D00319CITY OF SAINT PAUL
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
•
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
BUDGET REVISION
No.: 170031 �
Date: � ! '
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER� cons_sce�� :'_:� _'-e ac��ori:y ���°:ec �c -e ��a. . s�c _o� :�. .-
of the City Charter and based en the :e��es� c_ ��e �_ _.._.,. .,_ c�e �e. _. �_ _„` PubliC Wofks
to amend the 19 94 budgec of �he P W Engineering __. ,-�e �.."__.,_ „-_
Department of Finance and Manaaenent Services is atiLhe^zed te zmend sz_d b..6ce: i, �'^e �.,__,,,,_ ,
manner:
Curren[
Bud�ct
205-12190-0848 Capital Outlay
205-12190-0857 Capital Outlay
205-12190-0299 Services
205-12190-0383 Materials
•
1�,145.00
11,500.00
1,000.00
175.00
Changc
(8,424.99)
(125.66)
7,550.G5
1,000.00
Amended
Budge[
2,720.01
9,782.17
8,550.65
1,175.00
To transfer monies within a Public Works Engineering Fund activity. Purchases that were budgeted in capital
outlay did not meet the minimum dollar requirements for capitalization, therefore, required expensing out of
services and materials budgets.
� pa�re by' 'vity Manager �-
� --�
Requested by Depanment Direcwr
. proved Qy: `1ayo� �
/ ���-`��
na«
Public Works
wrv���.� ronavrvern�rvc n ���
Bill Cutting 266-6075 "�
SIGNATURE PAGES
1
ATE INITIATED
10/13/94 GREEN SHEET� NO. 16869
r � f INITIAUDATE INITIALIOATE—�
ASSIGN r� DEPAftTMENT DIREGTOR c' � CITV COUNGL i
......_____., rICITYATTOflNEY (cl CINCLERK ,
ORDFA � MAYOR(OR ASSISTAN'�
(CLIP ALL LOGATIONS FOR SIGNATUflE)�" G ASSOCIATE �
FlN 8 MGT. SERVICES DIR.
Q DEPARTMeNT
Transfer of capital outlay budget within P.W. Engineering aciuvity.
RECAMMENDATIONSApprova (A) w Ra�ed (R)
_ PLANNING COMMISSION _ qVIL
_ qB COMMITTEE
_ STAFF _ _
_ DISTRICTCAUNCIL _ _
SUPPORTS WHICH COUNCiI OBJECTNE?
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
1. Has this persoNfirm ever worked under a conttact for this tlepartment?
YES NO
2 Has this persoNfirm ever been a ciry employee?
YES NO
3. Does this persoNfirm possess a skdl no[ normally possessed by any arreni ciry employee�
YES NO
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and aitach to green sheei
INITIA7ING PROBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNIN (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHV):
Items that were approved in capital ouday budget required expensing from service and ma[erial budgecs.
RECEIVED
OCT 2 6 1994
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED;
�xpenditures will be properly accounted £or and line item budgets will not be ove�spent.
I
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVE�:
None
REC��vE�
NOV3
CITY CLERK
_----__------_- -- - -
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEO:
Uniess monies are transferred, service and material budgets would retlect insuffecient funds while capital outlay budget would indicate an
unexnended balance.
LAMOUMOFTRANSACTION$ 0 00 COST;REVENU@BUDGETED(CIRCLEONE)
NDING SOURCE P W F7�ll�rering Fnnd ACTIVITY NUM9ER ]'_
FINANCIAL MFORMATION: (EXPLAIN)
NO
��