95-671, �. -
r� �, i 3�
! ! �����������
6'I'�� OF ST. PAIIL C�UNC FILE.��.�t.-c.�r. �(
PEELIlSINA$Y O$DSB B
FileNo. 595106
Voting Ward 7
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on both sides Reaney Avenue from Nortonia Ave. to N. Ruth Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
&econstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 16th day
of August, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said
the manner provided
hearing, the nature
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas / Nays
✓�B akey
�i'fimm
�
� rris
✓�Mf gard
!!i"RR�ttman
r�YQr hune
public hearing be given to the persons and in
by the i.harter, stating the time and place of
of the improvement and the eotal cost thereof
ananeuen
Adopted by Council: Date a.� ��dj C
° �� L _1 � Certified Passed by Counci Secretary
e
� In Favor By • �, , —, �_--�
� � �
� Against GL C��� �%�'/� :%��-�����t-
� Mayor
Public
Public Works Sidewalks
Date –
Offic
TOTAL A' OF SIGNATURE PAGES
6-9-95
GREEN SHEET
ATTORNEY
3E7DfAECTOR
�a con nssisraNn
1 _(CLIP ALL LOGA710NS FOR SIGNATUHE) u ASSOCIA7E
accourrrurr
NJREWESTEO � � � a�
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 7(See attached list)
File No. 595106
iMMENDATiONS: Approve (A) ur Rejett (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
PLANNINCa COMMISSION _CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Hd51hi5 p2 � NOer worked under a contract for this deparonent?
Y
CIB CqMMfTTEE 2. Hd5 ihi5 erson/firm ever been a ciry employee?
— �ES No
STAFF _ 3. Does ihis persoNfirm possess a skUl not rwrmally possessed 6y any current ciry
employee?
DISTRICTCOUNCIL— 2 YES NO
__ ___ — Explain all yas answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
N
Ward 7
), WHAT, WHEN,
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, alternating free/thaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it wouid be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are crea { a [ s � resuk of th a
4Vb4i1<{:P k� E.FQp�L{t631
��!i`z �' � l���J
IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S 6 90 � OO COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE oNE)
��, G�S�G `>/
N o: 31594
INITIALlDATE �
CffY COUNCIL
CfiV CLERK
FIN. & MGT. SERVtCES DIR.
NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 95 A. PhA 95 = 515,000 _acirvinNUMSEa C95-ZT727-0784-27010
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) B� pST � 47 6 � OOO
C, CIB 95 = 50,000