95-232�- ' �
��- ORIGIN�L �3+
CIRY OF ST. PAQL COIINCIL FILE N0 9s-a.�
PBELIZiIHABY OgDSF By ,��,[(/{ ��✓']e.{�o/�/rti �7� J s�
File No. 595 0 -S95016
Voting Ward 4
In the Matter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
595009 - on both sides Blair Ave. from North Pascal St. to Asbury St.
595010 - on the north side .lidway Parkway from Bison Ave. to North
Pascal St.
S95011 - on both sides West Minnehaha Ave. from North Pascal St. to
Asbury St.
595012 - on the east side of Raymond Ave. from Bradford St. to Long
Ave. and the west side of Raymond Ave. from Territorial Rd.
to Bayless Place.
595013 - on both sides Raymond Ave. from Buford Ave. to Hendon Ave.
S95014 - on both sides Raymond Ave. from Carter Ave. to Doswell Ave.
S95015 - on both sides Raymond Ave. from Doswell Ave. to Buford Ave.
595016 - on both sides Raymond Ave. from Hendon Ave. to Dudley Ave.
*E5TIMATED CONSTRUCTZON RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
&econstrnction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnction
(where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be
approximatelp $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
95=a 3 a-
�9tF}i tltS£F
6�A� �� 199�
The Council of the Citp of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
199� Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 3rd day
of May, 1995_, at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said
the manner provided
hearing, the nature
as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Blakey
.� Grimm
✓ Guerin
✓ Harris
✓ Megard
�,s Rettman
✓ Thune
public hearing be given to
by the Charter, stating the
of the improvement and the
�In Favor
�Against
Adopted by�unci
Cetti,.fic�d Xass
the persons and in
time and place of
total cost thereof
° �yq�
cil Secretary
1'r•s�
9
Public Hearing Date — Ma 3> 1995 RE 2-24-95 9S'oZ•3�'�
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINITIATED GREEN SHEET ' r,o.3155a.
Public Works Sidewalks Z-�O-JS INITIAUDATE INITIAUDATE
CONTACTPERSONBPNIXJE �pEppRTMENTDIRECTOF �CIiYCOUNCIL
Thomas P. Keefa - 266-6121 ��N �Gltt ATf�RNEY � CfK GIERK
MUSTBEONCWINCILAGENDABY OAT NUMBERFOH
{ 3� 1 S RWnNG � gUDGEf DIRECTOR � FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR
:1est be in Council �tesearc Office «+�
no later than noon Friday 3-3-95 OMAYOR(OFiAS51STANn t� Council Research
TOTALtOF51GNANREPAGES 1 _ (CLJPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATUR� � ASSOCIATE � DEPARiMFNTALACCOUMIWT
ACT10N flE�UESTm � � �
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward 4(See attached list)
�.rL S S
RECOMMENOnT10NS: Apqove (A) w Fieject (Ft� PERSONAL SERVICE CONTiiACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING IXIESTIONS:
PLANNING COMMISSfON _CNIL SERVICE COAIMISSION �. H35 Sltis p2(SONf1cm eVEf w0[kCd under a WR4act for 11u5 deQ2fh11ertt?
YES NO
_cie CoMMtftEE — 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
A siAFF — YES NO
DISTflICTCOUNCII� ��'�'� Z 3. Dces this persoNfirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry
— employee?
SUPPOflTSWHICHCAUNqLOBJECT7VE7 YES NO
Explain atl yas answars on separate sheet and attach to green sheet
INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOFTUNITY (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHI�:
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade materiai, alternating freetthaw cycles,
service Iife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must be
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
The community wi11 benefit Srom this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewafks for its many c+t+zens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
n.,,,�-:�:: - �.i:;i� ����
i ..._,:�-: .___.
(1 3 .�r,n:-
��..li a's i,iY:j
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
Simply stated, prope�ty owners detest assessments, and despite the fact up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it still
remains controversial.
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVE�:
This option would allow the infrastrudure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wi{I generate more personaf injury suits,
uftimately resuRing in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as well as claim payouts.
TOTAL AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION S 3'� Z 7 O. 00 COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIHCIE ONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOUpCE 95-M-06b4 A. PIA 95 = 515,00o pCITVITYNUMBER G95-2T727-0784-27010
FINANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B � AST = 410 , OOO
C. CIB 95 = 50,000
„_: . , _ , : , . : •,,,, ,•_ .
Ward 4
q�-�a-
S`JSDO �} PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BLAIR AVE. from N. Pascai St. to
�
Asbury St.
INITIAT4NG ACTION: Shis order was initiated by the Director of Public iNorks as
public necessity on the basis of four (4) compiaints, a petition with one (1) signer and
an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled
and cracked paneis.
,S�j$D!b PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. MIDWAY PKWY. from Bison Ave.
� i to N. Pascal St.
fNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director ot Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and
an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches,
scaled and cracked panels.
.............................................................................................
,$9Spl� PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. MINNEHAHA AVE. from N.
�� Pascal St. to Asbury St.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of nine (9) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels.
.............................................................................................
Se�sO/.L PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. RAYMOND AVE. from Bradford St.
to Long Ave. & W.S. RAYMOND AVE. from Territorial Rd. to Bay(ess Pl.
,<
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of five (5) compiaints, a petition with one (1) signer and
an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels.
.............................................................................................
-2-
9s a 37
595� / j QROJEGT• RECONSTRUCT StDEWALK B.S. RAYMOND AVE. from Buford Ave.
�z
to Hendon Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and
an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, settied and cracked panels.
.............................................................................................
S95n�y
PRO �EGT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. RAYMOND AVE. from Carter Ave.
to Doswell Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
pubiic necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled
and cracked panels.
............................................................................................
S`ISO/S PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWA�K B.S. RAYMOND AVE. from Doswell
Ave. to Buford Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the waik.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concreie with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, scaled and settled panels.
............................................................................................
Sq$dl6 PROJECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. RAYMOND AVE. from Hendon
f�
Ave. to Dudley Ave.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of two (2) compiaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches, scaled and settied panels.
............................................................................................