96-752��- ��f�������
39
CITY OF ST. PHUL CWNCIL FILE NG. (� ��I S.Z.�
pRRT.TM'na,'G4 pR� B
Fil No. u04
vo na Ward 1
3n tha Matt,r a£ Sidewaik recons"trution at thE foiiowing locationi�):
S95Q47 - on the east side N. St. Albans St. fro� Hague xve.
to Laurel Ave. at 678 Haque Ave. only.
1�q � r» +� ;•
RF.ST➢. TTAT RnT �3 (Qne, two or three family atrUCtures)
Reaoastxuetion (replacement of old eidewslk} -$7.21 per front foot for a
five (5} foot wtde walk and $$.64 per front faot far a six {6} foqt wida
wa2k. Ali other wi,3th� wi21 be prvrated acaarding2y. taeu construatiaa
(where no walk existed} - 100� of the actual cast s9timated to be
approxi�ately $3.23 per square foot.
Atl corner residentiel proparties will receive s aredit up ta the fir�t 159
feet af new or recQnstructed sid?walk along an�3 abutting th� ^long 9ide" af
the property.
AAf TT-RF.4T FmmTaT.{MOre than three family structures), Noa7 Ftr� r�rmr r nm
For naw and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� af actual cast esLimaLed to be
approximately $9.35 per square foot,
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Meyor unon
the above imgrovement, and having coasidered said report, i:ereby resolvea:
2. That t?ie said report and the �ame i� hereby approved with no
altarnstives, and trat th� astimated aost thereof ie *3EE };BOVE
for estimated construotion rates, finanesd by assessments and
1996 Public Imprr�vea;ent Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28th day of
Auqust, 1995, at 4:30 0' clock P,M„ 1n the Council Chambers of the City
iiail and Court House Buiiding in the City of Saint Paul.
3. Tuat notioe of said public hearinq be given to the peracns and in the
maxuter provided by the Charter, stating tlse tima anc3 }lace �f i;�eriag,
the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estisated,
CflUNCILPERS4AT�
Yeas� tvTays
BZaksy
�
�uerin
x arri.s
�gard
�ttman
�ne
pi�Rl�euen A�Ionted by Louacil: Uate '3 �`��(
,IUL 2 0 1gg6 Certified Passed by Council Sec tary
� 1'i R� svo�''" By c � . �,
Q Aqeinst �G
Mayor
F
r
f
�
. _.. ,.. _ �.�
' Public`'Hearing^:Date -Ai� u'st 28 �1996"" ' RE 6-21-96
DEPAPTMENT�OFFICFJCOUNCIL ' DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET � r,o.'�'�s��— �
Public Works Sidewalks . � 5-10-96 INITIAI/DATE INRIAVDATE
CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE � DEPARTMEN7 DIPECTOR • � CIN COUNCIL .
Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6t21 asscx �CITY ATTOBNEY � CIN CIERK J
NUMBEAFON -
MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABY(�AlE} 7_IO-96 ROUTING �gppC�7DIRECTOR �FIN.BMGT.SERYICESDI0. �
Must be 3n Council Research Office °"DF" MqYOR(ORASSISTAN� i❑ COUnCIi Research
no later than noon Frida 6-28- 6 ❑
TOTAL / OF SIGNATVRE AAGES 1 __ (CtJP ALL LOCATIONS FOP SiGNATURE) � ASSOCIATE MENTAL ACCOUNTANf -�
ACTION REOUESTED , {� ��} D -
r � - r�o
Reconstruct Sidewaik in Ward 1(See aitached list)
File No. 596047
RECOMMENDA710NS: Appro�re (A) or Rejea (R7 PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING (]U£S710N5:
_ PtANNtNG CoMMtSSroN CNA SEAVICE CAMMISSION 1. Has th�s Pe ES � NOer wo:ked uoder a conVact for tt�is depar7nent? -
Y
_Ct0 COMMI77EE � ' 2. Nas 7his P ES� r NO et �en a city employee? . ' . �-
Y
A S7nFF - `�- 3. Does [his peaoNBrm possess a skiil not normatly possessed by any current ciry
— employee? - . - -
DISTRICTCOUNCIL— H . YES NO -
SOPPORTS YVHICH COUNCIL DBJECTNE4 - ' F�P�ain all yas answers on separata sheet end attach to graen shaei �
Neighborhoods � � ;Wai��'1" �
IVI7IATlNG PFOHLEM, 7SSUE, OPPORNNt7Y (NMO, WHA7, WHEN, WNERE. WFiY): - ,
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, defeterious subgrade material, alcernating freefthaw cycles, -
service life limits, chemicai additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These pro6lems occur on a citywide level and mus[ be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be
rartdered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possibie liiigations. ' _
�r �
. � . �et��` 1.,�� �� .
� � �� � �P, � �,19 _
AOVANTAOES (F APPfi0VE0: . , _ ; � . ` � , � . - ' � �
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks fo� ns.� The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it tollows thai private sector jobs are created as a result ot this activity. ;�
OISApVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: - ,
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of consiruction procedure and assessment.
Simpiy stated, property owners detest assessmeMs, and despite the fact up to one•haH the assessment is City subsidized, it still _
remains crontroversial. .
� � �, C�nC� I�s�rdt C�ttt�r<�
JUN 2 2 i996
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: .
This option would aUow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more perso�al injury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventuai repairs and/or replacement, as weli as claim payouts.
� °_ ��.
x �-" �� � . . � � � �" � _ .
TOTALAMOUMOFTRANSACTIONS �n�,g,qR nn COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) " YES � t+o�- "
FUNDINGSOURCE q6-M-0665 A. PIA 96 = 535,�00 ACITVRYNUMBER C9�i�2.T]28'�]8 ��
RNANCIALINFOFMATION:(E%PLAIN) . Q� AST a 432 �000 . . `' �
��. C. Ci6 96 = 5a,000 � � -"
� _ - � � , _ ' .