95-598L L.
ORIGINAL
��
COIINC FIL N0.
c
By
Fil o. S9 07 fi
Yo ing Ward 5
CIiY OF ST. PAIIL
PB&LIMIAAEY OgDSE
In the Mattet of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
595074 - on north side Topping St. from .iackubin St. to N. Western Ave.
S95075 - on the west side Westminster St. from E. Wheelock Pkwy. to E.
Hoyt Ave. at 330 E. Wheelock Pkwy. only.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Beconatrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. IIev eonstrnction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to Che first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
Eor new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That Che said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd_ day
of August, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
• Blakey
�G imm
i/Guerin
�rris
�gard
t/Rettman ���11QUCfi
�hune JU�.. ° 1 19��
(� Adopted by Council: Date 0�{9S
i"}�S�v��'
/ Certified Passed by Council Secretary
i/
\!
� In Favor By
� Against �!i n--
(� Mayor
� 1-��]S tv��
Public Hearin Date - Au ust 2 1995 RE 5-26-95 y.� '.5
PARTYEN7lOFFICElWUNC0. �A����^*�� GREEN SHEET No.3i588
Public Works Sidewalks 5-9-95 winnwnrE iNrcwwnrE
WNTACT PEpSpry a PVqNE � p�ppqTA1ENT DIflECTOF � CITY COUNCL
Thomas P. Keete - 266-6121 ��N cm armw,�r ❑ cnr asnK
NUMBER WH �
MU3TBEONGOUNC0.AGENDABY(DATE) 6-14-95 ���' aBU�CETDIfiECTOfl -- �FW.dMGT.SERVICESDIfl. -
Must be in Council Research Office °"0� � MAYOR(OflAS515TM7T) � Coundl Researdi
no later than n F ——
TOTALlOFSICNANf�PAGE3 1 _ (CIIPALLLOGA710NSFOR9CNANRq �+GSSOC�ATE PA EMALACCWNTMI�
ACTION flEOUESlED � .. � ��
Reconstrud Sidewaik in Ward 5(See attached list)
File No. 595074-75
HECa.�MENDpnONS:nFpae (N v aajea (HI PERSONAL SERVICE COMRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
PLANNWG COMMISSION _CIVR SEFVK7E WMM15S%XJ 1. F{a5 ihis p8r5aVf NOer worked under a contraa fa ihis deParanentq ._ �
Y
_C18 COYM(ilEE _ 2. Has ihis peESOMim1 � Br been a dty Bmployae?
A STAFF _ 3. Does Ihis perwnRrtn possess a skAl rw[ rwrmaiy possessed by arry current ciry -
-- empbyee4
asrn�crca,r+ca— 5& 6 ves No
s � q � �� �� L �� T �� Ezp�afn all yea anawers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet -
Neighborhoods Ward 5
WRI�TIN6 PROBLEM. ISSUE, OPPOqNNrtY (NMO. N71AT, WHEN, WHERE. WH'n: . ,
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, dateterious subgrade material, afternating freenhaw cycies,
service I'rfe IimBs, chemical addftives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These probiems occur on a citywide levei and must be ",
addressed and correded on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, ihe sidewalk condftion would worsen to a state whare it would be �:
rendered unusabfe and subject to incaeased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible Iftigations.
..4' � .. _ . . _. . . ' _ . '
ADVANTAGES ff MPHOVED: .. _ . . . .. _ , . ,
The community will benefit from this project because B will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many cftizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs ara created as a resuR of ihis activity.
DtSADVANT0.GES IF APPFtOYED:
Histacicaity, the sidewalk reco�sVUCtions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
DISADVANTAGES IF NQT APPROVED: -
This option would ailowthe infrastructure of sidewafk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uttimately resuking in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
nt r.,_
Qiiri:.0 r'*::�.a:5�'�.: i %�
�..
(!i,-�`,� � J �.�.��
TOTALAMWNTOFTRANSACTIONS 5� 680.00 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONEj YES NO
FUNDINGSOUBCE 95-M-o664 A, PIA 95 = 515 .00� ACiNITYNUMBER C95-2T727-o784-2 O10
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B, AST ��r 16 � OOO
C. CIB 95 = 50,000