95-672LL
Cl2Y OF ST. PAIIL
PBELIHIAABY OBDEB
QRIG����,!
3�
,
COUNC FILE 0. ' b f�
B y ,�" �� � ,.
Fi�No. 5951 7 6 595108
Vo ing Ward 5 ,2isy3
-�
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
595107 - at 1084 Kilburn Street.
595108 - Constructing (new) sidewalk on the east side of N. Milton St. from
W. Aoyt Ave. to approx. 115 Ft south of W. Aoyt Ave. and the south side W.
Hoyt Ave. from N. Milton St. to approx. 156 Ft east of N. Milton St. at 1558
N. Milton St.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
qs � ��
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2
3.
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 16th_ day
of August, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas� Nays
✓ B�.akey
���„r i mm
✓G� erin
✓�arris
�gard
�ttman
�P�une
�flRltau�n
Adopted by Council: Date��,��-S
Certified Passed by Counci] Secretary
�In Favor By
QAgainst /%i/i � �J'; , +, �C
" ` � ` Mayor
JUL � 1 1995
Public Hearing Date —
'JEPARTMENT/OFFICECAUNCIL
Public Works Sidewalks
CONTACTPERSONBPHONE
Thomas P. Keefe - 266-6125
MUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (OATE) (
Must be in Council Re
no later than noon Fr
TOTAL Y OF SIGNATURE PAGES _
395 RE 6-9-95 ,j �i7�"
DATEMRIATED GREEN SHEET �NO.
5-26-95 INITIAUDATE INITIAL/DATE�
DEPAflTMENiDIRECTOR ' uCENCaUNqL_
Ci7Y ATTOAHEY QCf7Y CLERK
BUDGET DIRECTOR � FIN. 8 MGT. SEflVIGES
MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn � COL1fICII F
_(CUP ALL LOCATIONS f-0H SIGNANRE) u ASSOCU+7E
Reconstruct 8� Construct Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list)
File Nos. S95107-8
_CNII SERVIGE COMMISSION
CIB COMMf1TEE
STAFF —
DISTflICTCAUNCiL — O � 1�
pq75 WN1CH COUNCIL O&lECTPJE7
ISSUE, OPPORTUNIT' (WHO, WHAT, WHEN.
��
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLIOWING QUESTIONS:
7. Has this p�S �� NDer worked under a cotNact for ihis depa*tlnent?
YE
2. Has this perso�rm ever been a dry employee?
YES NO
3. Does this persoNfrm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry
employee?
YES NO
Ezplain ail yas answers on s¢parate sheet and attach to green sheet
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freeRhaw cycles,
service Irfe Iimits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide leval and must 6e
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible Iitigations.
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewaik
contracts are executed by pcivate contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
�.'���� �'��'��'�3 �"tt��.�
JElN Q 4 1��5
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversiat.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEU:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uftimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTAL AMOUM OFTRANSACTION S 4 1 09 .00 _ COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CiRCLE ONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 95 A PIA 95 = 515,000 ACITVITYNUMBEH C95-2T727-0784-27010
FINANCIAL INFOflMATiON: (EXPLAIN) a, AST = 4 i 6 � OOO
C. CIB 95 = 50,000