96-754x
� �
nRiG1N,q�
�i
CI7R QF SR. PBUL. C � L LE , q�
� T " IIHIIiBR.Y oRDER gy I v
F`11 �G. .�`i����Q
voti_nq wara s
Zxi the Mattlr a£ Sides+ralk reconstrution at the foliowinq location{s);
on bcth sides of Kenneth St. from Bohland P.ve. to Saunders Ave.
�urc � • � '.�: s_u
RF.STD NT'�AT. ATF' (one, twa or three family strvatures)
Reconstruction (replaaement of old sidewalk} -$7.21 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide we2k and $$.5? per frent faot far a six_ (FJ foot wicie
walk. A11 other widths wi12 be prorated accordingly. New canstruction
(where no walk existed) - 10�$ of the actual cost esti.mated to be
approximately $3.23 per square foot.
A11 cornsr seaidential oropertiev will receive a credi.t +3p to the first 15Q
feet o£ new or recoristructed sidewslk alc,ng and BbllYGIkICf �tYB "lonq side'* of
the gsoperty.
p+f( T,TS FSSf7FNTTAT (MOI2 than three femily structures}, NCAT-R�' T
_.�.Z?�NT�$T Ra__�_7'�
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100$� of actual cost esti.mated to be
approximately $4.35 per square foot.
The Ccuncil of the City �f Saint Paul having received the report ef the Mayor upon
the above impravement, and hsving consideret3 said report, hereby reaolves:
l. That the said report and the same 1s hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost �hereof is *SEE ABOVE
far estimsted construction rates, fi.nanced by assessments and
1996 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That e puhlic hearing be had on said improvement on the 4th day of
^ oeptamker, 1995, at 4:30 o'alack P.M., in the Counci2 C7iambera af' the
Gity fta11 and Court Heuse Building in thE r_ity of Baint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearinq be given to the persons and in the
manner provided by the L"harter, stating the time and place of hearing,
the nature of the improvement anr2 the tctal cost there�f as estimated.
COC3NCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
"�lakey
�pg GInEi
✓�uerir,
�LZ'13
v1°�garcY
��tmar,
vt'�ime
PUBtr,auFn Adopted by Cour�ci2: Date � ���
J U� 20'gg6 Certifieci Fa3sac� i:y Council se etsiy
� Sn F'PsYOa BY , �
� Against ��
Mayor
.. Public Hearing Da
DEPAqTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL
Public Worka Sfdewalke
Cf7NiACT PERBtlN 6 PHtlNE
Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121
MUST B'e ON COUNqL AGENDA BV (Ol
Must be in Council
no later than noon
TOTAL i OF SIGNATUAE PAGES
Of
WOGET OIRECTaR
MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn
(CLIP ALL LOCATONS FOq SIGNATURE) � � ASSOCIATE
1996 RE 6-28-96
DATEINITIATED GREEN SF9EET
6-12•96 --- INITIALJBAT€
� � � DEPMtMENT tlIHECTOR
E ASSIGN
6... ._.... _.._ rl cm nrroarvEr
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached list)
File No. 596050
PLANNIN6 COMMISSION
C18 COMMITTEE
STAFF
_CIVIL BERVICE CAMMI9910N
^ DISTAICTCOUNCIL — IS _
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNqL OBJECTNE7
�`
PERBONAL BERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLOWING 4UESTIONS:
1. Hae M�a poEe NOar workad undor a wn[ract tor thie depertmant7
Y
2. Has this pe Nfi Ne been a ciry employee?
Y
3. Does Ihis pe�son/firm possess a skili no[ wrmally possessed by arry current ciry
employea?
YES NO
�piain ali yas answers an separeta shaet snd etiach to graan shoel
Ward 3 �
(WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freerthaw cycles,
service I'rfe limiis, chemical additives, extreme temperaiure variaiions, etc. These problems occut on a city,vide fevel and must be
addressed and cnrrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a siate where it would be
rendered unusabfe and subjed to increased pedesirian injuries from fafls and possible Vitigations.
The community will benefit from this project because ft will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contsacts are executed by privaie coniractors, so it tollows that privats sector jobs are created as a resu{t of this activity.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of consiruction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stili
remains controversial.
C� �a�r C�tP��
.lUN 2 6 t996
�wvnmwc�ts m mm �rrr`uvtu:
This option wou{d a{low the infrastructure ot sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in tur`n, wi gen r 'E�`f on�"""a� n�ry suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
�1��
� • • �i
CItY CAUNCIL `��" �;
q7Y CLERK
FIN. d MGT. SFRYICES DIR.
fOTALAMOUNTOFTflANSACT10N5 j,OH3.00 COST/HEVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEy YES No
RJNDINGSWRCE 96—f�—�0565 A. PiA 96 � 535.��� ACITVIT'NUMBEA Cg6-2T728-0784-27ott
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PIAIt� B � qsT = 432 �OOO
C, Cis 96 A 50,000