Loading...
97-478LL CITY OR ST . PAUI, C ii! L ro .°l �- v��r PR&LIMINARY ORDSR B � - Fil No S 035 Voting W rd 5 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597035 - North side of E Sycamore St from Sylvan St to Jackson St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRL3CTION RA.TES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. � The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report af the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. i� � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +�lakey ✓�o s trom s%arris ,/Fegard ✓� rton f ..�t�`�'rn' C'- 1 t�'rts �'t'fiune Adopted by Council: Date � O�q�� Certifiefl Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �Against pl{pl {St�cn Mayor �IAY 17 1997 -Public Hearing Date - June ZS, 1997 RE 4-18-97 DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNGI DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET rt 32233 Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-97 INITIAL/DATE INITNL/DATE CONTACTPERSONdPHONE pEppp7MEM01RECTOR �CfTYCOUNGI RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 AS91GN �CITYATTORNEV �CITYCLEflK NUMBER PoR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) S—�—J� p�T�� �WDGETDIPECTOR �FIN.aM6T.SERVICESDIq. Must be in Council Research Office �A MAYDR(OAASSISTAN� �Coundl Research b noon r' 4-2 — � TOTAL ft OF SIGHATURE PAGES 1 _(CllP ALL lOCA710N5 FOA SIGNATUAE) � ASSOC7ATE DEPAqTMENTAL ACCOUNSAM ACTIONREWESSED _ � 3�.iA—, Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attachad list) a-� _�-� g � �t� NO RECOMMENDA7IONS: Appave (A) or Rejecz (P) pER30NAL SEflNCE CONiRqCTS MU57 ANSWER 7HE FOLLOW{NG QUESTIONS: _ PUINNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEflViCE COMMISSION �� H � �19 �iES � NOBf WotkBd undel a fAntfaC[ fw 11tiS departrnen[? _CIB COMMITtEE _ 2. Has this pers�rtn ever been a city employea? YES NO A STAFF 9. Doea Uiia person/firm possess a skitl not normaly possassed by any cui�ent tiry — — employee? _DISTPICTCOUNCIL — � _ YES NO SUPPOA75 Wri1CH CWNCIL OBJECTNE7 �%P�91n all yss anbwars on seperab aheat and attach to gr6an sheet W� INITIA7ING PP09LEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (VJHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The probfem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. Thesa problems occur on a c'rtywide level and m�st be addressed and correctsd on an annual basis. Left uncorrecied, the sidewalk conditan woukl worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Ifligations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: . The community will benefit from this project because R will provida safe detect free sidewalks tor its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs ara created as a result of this activity. �ISpDVANTAGES IF PPPFiOYEO: ' Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and daspite the tact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. g"_ e £T�;!2�,ra*.`: !'^�;, 9 c: ,•E: . `4''`E. . , _ r, 7 r �.��., � � y r t �; d a DISADYANTAGES If NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk siock to deterioraie, which in turn, wi{I generate more personal injury suits, � uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS �, �� COSUREVENUEBUCIGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES tr0 FUNDINGSWf2CE 97-M p r . P�/� 9] � 557 s��� ACfTVRYNUMBER � ^2 2—� FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPUIN) B� AST 9 3OO � OOO c, cpa 97 = So;ooa LL CITY OR ST . PAUI, C ii! L ro .°l �- v��r PR&LIMINARY ORDSR B � - Fil No S 035 Voting W rd 5 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597035 - North side of E Sycamore St from Sylvan St to Jackson St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRL3CTION RA.TES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. � The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report af the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. i� � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +�lakey ✓�o s trom s%arris ,/Fegard ✓� rton f ..�t�`�'rn' C'- 1 t�'rts �'t'fiune Adopted by Council: Date � O�q�� Certifiefl Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �Against pl{pl {St�cn Mayor �IAY 17 1997 -Public Hearing Date - June ZS, 1997 RE 4-18-97 DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNGI DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET rt 32233 Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-97 INITIAL/DATE INITNL/DATE CONTACTPERSONdPHONE pEppp7MEM01RECTOR �CfTYCOUNGI RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 AS91GN �CITYATTORNEV �CITYCLEflK NUMBER PoR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) S—�—J� p�T�� �WDGETDIPECTOR �FIN.aM6T.SERVICESDIq. Must be in Council Research Office �A MAYDR(OAASSISTAN� �Coundl Research b noon r' 4-2 — � TOTAL ft OF SIGHATURE PAGES 1 _(CllP ALL lOCA710N5 FOA SIGNATUAE) � ASSOC7ATE DEPAqTMENTAL ACCOUNSAM ACTIONREWESSED _ � 3�.iA—, Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attachad list) a-� _�-� g � �t� NO RECOMMENDA7IONS: Appave (A) or Rejecz (P) pER30NAL SEflNCE CONiRqCTS MU57 ANSWER 7HE FOLLOW{NG QUESTIONS: _ PUINNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEflViCE COMMISSION �� H � �19 �iES � NOBf WotkBd undel a fAntfaC[ fw 11tiS departrnen[? _CIB COMMITtEE _ 2. Has this pers�rtn ever been a city employea? YES NO A STAFF 9. Doea Uiia person/firm possess a skitl not normaly possassed by any cui�ent tiry — — employee? _DISTPICTCOUNCIL — � _ YES NO SUPPOA75 Wri1CH CWNCIL OBJECTNE7 �%P�91n all yss anbwars on seperab aheat and attach to gr6an sheet W� INITIA7ING PP09LEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (VJHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The probfem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. Thesa problems occur on a c'rtywide level and m�st be addressed and correctsd on an annual basis. Left uncorrecied, the sidewalk conditan woukl worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Ifligations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: . The community will benefit from this project because R will provida safe detect free sidewalks tor its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs ara created as a result of this activity. �ISpDVANTAGES IF PPPFiOYEO: ' Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and daspite the tact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. g"_ e £T�;!2�,ra*.`: !'^�;, 9 c: ,•E: . `4''`E. . , _ r, 7 r �.��., � � y r t �; d a DISADYANTAGES If NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk siock to deterioraie, which in turn, wi{I generate more personal injury suits, � uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS �, �� COSUREVENUEBUCIGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES tr0 FUNDINGSWf2CE 97-M p r . P�/� 9] � 557 s��� ACfTVRYNUMBER � ^2 2—� FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPUIN) B� AST 9 3OO � OOO c, cpa 97 = So;ooa LL CITY OR ST . PAUI, C ii! L ro .°l �- v��r PR&LIMINARY ORDSR B � - Fil No S 035 Voting W rd 5 Ia the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at the following location(s): 597035 - North side of E Sycamore St from Sylvan St to Jackson St. *ESTIMATED CONSTRL3CTION RA.TES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of o1d sidewalk) -$7_45 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RE5IDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. � The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report af the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. i� � That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place o£ hearing, the nature o£ the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays +�lakey ✓�o s trom s%arris ,/Fegard ✓� rton f ..�t�`�'rn' C'- 1 t�'rts �'t'fiune Adopted by Council: Date � O�q�� Certifiefl Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �Against pl{pl {St�cn Mayor �IAY 17 1997 -Public Hearing Date - June ZS, 1997 RE 4-18-97 DEPARTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNGI DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET rt 32233 Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-97 INITIAL/DATE INITNL/DATE CONTACTPERSONdPHONE pEppp7MEM01RECTOR �CfTYCOUNGI RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 AS91GN �CITYATTORNEV �CITYCLEflK NUMBER PoR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) S—�—J� p�T�� �WDGETDIPECTOR �FIN.aM6T.SERVICESDIq. Must be in Council Research Office �A MAYDR(OAASSISTAN� �Coundl Research b noon r' 4-2 — � TOTAL ft OF SIGHATURE PAGES 1 _(CllP ALL lOCA710N5 FOA SIGNATUAE) � ASSOC7ATE DEPAqTMENTAL ACCOUNSAM ACTIONREWESSED _ � 3�.iA—, Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attachad list) a-� _�-� g � �t� NO RECOMMENDA7IONS: Appave (A) or Rejecz (P) pER30NAL SEflNCE CONiRqCTS MU57 ANSWER 7HE FOLLOW{NG QUESTIONS: _ PUINNING COMMISSION _CNIL SEflViCE COMMISSION �� H � �19 �iES � NOBf WotkBd undel a fAntfaC[ fw 11tiS departrnen[? _CIB COMMITtEE _ 2. Has this pers�rtn ever been a city employea? YES NO A STAFF 9. Doea Uiia person/firm possess a skitl not normaly possassed by any cui�ent tiry — — employee? _DISTPICTCOUNCIL — � _ YES NO SUPPOA75 Wri1CH CWNCIL OBJECTNE7 �%P�91n all yss anbwars on seperab aheat and attach to gr6an sheet W� INITIA7ING PP09LEM, ISSUE. OPPORTUNITY (VJHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The probfem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating free/thaw cycles, service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extrema temperature variations, etc. Thesa problems occur on a c'rtywide level and m�st be addressed and correctsd on an annual basis. Left uncorrecied, the sidewalk conditan woukl worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Ifligations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: . The community will benefit from this project because R will provida safe detect free sidewalks tor its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs ara created as a result of this activity. �ISpDVANTAGES IF PPPFiOYEO: ' Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and daspite the tact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. g"_ e £T�;!2�,ra*.`: !'^�;, 9 c: ,•E: . `4''`E. . , _ r, 7 r �.��., � � y r t �; d a DISADYANTAGES If NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk siock to deterioraie, which in turn, wi{I generate more personal injury suits, � uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS �, �� COSUREVENUEBUCIGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES tr0 FUNDINGSWf2CE 97-M p r . P�/� 9] � 557 s��� ACfTVRYNUMBER � ^2 2—� FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPUIN) B� AST 9 3OO � OOO c, cpa 97 = So;ooa