95-379I. .
� � ORIG�Nq� 2 �
CIiY OF ST. PAIIL COUNC ILE �'-S 3 7�
PEELII4IHAFY OBDEg By
Fil No. S950 3- 95047
Vo 'ng Ward 5 � �
Zn the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
595043 - on the west side Edgerton St. from York Ave. to Case Ave.
595044 - on both sides East Lawson Ave. from Mississippi St. to
Westminster St.
595045 - on both sides East Lawson Ave. from Westminster St. to
Arkwright St.
595046 - on the south side West Maryland Ave. from Galtier St. to
Matilda St.
595047 - on the west side Westminster St. from East Hoyt Ave. to
approximately 400 Ft south of East Hoyt Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRIICTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
9�=���
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 14th day
of June, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Aall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas/' Nays
V �,lakey
l/G imm
Guerin
rris
egard
ettman
Thune
91tt5? t�C�ef�
�IAY m 6 �99�
Adopted by Council: Date��,�, tR,�`L�.�
�--
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�In Favor By �, �,
, _
� Against
Mayor
Public Hearing Date —.Tune 14, 1995
Works Sidewalks
P. Keefe - 266-6121
RE 4-7-95
— I GREEN
��f s 3, y
SHEET No.
_ INITIALlDATE INITIAUDATE
�COUNCILAGENOAeY(OA7E� ({—Z(�—�5
be in Council Researc Office
JiTMENTDIRECTOR �CITVCOUNGL �
ATfORNEY �Ct7YCLERK
iETDIPECTOR � FIN. d MGT. SERVICES DIR �
�a �oa ass�srarrt� 1❑ Coundi Research
tOFSIGNATUNEPACE3 _ 1 _ (LUPALLLOCATOHSFORSIGNANR� u ASSOCIA7E
Reconstrud Sidewalk in Ward 5(See attached list)
File Nos. S95043-44-45-46-47
#AMENDATIONS: ApP+� (N ar fleje�2 (fl1
PV+NNINGCOMMISSION _CIVILSERVICEC(
STAFF
— 5,6 _
71L O&IECTNE7
Ward 5 �
i0. WHAT. WHEN. WHERE,
PERSONAt SERVECE COMRACTS MUST ANS WER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
t. Nas tliis person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
YES NO
2. Has this pere�rm ever been a city employee?
YES NO
3. Dces this persoNfirm possess a skill not nortnaliy possessed by any current dry
employee?
YES NO
Explafn all yos answers on saparete sheet and attaeh to grean sheet
The probtem "defective sidewalk" was created because of [ree roots, deleterious subgrade materiai, afternating freetthaw cycles,
service I'rfe limits, chemical addRives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annuai basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible Iitigations.
The community will benefit from this projeci because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so ii follows that private sector jobs are created as a resuft of this activity.
=t.-. - - F, �
"...,., : .2 ._. . . �. .°Z.i
� F . �.., C , � ,`.' ^r
:�. C' v . .
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruciions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, property owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it stili
remains controversial.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stodc to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
uftimatefy resufting in the expenditure of iarger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacemeni, as we!! as claim payouts.
COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CtRCLE ONE} (YES� No
FUNDINGSWRCE 95-t-t-0664 A. PiA °5 = 515 ,�0� ACITVITYNUMBEH
FtNANqAL INFOFMATIOM: (EXPCAM) a. a s � = 4 t 6 � �QQ
C. CIB 95 = 5�,000