09-231 /
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
Councif File # 09-231
Green Sheet# 306671b
ORDINANCE
OF
PAUL, M{NNESOTA
Presented by
�
An oriiinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code
pertaining to zoning for the City of Saint Paul and the zoning maps
thereof:
WHEREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §462.357 and §64.400 of the Legisiative
Code, Church of St. Andrew Kim duly petitioned to rezone 1449-1465 Cleveland Ave N,
being legally described as ST ANTHONY PARK NORTH LOT 4 BLK 16 and ST
ANTHONY PARK NORTH LOTS 5 6 AND LOT 7 BLK 16, PINs 202923140116 and
202923140117, from RM1 Multiple-Family Residential to TN 2-Traditional Neighborhood;
the petition having been certified by the Planning Division on November 17, 2008, as
having been consented to by at least 67 percent of the owners of the area to be rezoned,
and further having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property
situated within 100 feet of the total contiguous property within one year preceding the date
of the petition; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
December 11, 2008, for the purpose of considering the rezoning petition, and pursuant to
§107.03 of the Administrative Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning
Commission for approval; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its meeting held
on Dec 19, 2008, and recommended approval to the C+ty Council; and
WHEREAS, notice of public hearing before the City Council on said rezoning petition was
duly published in the official newspaper of the City on January 19, 2009, and notices were
duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within
350 feet of the property sought to be rezoned; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council having been conducted on February
4, 2009, at which all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard, the Councii
having considered all the facts and recommendations concerning the petition; now,
therefore
THE COUNCIL OF THE C{TY OF SAINT PAUL DOES OftDAIN: �UBLISH�
�iPR 13 ?flD9
Section 1.
That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet Number 1, as incorporated by
reference in §60.301 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further
amended as follows:
That the property at 1449-1465 Cleveland Ave N, being more particularly described as:
Council File # 09-231
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
ST ANTHQNY PARK NORTH LOT 4 B�K 16 and ST ANTHONY PARK NORTH
LOTS 5 6 AND LOT 7 BLK 16
be and is hereby rezoned from RM1 to TN2.
Section 2.
This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days from and after its passage,
approval and publication.
�UBL►SH�p
AP� i � 100�
e
Cader
Harns
0
�
Adopted by Council: Date: �������
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary
�
Date:
Requested by Department of:
Plann' and c nomi evelopment
By:
Approved by Financial Services
�
Form Appr ved by City Attorney
BY: � ✓ � �+^�--- 2 —ll--
Approyed b, ayo f r Subm' s'on to Council
B '�� �'����
�U
QpR i 3 i�a�
BY:
�
09-231
Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sfieet Green Sheet Green Sheet
�C�
Departmentlpffice/Council: Date Initiated:
PE _Planning & Economic 05-FEB-09 Green Sheet NO: 3066716 �
Development
ConWCt Person & Phone: Deoartment Sent To Person InitiallDate
Patricia James � 0 lanniu & Economic Develo me [ a�
�639 1 jPlannioa & Economic Develoome De arhnent D'vector
Assign 2 Attorn � Z- - d1
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Date): Number g or's Office Ma or/Assistant
For
Routing 4 ounc� �
Dot. Type:ORDINANCE Order 5 ' Clerk C5 Clerk
E-Docume�t Required: N
Document ConWct:
ConWCt Phone:
Total # of Signature Pages (Clip All Lowtions for Signature�
Action Requested:
Adopt ordinance memorializing City Council action approving the rezoning from RMI Multiple-Family Residentia] to 1'N 2-
Traditional Neighborhood for property at 1449-1465 Cleveland AvenueN. between Hendon & Buford (ZF# 08-201-656). Public
hearing held February 4, 2009.
Reco mendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Foilowing Questions:
Planning Commission 1 Has this personlfirm ever worked under a contract for this department?
CIB Committee Yes No
Civil Service Commission 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a city employee?
Yes No
3 Does this personlfirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current City employee� .
Yes No
Explain a0 yes answers on separate sheet and attach to green sheet.
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
The Chwch of St. Andrew Kim has petitioned to rezone this property to TN2 to accommodate [he purchase and re-use of the property
by the Emily Program. The City Council approved the rezoning of Febivary 4, 2009, aRer a public hearing.
Advantages If Approved:
Rezoning ordinance will be adopted per City Council in[ent. .
Disadvantages If Approved: �y�;;c � �
None
FES 10 ?C�e�
Disadvantages tf Not Approved: ��fJ ����� ��
City Council action will not be completed. � A��
Total qmount of '
Transaction' Cost/Revenue Budgeted:
Funding Source: Activity Number:
Financial I nformation:
(Explain)
February 5, 200912:52 PM Page 1
DEPAR7MENT OF PLANNING &
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Cecr[e Bedor, Omector
�
r,�-a3r
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Christapher B Co[eman, Mayor
January 13, 2009
Ms. Mary Erickson
City Council Research O�ce
Room 310 City Hall
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
Dear Ms. Erickson:
25 Wesi Fourtfi Street
Sa+nt Pau1, � 55102
Te7ephone 651-266-6700
Facsrmde. 657-228-3220
I wouid like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council has been rescheduled from
Wednesday, January 21, 2009, to February 4, 2009, for the following zoning case.
Zoning File Number:
Fife Name:
Applicant:
Address:
Purpose:
08-201-656
Church of St. Andrew Kim (Emily Program)
Church of St. Andrew Kim
1465 Clevefand Ave N, between Hendon & Buford
Rezoning from RM1 Multiple-Family Residential to TN 2-Traditional
Neighborhood
Previous Action:
Zoning Committee Recommendation: approval, 5- 0- 0, December 11, 2008
Planning Commission Recommendation: approval, unanimous, December 19, 2008
I have confirmed this day with Councilmember Stark's office. My understanding is that this
public hearing request will appear on the Council agenda on or before the January 28, 2009,
City Council meeting and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legal
Ledger. Please call me at 651-266-6639 if you have any questions.
Si rely,
Patricia James
City Planner
cc: File #: Q8-201-656
ApplicanUAppellant: Church of St. Andrew Kim
Ms Lindsay Brown
Paul Dubruiel
Wendy Lane
Carol Martineau
Allan Torstenson
NOTiCE OF RESCHEDUI�D -
PUBLIC HEeYRING ,
The Saint Paul City Cotatcff will con-
duct a public hearing on Wednesday, Feb-
ruary 4, 2009 (originally scheduled for
January 21) at 5:30 p.m. in the City
Conncil Chambers, Third Floor, City
HallJCoiutliouse, 15 West Kellog� Boule-
vard, St. Paul, MN, to consider the appli-
cation of Church of St. Andrew Kun to re-
wne property at 1465 Cleveland Avenue
North, beriveen.Hendon and Buford Ave-
nues, from RMl Mulflple-�an�ily Residen-
tial to TN2-17aditional Neighborhood. [ZF
OS-201-656] -
Dated: January 13, 2009 ,
MARY ERICKSON
ass�st�t c��y ca,�� s�e�y
, (Januasy 19]
—ST. PAULLEGALI�DGER
22189704
AN AFFIRMAITVE ACTION EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNMG &
ECOtdOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Cecrle Bedor, Orrecmr
� itsr
+ L e.
��
11AAA
CITY OF SA]Nf PAUL
Christopher B. Coleman, Mayor
January 12, 2009
Ms. Mary Erickson
City Council Research Office
Room 310 Cify Hall
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102
Re: Zoning File #:
File Name:
Applicant:
Address:
Purpose:
25 Wes! Fourlh Street
Samt Paul, MN 55l02
08-201-656
Church of St. Andrew Kim (Emily Program)
Q
Telephone: 65/-266-6700
Facsim<[e: 65/-228-3220
Church of St. Andrew Kim
1465 Cleveland Ave N, between Hendon & Buford
Rezoning from RM1 Multipie-Family Residential to TN 2-Traditional
Neighborhood
City Council Hearinq: Februarv 4. 2009, 5:30 q.m. Citv Council Chambers
• Staff Recommendation:
District Council:
Zoning Committee Recommendation:
Support:
. Opposition:
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Deadline for Action
Staff Assigned:
Approval
District 12 recommended approval
Approval, vote: 5 - 0
2 persons spoke in support and 1 letter was received.
0 persons spoke in opposition arad 0 letters were
received.
Approval, vote: unanimous
January 11, 2009, extended to March 12, 2009
Patricia James, 651-266-6639
Attachments: Planning Commission resolution: 08-57
Planning Commission minutes, December 19, 2008
Zoning Committee minutes, December 11, 2008
Deadline for Action Extension Letter
Correspondence received
Staff Report packet
cc: Zoning File 08-201-656
Applicant: Church of St. Andrew Kim
Ms Lindsay Brown, Emily Program
City Council Members
� District Council: 12
Wendy Lane
Larry Soderholm
Allan Torstenson
Peter Warner
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
�
�
LJ
city of saint paul
planning commis�ion resolution
file number o$-5�
date December 19. 2008
a�-a�i
WHEREAS, The Church of St. Mdrew Kim, File # 08-201-656, has applied for a rezoning from RM1
Multipie-Family Residential to TN 2-Traditionat Neighborhood under the provisions of � 61.801(b) of
the Saint Paul Legislative Code, on property located at 1449-1465 Cieveland Ave N, Parce�
Identification Number (PIN) 20292314�116, 2o2923140117, legally described as ST ANTNONY PARK
NORTH LOT 4 BLK 16 and ST ANTHONY PARK NORTH LOTS 5 6 AND LOT 7 BLK 16; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission, on December 11, 2008, held a public
hearing at which all persons present were given an opportunity to be heard pursuant to said
application in accordance with the requirements of � 61.303 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and
WHEREAS, the Saint Paul Pianning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its Zoning
Committee at the public hearing as substantially reflected in the minutes, made the following findings
of fact:
1. The Church of St. Andrew Kim owns the properties that are the subject of this application as
wel4 as a lot acsoss the alley from the main site that is also currentiy used for parking. The
Emily Program, a treatment program for peopie with eating disorders, seeks to purchase the
property and convert the church building to a community residential facility for sixteen (16)
residents, with licensing from the Minnesota Department of Human Services. They also wish
to use the building for offices and outpatient treatment. Re-use of the rectorylparsonage
building is stifl in the p{snning stages. Whi1e the Emi1y Program plans to purchase the smaller
parking lot across the aliey, they intend to convert the lot to open space. This small lot is
zoned R3 and could not be used as parking for the proposed use. It is therefore not a part of
this application.
2. The existing zoning (RM1) cannot accommodate the proposed uses for office and outpatient
services, although the community residential facility is permitted in the RM1 district subject to
approval of a conditional use permit. The TN2 zoning district is intended to foster a variety of
uses such as those proposed by the Emily Program. TN2 zoning is also consistent with the
way this area has developed, which includes a mix of residential densities, commercial
development, and the institutional campus use across Cleveland. Community residential
facilities are permitted in the TN2 district without a conditional use permit as long as all the
applicable conditions are met. The proposed facility for 16 residents meets all of the applicable
conditions of § 65.153.
3. The proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan (2002)
supports compatible mixed uses within single buildings {Policy 5.201). The proposed reuse of
the church building is consistent with the 2008 District 12 plan, which supports adaptive reuse
of historic buildings.
moved by Morton
seconded by
• in favor Unanimous
against
L�1-� 31
Zoning File # 08201-&56
Planning Commission ftesolution
Page 2 of 2
4. The proposed zoning is compatibie with the B2 zoning to the south and the University campus
across Cteveland in Falcon Heights, Uses permitted in the TfJ2 district are simiiar to
residential uses permitted in the RM1 Multiple Family Rssidential district and generally similar
to commercial uses permitted in the 82 Community Business district. Revisions fo the parking
lot will be reviewed fhrougli the site plan review process to address the impact of the new use
on adjacent properties, especially the single family properties across the alley to the west.
5. Because of the mix of uses in the-area, rezoning this property to TN2 would not constitute "spot
zoning,"�i.e. it woufd not establish a use cfassification inconsistent with the surrounding uses
and create an island of nonconforming use within a larger zoned district.
6. The petition for rezoning" was found to be sufficient on November 17, 2008: 16 parcels eligible;
11 parcels required; 72 parcels signed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Saint Paul Planning Commission recommends to
City Councii that the appiicafion of Church of Sf. Andrew Ki.m for a rezoning from RM1 Multiple-Famity
Residential to TN 2-Traditional Neighborhood for property at 1449-1465 Cieveland Ave N be
approved. -
�
•
•
�-a3 i
i city of safnt paul
planning commission resolution
file number o$-57
da�e December 19. 2008
WHEREAS, The Church of Sf. Andrew Kim, File # 08-201-656, has appiied for a rezoning from RM1
Multiple-Family Residential to FN 2-Traditional Neighborhood under the provisions of � 61.801(b) of
fi�e Saint Paul Legislative Code, on property located at 1449-1465 Clsveland Ave N, Parcel
Identification Num6er (PIN) 202923140'f 16, 2029239 40 7 17, legally described as S7 ANTHONY PARK
NORTH LOT 4 BLK 96 and ST ANTHONY PARK NORTH LOTS 5 6 AND LOT 7 BLK 16; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission, on December 11, 2008, held a putilic
hearing at which ai� persons present were given an opportunity fo be heard pursuant to said
application in accordance with the requirements of � 61.303 of the Sainf Paul Legislative Code; and
WHEREAS, the Saint Paui Planning Commission, based on the evidence presenfed to its Zoning •
Committee at the public hearing as substantiaily reflected in fhe minutes, made the following findings
of fact:
1. The Church of St. Andrew Kim owns the properties that are the subject of this application as
weil as a lot across the a(fey from the main site that is also currentiy used for parking. The
Emily Program,.a treatment program for people with eating disorders, seeks to purchase the
• property and convert the church buiiding fo a community residential facility for sixteen (16)
residents, with licensing from the Minnesoia Department ofi Human Services. They also wish
to use the building for offices and ouYpatient treatmenf. Re-use af the rectory/parsonage
building is still in the planning sfages. While the Emily P�ogram plans to purchase'the smaller
parking lot across the aliey, they intend to convert the lof fo open space. This small lot is
zoned R3 and could not be used as parking for the proposed use. It is therefore not a part of
� this application.
2. The existing zoning (RM1) cannot accommoclate the proposed uses for office and outpatient
services, although the community resideritiai facility is permitted in the RM1 district subject fo
approvai of a conditionai use permit. The TN2 zoning district is intended to foster a variety of
uses such as those proposed by the Emily Program. TN2 zoning is also consistent with the
way this area has devefoped, which includes a mix of residentiai densities, commercial
development, and the instifufiona� campus use across Cleveland. Communify residenfia.l
facilities are permitted in the TN2 district without a conditional use permit as tong as all the
appiicabte conditions are met. The proposed facility for 16 residents meets all of the appficable
conditions of § 65.153. �
3. The proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Pian (2042)
supporfs compatible mixed uses within single buildings (Policy 5.201). The proposed reuse of
the church building is consistent with fhe 2008 District 12 pfan, which supports adaptive reuse
of historic buildings.
moved by Ma�on
seconded by
� favor Unanimous
against
D% �3/ ,
•
�.
Saint Paul Planning Commission
City Hal] Conference Center
15 Kellogg Boulevard Wesf
Minutes December 19, 2008
.
A meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul was he(d Friday, December 19, 2008, at
830 a.m. in the Conference Center of City Hal I.
Commissioners
Present:
Commissioners
Absent:
Mmes. Donnelly-Cohen, Faricy, Morton; Smitten, Wencl; and
Nlessrs, Alton, Bellus, Gordon, Kramer, Margulies, Ne(son, and Wazd.
Mmes. *Lu, *PoRer, and Messrs. *Barrera, *Commers, *Goodlow, *Johnson,
and *Spaulding.
*Excused
Also Present: Larry Soderholm, Planning Administrator; Patricia James, Penelope Simison,
Josh Williams, and Sonja Butler, Department of Planning and Economic
Development staff; also, former Commissioner Dennis Rosemark.
T. Approval of minutes December 5, 2008. ,
MOTION: Comrrtissioner ponnelly-Cohen moved approval nfthe minutes ofDecember S,
2008. Commissioner Nelson seconded the motion. The mntion carried unnnimnus[y on a
vnice vote.
�
III.
Chair's Announcements
Chair Alton read a resolution thanking Dennis Rosemark, who served as a member of the Saint
Paui Planning Commission from 2006 through June 2008, when he became the City Council
Legislative Aide for Ward 3 and had to resign from the Commission.
MOTION: Commissioner Gardon moved approva! of the resaladion honoring Commissioner
Rosemark. Commissioner Kramer seconded the motion. The motion carrierl unanimously on
a voice vote.
Mr. Rosemark thanked the Commission and made a few comments about how much he is
learning from the direct day-to-day contact with citizens that he now has in the Council offices.
Planning Administrator's Announcements
Larry Soderhoam reported on pianning-related business at the City Council for last week,
including the adoption of the Parks and Recreation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, and their
agenda for next week, including the establishment of a Water Working Group.
•
1�, -
a� ���c
Ms. Simison stated that she will address this when the Implementation Section is7eviewed by the
Comprehensive Planning Committee, which is the next step in the process._
Chair Alton read the rules of procedure for the public hearing.
No one spoke and no additional written testimony was given at the meeting.
MOTTON: Commissioner ponnel[y-Cohen moved to clnse the public hearing, leave tke �ecord
open f6r wrinen testimony unti! noon on Monday, December 22, 2008, arid io refer the matter
back to the Comprehensive Planning Committee fnr review and recommendatiou.
Comtnissioner.Ward seconded Ihe motinu The motinn carried unanimously on a voice vot�
v.
VI.
Zoning Committee
NEW BUSIlYESS
#08-185-032 7ue1 Fairbanks Chemica! Dependenc�(Blair Av� —Conditional UsePermit for
hansitional housing facility with 6 residents and variance of required parking (3 spaces required,
1 space proposed). I754 Blair Avenue 68tweep Wheeler and Aldine.
(Sarah Zorn, 651/266-6570) •
MOTION: Commissinner Monon moved tlie Zoning Committee's recommendation 10 approve
f&e conditional use pe�miY wifh conditions. The mntion carried unanimously on a voice vote.
#08-�O1-b56 Church of St. Andrew Kim (Emily Program� — Rezoning form RIv11 Muitipie-
F�mily Residential to TN2 (Traditional Neighborhood). 1465 Cteveland Avenue North between
Hendon and Buford. (Patricia.lames, 651/266-6639)
MOTTON: Cammissioner Morton moved the'Zoning Commit[ee's recommendation tn approve
the rezoning. The motion carried unanimously on a voice vote
Comprehensive Ptanning Committee
Chair ponnelly-Cohen .
Percent for Public Art Ordinance —M update on 1he contents ofthe proposed ordinance.
(Josh N'illiams, 651/266-6d59J . �
Mr. Soderhoim reminded the Commission that Yung-Kang Lu, as the Commission's liaison to the
public art ptanning process, reported at the last meeting that the "Percent for Public Art"
ordinance was in a draftform and might be submitted to the City Counci[ for consideration soon,
The Commission asked for more informaEion about it and staff offered to provide it at this
meeting. Unfortunately, rteither of the two planners who have been invotved in the process was
available, so Mr. Soderholm asked Josh Williams to bring the draft ordinartce to the Gommission
today., Josh was at the most recenz meeting of the Ci 'ry stafF'working group, but he doesn'thave
much background on the whole issue. -
�
C�
�
Recorde and prepared by
Sonja Butler, Planning Commission Secre �en�,
planning and ficonomic Development Dep
Ciiy of Saint Paul
� guHet\Fleming�Decembel 19, 20�8
�/Z/�� �
ppproved f �D te)
1 �--- ,���
Mari�yn orter mission
Secretary of the Planning
d1 ���
•
RP�.,PCtfullv submitted,
D9-a � (
• MtiVUTES OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE
Thursday, December 71, 2pp8 _ 3:30 p,m.
C�tY Councii Chambers, 3rd Fioor
City Hat! and Court �iouse
15 Wesf Ketlogg BQylevard
PRESENT: Aiton, Faricy, Gordon, Kramer, and Morton
EXCUSED: Donneily-Cohen and Johnson
STAFF: Patricia James, Caroi Martineau, and Peter Warner
The meeting was chaired by Commissioner Morton.
Church of Sf. Andrew Kim (Emiiy program� _ 08-201-656 - Rezoning from RM1 Multiple-Famity
Residential to TN 2-Traditional Neighborhood, 1465 Cleveland Ave N, between Hertdon & Buford
Patricia James presented the staff report with a recommendation of a
James also stated District 12 recommended approval, and there was one letter in su
pproval for the rezoning Patricia
oPPasition.
pport, and no letters in
Dirk Miller, the appficant, explained the purpose of the Emify Program and wh ihe
went on to say there would eventually be approximately 60 full and part time em lo ees.
explained that they treat patients from 13 to 65 years of age; although no one younger than 16 ye s old
would stay at the facility, P Y Mr. Miller a(so
• exp a ed Em P ogram rsow a Anaa Wes�n H useaa�d thatH has be n uge asset to the
community. Most clients come from Minnesofa; a few will come from out-of-state.
Mr. Miller, the applicant, stated they have a medical provider on-site twenty-four hours a day and they Work .
principaliy with Fairview Riverside Hospital, along with ali the major hospitals. He also stated the program
could accommodaYe mafe as weli as female residents.
Jae Kelly, 2650 University Ave., stated he was in support of the program. There is a need for more
resources like this for people with eating disorders. The Emi(y Program is a good neighbor.
Eric Galaiz, 9472 Raymond Ave. stated he supported the program, provided the City required a site plan
review, wh]ch he understands wil! be required by staff in the Department ofi Safety and Inspections. He aiso
submitted a ietter for the record.
The public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Richard Kramer moved approval of the rezoning. Commissioner Carols �aricy seconded the
motion.
The motion passed by a vote of 5-0-0.
Adopted Yeas - 5 Nays - 0 Abstained - 0
Drafted by; �u�mitted by q
�� � pproved by:
�—_�3� "_ d ^ � ,/i y>- �
� arol Martineau Patricia James -�
ecordin Secreta Gladys orton
g �l Zoning Sectron Chair
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNMG &
ECONOMIC DEVEL04MENT
Cecrle Bedor �irector
Q
Q J —�� �
CITY OF SA1NT' PAUL
Christopher B. Coleman, Mayor
L�
�
December 23, 2008
25 West Fourth Streel Telephone: 651-166-6700
SaintPaut,MN55/02 � Facsim+le:651-228-3220
Church Of Saint Andrew Kim The Emily Program
1850 Miss River B1vd S Attn: Ms Lindsay-Brown
St Paul MN 55116-2644 2265 Como Avenue
St Paul MN 55108
RE: Zoning File # 08-201-656, Church of St. Andrew Kim (Emily Program)
Dear Rev. Paul C. H. Lee:
On November 12, 2008, you applied to rezone property at 1465 Cleveland Ave N. After a public
hearing by the Saint Pau! Pfanning Commission's Zoning Committee on December 11, 2008;
the Commission voted to recommend approvai recommended of your request on December 19,
2008. �
The Planning Commission's recommendation is being fiorwarded to the CiCy Councii for their
action. Minnesota Statutes 15.99 requires that all city action on zoning applications be
compieted within 60 days of the date the application is made; but ailows the City to extend this
period for an additional 60 days (total of 120 days). In order to accommodate the City Council
public hearing on your rezoning, which is also required by state {aw, the City of Saint Paut is
hereby extending the deadiine for action from January 11, 2009, (original 60 day deadline) to
March 12, 2009 (additional 6� day deadline). The City Council public hearing on this rezoning
has been scheduled for January 21, 2009.
Please contact me at 651-266-6639 or patricia.james@ci.stpaul.mn.us if you have questions.
Sin, rely,
. �
Patricia James
City Planrier
cc: File# 08-201-656
Zoning Administrator
License Inspector
District 12 Community Council
AN AFF3RIv3ATSVE ACTTON EQ13AL OPPORTUNiTY EMPLOYER
o9-�3i
St Ant6ony Park Community Conncil/Disttict cz
Sqo Cxomwell Avenue. Saint Paul, � SSIi4
6 5 1 � 6 49 - 599 2 '� 651�649-5993 F^X R'R'wsapcc.org
Novembet 17, 2008,
Patricia James
Planning and Economic Development
25 West Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Ms. James,
ST. ANTHON
' `1 r
E
� ✓ 4
��' DIS�
I am writing to eacpress the support of the St. Anthony Pazk Community Council for the
Emily Program's application to rezone the church properties at 1445 Cleveland. The
Boazd of Directors passed the following resolution on November 13�':
"The $APCC recorrimends approval of the Emily Program's request to rezone the St.
Andrew Kim Church property from RMI to TN2. As part of the site plan review process,
we recommend that the city look at the screening, circulation and Zighting issues in
response fo n'eighbor's concerns. " �
The SAPCC is excited to welcome the Emily Program's residential prograzn into the
neighborhood. I send thanks for your consideration.
Sincerely,
`�� _
Renee Lepreau
Community.Organizer
•
�
Cc: Emily Progam, Councilmember Stark •
o�-a ��
n
u
Eric Galatz and Lisa Tiegel
1472 Raymond Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55108
Ms. Lindsay Brown
The Emily Program
2265 Como Avenue Suite 100
St. Paul, MN 55108
November 10, 2008
Re: Application for Rezoning of 1445, 1449, and 1465 Cleveland Avenue
Deaz Lindsay:
Enclosed is the executed Consent of Adjoining Property Owners for a Rezoning you requested.
As we discussed on several occasions, we think The Emily Program is a good fit for the site and
the neighborhood. We do, however have concerns about the existing condition of and use of the
site; mostly relaring to the pazking lot, which we expect The Emily Program will address. Our
consent to the rezoning of 1445, 1449, and 1465 Cleveland Avenue North from RM1 to TN2 to
•, accommodate the redevelopment of that property from a church to a community residential
facility for the treatment of eating disorders, with outpatient services, is based on our analysis of
the St. Paul zoning ordinance, as set out below. If the proposed development does not conform
our interpretation of the zoning ordinance, we may withdraw our consent. W e are asking only
what the St. Paul Code of Ordinances requires, so we hope none of the following wil] be
controversiai.
SUMMARY
The following is a suinmary of the conditions of our consent to the rezoning. A more detailed
discussion of each condition follows.
1. No parking at 1456 Raymond Avenue. We appreciate that The Emily Program has not
included 1456 Raymond Avenue in its application for rezoning and understand The Emily
Program will remove the existing asphalt paved parking lot and use the site for a private garden.
2. Site Plan Review for 1445,1449, and 1465 Cleveland Avenue. In addition to rezoning, we
expect that the City will subject the project to Site Plan Review, and require The Emily Program
to comply with the Code requirements applicable to parking lots in TN-2 districts.
3. Access to the parking lo� We expect that the existing access to the Cleveland Avenue
parking lot from the alley will be eliminated or substantially reduced. If the City permits The
• Emily Program to use the alley for access at all, we expect the access will be one-way in and
one-way out, with traffic directed to and from Buford Avenue.
5679359v1
a
��1-a31 �
4. Setbacks. Secrion 63.312 requires a 4-foot landscaped setback from the alley. +
5. Visual Screening.
a. Ma�cimum height fence (6.5 feet) aiong fhe alley and up the norfh side of 1465
Cleveland, to screen headlights as much as possible.
b. Because the slope of the site makes it virtually unpossible to. screen headligfits
from second story bedroom windows with a fence, The Emily Program should be required to
plant trees that will mitigate the headlights, in addition to the fence.
c. The Emily Program's stated intent to conduct most of its visiting and out-patient
business during ordinary business hours, with the only anticipated traffic at night being a shift
change involviag two or three staff inembers coming and going azound 11:00 p.m. should be a
condition of Site Plan Review approval.
6. Landscaping. We expect The Emily Program will be required to comply with Section
63314, which requires that "Iandscaping shall be provided to buffer the facility from adjacent
properties and from the public right-of-way; reduce the visual glare and heat effects of large
expanses of pavement; and provide areas for the retention and absorption of stormwater runoff."
7. Lighting. We expect The Emily Program will be required to replace the exisring unshielded
pazking lot lighting with lighting that conforms with Section 63.116, which requires that outdoor
lighting be "shielded to reduce glaze and shall be so arranged as to reflect lights away from all
adjacent residentia] districts or adjacent residences in such a way as not to exceed three (3) �
footcandles measured at the residence dish boundary"
8. Required Parking. The City should require The Emily Program to provide no more than the
minimum pazking ailowed by the Code.
Discussion
The following is a more detailed discussion of the conditions the St. Paul Code of Ordinances
imposes on the redevelopment of the property:
1. No parkmg at 1456 Raymond Avenue. We understand the City plamiing staff and The
Emily Prograzn agree that the Code does not permit pazking for a commercial TN-2 use in an R
district. We appreciaYe that The Emily Program has not includeti 1456 Raymond Avenue in iYs
application for rezoning. We understand The Emily Program will remove the exisring asphalt
paved paddng lot from 1456 Raymond Avenue and, in the short term, will plant grass or sod,
with the Tong term plan of plantirig and using the site for a private gazden for its residents.
2. Site Plan Review for 1445, 1449, and 1465 Cleveland Avenue. In addition to rezoning, we
expect that the City will subject the project to Site Plan Review, and require The Emily Program
fo comply with the Code requirements applicable to pazking Yots in TN-2 dish Site Plan
Review is required, and appropriate, because (1) The rezoning will allow The Emily Program to
replace a Church, which generated traffic almost exclusively on Sunday mornings and Chrishnas
Eve with a commercial use that will operate yeaz-round, 24 hours per day, 7 days per vzeek, and •
(2) the renovarion will increase the gross square footage of the e�sting building. It is especially
5679359v1
b�.- (
• important to subject the project to site plan review because, once the property is rezoned, fhe
uses The Emily Progtam proposes for the site are Permitted Uses and the development will not,
therefore, be subject to further review as a Conditional Use.
3. Access to the parking lot. We expect that the existing access to the Cleveiand Avenue
pazking lot from the alley will be eliminated or substantially reduced. The current parking lot is
completely�open to the alley.
a. T'he existing parking lot is not a lawful nonconforming use and should not be
allowed to continue. Even if ttie existing lot was a lawful nonconforming use, The Emily
Program will intensify the use from Sundays and Christian holidays to all day, every day
commercial use.
b. Code Section 63.310 prohibits access to a commercial parking lot from a
residential alley "except where the applicant can establish, in the review of a site plan
applicarion, that allowance of alley access wouid not create or aggravate an unsafe condition and
one (1) or more of the following conditions exist:
"(1) Alternatives to alley access are unsafe due to traffic volumes, traffic speeds,
proximity to an intersection, steep slopes, a blind pedestrian crossing, or some other
unsafe condition;
• "(2) The location of existing shuctures on the property prohibits access to the street;
"(3) A comprehensive plan or a neighborhood plan approved by the city council
recommends that new off-street parking facilities be located in the rear of development
sites or discourage additianal curb cuts or driveways across sidewalks; or
"(4) The number ofparking spaces in the off-street parking facility is seven (7) or less."
c. We understand (without conceding) that the City may determine that access from
the alley does not "create or aggravate an unsafe condition" and access to and from Cleveland
Avenue is unsafe. If the City makes that determination, the City should at least limit the number
of openings into the alley.
d. All pazking lot circulation should be restricted to the parking lot. The Emily
Program plans provide two drive lanes perpendiculaz to the alley. To get from one lane to the
other, a driver will have to use the alley for circulation. If the City allows access from the alley
at all, the City should limit the access to one opening (or separate one way "in" and one way
"ouY' openings) and require that ali circulation from parking space to parking space be contained
within the property lines.
e. Parldng lot access and egess should be restricted to Cleveland Avenue, If the
City nevertheless allows access from the alley, alley access should come and go from the closest
street, Buford Avenue. The City imposed this condition on Corpus Christi Church in the 1980s
after the fact, when Corpus Christi tore down their rectory and bnilt the parking lot without
p_e_rmits and without complying with then-cunent development standards. There is a"No Right
• Turn" sign in the alley, facing the Cleveland Avenue parking lot. The configuration of the island
between the parking lot and alley and additional signage should reinforce this requirement. This
5679359v1
C 5'- a 3 �
condition should encourage traffic from outside the neighborhood to use Buford and Cleveland, �
where a h light controls the intersection. .It also limits the burden of the additional traffic to
the south end of the alley. The north end is already burdened by a nonconforming (and possibly
unlawful) commercial parldng iot that backs directly into the alley.
4. Setbacks. Section 63.312 requires a 4-foot landscaped setback from the alley.
5. Visual Screening. Section 63313 requires that, in "off-street parking faciliries which adjoin
or abut across an alley, a residenrial use or zoning district, a visual screen shall be provided and
maintained as required in section 63.114, Visual screens." Section 63.114 requires a screen "of
sufficient height and density to visually separate the screened activity from adjacent property."
,
a. The slope of the pazking lot is such that the head lights of a car at the east end of
the site (near Cleveland Avenue) is at eye level with the second floor bedroom windows of the
houses across the alley. While the property has been operated as a Church, this nuisance has
been limited to occasional evening events. Once The EmiIy Program begins operafions, there
will be cars coming and going for eazly evening progruns and late-night shift changes e�
ni l t•
b. The slope of the site makes it virtually impossible to screen the headlights
completely with a consiructed screen unless The Emily Program builds up the west end of the
site to level the pazking lot. We understand this may not be economically feasible. In the •
altemafive, The Emily Program should be required to plant a landscaped screen that will mirigate
the headlights, in addition to constructing an opaque screen around tha pazldng lot tq the
maacimum allowed height, which is 6.5 feet. The screen should include the backyazd of 1465
Cleveland Avenue, which is a pazking area and access to a gazage under the existing residential
structure on that property, which shucture The Emily Program also proposes to convert to
commercial use.
c. The City could further mifigate the impact of headlights by imposing limits on
hours of operarion. We understand that The Emily Program intends to conduct most of its
visiring and out-patient business during ordinary business hours, with the only anticipated traffic
at nighY being a shift change involving two or three sYaff meanbers coming and going around
11:00 p.m. Those lunits should be a condition of Site Plan Review approval.
6. Landscaping. Section 63314 requires that "landscaping shall be provided to buffer the
facility from adjacent properties and from the public right-of-way; reduce the visual glaze and
heat effects of large expanses of pavement; and provide areas for the retention and absorprion of
stormwater runoff." As discussed above, the landscaping should include trees that can be
expected to g�ow to twenty feet ar more to block head lights into the second stories of the homes
across the alley.
7. Lighting. Section 63.116 requires that "All outdoor Iighting in ail use disiricts, incIuding off-
street pazking facilities, shall be shielded to reduce glaze and shall be so arranged as to reflect
lights away from aIl adjacent residential districts or adjacent residences in sucfi a way�as not to •
exceed three (3) footcandles measured at the residence distaict boundary" and "All lighting in all
5679359v1
�� �,� r
• districts used for the external illuznination of buildings shall be placed and shielded so as not to
interfere with the vision of persons on adjacent highways or adjacent property." The existing
parking lot is lit by unshielded flood lights mounted on the side of the building, which shine in
the eyes of drivers in the aliey and into the residential backyards. We expect The Emily Program
will be required to replace the exisring lighting with lighring that conforms with the zoning
ordinance.
8. Required Parking. The City shouid require The Emily Program to provide no more than the
minimum parking allowed by the Code.
a. The Emily Program proposes to provide a residential ireatment center for 16
residents and related office uses in about 8000 square feet of space in the Church building and
another 2100 square feet in the residential structure at 1465 Cleveland Avenue.
b. Section 66341 allows parking for a maximum of 10% more than Chapter 63
requires, and for properties fronting on a transit street, such as Cleveland Avenue, allows a 25%
reduction of parking requirements.
c. Chapter 63 requires one parking space for every 2 residents in a residential
treatment facility and 1 space for Z50 square feet of office space.
• The most pazking The Emily Program is required to provide is, therefore:
(16/2) + (8000 + 2100)/250 = 8 + 10,100/250 = 8 + 44 = 49 cars
The least pazking The Emily Program is required to provide is, therefore:
49x0.75=37.
In light of the facts that the bus stops in front of the building and many of the staff inembers also
work at 2265 Como Avenue and can pazk there and either walk or carpool between the facilities,
we strongly recommend that The Emily Program provide the minimum parking required.
CONCLUSION
According to Section 66.313, the intent of TN-2 zoning "is to foster and support compact,
pedestrian-oriented commercial and residential development that, in turn, can support and
increase transit usage. It encourages, but does not require, a variety of uses and housing types,
with careful attention to the amounzt and placement ofparking and transitions to adjacent
residential neighbarhoods." We support the proposed rezoning from RM-1 to 1'N-2 because we
support the higher density, transit oriented goals TN zoning intends to support and we think The
Emily Program fits well with TN goals. Our support depends on The Emily Progam complying
with TN development standards.
.
5679359v1
�
r1
LJ
For your convenience, I axn attaching my Zoniag Analysis, with copies of the relevant Code
sections
•
�
Sb79359v1
o����
�
The Emily Project Zoning Analysis
Assumptions
•
�
Exisring zoning:
Existing Use:
Proposed zoning:
Proposed Use:
RM-1.
Church
TN-2
Community Residenrial; licensed human service
Residential treahnent center for 16 residents
Out pafient treatment
Reason for rezoning: The proposed Community Residential use is a condirional use in the
existing RM-1 district and offices for outparient treahnent are not allowed
Effect of rezoning:
Improvements
Existing
Improvements
Exisring
in the existing district at all.
Both proposed uses will be permitted uses.
Other uses that are conditional uses in the RM-1 district and are permitted
in the TN-2 district include: Roominghouse, boarding house; Hospice;
Dormitory; and Fratemity, sorority
Other uses that are not permitted at all in the RM-1 district and are
condirional uses in the 1'N-2 district include: Commercial Offices,
generally; Medical Offices, generally; Retail, generally; Restaurant; Brew
pub; Tattoo shop; and Tobacco shop
The existing improvements consist of (1) a 8865 square foot, wood
framed, stone clad church building, with a first floor sanctuary and below
grade meeting rooms, classrooms, and offices, and (2) an asphalt paved
parking lot that slopes from Cleveland Avenue to a north-south public
alley. There is no landscaping, screening curbs, or other barriers between
the a11ey and the parking lot. The property on the west side of the alley is
zoned R-3.
The existing parking lot is nonconforming and is not a legal
nonconforming use. The existing pazking lot was expanded in or azound
1988 without permits and without conforming with then-current zoning
ordinances.
Current nonconformities include (1) lack of visua] screening between the
parking lot, the residential properties to the west, (2) access from the alley
to the parking, and (3) unshielded exterior lighting that shines outside the
property lines.
5679359v1
��(-�3i
�
Proposed The developer proposes to expand the finished floor azea of the exisring
building by constructing a second floor within the existing sanctuary to
accommodate 16 bedrooms. °
Code Analysis
1. Because We proposed uses are permitted uses after rezoning, the only approval
required other than rezoning will be site plan review:
Sec. 61.402. Site plan review (all districts).
(a) Plan to be submitted. A site plaK shall be submitted_to and approved by the
planning commission before a pernut is issued for grading or the erection or
enlargement ofgross floor area for any development except one- and two-family
dwellings, but including the following:
(4) Any development in a TN distric�
(10) All off-streetparkingfacilities except as noted in section 63.202.
Sec. 63.302. Site plan review.
A site plan shall be submitted for review as outlined in section 6I.402. In addition, the •
following shall be submitted:
(a) , Qwnership of a11 lots or parcels intended for use as pazldng;
(b) Indication of structures or facilities to be served by the off-street parking facility;
and
(c) Location and direction of drainage for stormwater runoff.
2. Access from the alley to the parking lot is prolubited.
See. 63310. Entrances and exits.
Adequate entrances and eacits to and from the pazlang facility shal] be provided by means
of clearly defined and limited drives.
( fl Alley access from nonresidential property. Enh and e7cits to and from all off-
street pazking faciliries which are locateii on land in nonresidential zoning dish and
which abut residenrially zoned land across an alley shall be denied a1Tey access except ,
where the applicant can establish, in the review of a site plan application, that allowance
of alley access would not create or aggravate an unsafe condition and one (1) or more of
the following conditions elcist:
(1) Alternatives to alley access are unsafe due to traffic volumes, traffic speeds,
proximity to an intersection, steep slopes, a blind pedestrian crossing, or some
other unsafe condition;
(2) The locafion of existing structures on the property prohibits access to the
street; •
5679359v1
o�-���
� (3) A comprehensive plan or a neighborhood plan approved by the city council
recommends that new ofF street parking facilities be located in the rear of
development sites or discourage additional curb cuts or driveways across
sidewalks; or
(4) The number of pazking spaces in the off-street parking facility is seven (7) or
less.
3. Site plan standards require a landscaped setback from the alley and visual
screening.
Sec.63312. Setback.
Except as otherwise provided in section 66. 442{c) or section 66.431(b) off=street parking
spaces shall not be within a required front or side yard and shall be a minimum of four
(4) feet frnm any lot line. ...
Sec. 63313. Visual screening.
For off-street parking facilities which adjoin or abut across an alley, a residential use or
zoning district, a visual screen shall be provided and maintained as required in section
63.114, Visual screens.
Sec.63314. Landscaping.
. For any parking facility, other than a parking garage, landscaping shall be provided to
buffer the facility from adjacent properties and from the public right-of-way; reduce the
visual glare and heat effects of large expanses of pavement; and provide areas for the
retention and absorpfion of stormwater runoff. All required yards and any
underdeveloped space shall be landscaped using materials such as trees, shrubs, sod or
groundcover plants. Any landscaped area shall be planted and maintained in accordance
with section 63.115, Landscaping and plant materials. All parking and loading areas
(including drive-through facilities, outdoor auto sales and rental, pump island service
areas and stacking spaces) adjoining public streets or sidewalks shall provide:
(a) A landscaped yard at least 4 feet wide along the public street or sidewalk. If vehicles
may overhang the yard, an additional three (3) feet of width shail be provided.
(b) In all districts except industrial districts, screening shall be provided consisting of a
masonry wall or decorative fence (not including chain link) supplemented with landscape
material, forming a screen a minimum of three (3) feet in height, a masimum of four and
one-half (4 1/2) feet in height, and not less than 50 percent opaque.
(c) In addition to perimeter landscaping, pazking lots for more than fifty (50) cars shall
contain planted islands. As a minimum, one (1) square foot of landscaped area shall be
provided for every ten (10) square feet of paving.
(d) A fast-food restaurant that is not part of a retail strip centet shall provide, as a
minimum, one and one-half (1.5) square feet of landscaped area for every ten (10) square
feet of paving.
• Sec.63.318. Lighting.
5679359v1
� a��,
All pazking facilities shall be illuminated to a level to a11ow safe, secure access to the •
pazking facility and within it. Light fixtures on the top level of pazking struchues shal� be
set back from the edge so tkat they are not visible from fhe adjoining street. AlT parking
facility illumination shail conform to the provisions of section 63.116, exterior lighting.
TN2 Development Standards
63.110 General Design Standards.
66343 (b)(21} Parking lot lighting. Pedeshian-scale lighting shall be provided within
pazking azeas. Light standazds shall be nine (9) to twelve (12) feet in height and have a
downcasf glow.
Sec. 63.114. Visual sereens.
(a) Wherever a visual screen is required by Yhis cocie, it shall be of sufficient height and
density to visually sepazate the screened activity from adjacent property. The screen may
consist of various fence materials, earth berms, plant materials or a combination thereof.
(b) Whenever visual screens aze required, for the uses below, the following sfandazds
shall apply.
(1) Height regulations;
TABLE TNSET:
Use Minitnum Height Masimum Height
Off-street pazking 4 ft. 6 in. 6.5 ft.
Outdoor storage 6 ft. --
Recycling drop-off sYarion 6 ft. --
Recycling collection center 6 ft. --
Recycling processing center 8 ft. --
Mator vehicle salvage operation 8 ft. --
Hospital, ambulance and delivery areas 6$. 8.0 $.
Utilitybuilding, stations and substarions 6 ft. 8.0 ft.
Sec, 63.116. Exterior lighting.
(a) AlI outdoor Iighting in all use districts, including off-street pazking faciIities, sha1I be
shielded to reduce glare and sha�l be so arranged as to reflect lights away from all
adjacent residential distr'tcts or adjacent residences in such a way as not to exceed three
(3) footcandles measured aY fhe residence district boundary.
(b) All lighting in all districts used for the extemal illumination of buildings shall be
placed and shielded so as not to interfere with the vision ofpersons on adjacent highways
or adjacent property.
(c) Illmnination of any other outdoor feahue shall be maintained statio�ary and constant
in intensity and color at all tisnes when in use.
Sec, 63.202. Site plan required.
•
C�
5679359v1
oy���
• A site plan approved by the planning commission shall be required for the establishment
of a new off=street parking facility, for the paving of an unimproved off-street parking
facility and for the repaving of an off-street pazking facility whose existing paved surface
is removed. These facilities shall meet all standards and regulations for parking faciliries
and site plans contained in this zoning code, and ali paving shall require a buitding pennit
pursuant to chapter 33 of the Legislative Code. A site plan shall not be required when a
new coating is applied over an existing paved surface. Site plans for one- to four-family
dwellings may be approved by the zoning administrator.
Sec. 62.108. Change of tenancy or ownership.
There may be a change of tenancy, ownership or management of any existing
nonconforming uses of land, stnxchues, and premises and nonconforming structures with
conforming uses provided there is no change in the nature or character of such
nonconforming use or structure.
4. Parking CANNOT exceed 48 spaces; may be reduced to 33
i/2 x 16 Residents = S
1 space per 250 sq. ft. GFA; 8865 sf = 35 spaces
Sec. 66.341. Required conditions in TNl--TN2 traditional neighborhood districts.
(a) Amountofparking.
• (1) The minimum amount of required parking shall be as specified in 63.
(2) The maximum amount of surface parking shall not exceed the specified minimum by
more than ten (10) percent or two spaces, whichever is greater. If additional parking is
desired, it must be placed underground, within an enclosed building, or in a tuck-under
garage.
(3) For properties having frontage on a transit street, as defined, the minimum amount of
required off-street parking for nonresidential uses, as specified in chapter 63, may be
reduced by up to twenty-frve (25) percent.
•
5679359v1
�-a� I
Our consent to the rezoning of 1445 Cieveland Avenue North from RMl to T'N2 to
accommodafe the redevelopment of that property from a church to a coinmunity residential
facility for the treatment of eating disorders, with outpatient services, is bas,ed on our analysis of
the St. Paul zoning ordinance, as set out below. If St. Paul Planning and Economic Development
staff does not confirm our interpretation of the zoning ordinance, we may withdraw our consent.
Assumptions
Existing zoning:
Existing Use:
Proposed zoning:
Proposed Use:
RM-1.
Church
T'N-2
Community Residential; licensed hutnan service
Residentiat treatment center for 16 residents
Out patient treahnent
Reason for rezoning: The proposed Community Residentiai use is a conditionat use in the
existing RM-1 district and offices for outparient treahnent are not allowed
in the existing district at all.
Effect of rezoning: Both proposed uses will be pernutted uses.
Improvements
Existing
Other uses that are condirional uses in the RM-1 dishict and are permitted
in the TN-2 districY include: Roominghouse, boazding house; Hospice;
Dormitory; and Fratemity, sorority
Other uses tha! are not permitted at all in the RM-1 district and are
condifional uses in the'I'N-2 district include: Commercial Offices
generally; Medical Offices, generally, Retaii, generally; Restaurant; Brew
pab; Tattoo shop; and Tobacco shop _
The existing improvements consist of (1) a 8865 square foot, wood
framed, stone clad church building, with a first floor sanctuary and below
grade meeting rooms, classrooms, and offices, and (2) an asphalt paued
pazldng lot that slopes from Cleveland Avenue to a north-south public.
alley. There is no landscaping, screening, curbs, or other barriers between
the alley and the pazking lot. The pzoperty on the west side of the alley is
zoned R-3.
The exisring pazking lot is nonconforming and is not a legal
noncanfarming use. The existing parld"ng 1ot was expandad in or around
1988 without pernuts and without conforming with then-current zoning
ordinances.
�
u
•
5679359v1
t��-a��
�
Improvements
Existing
Proposed The developer proposes to expand ehe finished floor azea of the existing
building by construcring a second floor within the existing sanctuary to
accommodate 16 bedrooms.
Code Analysis
1. Because the proposed uses are permitted uses after rezoning, the only approval
required other than rezoning wfll be site plan review:
Current nonconformities include (1) lack of visual screening between the
parking lot, the residential properties to the west, (2) access from the alley
to the pazking, and (3) unshielded exterior lighting that shines outside the
property lines.
Sec. 61.4Q2. Site plan review (all districts).
(a) Plan to be submitted. A site plan shall be submitted ta and approved by the
planning commission before a permit is issued for grading or the erecrion or
enlargement ofgross floor area for any development except one- and two-family
dwellings, but including the following:
•
(IO) All off-street parking faciliries except as noted in section 63.202.
Sec. 63.302. Site plan revierv.
A site plan shall be submitted for review as outlined in seetion 6I.402. In addition, the
following shall be submitted:
(a) Ownership of all lots or parcels intended for use as parking;
(b) Indication of all structures or facilities to be served by the off=street parking facility;
and
(c) Location and direction of drainage for stormwater runoff.
(4) Any development in a TN district.
2. Access from the alley to the parking lot is prohibiYed.
Sec. 63.310. Entrances and exits.
Adequate entrances and exits to and from the pazking facility shall be provided by means
of clearly defined and limited drives.
•
( fl Alley access from nonresidential property. Entrances and exits to and from all off-
street parking faci2ities which aze located on land in nonresidentia] zoning districts and
which abut residentially zoned land aeross an alley shall be denied alley access except
where the applicant can establish, in the review of a site plan application, that aliowance
of ailey access would not create or aggravate an unsafe condition and one ( i) or more of
the following conditions exist:
5679359v1
� �`1-�31
(1) Altemarives to alley access are unsafe due to traffic volumes, traffic speeds, ,
proximify to an intersection, steep slopes, a blind pedestrian crossing, or some
other unsafe condition;
(2) The ]ocation of existing struchues on the property prohibits access to the
street;
(3) A comprehensive plan or a neighborhood plan approved by the city council
recommends that new off-street pazking facilities be located in the rear of
development sites or discourage addifional curb cuts or driveways across
sidewalks; or
(4) The number of pazking spaces in the off-street parldng facility is seven (7) or
less.
3. Site plan standards require a Iandscaped setback from tHe alley and visual
screening.
Sec.63.312. Setback.
Except as othenvise provided in secrion 66. 442(c) or section 66.431(b) off-street parldng
spaces shall not be within a required front or side yard and shaU be a minimum offour
(4) feet from any lot line. ...
Sec. 63.313. Visuat screening.
For off-street pazking facilities which adjoin or abut across an alley, a residential use or •
zoning districY, a visual screen shall be provided and maintained as required in section .
63.114, Visual screens.
Sec. 63314. Landscaping.
For any pazking facility, other than a pazking garage, landscaping shall be provided to
buffer the facility from adjacent properties and from the public right-of-way; reduce the
visuai glare and heat effects of large expanses of pavement; and provide areas for the
retenrion and absorption of stormwater runoff. All required yards and any
underdeveloped sgace shall be landscaped using materials such as trees, shrubs, sod or
groundcover plants. Any landscaped azea shall be planted and maintained in accordance
with section 63.115, Landscaping and plant materials. All parking and loading azeas
(including drive-tbrough facilifies, ontdoor auto sales and rental, pump island service
azeas and stacking spaces) adjoining public streets or sidewalks shall provide:
(a) A landscaped yazd at least 4 feet wide along the public street or sidewalk. If vehicles
may overhang the yazd, an additional three (3) feet of width shall be provided.
(b) In all districts except industdal districts, screening shall be provided consisting of a
masonry wall or decorarive fence (not including chain link) supplemented with landscape
material, forming a screen a minimum of three (3) feet in height, a maximum of four and
one-haIf (4 1/2) feet in height, and not Iess tYian 50 percent opaque.
(c) In addition fo perimeter landscaping, parking Iots for more than fifty (50) cars shall
contain planted islands. As a minimum, one (1) square foot of landscaped area sha�l be
provided£or every ten (10) squaze feet ofpaving. •
56793S9v1
�-:�i
i (d) A fast-food restaurant that is not part of a retail strip center shall provide, as a
minimum, one and one-half {1.5) squaze feef of landscaped area for every ten (IO) squaze
feet of paving. �
Sec.63.318. Lighting."
All pazking facilities shall be illuminated to a level to allow safe, secure access to the
pazking faciliry and within it. Light fixtures on the top level of pazking structures shall be
set back from the edge so that they aze not visible from the adjoining street. All parking
faciliry illumination shall conform to the provisions of section 63.116, exterior lighting.
TN2 Development Standards
63.110 General Design Standards.
b6343 (b)(21) Parking tot lighting. Pedestrian-scale lighting shall be provided within
pazking azeas. Light standards shall be nine (9) to twelve (12) feet in height and have a
downcast glow.
Sec. 63.114. Visual screens.
(a) Wherever a visual screen is required by this code, it shall be of sufficient height and
density to visually separate the screened activity from adjacent property. The screen may
consist of various fence materials, earth berms, plant materials or a combination thereof.
(b) Whenever visual screens are required, for the uses below, the following standards
shall apply.
• (1) Heightregulations:
TABLE INSET:
Use Minimurs Height Nfalcimum Aeight
Off-street parking 4 ft. 6 in. 6.5 ft.
Outdoor storage 6 ft. --
Recycling drop-off station 6 ft. --
Recycling collection center 6 ft. --
Recycling processing center 8 ft. --
Motor vehicle salvage oper�tion 8 ft. --
Hospital, ambulance and delivery areas 6 ft. 8.0 ft.
Utility building, stations and substarions 6 ft. 8.0 ft.
Sec. 63.116. Exterior lighting.
(a) All outdoor lighting in all use districts, including off-street parking facilities, shall be
shielded to reduce glare and shall be so arranged as to reflect lights away from all
adjacent residential districfs or adjacent residences in such a way as not to exceed three
(3) footcandles measured at the residence district boundazy.
• (b) All lighting in all districts used for the extemal illumination of buiidings shall be
placed and shielded so as not to interfere with the vision of persons on adjacent haghways
or adjacent property.
5679359v1
ZONING COMMITTEE STAFF REPORT ���� �
.
•
•
1. FILE NAME: Church of St. Andrew Kim (Emily Program)
2. APPLICANT: Church of St. Andrew Kim
3. l'YPE OF APPLICATION: Rezoning - Consent
FILE #: 08-201-656
HEARING DATE: December 11, 2008
4. LOCATION: 1449-1465 Gleveland Ave N, between Hendon & Buford
5. PIN & LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 202923140116, 202923140a 17; ST ANTHONY PARK
NORTH LOT 4 BLK 16; ST ANTHONY PARK NORTH LOTS 5 6 AND LOT 7 BLK 16
6. PLANNWG DISTRICT;12
7. ZONING CODE REFERENCE: § 66.313; § 66.321; § 61.801(b)
8. STAFF REPORT DATE: December 1, 2008
EXISTING ZONING: RM1
BY: Patricia James
9. DATE RECEIVED: November 12, 2008 60-DAY DEADLINE FOR ACTION: January 11, 2009
A. PURPOSE: Rezoning from RM1 Multiple - Family Residentiai to TN 2=7raditionai
Neighborhood.
B. PARCEL SIZE: 230 ft(Cleveland) x 150 ft. (Buford) = 34,500 sq. ft.
C. EXISTING LAND USE: Church, rectory, and parking lot
D. SURROUNDING LAND USE:
North: Student housing (RM1)
East: University of Minnesota campus (City of Falcon Heights)
South: Commercial uses (B2)
West: Single family residentiai (R3)
E. ZONING CODE CITATION: § 66.313 provides the intent of the TN2 zoning district; §
66.321 lists the principal uses permitted in traditionai neighborhood districts; §61.801(bj:
provides for changes to the zoning of property initiated by the property owner.
F. FfISTORYiDiSCUSStON: A site pian for the parking lot was approved in 1990 (Site Plan
File # 1698)
G. DISTRICT COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION: The District 12 Council has recommended
approval.
H. FINDINGS:
1. The Church of St. Andrew Kim owns the properties that are the.subject of this
application as well as a lot across the alley from the main site that is also currently used
for parking. The Emily Program, a treatment program for people with eating disorders,
seeks to purchase the property and convert the church buiiding to a community
residential facility for sixteen (16} residents, with licensing from the Minnesota
Department of Human Services. They also wish to use the building for offices and
outpatient treatment. Re-use of the rectory/parsonage building is stiN in the planning
stages. While the Emily Program plans to purchase the smaller parking lot across the
aHey, they intend to convert the lot to open space. This small lot is zoned R3 and could
not be used as parking for the proposed use. It is therefore not a part of this application.
2. The existing zoning (RM1) cannot accommodate the proposed uses for office and
outpatient services, although the community residential facility is permitted in the RM1
district subject to approvai of a conditional use permit. The TN2 zoning district is
intended to foster a variety of uses such as those proposed by the Emily Program. TN2
zoning is also consistent with the way this area has developed, v�nich inciudes a mix of
residential densities, commercial development, and the institutional campus use across -
Cleveland. Community residential facilities are permitted in the TN2 district without a
conditional use permit as long as all the applicable conditions are met. The proposed
fiacitity fior 16 residents meets alI of the applicable conditions of § 65.153.
Zo�ing File # 08-201-656
Zoning Committee Staff Report �
Page 2 of 2 Oc� _
3. .The proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Land Use Plan •
(2002) supports compatible mixed uses within single buildings (Policy 5201). The
proposed reuse of the church building is consistent with the 2008 District 12 plan, which
supports adaptive reuse of historic buildings.
4. The proposed zoning is compafible with the B2 zoning to the south and the University
campus across Cleveland in Falcon Heights. Uses permitted in the TN2 district are
similar to residential uses permitted in the RM9 Multipte Family Residential district and
generally similar to commercial uses permitted in the BZ Community Business district.
Revisions fo tfie parking lot wiil be reviewed through the site plan review procesa to
address the impact of the new use on adjacent properties, especially the single family
properties across the atley to the west.
5. Because of the mix of uses in the area, rezoning this property to TN2 would not
eonstitute "spot zoning," i.e. it wouid not establish a use classificafion inconsisfenf wifh
the surrounding uses and create an island of nonconforming use within a larger zoned
district.
6. The petition for rezoning was found to be sufficient on November 17, 2008: 16 parcels
eligible; 11 parcels required; 12 parcels signed.
I. STAFF RECOMMENDATION; Based on the above findings, staff recommends approval of
ffie rezoning from RM1 Multipie-Famiiy Residential to TN 2 Tradifional Neighborhood.
•
�
��-a�j
�
PETITION TO AMEND THE ZQNING CODE
Departmeni of PLanrzing and Economic Developmeni
Zoning Section
1400 Cuy Ha11 Anner
25 West Fourth Street
SaintPaul MN55702-I634
(651)266-6589
� �� 1
PropertqOwner T�nP_ Chu+-c4, o� �-�• }��rew -�'.m
Address 1�4,r7,�1`4'i� ���? �,rNea[u'tr� �cvPJnu.2 {�or�klti.
APPLICANT City S�-.pa.�+Q. St Zip 55tog DaytimePhone (e5l•428•q��o3
PROPERTY
LocnTTarr
Contact Person (if different) l'end� « L�rou�r� Phone 4�5t. �"1°t � lv 13'O
Address/LocationlN'is r��evetant� \+-1"c�l C1�e.vPlax�� 1�-}6�i C;Leurlan.t�.
LegalDescripfion \.015 yk�5 1�\oc� 1�� SF�. ltv��hvvw �a.vk. Nv�K.
��m4{ Cn�,�.nhu , 1ul�r�rr_so�e� CurrentZoning 1�Mt
(attach a�onal shee necessary)
TO TBE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNC7L:
Pursnant �fo Section 61.800 of the Saiat Paul Zoning Ordinance and to Section 462.357(S) of Minnesota Statues,
.'�YL�2. ��nu,rr� r,-� S4 Y�Yt� , owner af land proposed for rewning, hereby pefirions you tn
rezone the above drscri6ed property from a ��l � zuning district to a�p.4 'L
zoning district, for the purpose of:
�Th� �mi1� �vncJrart-� �vV•�idi�q t`�eSic�C.n� v-ro�+
ow�pafitY. - �veak - r - n - e� - .�'o� C`��ev�ks v�-�ti..
e P�.�SDr"C}�es$ .
{iL1i31'l�ik7
(aftach additional sheets if necessary) •
Attack�ments as reqnired: �Site PIan�Consent Petition� Affidavit
1E�P 1 .� �U��
BY:� ,�. �c,� ��� �f-==r��-�
Fee Owner of Property
L
Title: /"���a,
�,._,.s
JESSlE LEE Tq QR
_ = Notary Pu61io
Minnesota
"" My Commission Expires January 31, 2093
Page 1 of __
Subscrihed and sworn to before me
� �y -� 31
CI�'Y OF SAINT PAUL
AFFIDAVTT OF PETTITONER FOR A REZONING
STATE OF Ti4IlVNESOTA)
COUNTY OF RAiYISEY )
�.�.�
The petitioner, C�GLr��� !�' L°� -2._�-- being frrst duly swom, deposes and sfates that fhe
consent petition cantains s b�natures of the owners of at least two-thirds (2l3j of atI eligibie properties .
within 100 fee± of the subject progerty described in the patition and all progerty contiguous to the subject
property that was owned, piuchased, or soId by ttie getitioner within one (1) year preceding the date of
ihe petition; petitioner is informed that the consent petition mvst contain signatures from each and all
o'wners of jointly-awned groperty in order to constitute consent from that property and that failure to
obtain consent from each and all owners could invali,date the consent pefition; petitioner believes that the
consent petition was signed by each of said owners and that the signature aze the true and correct
signatures of each and alI of the parties so described.
�
�
� �/f��-� �-
NAlVIE
���d �'/ 'S'�i �r �o: �u cs— ��v � -���
ADDRESS
6 �r� — .Z–�— 2Z
TF.7.F NFJMBER �
Subscribed and o to 6efore me this
� day of 1�����_, 20�.
�
JESSfE LEE TAYLOR
Notary Publio
Minnesoia .
'. My Commission Exp(res January 31. 2013 ..
IO-01
.
.� ` -
�
�r a� j
• `'� .
The �milp program
Perzonalized treatment (or eatine disarders
Department of Human Services
P.O. Box 64837
St. Paul, NIN 55164-0837
O 2ao E. S uperior StreeG Suite 204
Duluth, MN 55802
Fa=: (2ta) 722-StBa
Julie Reger
Licensing Division
CJ
r1
L.J
July 14, 2008
RE: Emily Prograzn Rule 36 Residential License Application
Dear Ms. Reger,
2265 Como Ave-
� St. Paal, MN 55103
- F�: (551) 379-5276
o Mna Westin House
, 112057 $tone Creek D.rve
Chaska, MN 55318
Fax� (952) 448-5642
Per our phone conversation last week,_ please find enclosed our application for Rule 36
licensure for our Eating Disorder Structured Living Program {EDSLP). As you indicated
we could do, we are submitting this applicafion for licensute without policies and
procedures, pending the development pf new policies and procedures by the Program
staff related to the new EDSLP licensure type under Rule 36. We will submit policies and
procedures once they aze established by the Program staff.
We appreciate your assistance with trus process. Please contact me with any questions at
651379.6133 or jillian(a�emilwrogsam.com.
Sinc ,
Jillian Croll, PhD, RD; LD, MPH
Director, Education, Reseazch, and Program Development
Nitin Plione: (651) &:i `,-313
, .`s
wiww'.emil r rain.com`-
U� -a3�
�
State of Minnesota
Department of Hnman Services ' .
Division of Licerising _
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 245A (Human Services Licensing Act)
Minnesota Rules, parts 9520.0500 ti�rough 9520.Ob90
Application for Rule 36 licensure_
To operate nnder a variance for
Intensive Residentisl Treatment {IItTS� and Crisis Stabilization {CS�
• - 'f�tZ
Address of program:
: una� l� aA.�n, = 22t
CiiX:
. St faw(
Tetepfione number:
� � 1'�M1%YZ'l NLCFS�aba�
E». � ly (�
Gs�,w
' �hl f�45
�i ��i((.�' �rot
yon hoId otleer pmgram/sereice Iicenses
ra�.•-. — (�.s;t4.zKFsa.( f�»��y.awi
' Si }�
�.:I� loo '3ca����w �
State: . . Zip: Counry:_
�+�^� 55to$ (
�Fae num6er, ifapp[icabfe: . '
3 Z3 CaSt . 3�t S2
Telephone number for conhc[ person:
fi5c 3� 4:ts
aed hy t]te Department of Hnman Se�vi�
: i' S C(2�€t(�K�
If yes, piease provide the riaine of the program, the license mm�ber, Iocatian and type of setvice on a separate sheet
$aFe yon ever had a license denied or revoked? Yes No 3� .. -
If yes, plaase provide the name of the program, the &cense number, location and type of service, and the date of the
action on a separate sheet ,
3pecific pro�ram information:
E2{� l��sarder Sf�-..c(ic-�& (.a�:.,..� ta-oS+mH., Ua,nu..c� �F'
II2TS CapaciTy �� Gender of ciients served (eircle): MaT" em Age range from: l� through 65
CS Capacity _ Gender of clients served (circle): Male Female Age range from: _ through .
Note:
Pursuant to lvlinnesota Statutes, section 245A.04, subdivision i, the application must be.made on the forms and
in the manner prescribed by the commissioner. The Licens'ing Aivision will not process an application before
tlie application fee is paid.
Send the applicatiori fee and your complefed application to:
DHS.License—DepositCode 150
Initial LicenseApplicafion
PO Box 64837
St Paut, IvIN 55I64-0837.
�A3 �-F ��(�ZI��,
�.w�L. 1�lasex a�nc[
�F�'S kas p.,p�oro�2�
c. v�n t�n'� m L. r+� °` O
6-� �� y . o •
N
C�
C J
�l a3j
n
LJ
Following the eheck list of requiremenfs, there are links to — or copies of— the reIevantMinnesota Rules
and Statutes.
Background Study Information
I. Complete the enclosed Background Study Ozder Form and submit it with your completed license application
packet.
� 2. Wkien the Division of Licensing receives your application packet, you will be sent specific instructions and
tools for submitting background studies.
3. Background studies are required for persons A, B and C,'below:
A. The person who signs the license application.
B. The person with the highest degree of decision-making authority over the program.
C. Each staffperson who will have direct contact with persons served by the program before the
staffperson has direct contact. �
4. Background studies for persons identified in A and B must be cleazed before a license is issued.
Licensing laws and rules
The following laws and rules are enclosed for your reference:
A. Variance to Nlinnesota Rutes, oarts 6520.0500 to 9520.0694 (IZule 36)
B. Minnesota STatutes, Chapter 245A "Human Services Licensing AcP'
C. Minnesota Statutes. Chaoter 245C "Human Services BackgroLind Studies"
D. Minnesoxa Statutes, sections 626557 and 626. 2"Vulnerable Adulu Act>" and Minnesota
Statuces, section 626.556 "Reponing of Maltreatment of Minors Act°
E. Minnesota Statutes. Chaorer 253B "Minnesota Commitment and Treaunent Act" .
u
Forms to.be completed and.submifted by all applitants .
�-�3�
�
Applicatian grocess
• Air applica6on will not be considered complete until all required information has been submitted and -
determined to be in compliance with the laws'and rales. �
•_ If an appiicaUon includes policies and procedures that are determined to be not in compliance with the
applicable laws and rules, the application wiIt be considered incompiete and a tist of problems wiII be
pro-vided to the applicant with instructions for correction. A time iimit for conection wifl be specifred.
• Failure to submit a complete application within tha specified time will result in license denial and tlie
license fee will be forfeited.
• Withir�,-90 days after receipt of a comjileted application �whea everything has been submitted and
determined to be in compliance), including all necessary approvals from other authorities, you will be
informed whether your license application has been approved or denied.
• If your license is denied, you will be informed at that time of your right to eontest the denial.
• After a license is issued, the Licensing Division will conduct periodic licensing reviews, including
unscheduled drop-in visits and complaint invesGgaUons.
�
Snbsequent annual fee . �
Licenses are effective from Jan. i to Dec. 31 of each catendar yeaz. The appiication fee is. considered the license
fee for the calendaz year in whieh the applica6on is approved. Licenses are re-issued anpually and license
holders must submit.payment for the license when invoiced in order for their $cense,to remain effective. See fhe
license fee schedule in Minnesota Statutes, section �45A.10:
Requirements specific to applicants for a Rnle.36 variance
• The foilowing lists iriclude required forms, policies azid repoits to be submitted �or the applicaYion to be
considered complete.
• Each item on the following lists must accompany the Application for Rule 36 Licensure_
• Return the checklists with the application, showing the.name or other identifier ofthe document that
contains the xequired information, f,Rxamples of docmnent identifiers include "Policy azid Procedures
Ivlanual, pagexs" or "Application attachment x'�
• Keep a copy of the completed check list for your records.
.
•
�.��
V1053NNIri 'IOVd 1S 9C°°-`"w!da
� � . H1YlON '3Atl dNtll3A3�J 594t O�
w�wK.u�=..q=nw�. 19V21`Jtld A11W3 3H1
w ��w.��.aa=��me� xn�n�
���➢� 3SflOH NI1S3M VNNV 3H1 �� —:
w �.�.,. �. n �»,-,a
�.�,o �.t� �..� �
—��� �
�� 0
•
�
--------------------------------- �
8A �M
(�' �ga � � � tl1053NNIW 'l�Vd '15 mR � 9 � ny �" '
Q-/'� �,�j j � E_ � P. � w n' e wwy�� o H1MON '3Atl ONtll3A3l� S94t ��
YVtl8908d AlIW3 3H1
� . � ��: a � � �� - . mn�n� _ �a
3SflOH NIlS3M VNNd 3H1 �� .��
F� z
�
�
< < -
r
z
0
O
0
�
U
� N
Nrc . I X3lj pw
xa :F____>
wa , I X313 �a
--�-- a
� a�-'
� �n, inz �
o�rc O�
¢
� a» aa'i
O
w
m
N
(/1WN
QUQ
_
j(n�yN
�¢ww
z�oLL
Y���.
w
0
0
a
----r -------
,f �� lltlM
tp 5 3dtl�5aNtll
'���T' 03SOd0ad
� �I
�
ar�i '�ii
N Q
Ohy
�-O<
OZ�
aa�
o Q
QF o �� o
aw ¢ °� ° �>
�3 c ���J�o nw
�¢ Q aoo�oa wa ,
¢z � vi�� s �
WQ w m p �ZY� tnae.i
Cl¢ O LL'�H2�NH 1��.¢
� � ��0� v.�� �
a
� �-' HyCJQLLpW NO�
� a m � Z s Z¢¢ 4 U 2�
L W i-.CL -� N U' N
Zu p ZZ�a�Q�W
o �
OV� � "20C� QUQ
V n fI1��ZF
� I 2 Z�' N W W m W 2 S
NN �3¢�o�¢
�
y ZK�Q � UIC��VU'f�p
m t-(JWK7W��Q��2p
W O O JUIQJ��J� Z OJ
Qr cnUO�c�Q �QC�Fi.
ON ZCp�r�OZN�Y�Z
fIi Y�Z Q t-Y�i
a� CLd.JF�i41Vd'Fdda✓1
p�S 40 �r��atn �X
VIU'� U'p�yR'ZQ�MWUIJW
- C�Z
�tn�wt��O��2�NOOON�
X InX y�X>�L.d'�W
yw?�w a�--
w QO w Q26U K �
Y.=�.INIDMgQR�VQN[0�1�
w
U
4 �
�
�
z O � z
a � -- � --
w i w
K 4 K
O � p
�
w a w
N
F O p
� oe. ' v
z mc z
F aa I
N y
X __
tat LI
`��
�g�
5 �a�m�
_ :?
Y a:.
� ¢m
@ gmu
'i.,S' �
`L:.S'I
G
�
�
, � �
I I
--- i I
I
�i fiV�T{ L(fQpTYJ�V U -
0
�
0
�
°
n M
�
a �
�
0
•
•
.
' �
� � �:�� i�
' �.`�'�, ,.z� ���
� ' " ^4 ��� I
- � ����i����r �
+�".r�+s�..=� x :'�c�
�~ � r
- � �z�q
��
��
��
�;
.A"i ��
�
'fr� ; e
o�r
w o z�
� � w�
� w gw
O Qp OW
w aa� w�
x y 4 �
� UI W�
3 wo0 �o
W p�� �4
Z K F W O W
Q�F- tiU
w CJp¢ Z
O � F w
O �Zd Q�
a 9wN d�
p LL Q O Q W
O �
Q Z�w ?j
Q Z U � �
N Y wtiWU
O�- �rn�`�,.�0
I-_' ¢ �¢��
wa wZ�-
c�� c�aw �
zwz>x�oaz
UO r p
��aoaQ��
QOOJ Jt-¢,Z
N a J H W Z J� w W C
W<O �
F>F-lOjl�
��oia
>�in�
w w
Y�fLN
_�
vios3NNiw `invd �is `°"°'° °" °"",
cwsu� � H1210N '3AY QNtll3A3l� SC4! '��
v w .wu m w +n =w.� w723`JObd A11W3 3H1 � � i
m � w n o ° v„ -
`° a��„"m'�°.a'�"" 3SflOH NIlS3M bNNd 3Hl �
.,a�-�
�7
, ��
-Hl�f8N-3R�i-3�� 9td���^�
� Y
z
0
1
m
N
N
J(
� ¢Fa-
O N N N
Z F Q J
y O � 4
IY N
� 6N
RM?q�
O
�
�3lld �
39N3d 3nI1V2iOJ30
1H�13H MOl M3N
o O �
w
li N y_
a 6 �
1 . � F �
iy�
��� ,
II ���� ��-_
�
�
U U I
� �� __ i
� , f5 w o �-_-
� o o �
w � U�
U Q
Z �� ��
J � � F
� � 3 �
Z �F.Sp Wx
_ N Q W J 2 W
v 1 p ,- z�. I
?< t�w . _"_"_�__—__'-___--__
Z
�� 1 �
:N
J �
m
�ww I
3c"9¢�
ww¢u
z>pa .
_ I__�___-___"_-_._—__—..
�JN3B 3N1tl210J30
1 ^ M � Ol � M3N
�I IlV�/\� ��
�
°
0
i
0
n
II o
n
J
Q N
U f
N O
W �
� J
� �
F--
�
W
� �
� z
�
� U
�w
�
�
V
�
W
r
�
�
�
I 1
� �
� .
� ` T l � . ., -F / :l
�,
f x't � �
.� ' y 4 � yx �} � t �
n ��
R
� = a i . _�
a �
° __""____}'_sziu"
tl3tlb
� 43Pll�
3 s+M� . �f �
I IL 'A
� � IL.i
_ �
("�
. �� , /.�}
� �f. 'tiJ..3
r� r�w � \ � ,
t I'u - I I H m �_y \/
1 I<« ! )<°� �
lJ - lJ� " o
� � �a
11 ��
'_' . ' , '` z L: , C..
.i� ~ k ' .i `:C
III �i
� `k � � �
— '.,l ust i `. Jr_jr .
i `
%}L-: ' 'qt'. � .
.it �`:l {
� � LL r
�.�.tr�3�.�i �.p.� fi` S', i
A j ,
R. �
LL p rc
,
w�
�
�p
�
�
�
U
.�
.�-. -
�
�
.�
- C�
�
•
•
�
�� �
�
�
Y
¢
•
j ' . �. �F E � � .. �:F ! 7 � �
k , : :.
f ��� j'. ' . �a
- ��� _1
�
..
�
�:
o�-a��
�
�
Q
i - ' F .E ` � t :�' /,
� - - t � �
4 i , �
S � �� � � � �� � � _
f � y
•
s
R
.
�
._
�
�
�
�
�.
�
�
�
r�
�J
�
ZOiVING PETITiON SUFFICIENCY CHECI� SHEET
x�zo�r�rG scu� r;cuP
�
FIRST SUBMITTEA "����
DATE PETITION SUBMITTED:
DATE OFFICIALLY RECEIVED: e � I tl��
• , PARCELS ELIGIBLE: �� ,
PARCELS REQUIRED: f I
PARCELS SIGNED: �� � ��
1` �
RESUBMITTED
DATE PETITIOY RESUBLfITTED:
DATE OFFIC[ALLY RECE[VED:
PARCELS ELIGIBLE:
PARCELS REQUIRED:
PARCELS SIGNED:
Da—a� i
� a
CHECKED BY: °6� ' DATE: � Q m ��
9♦
•
Oq°�-�37 • . .: _ . �
9 orr s:�n4-fu�s .. . � : - . _ CZTY _OF 5AINT_PAU�;. , . _;: . � _ � �
� :
�NSEN'I`OF:AIDJOIN'ING.PROPERTY OWNERS FQR'A __.
, . . . .. : - REZONIIV� . _ � - .. .
: ... . . . ..:
:- .-.. -:-� ---.-. ....:...---_- ... . :_ � - - --- -
We, the unders oPued, otvriers of propecty within lA0"feet of tfie totai confie ons descript[on of reai as#ate
owned, purchased, or sold by TfIE PE'ITITpNER within one yeaz preceding the dafe of tfiis petition
aek�owledge thaf we ha've been presented witl� the followtng; �" -
� 1__ Acopyofthepetitionof '"C4ii ��uxdh o �- � A- ,a' SL .. . .
- (aame of pe6itioner) _ . ; . '
' torezonetheproper[ylocatedat 144�s� 1�149� tKC�,S � C\euo� ' A#�.�ex� No✓�l� '
from a C� l zonind di�trict to a"YN Z zoning district;. and : �. - -
2. A cropy of sections 1., .1�31" through (�(� .�421 inciusive of.the Saint Paui Zoning Eode:
A�e acknowledge'that we are aware of all of the usea permitted'in a TN 2' zoningdistrict, aad we
are ac�are that any of fhese uses.can be established upo� Ciry. Cauncii approvat o€theRezohing. We hereby
: consent to the rezoning af the property in the petition of ` ' .-, _-.._
.' The f`1-i �yc�, �-,� �,4 �,� '�rn to a TN 2... zoning distdct. _' .' .
, Cna�ne of peti[ioner) ' : ' , �
. VYe co�ssent to the appsoval of this rezoning as it was expIained to us. by the applicanf or
his/her representafive. - :
. ABDRESS OR PIN RECORD O'S�!NER -' SIGNATURE � DATE .:
!u. .n.a/e� U..L�.. Ai / � . ,.i � . . . . . .
�440 �
t��i�
.. �
�.oy) i
.� /� s
s �- P
�7'S� i
' . , ��y <
�
� . /��
: . � .: �:. ._ , �r 5.
��. . . � . � .
a �-,�.
:v�•.� GI.�I�
k-� �en: .. �
^i�U�i��cl .� �
� � �� -,
°��°� . C�Err�Y
�' ., . ' '. � '.
y����- G'G�u�.��
, �, �i.� • - �
n � � (n
' tV
' ��. . � : -
� �1ri�_, :��
����D��
��'' _�
� '
v ��
� � / s ,_��
;��_ � ��
/ a�
��2
� �
�D`� '.
5�_/a� .
�p ; � '
'�� :
. . . . � .�. ��,. •�� .,�.� �
. : k�{b� ��a :: o�.. `.� �� : N2e.st�eEk `:
: . �h� `� �(�� � 1t -+�. Dg� ; : .�
.. '� Tfiis petition_ shaIl irof l�e`considez o�cialIy filed untit 1he Iagse of seven (7} working days_ aftei;it is .. .
. � received by_ the Pianning Division. _ Any signatoc of this _petition may withdraw h4s/her name:therefrom by
. ' WritteIIreauestwiEhinthaftima_�` .- '.. . . . . . . ' -. . . � - ' � ' ' . ., " . '
. _ . . . _ . � t�'�—a� f _
� ,. .
� o r� � � 0..P 5� g n Q-+u.� . CITY ; OF SAINT. PAUL .:.., .-.
•' : Con2�d�nt San6ovn s - .. .. . . ,
- OF ADJOINING PR�PERTY OWNE
•
I�yo •
t44t�
I(1zs
Ch�s.t�»t,e� �lan-N; RS FOR A .
..
R�ZONII�IG . .
��F�o ��m,� � ,
._ ... ....:..:..._:. ..: - _-.-_ : ......_. .-.-: _._--- -
��.., ...� _��:___ __ _ of property t�ithin 1{?O feet of tlie totai contiwans description of raai estate
owned, purchased, or sold by `TH$ PEITTIpNER EyiThin one year preceding tlie date of this petition
aeknowledge that we have been presented with t�e following:
l. ticoQyofthepetitionof T�ne �huxeC� o � �}�r,r�er ��� t.-�� :
(name of peEitioner) , , ' �
' to rezone the propezfy located at �yy5� 144q� ��!(0 5'('\�.;b\c�' �}�., e,nu ' Nov-44� ` '
from a 'M 1 zonind district to'a �PJ 2 zoning district; and : �
2. A copy of sections ( through (�I� .421 'inclusive of.the Saint Panl Zoning Code:
We acknowledge that we are aware of all of the usea permitted'in a_TN 2' zoning districi, and we
aze aware [hat any of ffiese uses.can be established upo� City. Councii approval o€theRezoning. We hereb'y
coasent to the rezoning of the property in the peGtion of ` .
The (`h�'-~^4* ^�' �k' ,�,� �.p � ��m tca a �N2 ioning distdct. . _
. (name of patitioner) '' ' ' ,
We consent to the appxovat "of'this rezoning as it was expIained to us_ by the applicant or _,
his/her represenfafive: :
ADDRESS OR PIN ' RECORD C1WNgR �'-' SIGNATUTtH ' DATE :
l�A. _.....r.... c . . , � �
, �'�
.. /S�
<
• ��
- C
� 1'-li��; fL
�..
k.�c1,� �li(t���s� . S�k�
e �.._
� _.
ger7
�.n�
�s��.�
� !i/! �
.
�►' ��I�'�/.
�
i(�B�
� ED
�� �
_�� i 2a�
�/..�
�: a 7`
-E? '
� "I�t�(
� � _:.�>. C"` �lc'�
hL��.'� ,���YG��' (J . _ . �'. � . '
. I. - � '.j t_.,��
vvECf . .. . . .
_ i4 - .. ' . .. � . . . . ' .
. . _ ._ ,._. , �... , . .. . . �. , .. . �— :
���
����. .
��o: �
7 /�
��l�c t?,� ,''.1�9G�,�a?_ .; . �. � , .. . . . . -
. �.,� �. ��.. . �, �;� . . . � t ., 7 �� :
.� . . ; _ : � �
_ � This pe[ition. shall not be'cbnsidered"as �o�ficially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days, after it is .
. received by_ the Planning Division.. Any signator of this_petition may withdraw his/het na'me: therefiom by �
.,,::+�n.. _.,,.,...,.«...:.�.:_ .,........._ . : .
: . �-��� � ' � � ; : � . . . ` .
. ' . _ ct OY[Qt�'1([„Q S19h14T1Ks 1 l. :O.i t7H IqJ..PL1C1.11_ ..." �'. �_'....' .' s . .:. :.� ' :. .: . '"
- . _ � J - . _ : i
: � . � {,auven £KkaGd p �. , . .
. . : � �. � ��� ; - . • REZONNING� . .. � .. �: � � � :
� We; the undezs a�ea, owners vi y� � 6vithin 1�0 feet of tiie total contiguous description of reai estate �
. � owned, purchased, or sold by Tj� pE"F'grIpNER x bne year prece.ding the date of'tf�is petition
aektZOwledge that we hava heen presenfed witfi the foIIowing: ..
1. tl copy of the petition of ��ni �h�� rrl. o �- ` C,� �A-.,,�' l,/�' �' '.
. . . , .: : , � . - �. �name of peEiAoner) , . � ; .
. . �' to rezone the properfy located at �y�� 1449 � ��4 � f\ � \ • `�u Nor=�lh " � .
from a 'M l � . zdnind disttict to �a — 1"pJ 2. zoning ctistrict;. and : � . . - ' - '
', 2. A copy of sections (�(., • 2�3 f'. through (y(e .'�2f 'inciusive of.tfie Saint Paul Zoning Code: � '
.' A�e acknowIedge'that we are aware of all of the uses permitted'in a TN 2�' � ��c[, and� we '
:. are a�are thaf any of fhese uses.can be established upon City. CouncIl approval o€theRezonisg. FVe hereby .'
-- consent to the rezoning of Hie property in the peution of ' : _._ _ ,„.
. � The f`�.; � r��, � G- . : +.n � zoning district. . . .
� ' �r � tv a �N 2 .
� . '. . . : � . (name of.pefitioPer} . ' � , ' . ; ' , . •
.... We consent-to the apgxoval of��his rezoning as it was expIainect to by flie app}ic�ut oz _:
his/her.reprASenta�ivs. � � . . . : . . .
A' AIIDRESS OR PIN ' ' RECORD UWNER • ' - - . SIGNATURB ' DATE � :
_ .`✓I� YLtA/ � Se�L At_/. � i re- 1 - - - . .: .
1U40 =
: �;
s,��.0
� � II �i��
� .
��� ��� �i��
. � ' ,'�
���
,..
__ -._.�__�
� �
� � � �rd
�;,.. . ..
��_ ( t� /� fa� -
s
= �— f� a�: .,.
Ca y �
-'� ( �o � '
. /: " ���Q .
�� l�
�� .:"..: �� . . . -
� � ss� �i �� ����`-I'�:-. . �, .; ; �. . � ix��`.zoas �
� : � _ . �.S���O � t ��i�:t j��o r . r. . ` ' :. . . :
. . . ���rv�' � � ���add, � :t. �-G� Y. � � .
� . : . � . .
. . - . . : � - . � _ .. .. . - � _ - : _ . _�
.. � Tfiis'pe[it�on-shall not be `considered `as �o�'f`ici'aIIy filed until the lapse of seven (7) wor(cing days after it is .
. _ received by_ tho Planning Divisioa.. Any signatoc of this,petition may withdraw h}s/her naine:therefiom by
. .. . � �41nCt8II LfAllES[ PJiE�71R t17at timB. -'� -- - - ' . -- . . ' . - - � . - - . . . . . - .
0
plop y c3 a 1 5 14N9 i'-i(c5 C r��e a.rt �ver�w Nov-4l� '
from a Y�l l" zonind district to a"T`N 2 zoning'district;,and : .. �
2. A copy of sections J through (�(o . 421 ' inclusive of.the Saint Paul Zoning Code:
Vi�e acknowledge that we are aFUare of a11 of che uSes petmitted' in a TN 2' zo4ing district, and we
aze ai�are thaf any of these uses.can be established upo� Ciry Council approval of the Rezoning. We hereb"y
cansent ta the rezoning af the Property in the peption of ' -,- ..
The f`�-iu.irr�. r-� �k. � cw, �m toa �N2 zoningdistrict. . .
' . (name of petitioner) �' ' : '
We coi�sent to the appsoval of this rexoning as if was expIained to us by the a�pIicant or
his/her
A3IDRESS ORPIN '' RECORD OWNER SIGNATURE ' DA'TE :.
'�.. � � � . � .. � . .' � si�na r : �J . � " '. � . .� �. . � :. - _ �-
: ` � � SAIl�FT. PAUL . ; . .; . . � :
! , -. . � �,{{. £ �l�zabe-I�G� }�cw�i-1-:. _
� � � �{y 3 � M,�d ��G PROPERTY OtiVNERS �'OR A . � , .
_ 'ZONiNG
�: I��3
�
We, tfie undersigucu, owners oi property yvi[hin 100"feet of tlie total contio ous description of reai astate
-. owned, parcbased, or sold hy THE PE`FPPIONER within one yeaz preceding the dafe of 'this petition "
aeknowledge that we hava been presanted with the foIlowing:
1_ A copy of the petition of �C11e t�hi.i,reC� Q �- C,l- �}�n� t-e ��' c,:�'
. . : (nazne of petitioner) . � . _' , ' ,
to rezone the erC lo ted t 4y '\�\ r� '
.
�'1
• /
. .
/,
�
. L
�
�?�.3/
, . '
f �� ��. .
!'a �
( � �
---�! O'�
� �J : ° � _ _ .
����. �r:z��it�GL'� ��;�`��z z'��� ��; " � �; � , f`� .-;�I.: L*�.
�� � �:
: ,�..
� : .. , .
. .. .
Tbis petitibn. shall.irot be`considered as officially filed nntil the lapse of seven (7) working days, after zt is
received b f. the Planning Divisiog.. A,iy signator of tfiis may withdmw his/her name;therefrom by
�.._:�i,__.,_..,...x...:aL:_al_aa.__ . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . ' . .. -
D� �a,� �
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
AFFIDAVIT OF PERSON CIRCULATING CONSENT
PETTTION FOR A REZONING
STATE OF NIINNESOTA)
:SS
COUNTY OF RAMSEI�
p t 2(c Y v � �- +-� ��- being fust duIy sworn, deposes and states that helshe is
the person who circulated the consent petition consisting of � pages; that affiant is informed
and believes the parries described on the consenY petition are owners of the parcels of real esYate
described immediately before each name, and that each of fhe parties described on the consent
petition is an owner oi property wifhin i�`i feet of the snbject property descn'bed in t�e pe�tion
and all properties contiguous to the subject pmperty that was owned, purchased or sold by the
petitioner within one (1) year preceding the date of the petition; that the consent petition was
signed by each said owner, and the signahues aze the true and cosect signatures of each and all
of the parties so described.
.D � 26z V l, c u�. r=>' C�—��
NAME
2.2.G$ Co-v�.a. �✓F
�7 I�F4�1`. I�otV "J�SfG�
ADDRESS
�5�.3��7. C¢ttt
'j'FT,RP NUMBER
Subscribed and sworn to before me tlus
�a day of i ���� , 20G�
�A� � �� _�_
. •
L1SA L CaRELL
" Noiary Public-Minnesota
m .+� MYCa'm4ssiafEZpi�gJen37.Za'i3
10/08
�
�
�
�-/-� 3/
�
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
AFFIDAVIT OF PERSON CIRCULATING CONSBNT
PETTT'ION FOR A REZONING
STATE OF MIlVNESOTA)
:SS
C�
,F' P � z-,� ..
`� NAME �
2u�� C�r���t,�, ��.P�,2.,r-�N Ss��s'
ADDRESS �
(� 51. 3��. �1� 0
TELEPHONE NUMBER
COUNTY OF RAMSEI�
i_tin� scz� 1� rl , being first duly swom, deposes and states that he/she is
the person who circulated the consent petirion consisting of �_ pages; that affiant is informed
and believes the parties described on the consent petition are owners of the parcels of real estate
described immediately before each name, and that each of the parties described on the consent
petition zs. an ow*.ie: of property c=.�ithin ] 00 feet of the subject preperty desc?ibed in the petirion
and all properties contiguous to the subject property that was owned, purchased or sold by the
petiuoner within one (1) yeu preceding the date of the petation; that the consent pefition was
signed by each said owner; and the signatures aze the true and correct signatures of each and all
of the parties so described.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
--t ��day of �L _. , 20�
�� = � �'� C� _
. NOTARY PUBLIC
`. -�:. LiBA L GRElL
_ _' Nofaty Public-A�innesata
� MyCanm'ssbnEx�rvresJan31�2Q
10108
�
� j - '�� �?�- a�` � �. s�§ '� k kc� `�'a,����d'.� � � �' ,..�.
� i ;_ y { t� ._�g "� ��,;,, a �. . , �1 .
�$ }- {1 �'•w� t� ��rc' _ � I3 . "'��
` � �� w;., �
. �-1 �e ._� 7.�`-�. �� � `�-'-� .
-, i . —..— - ?- . .me
- — . �i" - .
'.' el
� -^ .- . .
� :' .
g
.. . . ..a. . ..:a � :a
a
�:t.:� '
:. ✓,-..: � �.
��-a �i
Zoning File # 08-201-656
Church of St. Andrew Kim (Emily Program)
Page 2 . .
•
•
Rectory at north end of site
. -. . . ,.;+,
Housing north of site
�; � °
� `^"y 3
: �S� .. . . � �;;.-:
�� � x � � �.
i� r ��
+ �,.i %
� �
��,..v�:�
.,�,
t
.. / ',. f � '
i'
��
t�
� � _
'� '
_ '�� ,�
� 1 R � < �.
I`! _
- �,�.e n:K-°.
�.ia.�v ... .
�a+
�:
.. itK$i�.1 ..
m
�.._
�'(;?
i f-� -.. � i{�.
1
'��
�
C � �
� a5 { 4
3�
�
o�-a3�
•
r _
�
CITIZEN PARTICIPATfO DIS RICTS
V
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION P�.ANNING DiSTRICTS
i.SUNRAY=BkT?LECREcK�HI6HWOQD
2.GREATER EAST 5.IQE .
3.WEST SIDE
_4.DAY70N'S SL.UFF
S:PAYNE-PHkl.EN
6.NORTH END � �
7.THOMAS=DALC
8,SUMMIT-UNIUERSITY
9:WEST SEVENTH
� a. cor�a
.HAMLINE-MIDWAY �
. T. ANTNONY �
. .M�RRIAM PK.-LEXIN�TO�t NAMLINE '
�4..GROV€LAND=MACALEST�R-
- 15.HIGHLAND
16:St1MMIT HILL
- ] 7. DOWN7b41N
i'�1 I_ti:
�
� :
APPLICANT—�°°��� � � � � � � � LEGEtdD'
PURPOSE t e � ��° � � zoning distrid boundary
FIZE ��� `�� DATE � ° � subjeci property n� orth-i°
PLNG. DIST �°' MAP# o onefamily • e � commerc�
- � -' - � !wo family p � � industriai
�� jz-� � muttipie family V vacant
Q. � _ .�, � . , � , , r , , , . , _, � . . . , �