96-741y: .
�L
CITY OF SR. PaUL
PRELIIdBiARY 01�ER
QRIGI�!AL
�
COLTPICIL F'TLE NO, q�- � t
BV �la�. �i7'l�t...�
F`iie Ida. ^ u�6G05
Yoting Ward ?
Sn th� t4attsr of Reconstruction of sic�ewalk an both sides Maria
xse• from Enclid St. to surrey xve,
�N�' . _ � . e\ : .. _._"�—_ _-Y..
FzEgT F157T7AT ATFS tCme, two or three fami2y structures)
Rsconstructiost (replacement of old sidewalk} -$7.22 per front foot for a
five (5) foot vride vzalk and $9,64 per front fo�t for a six (6} foot wide
walk, All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Haw canstructioa
{where no wa2k existed) - 100� of the actusl cast estimated to be
apgroxamately $3.23 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will reeeive a credit up tca the first 150
feet �f new �r recon�truated sidewalk alonq anci abvtting the "l�n� side^ of
the property.
Mttim - F�rj} �T7ai {More than three family struc±uresJ rrofr- F�zn �r 7ar RAT S
For new anci reaonstructe� sidewalk; 1U6� oY actual cost estimeted ta be
agproximately $9.;5 �r squ�re fa�t,
The Counoil af the City �f 9eint Paul havizg rraeive3 the report of th� Mayor upon
the abore improvement� and having considered said renort, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and *_he same �s hereby appreved with no
alternative�, and that the estimatad aost thereof is 'SEE 11BOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by asse�sments and
1996 Public Improvement Aid.
2. fihet e public hearinq be had on said i.mprovement an the 28th d�y of
August, i996, at 4;30 c,'cloak P.M., in the Cauncil Chambers af the City
Hall ana Court House Buildinq in the City of Saint Paul.
3, mhat natice of said public hearinq be given te the persons and in the
manner provided by the Charter, stating the ti.me and piaca of hearing,
the natura of the imprcrement and tke total ccs* thereof ss e�timate�.
A(�91(Sf1�S1
Yeas� 2davs
Blakey
�3ostrom
�erin
�/fI� sris
+/Meqard
�ttman
ii4'hune
JUL 201996 �opted by Covncil: Bate V tRg�,
Certified Passed by Council Secretsry
� In �'avor $y
�Against ��
Mayor
- Public Hearing Date — August Z8, 1996 RE 6-21-96 � ^
DEPARTMENDOFFICFJCOUNCIL ' DATEINITIAiED GREEN SHEET NO. �`�"O
Public Works Sidewalks ' 3-5-96 �ry�7�qUpq7E iNRwwar�
CONTACTPEq$pNdPHONE �� , �DEPARTMENTD�RECTOR �D{TYCAONCIL
Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6121 =ASS��� '"
. NU438FAiOFl GCINATTOflNEY �COYCLERK
MUSTBEO.y CAUNCILAGENDABY ATE) ] Ej �y'SFOIiTING BUDGETDIRECTOq �FIN.SMGT.SERVICESDIR.
r1llSC f/e 1R C011RCl Research 4ffice ` �����MAYOft(ORASSISTANn 7�� QOUtiCI� Research
no later than noon Frida 6-28-96 ?�.,_ ❑
TOTAI/G57GtiANREPAG'cS i _ (CLiPACLLOCATONSFORSIGkATfIRE) �ASSOCIATE �DEPAFiMENTALACCOUNTANi
�ACT7CN flEOUESTED ]� � �-�-q�
� Reconstr�ct Sidewalk in Ward 7(See attached fist) �C: �� �
s
� Fiie-No. 595005"�='.`=M'-
' RECAM;lENCATIONS lsppmve {t� w Ftojea (A) pER50KkL SEftYlCE CONTRACTS 1€UST 1^:SWER THE FOLLOYJIRG GUES7lOP7S:
PtANNING COMM75510N CNII SERYICE COMMISSION t. Has Ihis personlfirm ever workad urMer a conVact (or this department?
— — YES NO
CB CoMMtiTEE 2. Has this person/firm ever been a ciry employee?
— — YES NO
A S7AFF 3. Dces this parsonmrm possess a skiil not normalty possessed by any current ciry
— — employee7
_,DISiRiCTCqUNCiI —�{ _ YES NO
SUPPoftTS WHICH COVNCILO&)ECTNEI Ezpfain aIl yas answars on saparate sheet and attach to g:ean sheat
Neighborhoods =S7a �"'7=`��`�
IN{TIATING PAOBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOATUNISY ('V:fiO, VJHAT, WHEN, WNEAE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tres roots, deleterious subgrade material, al,ernating freeRhaw cycles,
service 1'rfe 4imits, chemica! add'Rives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These pro6lems occur on a cRywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual 6asis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condiiion would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjsct to increased pedestrian injuries irom falis and possible litigations.
AOVANTAGESIFAPPROYED:
The community will benetit from this project because it will provide sate detect tree sldewalks tor its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by prlvate contracrors, so it toliows that private secior jobs are created as a resuR of this activity,
DISADVANTAGES iF APPROVEO:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructians have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one•half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains crontroversial. ,
�C0l;I1C� �b�CC�i �F1�lC
JUN 21 1996
DISADYANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This opiion would afiow the infrastructure of sidawalk stock to deteriorate, whicfi in turn, wiA generat� moYb personaf injury suits,
uftimately rasulting in the expenditure of farger dollar amounts in eventual repairs andlor replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTALAMWMOFTNANSACTIONS 9,��5_QO COST/fiEVENUE8UD6ETE�(CIRCLEONE) YES !ro
FUNDINC3SOURCE g6-M�o665 q, PIA 96 � 535.000 ACRVITYNUMBER C96-2T728-0784-2 Oti
FINANCIAL INFOpMATiON: (E%PIAIN) B z /�ST °�13Z � OOO
C, C�e 96 = 50,000