Loading...
97-343���(��;t��t � L � ��� CITY OF 3T. PAVL �z�� _ ..,.yfti < ; . c. _�s Sa the Matter a£ xecar,�truction af siuewali€ at rne fcilt�vrin�t lccatie?�s: °97t��1 - Sout?z sidE cf Lafond Ave from xa. i�ltor. St. to N. Chatswarth St. Gg7fp? _ B�th fiides of Ven Bur?n Rva, f N. Chat�orth �t, fo i�t. 4x_f�r�3 �t, �meq+Th,rcrt*�n r!;?g�^tRT1CTI*JRr E.,pmr�a F.STI} .j�7TTai. R�T .4 (ppg 'tyq6 tjy� tjyr2E fami2y structures) Reaonatsuetion treplacement of �ld sidewalk) -$7.45 per front fC�CL for a five {5; fo wide wal'x and $B.94 p�� 1LOZL fo�� f�,r a six �'a) f wide walk. A1i ather widths wiil he prorated accordingly. New aonstrssation {where r.o vra3k existed) - IOO�a os the actual cost est:snated to be �pproximately 53.33 �er square foflt. A13 cerner resider.tial praperties wi21 receive a �r�dit up to tt�� fir�t 354 feet of new oz recor,struoted sidewalk al�nq and abutting the "lnn� side" of the pro*�erty. Nii7L'P2-RESSDENT;.r�.T,;More than *hr�e ia.�ily structuies} Ti�Siv'— N"+ k'-N'1'TR' kT'.� Fnr ne� qr�t _r�ron�tru�ted sidewslk: 2Q4� of :�ct cc�Rt estinater_? .*_.r� k�e a�,prox�.a�ataly $4.50 per sc�uare foot. The Council of ths City �f Sair�t Pau's h�iving received the re�ort of the rlayo upon ihe above im�rovement, an� having cansid2rer� said report, t;ereby rasc,lves; 3. That the said report and the same is hErsby aygro�ed with no alternatives, and that the astimated cost thereef is *SEE ABOVE for est�ated construction rates, financed by assessmenty and Z9g7 p,�t,i ic Impr�vement A_d, `�'��'` Mn z. T;�at s public haaring l�e had �n said iseprovement an the z�-day of � 1997, at 4s3Q o'clock P.M., in the C:ouncil Chambers of the City Hali and vOi1T i�Oei.�� �u ? if�. 17'� 1za _iic l'.it �i i I Sn=?? L c'v.1i . rouNC��, FILE NO, -y3 �y riI Sdo. , u1,� u� a�% +,r`; ,-.� ?2srd_l � - ..i..� 3. That 114LZL'G� of said public hEarsng be giYLn �o the gersGns a�u in the manner provided by the Charter statinq the t:me snd placa of hearin�, tn� natnre of �he improvement and the Lo�ai aast t:�arecf as esti.�atad. c;c�t„JC2LPERSC3�y5 Yeas 23ays �Biakey ��strom �arris �� Mer ✓FfE�$�� '✓t�t'ettman �una P(lq1 f.SN�n �..:4 .: �•. i' � s s � :, Fldopted by C;ouncil: �7aGe ���1qq� Certified Paased l�V Council Secretary � ir� E"avor By �� � _ h� �J�,�� � AgainsL �• Mayo� Public Hearin¢ Date — d �—�-4�- RE 1-24-97 (�Ll DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL OATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET V NO. � � Public Works Sidewalks 1-9-97 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE CANTACTPEHSONSPHONE �pEpAflTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6086 ^ss�cN cm anoaNEv MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATEJ HUMBEfl FOR ❑ ❑ CITV CLERK 2.—].2-9] NOUTIN6 Og�p(�ETDIRECTOR �FIN.dA1GT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Coun il Research Office �R MAYOR(ORASSISTANn i Coundl Research by noon Friday �f-31-97 ❑ ❑ TOTAL I OF SIGNATUFE GAGE$ 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOA SIGNATUflE) � ASSOCIATE � DEPAflTAIENTAL ACCOUNTAM ACTION RE�UESTED Reconstruc[ Sidewaik in Ward� �. (Sea attached iist) �� -� 3 Finance File No. 59700/— Z RECOMMENOATIONS: Acpmve (A) or Rejed (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSiON _CNIL SERVICE CAMMi5510N 1. Has ihis PB ES � NOer worked under a con[rac[ for this departrnent? Y Ci9 CoMMI77EE 2. Has this PersoMirm ever been a city employee9 — — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does Ihis persoNSrm possess a skill no[ normally possessed by arry current ciry — employee7 _OIS7qICiCAUNCIL — �J _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 F�cP�aln all yea anavrors on separate sheet and atlach to grean sheet Neighborhoods Ward ', INITIATING PROOLEM, ISSUE.OPPORNNIIY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHh: The problem "deiective sidewalk' was created because oi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aHernating freetthaw cycles, service life limds, chemical addRives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries irom talis and possibla litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROYED: The community wili benefd from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result oi this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the Tact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. � �, $ ,.'�a'.�`�?'�1 ��ae:;^,t. , � � ��] ���l�e( �}:'f�'c �e �. j���, (3 DISADVpMAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the intrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure oi larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTFlANSACTIONS CO57/REVENUEBUDCETED(CIRCLEONE) YES no FUNDINGSWRCE A. PIA 9� ACI7VfTYNUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: �E%PLAIN) B . AST C. CIB 97 ���(��;t��t � L � ��� CITY OF 3T. PAVL �z�� _ ..,.yfti < ; . c. _�s Sa the Matter a£ xecar,�truction af siuewali€ at rne fcilt�vrin�t lccatie?�s: °97t��1 - Sout?z sidE cf Lafond Ave from xa. i�ltor. St. to N. Chatswarth St. Gg7fp? _ B�th fiides of Ven Bur?n Rva, f N. Chat�orth �t, fo i�t. 4x_f�r�3 �t, �meq+Th,rcrt*�n r!;?g�^tRT1CTI*JRr E.,pmr�a F.STI} .j�7TTai. R�T .4 (ppg 'tyq6 tjy� tjyr2E fami2y structures) Reaonatsuetion treplacement of �ld sidewalk) -$7.45 per front fC�CL for a five {5; fo wide wal'x and $B.94 p�� 1LOZL fo�� f�,r a six �'a) f wide walk. A1i ather widths wiil he prorated accordingly. New aonstrssation {where r.o vra3k existed) - IOO�a os the actual cost est:snated to be �pproximately 53.33 �er square foflt. A13 cerner resider.tial praperties wi21 receive a �r�dit up to tt�� fir�t 354 feet of new oz recor,struoted sidewalk al�nq and abutting the "lnn� side" of the pro*�erty. Nii7L'P2-RESSDENT;.r�.T,;More than *hr�e ia.�ily structuies} Ti�Siv'— N"+ k'-N'1'TR' kT'.� Fnr ne� qr�t _r�ron�tru�ted sidewslk: 2Q4� of :�ct cc�Rt estinater_? .*_.r� k�e a�,prox�.a�ataly $4.50 per sc�uare foot. The Council of ths City �f Sair�t Pau's h�iving received the re�ort of the rlayo upon ihe above im�rovement, an� having cansid2rer� said report, t;ereby rasc,lves; 3. That the said report and the same is hErsby aygro�ed with no alternatives, and that the astimated cost thereef is *SEE ABOVE for est�ated construction rates, financed by assessmenty and Z9g7 p,�t,i ic Impr�vement A_d, `�'��'` Mn z. T;�at s public haaring l�e had �n said iseprovement an the z�-day of � 1997, at 4s3Q o'clock P.M., in the C:ouncil Chambers of the City Hali and vOi1T i�Oei.�� �u ? if�. 17'� 1za _iic l'.it �i i I Sn=?? L c'v.1i . rouNC��, FILE NO, -y3 �y riI Sdo. , u1,� u� a�% +,r`; ,-.� ?2srd_l � - ..i..� 3. That 114LZL'G� of said public hEarsng be giYLn �o the gersGns a�u in the manner provided by the Charter statinq the t:me snd placa of hearin�, tn� natnre of �he improvement and the Lo�ai aast t:�arecf as esti.�atad. c;c�t„JC2LPERSC3�y5 Yeas 23ays �Biakey ��strom �arris �� Mer ✓FfE�$�� '✓t�t'ettman �una P(lq1 f.SN�n �..:4 .: �•. i' � s s � :, Fldopted by C;ouncil: �7aGe ���1qq� Certified Paased l�V Council Secretary � ir� E"avor By �� � _ h� �J�,�� � AgainsL �• Mayo� Public Hearin¢ Date — d �—�-4�- RE 1-24-97 (�Ll DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL OATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET V NO. � � Public Works Sidewalks 1-9-97 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE CANTACTPEHSONSPHONE �pEpAflTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6086 ^ss�cN cm anoaNEv MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATEJ HUMBEfl FOR ❑ ❑ CITV CLERK 2.—].2-9] NOUTIN6 Og�p(�ETDIRECTOR �FIN.dA1GT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Coun il Research Office �R MAYOR(ORASSISTANn i Coundl Research by noon Friday �f-31-97 ❑ ❑ TOTAL I OF SIGNATUFE GAGE$ 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOA SIGNATUflE) � ASSOCIATE � DEPAflTAIENTAL ACCOUNTAM ACTION RE�UESTED Reconstruc[ Sidewaik in Ward� �. (Sea attached iist) �� -� 3 Finance File No. 59700/— Z RECOMMENOATIONS: Acpmve (A) or Rejed (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSiON _CNIL SERVICE CAMMi5510N 1. Has ihis PB ES � NOer worked under a con[rac[ for this departrnent? Y Ci9 CoMMI77EE 2. Has this PersoMirm ever been a city employee9 — — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does Ihis persoNSrm possess a skill no[ normally possessed by arry current ciry — employee7 _OIS7qICiCAUNCIL — �J _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 F�cP�aln all yea anavrors on separate sheet and atlach to grean sheet Neighborhoods Ward ', INITIATING PROOLEM, ISSUE.OPPORNNIIY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHh: The problem "deiective sidewalk' was created because oi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aHernating freetthaw cycles, service life limds, chemical addRives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries irom talis and possibla litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROYED: The community wili benefd from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result oi this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the Tact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. � �, $ ,.'�a'.�`�?'�1 ��ae:;^,t. , � � ��] ���l�e( �}:'f�'c �e �. j���, (3 DISADVpMAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the intrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure oi larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTFlANSACTIONS CO57/REVENUEBUDCETED(CIRCLEONE) YES no FUNDINGSWRCE A. PIA 9� ACI7VfTYNUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: �E%PLAIN) B . AST C. CIB 97 ���(��;t��t � L � ��� CITY OF 3T. PAVL �z�� _ ..,.yfti < ; . c. _�s Sa the Matter a£ xecar,�truction af siuewali€ at rne fcilt�vrin�t lccatie?�s: °97t��1 - Sout?z sidE cf Lafond Ave from xa. i�ltor. St. to N. Chatswarth St. Gg7fp? _ B�th fiides of Ven Bur?n Rva, f N. Chat�orth �t, fo i�t. 4x_f�r�3 �t, �meq+Th,rcrt*�n r!;?g�^tRT1CTI*JRr E.,pmr�a F.STI} .j�7TTai. R�T .4 (ppg 'tyq6 tjy� tjyr2E fami2y structures) Reaonatsuetion treplacement of �ld sidewalk) -$7.45 per front fC�CL for a five {5; fo wide wal'x and $B.94 p�� 1LOZL fo�� f�,r a six �'a) f wide walk. A1i ather widths wiil he prorated accordingly. New aonstrssation {where r.o vra3k existed) - IOO�a os the actual cost est:snated to be �pproximately 53.33 �er square foflt. A13 cerner resider.tial praperties wi21 receive a �r�dit up to tt�� fir�t 354 feet of new oz recor,struoted sidewalk al�nq and abutting the "lnn� side" of the pro*�erty. Nii7L'P2-RESSDENT;.r�.T,;More than *hr�e ia.�ily structuies} Ti�Siv'— N"+ k'-N'1'TR' kT'.� Fnr ne� qr�t _r�ron�tru�ted sidewslk: 2Q4� of :�ct cc�Rt estinater_? .*_.r� k�e a�,prox�.a�ataly $4.50 per sc�uare foot. The Council of ths City �f Sair�t Pau's h�iving received the re�ort of the rlayo upon ihe above im�rovement, an� having cansid2rer� said report, t;ereby rasc,lves; 3. That the said report and the same is hErsby aygro�ed with no alternatives, and that the astimated cost thereef is *SEE ABOVE for est�ated construction rates, financed by assessmenty and Z9g7 p,�t,i ic Impr�vement A_d, `�'��'` Mn z. T;�at s public haaring l�e had �n said iseprovement an the z�-day of � 1997, at 4s3Q o'clock P.M., in the C:ouncil Chambers of the City Hali and vOi1T i�Oei.�� �u ? if�. 17'� 1za _iic l'.it �i i I Sn=?? L c'v.1i . rouNC��, FILE NO, -y3 �y riI Sdo. , u1,� u� a�% +,r`; ,-.� ?2srd_l � - ..i..� 3. That 114LZL'G� of said public hEarsng be giYLn �o the gersGns a�u in the manner provided by the Charter statinq the t:me snd placa of hearin�, tn� natnre of �he improvement and the Lo�ai aast t:�arecf as esti.�atad. c;c�t„JC2LPERSC3�y5 Yeas 23ays �Biakey ��strom �arris �� Mer ✓FfE�$�� '✓t�t'ettman �una P(lq1 f.SN�n �..:4 .: �•. i' � s s � :, Fldopted by C;ouncil: �7aGe ���1qq� Certified Paased l�V Council Secretary � ir� E"avor By �� � _ h� �J�,�� � AgainsL �• Mayo� Public Hearin¢ Date — d �—�-4�- RE 1-24-97 (�Ll DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL OATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET V NO. � � Public Works Sidewalks 1-9-97 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE CANTACTPEHSONSPHONE �pEpAflTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNCIL Robert A. Lissick - 266-6086 ^ss�cN cm anoaNEv MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (DATEJ HUMBEfl FOR ❑ ❑ CITV CLERK 2.—].2-9] NOUTIN6 Og�p(�ETDIRECTOR �FIN.dA1GT.SERVICESDIR Must be in Coun il Research Office �R MAYOR(ORASSISTANn i Coundl Research by noon Friday �f-31-97 ❑ ❑ TOTAL I OF SIGNATUFE GAGE$ 1 _(CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOA SIGNATUflE) � ASSOCIATE � DEPAflTAIENTAL ACCOUNTAM ACTION RE�UESTED Reconstruc[ Sidewaik in Ward� �. (Sea attached iist) �� -� 3 Finance File No. 59700/— Z RECOMMENOATIONS: Acpmve (A) or Rejed (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLOWING OUESTIONS: _ PLANNING COMMISSiON _CNIL SERVICE CAMMi5510N 1. Has ihis PB ES � NOer worked under a con[rac[ for this departrnent? Y Ci9 CoMMI77EE 2. Has this PersoMirm ever been a city employee9 — — YES NO A S7AFF 3. Does Ihis persoNSrm possess a skill no[ normally possessed by arry current ciry — employee7 _OIS7qICiCAUNCIL — �J _ YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 F�cP�aln all yea anavrors on separate sheet and atlach to grean sheet Neighborhoods Ward ', INITIATING PROOLEM, ISSUE.OPPORNNIIY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WHh: The problem "deiective sidewalk' was created because oi tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aHernating freetthaw cycles, service life limds, chemical addRives, eMreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries irom talis and possibla litigations. ADVANTAGES IF APPROYED: The community wili benefd from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result oi this activity. DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment. Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the Tact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still remains controversial. � �, $ ,.'�a'.�`�?'�1 ��ae:;^,t. , � � ��] ���l�e( �}:'f�'c �e �. j���, (3 DISADVpMAGES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the intrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, uRimately resulting in the expenditure oi larger doliar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts. TOTALAMWNTOFTFlANSACTIONS CO57/REVENUEBUDCETED(CIRCLEONE) YES no FUNDINGSWRCE A. PIA 9� ACI7VfTYNUMBER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: �E%PLAIN) B . AST C. CIB 97