Loading...
97-477�L CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDSR cauc�rczL �zLS No . � � — y � ''1 B O Fi No. 59703 97034 Voting rd 1 � In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at [he following locations: 597033 - East side of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to B1air Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of olcl sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4_50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor up�n the above improvement, and having considerecl said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 �3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays V Blakey �Bostrom �arris �iegard �orton ✓s � 1�'rts ✓Thune Adopted by Council: Date ` �c� `{�rr'� � Certified Passed by Council Secretary 1 In Favor By o� �Against Mayor Al1Al lfln'n MAY 17 9997 Yub11C Hearin llate — June ZS, 1997 RE 4-18-97 OEPAflTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIpTED GREEN SHEET NO. �� Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAVDATE CANTACT PERSON S PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � GITY COUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ��N CITYATTORNEY �CINCLEflK NUMBEA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDAOY�DAiE) 5-7-97 ROUTNG g�p(�ETDIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIi Must be in Council Research Office �a MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) t� Coundi Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 ❑ TOTALt OF SIGNHTURE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCAliON3 f-0H SIGHA7UREj � ASSOCIATE � PARTMENTPL ACCOUNTANT ACTION FiEW ESTED �.3� � �'7 Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached lisi) �� _ y-1� . .5970 �— RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) a Re�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTPACTS IAUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _CIV�L SEFVICE COMMISSION �� ���$ PaES fi Ne vrorked under a contrac[ fw ihis departrnent? Y _CIB COMMITTEE _ 2. Has thi9 person/fl Ne been a city Bmployee? Y N S7AFF 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally passessed by arry current ciry — — employee? DISTRICTCAUNCIL � YES NO SUPPOR75 WHICH CAUNCILOBJECTNE9 �P�eln all yu anawara on eepnrate aheet and atlach to graan eheet WA� / INITIATING PflOBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORNNItt (WHO, VMAT, WHEN, WHERE. WF1V): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deieterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service fife limits, chemicai addNives, eMrame temperatura variations, eic. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wou�d be rendered unusable and s�bject to increased pedesiria� injuries from falis and possibie IRigations. . �l,o� ✓�' � F� ADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO: � �`/ The community will benefit from this project becausa it will provida sate detect free sidewalks for its r3' izens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a res �6fithis activity. i' DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL ��� ,.. .p 7 , , �_�+'_,. , � , � ;�:r !'.•. .E Ci t' ,._ v�i DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � _.rP: � This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. 70TALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 3.417.84 COST/FlEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 97-M=0667 q, PtA 97 = 557 .000 ACfTVITVNUMeER � - 2T 2-� $ FINANCfALINFOAMATION:�E%PLAII� B� AST = 300,000 C, Ct6 97 = 50,000 �L CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDSR cauc�rczL �zLS No . � � — y � ''1 B O Fi No. 59703 97034 Voting rd 1 � In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at [he following locations: 597033 - East side of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to B1air Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of olcl sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4_50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor up�n the above improvement, and having considerecl said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 �3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays V Blakey �Bostrom �arris �iegard �orton ✓s � 1�'rts ✓Thune Adopted by Council: Date ` �c� `{�rr'� � Certified Passed by Council Secretary 1 In Favor By o� �Against Mayor Al1Al lfln'n MAY 17 9997 Yub11C Hearin llate — June ZS, 1997 RE 4-18-97 OEPAflTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIpTED GREEN SHEET NO. �� Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAVDATE CANTACT PERSON S PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � GITY COUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ��N CITYATTORNEY �CINCLEflK NUMBEA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDAOY�DAiE) 5-7-97 ROUTNG g�p(�ETDIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIi Must be in Council Research Office �a MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) t� Coundi Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 ❑ TOTALt OF SIGNHTURE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCAliON3 f-0H SIGHA7UREj � ASSOCIATE � PARTMENTPL ACCOUNTANT ACTION FiEW ESTED �.3� � �'7 Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached lisi) �� _ y-1� . .5970 �— RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) a Re�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTPACTS IAUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _CIV�L SEFVICE COMMISSION �� ���$ PaES fi Ne vrorked under a contrac[ fw ihis departrnent? Y _CIB COMMITTEE _ 2. Has thi9 person/fl Ne been a city Bmployee? Y N S7AFF 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally passessed by arry current ciry — — employee? DISTRICTCAUNCIL � YES NO SUPPOR75 WHICH CAUNCILOBJECTNE9 �P�eln all yu anawara on eepnrate aheet and atlach to graan eheet WA� / INITIATING PflOBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORNNItt (WHO, VMAT, WHEN, WHERE. WF1V): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deieterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service fife limits, chemicai addNives, eMrame temperatura variations, eic. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wou�d be rendered unusable and s�bject to increased pedesiria� injuries from falis and possibie IRigations. . �l,o� ✓�' � F� ADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO: � �`/ The community will benefit from this project becausa it will provida sate detect free sidewalks for its r3' izens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a res �6fithis activity. i' DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL ��� ,.. .p 7 , , �_�+'_,. , � , � ;�:r !'.•. .E Ci t' ,._ v�i DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � _.rP: � This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. 70TALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 3.417.84 COST/FlEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 97-M=0667 q, PtA 97 = 557 .000 ACfTVITVNUMeER � - 2T 2-� $ FINANCfALINFOAMATION:�E%PLAII� B� AST = 300,000 C, Ct6 97 = 50,000 �L CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDSR cauc�rczL �zLS No . � � — y � ''1 B O Fi No. 59703 97034 Voting rd 1 � In the Matter of Reconstruction of sidewalks at [he following locations: 597033 - East side of North Grotto St from Lafond Ave to B1air Ave. 597034 - Both sides of Marion St from Aurora Ave to W University Ave *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of olcl sidewalk) -$7.45 per front £oot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $8.94 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $3.33 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $4_50 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor up�n the above improvement, and having considerecl said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 �3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *5EE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1997 Public Improvement Aid. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 25th day of June, 1997, at 4:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays V Blakey �Bostrom �arris �iegard �orton ✓s � 1�'rts ✓Thune Adopted by Council: Date ` �c� `{�rr'� � Certified Passed by Council Secretary 1 In Favor By o� �Against Mayor Al1Al lfln'n MAY 17 9997 Yub11C Hearin llate — June ZS, 1997 RE 4-18-97 OEPAflTMENT/OFFICFJCOUNCIL DATEINITIpTED GREEN SHEET NO. �� Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-97 INITIAUDATE INITIAVDATE CANTACT PERSON S PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � GITY COUNCIL RobertA.Lissick-266-6121 ��N CITYATTORNEY �CINCLEflK NUMBEA WR MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDAOY�DAiE) 5-7-97 ROUTNG g�p(�ETDIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERVICESDIi Must be in Council Research Office �a MAYOR(ORASSISTANi) t� Coundi Research b noon Frida 4-25-97 ❑ TOTALt OF SIGNHTURE PAGES 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCAliON3 f-0H SIGHA7UREj � ASSOCIATE � PARTMENTPL ACCOUNTANT ACTION FiEW ESTED �.3� � �'7 Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 1(See attached lisi) �� _ y-1� . .5970 �— RECOMMENDATIONS: Approve (A) a Re�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTPACTS IAUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNING COMMISSION _CIV�L SEFVICE COMMISSION �� ���$ PaES fi Ne vrorked under a contrac[ fw ihis departrnent? Y _CIB COMMITTEE _ 2. Has thi9 person/fl Ne been a city Bmployee? Y N S7AFF 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally passessed by arry current ciry — — employee? DISTRICTCAUNCIL � YES NO SUPPOR75 WHICH CAUNCILOBJECTNE9 �P�eln all yu anawara on eepnrate aheet and atlach to graan eheet WA� / INITIATING PflOBLEM, ISSUE. OPPORNNItt (WHO, VMAT, WHEN, WHERE. WF1V): The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deieterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles, service fife limits, chemicai addNives, eMrame temperatura variations, eic. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wou�d be rendered unusable and s�bject to increased pedesiria� injuries from falis and possibie IRigations. . �l,o� ✓�' � F� ADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO: � �`/ The community will benefit from this project becausa it will provida sate detect free sidewalks for its r3' izens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a res �6fithis activity. i' DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversiaL ��� ,.. .p 7 , , �_�+'_,. , � , � ;�:r !'.•. .E Ci t' ,._ v�i DISA�VANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: � _.rP: � This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. 70TALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 3.417.84 COST/FlEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSWRCE 97-M=0667 q, PtA 97 = 557 .000 ACfTVITVNUMeER � - 2T 2-� $ FINANCfALINFOAMATION:�E%PLAII� B� AST = 300,000 C, Ct6 97 = 50,000