By � vAgainst • Public Hearin Date - June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 DEPARTMENY/OFFICFKOUNCIL DATEINIilA1ED GREEN SHEET µo. �2235 Pubiic Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 INITUUlDATE IN(�IpUDAiE CONTACT PEFSON E PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOfl � CtlY CAUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �aN cm arroaNer �crrr c�aK xurecA wa MUSTBEONCOUNGLAGENDABY(OATE) 5 80U71NG gpppETDIRECTOR �FIN.aM(3T.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office �A MAYOH(ORASSISTAtJp � Coundl Research no later than noon Frid 4-2 - � � SOTAL t OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CUP ALL LOGAS10N4 FOA 90NANA� � RSSOCIASE -9EPA ENTAL ACCWMANi ACT70NREOUESTED 1��-, -G�7 Reconstruc3 Sidewaik & Raconstruct Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Ward 2(Sae attached list) � -�� REGOMMENDATIONS: Appow (/U or Rejxt (R) pEHSONAI SEHVICE CONTpACT3 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OVESTION3: _ PIANNING COMMISSION _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSKKI 7. Ha3 tltis pBlson/Gr NB Worked UMat e conifaC[ fw N�is depaNnentl Y CIB COMMI77EE 2. Has ihis per�rm ever been a dty employee? — — YES tJ0 A STAFF 3. Does ihis parson/fittn possess a skill not rmrmalty possessed by arry current ciry ! I �� n — employea? DISIRICTCOUNCRr � YES NO SUPPORTSNMICH C/JUNGI a[-etNEt E�cP�aln ali ys enew�ro on separete aheei aM atlach to green sheet Z � INITIRTINO PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR'NNIIY (WHO, YhiAT, WHEN, WHEAE. WHiJ: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service i'rfe limRs, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communRy will benefft from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaffy, the sidewafk reconstructions have creaied negative teedback in the area oi construction procedure and assessment. Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half tha assessment is City subsidized, it sti11 remains controversiai. �,�� f�s f? 1 � 19�7 DISADVANTAGES IF NOi APPflOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorata, which in turn, wiil generafe more personal injury suits, ukimately rasulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS S9.�i67.SH COST/REVENUEBUDGETEDjCIpCLEONE) YES No FUNDWGSWRCE 97-f�1-0667 p , P�/j 9] = r j5].0�0 ACRVITYNUMBER C97-2T729-o784-2 oi2 FINANCIAL INFORMqTION: (EXPUIIN) B�, AST ° 3OO r OOO C, Ct6 97 = 50,000 � CITY OF ST. PADL ORDER S In tha ASatter o£ Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597043 - Both sides of Fairmount Ave from S Victoria St to 5 Milton St 597044 - South side of W Ninth St £rom St Soseph's Lane to Main St 597045 - Both sides Osceola Ave from S Milton St to S Chatsworth St 597�46 - South side of E Seventh St from N Robert St to Jackson St 597047 - Both sides of St Joseph's Lane from W Seventh St to W Exchange St, Both sides W Exchange St from St Joseph's Lane to St Peter St & North side W Seventh St from St Peter St to St Joseph's Lane. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M?7LTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. i . The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2. 3, That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Pau1. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPER50NS Yeas Nays Blakey �ostrom �rris �egard �orton ii2`hune �C� \ \: v�s �� Adopted by Council: Date a �O ��°�� MAY 17 1997 Certified Passed by Council Secretary l In Favor By � vAgainst • Public Hearin Date - June 25, 1997 RE 4-18-97 DEPARTMENY/OFFICFKOUNCIL DATEINIilA1ED GREEN SHEET µo. �2235 Pubiic Works Sidewalks 4-10-97 INITUUlDATE IN(�IpUDAiE CONTACT PEFSON E PHONE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOfl � CtlY CAUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6121 �aN cm arroaNer �crrr c�aK xurecA wa MUSTBEONCOUNGLAGENDABY(OATE) 5 80U71NG gpppETDIRECTOR �FIN.aM(3T.SERVICESDIR. Must be in Council Research Office �A MAYOH(ORASSISTAtJp � Coundl Research no later than noon Frid 4-2 - � � SOTAL t OF SIGNANRE PAGES 1 _(CUP ALL LOGAS10N4 FOA 90NANA� � RSSOCIASE -9EPA ENTAL ACCWMANi ACT70NREOUESTED 1��-, -G�7 Reconstruc3 Sidewaik & Raconstruct Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Ward 2(Sae attached list) � -�� REGOMMENDATIONS: Appow (/U or Rejxt (R) pEHSONAI SEHVICE CONTpACT3 MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING OVESTION3: _ PIANNING COMMISSION _CNIL SERVICE COMMISSKKI 7. Ha3 tltis pBlson/Gr NB Worked UMat e conifaC[ fw N�is depaNnentl Y CIB COMMI77EE 2. Has ihis per�rm ever been a dty employee? — — YES tJ0 A STAFF 3. Does ihis parson/fittn possess a skill not rmrmalty possessed by arry current ciry ! I �� n — employea? DISIRICTCOUNCRr � YES NO SUPPORTSNMICH C/JUNGI a[-etNEt E�cP�aln ali ys enew�ro on separete aheei aM atlach to green sheet Z � INITIRTINO PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOR'NNIIY (WHO, YhiAT, WHEN, WHEAE. WHiJ: The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles, service i'rfe limRs, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The communRy will benefft from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows ihat private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historicaffy, the sidewafk reconstructions have creaied negative teedback in the area oi construction procedure and assessment. Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the tact up to one-half tha assessment is City subsidized, it sti11 remains controversiai. �,�� f�s f? 1 � 19�7 DISADVANTAGES IF NOi APPflOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorata, which in turn, wiil generafe more personal injury suits, ukimately rasulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or repiacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTIONS S9.�i67.SH COST/REVENUEBUDGETEDjCIpCLEONE) YES No FUNDWGSWRCE 97-f�1-0667 p , P�/j 9] = r j5].0�0 ACRVITYNUMBER C97-2T729-o784-2 oi2 FINANCIAL INFORMqTION: (EXPUIIN) B�, AST ° 3OO r OOO C, Ct6 97 = 50,000