96-769LL �R��ii�'��
CITY OF SY. PAUL
� u ♦-'u a'
COUNCIL gz� No. 9 � - �1 �q
BY �_�t.tn._t.
FilA Nn. 89�C1c',$9601$
Voting Ward 2
�. I �t 2
Ia ths Matt�r af Sidewalk reaonstrutian at the fallowing l�oation(s):
59501? - an *soth eides Banfil St. fre� Lbusman �t. t� p7. �mith Aee.
596014 - on the west side af Waterloo St. fram E. Curtice St. to
E. Belvidere st.
�vn_ 1: _ . ? ' .
RFe2D.t3Tzar AT (One, two as three fami.2y structurea}
Reaoaatructioa (replacement of old sidewalk} -$7,21 per front foat for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.64 per front foot for a six {6) foot wide
walk. Ail other widths will be prorated aacordingly. Nex aonstructian
iwhere no vralk exi�ted) - 100'k of the actual coat estimated tv be
approximately $3.23 per square faot.
�il corner residential properties wili receive a cre3it up to tne first i50
fe�t of new or reconatructed sidavaalk along and abutting the "3ong side" of
the property.
►y
MIJT.TT_RFST FNTTAT �p�re then tLree fami2y structures} � jq(jTJ- F TD NTTAT ATRt'i
F�r new and recanstrueted sidewalk; lOC; of actual cost est;.mated to ba
a�+proximate2y $4.35 per squsre foot=
���;f����F��
: !-� �
q 6 -'1 �°I
p.2�� �
The �uncil of t�e City of Saint Pau2 hsving received the report of the 1laycr upon
the abave improvement, and havi.ng conmidered naid report, hsreby reaolves:
1. Thet the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated co�t thereof is *SEE AB6YE
for eatimated construction rates, financed by assessments anc3
1996 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on aaid i.mprovemant on tine �8th day of
August, 1996, at 4:30 o'alock P.M., in the council Cham2sers of tha city
Hall and Court Hou�e Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of aaid public hearing be given to the peroons and in the
manner provided by tha charter, stating the time and p2ace �f hearinq,
the nature of the imgrovement anrl the tatal oost thereof as esti.mated.
COtINCILPERSONg '
Yeas Nays
�akey
EQstrom
��jserin
��Ha�rris
'�M�e ara
✓fettman
Thune •- a�S2n}'
Adcpted by Council: Date � O ��q�
Certified Passed by Counail Secretary
6 1n Favor By� a. ���^�.�
.SZ��inst '�/�/L � ��Iti�
� N�S2vJ-�- May°r
p11R( I.SN�n
JU! 27 t996
� Public Hearing Date - August 28, 1996 RE 6-21-96 /]�]
DEPAflTMENT/OFFICECAUNCIL DATEINRIA7ED GREEN SHEET NO. �` `�
Public Works Sidewalks 3-28-96 INITIAUDATE INRIAUDnTE
CONTACTPEPSONbPHONE pEp/�pTMENTDIRECTOR CtTYCOUNCII.
ThomasP.Keefe-266-6121 �N cm�noaNEr cmaEaK
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DA7E��-1O-9 �A0�11 glJpCa5TO1RECT�R �FM.6A{G7.SERYK:ESD�fL
Must be in Council Researc� Office � MAYOR(ORASSISTMIT) t� Coundl Research
no later than noon Friday 6-28-96 ❑
TOTAL x OF SIGNANHE PAGES I �(CLIP ALL IOLAT10N3 WR 91GHANPEj � ASSOCIA7E � DEPARTx1E AL ACCWNTANi
ACTIONREWESTED —^ (� � � . iJ �„��,
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 2(See attached list) - 1 {� " 1/ � L 1 �"' �
File No: S96D12 :y �14 � _'
HECDAIMENDAiIONS:Appmre (N orRe�ed (R) pER30NAL SEHVICE CONTHACTS IAUST ANSWEH THE FOLLOYVINti GUESTION3:
� PLANNINA 69MMI�@I9N ,--. =�FNI4 &ER4ICE WA1MI9sION 7, Hes �hleper eoNflrtn aver worMed uMer a conVact for thla depaAmentY �
Y�S NA
C1B COMMitTEE t Nee tl�lep9rwNllrm w�r been a olty employae7
— — YES NO
A S7APF - 3. Uoes this paraon/flrm poasesa a akill not rarmalty posaeased by arry current ciry
— — amployae4
_DISTflIC7COUNCIL•3� _ YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH GWNCIL OBJECTNE7 Fxpl�ln aIl y�� mwnn on a�puab shM �td att�eh to gn�n thwt
Neighborhoods Ward',2'r�: .
INITIA7ING PpOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUN�TV (WHO, WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WHY):
The problam "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freerthaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide levei and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen io a stffie where it would be
rendered unusab�e and subject to increased pedestrian injuries trom falis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIPAPPROVED: , - �
The community will benefft from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that privata sactor jobs are created as a result ot this activity.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: -
Historically, the sidewalk reco�siructions have created negative teedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despfte the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidiied, it sti�l
remains controversial.
�n� FBe�aardr �t�r
JUN 21 19°6
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacemant, as well as claim payouts.
TO7ALAMWMOFTRAN9ACTIONS ��.H�S.00 _CO37lREVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES No' .
FUNDINaSWpCE 96-M A. PIA 96 = 535.000 ACRVtTYNUMBER C96-2T728-0784-27011
FINANCIAL INFORMA710N: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 432 � OOO
C, CIB 96 = 50,000
/