95-230, .. ..
LL
� ORIGI�IAL
a3
Cl2Y OF ST. PAIIL COIII�,� IL F LE N �.Z.3 D
PBBLZHIAABY OBDBH By //yuG�� f��� 3I �S�
File No. 595005 fi 95006
Voting Ward 3
In the Hatter of Sidewalk reconstruction at the following location(s):
595005 - on the north side Wordsworth Ave. from Edgcumbe Rd. to Sue St.
595006 - at 1860, 1864 and 1872 Wordsworth Ave.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRBCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
geconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$7.04 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $8.46 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Hev constrnetion
(where no walk existed) - 100Y, of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $3.15 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.25 per square foot.
The Council of tihe City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor
upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, herebp
resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no
alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE
for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and
1995 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 3rd day
of May, 1995 , at 3:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of
the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul.
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in
the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of
hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof
as estimated. �o��teae-r.
,�;'� � �' l995
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
r/ Blakey
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
�
Grimm
Guerin
Harris
Megard
Rettman
Thune
... ;�.., ;s.s�
�In Favor
�Against
Adopted by Council: D
Certifiy�5lPass
etary
BY.
Mayor
Public
Works Sidewalks
f PERSON & PHONE
�s P. Keefe - 266-6121
Ro latEY LL72.R ROOR
LAL Y OF SIGNAlUAE PAGES _
Off
0-95
RE 2-24-95
� GREEN SHEET
ATTOflNEY
iET DIHECTOfl
JR (OR ASSISTANn
_ (CLSPALLIOGAT10N5FORSiGl1A7URE} �ASSOCIATE
Reconstrucl Sidewalk in Ward 3(See attached {ist)
PIANNINCaCOMMISSION _CNILSEflVICECOMMISSION
_CIS COAiMITTEE _
A STAFF _
_DISTRICTCOUNCIL� ,� _
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
a -�� -
PEHSONAL SERYICE COtiTFiACTS MUST ANSW ER 7FiE FOLLOWtNG WESTVONS:
1. Has Ni5 parso�rm eVer worketl under a conVac[ for Mis department?
YES NO
2. Has this persoNfirm ever bcen a ciry empbyee?
YES NO
3. Does this persoNfirm Rossess a skilt not normally possessed by any curcent ciry
employee?
YES NO
Explain alI yes answers on separate sheet and atlach to graen sheat
ITIATING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO, WHAT. WHEN, WHERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was created because of tree roots, deleterious subgrade material, afternating freetthaw cycles,
service life limits, chemicai additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide level and must 6e
addressed and corrected on an annual basis. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be
rendered unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fails and possib{e litigations.
ADVANTAGES IF
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe detect free sidewalks for its many citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are executed by private contractors, so it follows that private sector jobs are created as a result of this activity.
q ��,�� j � �-�R"�5� �i ��
&x
�F�, � � 1°�5
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback in the area of construction procedure and assessment.
5imply stated, propeKy owners detest assessments, and despite the fad up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized, it siill
remains controversial.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits,
ultimately resulting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in eventual repairs and/or replacement, as weil as claim payouts.
� p�,�a�aa
No. �1 �5�
INITIAUDATE
❑ an couucit
� CIiY CLERK
�FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR
70 Coundl Research
rI DEPAFiTMENTALACCOl1NiANT
TOTALAMOUNTOFTflANSACTIONS $SZ.00 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE) YES NO
FUNDINGSOURCE 95-N�-o664 A, PIA 95 = 515,00o pCRVRYNUMBEH Cg5-2T727-0784-27oto
FINANCIALMPORMATION:(EXPLAIN) B. AST = +7 �OOO
C. CtB 95 = 50,000
�'jS"-a 3 �
•: • . . ; ► : • ►�� •
Ward 3
Scj�pp s PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SiDEWALK N.S. WORDSWORTH AVE, from
� Edgcumbe Rd. to Sue St.
INITIA7ING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as
public necessity on the basis of one (1) compfaint and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled paneis.
S9Sop4 PROJECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. WORDWORTH AVE. from
Edgcumbe Rd. to Sue St. at 1860, 1864 & 1872 Wordsworth Ave. Only.
/S
INiTfATING ACT10N: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as
public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt
patches and settled panels.