96-747L�
CITY OF' ST. PAUL
,� -,- , .. .,: . �;
3�
ccxmrcz�. FILE NO. - 1 �o — � y �
$v � �
F�iE rr�. s��oa
Voting Ward 4
Sn tha Mattrx� of Sidewalic reconstrution at the foliowing lacation{s};
5�6029 - on Dcth sides Eague Are. fro� P:. 5�zh2e2er St. t� r7.
Fairvisw AYe.
��� �wN_. Y ,. � Y. ,4 . Y
RF.$TI} .T�TTAT nm q(pne, two or three family structures)
Reconatruetion (replacement of old sidewelk) -*�,7.21 per fron*_ foat for a
fiee (Sj foot wide walk and $8.64 per front foot for a six (6} foot wide
+�rslk. A11 other widths will be proratefl accordingly. 10ew construetion
twhere no walk axisted) - 100'& af the aatual cost eatimated to be
approximately 53.23 per square faot.
Al.l coriier resicientisl prcrperties will receive a ereciit up to the first 150
feet of new or rec4nstructe�l �i�ewalk along an� abutting the "long side" af
the property.
C�RIr���.�.�
MIJT.TT_RF4TilF tTT�T {More than three family atructures) � NON- F.4TD .ATmTRT. AT
Far new and reccnstru�ted sidewalk, 1DQo of sctu�l cost astimated to be
apprUximately �4.35 per square faot.
�R;�!����
��-��2
Tha councll of the Cfty of Saint Panl Ilac.iag reaeived the report �f tIle Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said raport, hereby resolvea:
l. That the said report and the same is hereby approved wit2� no
�I.ternatives, and that tha estimatsd cast thereaf ia *SEE ABpVE
fer estimeted aonatruatian rates, financed by assessmants ana
399b Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearinq be ha+i on said improvemeat ar, the 26th dsy af
Au�ust, 1996, at 4:3fl o'clack F.M., in the Cauncil Chambers af tha City
Hall and Court Aouae Auilding in the City of 8aint Faul,
3. That �otice of said gublic hearin,� be given to the per�ons and in the
manner provi�ed hy the Chsrter, ststing the time snd place of hearinc�,
the natnrs of the i.mpsc�vement and the to�a1 ooa� theraof aa eatimated.
COUNCILPERSON3
Yees� /� Nays
s�3lakey
�/S�strosi
�erin
c.�'�rr3s
v�ioia"gard
� � , � ,. � t — tman
i7 RllRt�
Adopted by Council: Date`����1��
Certifia�3 Passe,� t,y Council $ecr tary
�In Favar Sy � „ ,
�Against
�'I6�rncirn
JUL 2 �J 1996
�
�.
x..', � Public Hearing Date = August 2&, 1996
t DEPARiMEMR]FFICHCOUNCIL DATE INRI
€ Pubi'�c works sidewafks ° ° a-lz-ss
- COMACi PEqSpN a PHONE _; _ -
Thomas P. Keefe - 266-67 2t ' � �'. �e o
6"
' •.
€' __
�-`'°�. -,- = ,
�;_=
($��', �; , .� .
!�',`. ... ..
��..�_-...
be
t OP 9I4NATUflE PA4E8 ' '� 1
Office
rewmmcrvuw� iurva: cppiare �ry w neq�x �ry
_PIANNINQ[�MMISSION : .` ' CIYILSER4ICE�MMISS�ON
_CtOCOMMI7TEE _ � . . �
A S7AFF - � - '"
- �__—
OISTRICTCOUNCIL— :;
�UPPOflT3 riNICH COUNCIL OBJECTNE7 ' '
.. � .: ��=' . '
"`u......i.t,�__t__.a_ � ,. ..o..
„�,_� (CLiA �iLL LOCA710N8 FOA 81GNATURE� � ASSOCtAiE �
Rsconstcuct Sidewalk in N,ard 4(See attached lisi)
File Nos S96029 °
�:::=.'
RE 6-21-96
GREEN SHEET `` ' aa ��
� INIi1Al/DATE INYfWUDATE� _
DEPMTMENTbIqECTOA CfttCOUNG�� � "
GtttAiTORNEY ' � �ClIYCLERK
BUDGEi DIRECTOR '� � FIN. 6 tAGT.
MAYOR{ORASSISTANTj� � ' . t� COUrtC1i
s
«��
__ -_ . � " . - _ :: l/ `�� ��
PERSONALSERNCECONTRACTSlAtISTRNSWERTNEFOiL6'MtiGQUESTIQN5: -_
t. Has ihispe �sonlfirtn ever worksd u�er a centrac[ fw this departrnent7 --
YES NO �
2. Has ihis pa Ne�ver been a dty employae? ,.- ,.. -. ._
Y
3. Does thia personlflrtn posaess a skili not normaly possessed by any curtent ciry �
empioyae7 . .
YES NO
Exp�ain all yes answars on aeparate aheet and sttezh io groen theut
WITIATGYG PAOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOflTUNi7Y (WF(9, WHAT, WHEN, NMERE. WFfn: .. .�. , ,. _
The problam "defective sidewalk" was crealed because oi tree roofs, deleterious subgrade materiai, aRernating fresfthaw cycies, ,
service 1'rfe liroBs, chemicat additives, entreme temperature variatians, eta These pcoblems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. left uncorrected, the sidewalk condkion wouid worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to incraased pedestrian injuries from fafls aad possible litigations. ,
MVANTA(3ES IF APPftOVED: _, � � , �.a .., ... � � . - �.. . ,., :.,. ...,.
Th"e commu�ky wili benefit from tfiis �project because h will provlda safe defed frae sWewaiks for its many oftizens. The sidewalk,-�
' contracts are executed by private contractors, so 8 foHows ihat privats sector jobs ars created as a resuft of this actrv�ry .
?�`,„ < % ; �
� � � �,
,
� �. �; �
,;.
. - :, , ,, -
�>.� �� � �
, �
x, "� r: , . . , �
'� ,r � .`..; ' , s�a; �`�`� ��``4�r `y-.a��.. "%€�ai ''
. _ , � .. , t "' � ,.,; S.
DISO.�yaN7AGES IP APPROVED: . _ _ , . � - �: � �,.
Historically, tha sidewaik reconstruciions have created negaiive teedback in 2he area of construction procedure and asses'sm
Simply stated, property owners detsst assessmants, and despfte the fact up io one-half ths assessment is City subsidized, it
temains controversial. �
��,:.-
" ,
�a�e9t� �$�(S�I ,�14�$(
.;.
, � � ��JUN 21��1996 >,°. � y :
„ � :
DfSADYANTAQESIFNOTAPPqOVEO:. - . . . . ,. .. , ,:. - ,,._
This option woutd allow the infrastrueture of sidewalk stock Yo deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury s
'ukimately resufting in the expeaditure of targer dollar amou�ts in eventuat repairs and/or repiacement, as weli as claim pay�
� , �; , '� - �
.
� � `
4 ? ..5 � . � . _ .. �
� �
� . v. . � r-. . '
w
��. �, l � : . � �'�i . .
. � :. ... -- �i
. r ...' ...i..�. . . `. . - '.. r �
..\ �,. .. . .> � .� '. . -. .. '
; x . - � r' t. . , . � . . -. . ,.-, _ t
. . . _ '�,,_ ..n , _' _ . _- ��
�:�'�:, TOYALAMWMOFTRANSACTWNS `- �0 ]5] 00 CABTIREVENUHBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj-> �YES�
':.: FuNOwcsouace`. A. PtA 96 = 535�000 ACITVITVNUMBER C9C>�ZT7ZH ^0784-270'
' PINANCIAIiNFOPMATION:(E%PCAIN). . : � AST ¢ 1 l32�OQO � - . . '
. ` C. CtB 96 � . 5a,000 � � � �
,
� � , : �
1 � � � � ����������� �I I� �llll 7i�i �a �;� � � . �.. ��� .