96-770� L �RI�I�!�iL
15
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE YdO. \�� ��O
P'RET� pgppl2 By -- a�L1�-Lr�-
iiic lYO. �35�3'✓G3rGYsL'S
votirzq wara 2
��
�. 10'r�
Ia th� Msttar ot Sidewalk reconstrution at the foilawinq 14Cat10II{g};
s96423 - on Lhe nort2xwest sida Adrian St. from Albion Ave. to
A7.a9ka Ave. st 1717 � 1729 Adrian St. only.
s96029 - on the east side Bay St, from Randolph Ave. to W. Seventh
u^t. 3t 452 nay St, c�niy.
59602n - on the north side Goodhue 9t. from Cliff St, to Uou�man
st. at 29g C,00dhuA gt. only.
595027 - on the north si�e James Are, from Taront� St. to W.
Seventh St, at 966 W. Seventh 3t, only.
W . • r, ,+
RFST]]FNTTAT um a{One, tvro or tMree family structnres}
Reconstructj.an (replacement af o2d sidezaa2k} -$7,�1 per front foot for a
Yive {5j faot wide welk 8TYC2 38.b4 per frant foot far s six {6} foot wide
v:r=lk. AIl other widths will be �rorated accordingly. Now ccnstructian
{wt�ere no walk existed} - 100% of the actuel cost estimated ta be
approximately $3.23 �r scivare fo�t,
All aorner re�idential properties will receive a crediz up to the first 150
feet c+f new or reconstructed sidevaslk alanq and ebuttinq the "lcng side" �f
the prc,perty.
Mf7T,TT-RFST F'NTTAT ('�+j,pre than three family atruotures}, �d.i1.^7- FSS �tvmTA'r RumF�
F'or new and reconstructed sideweik; 100o af actua2 cast estimated to be
epproximately $4.35 per square foot.
! � �� { �� 4! �E u f� �
tf i�\it.3{{�
� �-7? d
�_ . 2�� �.
The C.^.w-�cii of the C±ty of Saint Fan2 haviriq 2eaei�ed the repart cf the h2eycr upon
the above improvement, and having can9idered sai.d report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereb_y appraved with no
alternatives, and that the e�timated cost thereof i� *SEE ABOYE
for astimatecl constrvction rates, financed by assessments and
1996 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a publia hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th day of
Auc�uat, 14R6, at 4:30 o'a2ock P.M., in the Cr,uncil Chsmbe�-� of the City
Hall and Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said pubiic hearing b� given to the geraona cnd in the
manner �ravided by the Charter, �tatin� the tia�e and plsce of i�zerit�q,
the nat�are nf the imgrc�vamen+ $nd the total ra9t thereuf ss Estimated.
CC�[TNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�sk�y
ostrom
� erin
Iarris
�gard
�ttsan
Thune — �{�Sei'�"1"'
� In Favor
O As,7ainsL
� 1-� W ei� l'
PfiRl (SFI�n
At3apted �y Counci2: Date �„ b ` l�� �
Ceruified Pa�sEd by Council Se t�ry
sy �' a-. �����_
/�"` 1�
Mayor
JUL 2? i996
' Public Hearing Date — Au ust 28 1996 RE 6-21-96 L�
DEPARTMEN7/OFFICE/COUNCII DA7E INITWTE�
PublicWorksSidewaiks 4-12-96 GREEN SHEET '0 No. ��5g�
INITIAUDAiE WRIAUDATE
CONTACT PEflSON d PHONE � pEp�q77dENT DIPECTOH CITY COUNCIL �
ThomasP.Keefe-266-6121 ass+cN �arrnrronr+er gCrtYq.EftK
NUMBEN Wq
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(DA7E) ]-10-96 HOUTNO BUpGETDIRECTOR FIN.dMGT.SERVICESDIfl.
Must be in Council Research Office °�iOB' �MaroaroRnss�sT�wn t�Coundl Research
no later than noon Frida 6-28-96 ❑
TOTALlOFSIGNANNEPAGES 1 _ (CLIPALLLOCAl10NSf-0RSIGNATUR� �ASSOCIATE �DEPARTME ACCOUNTAM
ACTION qEWES7ED „��_U
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) (�/_ .. ( fO �
--+� r
Eile Nos. 596023-24 & 596026-27
FECOMMENDATIONS: Apprrns (!q or ReJetl (F� pENSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWEp THE KOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ CNIL SERVICE COMMISSqN t. Has Ihis pBrson/fi Ne Yrofked uMBf e ConVact fM ihis depaftrnent?
Y
_CIB COMMfiiEE _ 2 � m � Y�S� NO er been a ciry empioyee?
A S7aFF ' S. Does this parson/firm possess a skill no[ normalty possassed by any curtent ciry
— — employee? �
_DISTRICTCOUNGL — ,9 �'��` ' YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CW NCIL O&IECTNE7 �P��n all yas answora on saparata shaet ard ettach to grean sheet
Neighborhoods cW�fd`�2"�
INRIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOqNNIN (WHO, WFiAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY�:
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, aRernating free/[haw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extteme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
AOVANTAQE9 IP MPROVED: � � . ,
The communRy wili benefft from thfs project because R wlli provide safa detect iree sidewalks for fts many cRizens, The sidewalk
cantracts ara executed by private contractors, so it toliows that private sector jobs are created as a resuk of this activity. .
DISADYANTAGES ff PPP(i�YEO;
Historicaily, the sidewalk recronstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessmants, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, ft still
remafns controversial.
f�sanc� ��arch C,�f�r
JUN 21 1996 � _
OISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This opiion would allow the infrastrudure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits,
ukimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWNTOFTflANSACTIONS 6.608.00 CO3T/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No .
FUNDINGSOUfiCE 96-M-0665 A. PIA 96 = 535,000 ACENfTYNUMBER C 6-2 28-0 84-2 1 � �
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) ' B � , AST ° �{3�L a OOO � . '
C, cI6 96 = 50,000