95-400�-�- ORIGI�°�AL � Q 1/
CITY OF SR. PAIIL COUNCIL �IL N0. 7�� 7 O D
PgELIHIBABY OBDSB By �,��� (,P(� /�'u/rtas
File No. 595034 ��� C
Voting Ward 3 �
In the lfatter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
on south side Munster Avenue from Davern Street to West Seventh Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRIICTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a sia (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2
3 .
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14th day
of June, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�lakey
�rimm
�uerin
� arris
egard
� Rettman
Thune
PIIRi �wen �
Adopted by Council: Date_��0� �
�lAY 131995
Certified Passedby Council Secretary
�In Favor
� Against
Public Hearing Date —
�PARTMENT/pFFICE/CDUNCIL
�ubl'ic Works Sidewalks
bMACT PEHSON a PHONE
fhomas P. Keefe - 266-6121
AUST BE ON COUNCIL AGENDA BY (�ATE)
Must be in Council Res
no later than noon Fri
fOTAL t OF SIG/UNRE PAOES _
ne 14, 1995 BE 4-7-95 `7c� �� D V
°"'�'"'T'"�° GREEN SHEET No. �1 S69
3-23-95 INITIAVDATE INRIAL/DATE
DEPARTMENTDIRECTOfl �CINCOUNCIL
NUMIBEFtFOfl �CffYATiORNEY �CIttCLEFiK
6-95 � �bUDCETDIflECTOR �FIN.&MGT.SERVICESDIR.
ch Office MAYOR(ORpSSI5TAPIT) � Coundl Research
4-1 —95 �
1 _(CLIP ALL LOCA710N5 FOR SIGNATURq � ASSOCIAlE � DEPA�TAL ACCOIJNTMtT
Reconstruct Sidewalk irt Ward 3(See attached list)
F No. 595034
XNAMENOpTqNS; AppfcnB (a f
_ PLANNING COMMISSION
_CIB CAMMITTEE
_CNR SEAVICE fAMMISSION
_ STAFF —
_DISTPICTCIXINC�L - LS _
�PoflTS WHICH COUNGL OBJECTNE?
Nei�hborhoods Ward
PERSONAL SERVICE COM'RACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLtOWftJG QUESTIONS:
t. Has this parson/firm ever worked urMer a conVact for this depaunent?
YES NO
2. Has ihis person/firm ever been a ciry employee?
YES NO
3. Oces this personn5rm possess a skilt not rtormally possessed by any current ary
employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes a�swers on separate sheat and attach to green sheet
The problem "defective sidewalk" was creafed becausa of tree roois, deleterious subgrade material, alternating freetthaw cycles,
service 1'rfe limits, chemical additives, axlrema lamperafure variations, etc. These problems oxur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subjed to increased pedesVian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so ft follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
_.. . _�^ <..�";;�4'�
.... {�J'�
{JeFV
Nistorically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and ass�ssment.
Simply stated, properiy owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stodc to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uRimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doNar amounts irt evenival repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
fOTAL AMWNT OF TRANSACTION S o, 1]�; , 00 COS7JREVENUE BUD�ETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES xo
FUNDINGSOURCE 95-r��-a664 A, P�A S5 = 5�5 ��� ACITVITYNUMBER �95-ZT727-078!�-27ot0
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIM B. AST = IF�O .-,
C. CIB 95 = So,0�0