06-222Council File # ,p'��ti
Green Sheet # 3029877
Presented
ORDINANCE
0
25
'---�-'" meter
1 An Ordinance revising pazkinglpay rates, pursuant to Chapter 160 of the Saint Paul I,egislative Code
2
3 TF� COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
4
5 A. That the pazking meter pay rate and time limits on all Fifteen Minute parking meters be revised
6 from $.25 per fifteen minutes and a fifteen minute time limit to $1.50 per hour with a thirty minute
7 time limit.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
B. That the parking meter pay rate for all One Hour and Two Hour $1.50 per hour parking meters shall
be revised to $1.75 per hour.
C. That the parking meter pay rate and time limits on all $.75 per hour, $1.00 per hour, $1.25 per hour
parking meters within area generally bounded by Kellogg Boulevazd on the south, Chestnut Street
on the west, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard on the north and Broadway Street on the east, shall
be revised to a$1.50 per hour rate and a two hour time limit.
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty days following its passage, approval and
publication.
�iJf� s��#�;�
;�� ; t,
Requested by Department o£
C� ��F � (= �w�i.� � �r�-
.
s
Forxn Approved by City Attomey
BY� 1�is � �. �t.�.��j
Form A ve by ayor fo S ' s on to Co 1
By:
���i��
� : � t��
Adopfion Certified by Council Secretary
By:
Approved�y r: Date { y+��l Z3� ��o
B ( 7%�„ ��-��..�
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
v.r■�,
Cartad.PersonB Phane:
MargaretEga�
266-BSfi
Must Be on Council Agenda by (Dafe):
Ot-MAR-06
ContractType:
bl Z� �.�`vL��!y�
�-�� I Green Sheet NO:
i ,
Assign
Number
Fw
Routa�g
Order
`t�,-12"t-
3029877
0 Cosncil 1 I
i ent '
2 k
3
4
5
Tofal � of Signalure Pages _(Clip NI Lacations for Signature)
Action Requesfed:
An ordinance revising pazking pay rates pursuant to Chapter 160 of the Saint Pauf Legislative Code. ( Option A)
Matiore: A�m�e (A) or Reject (R): Persanal Service Contracts Must Mswerttie Following Duestions:
Planning Commission 1. Has this persoNfirtn e�erwvrked under a cartract forthis departmenY?
CIB Committee Yes No
Cirl Senice Commission 2. Has this persoNfirtn e�er been a city employee?
Yes No
3. Does this personlfirm possess a skill rrot nortnally possessed by any
curterd city employee?
Yes No
Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and aUach to green sheet
Initiating Problem, Issues, Opportunily (Who, What, When, Where, Why):
Advantages HApproved:
Disadvantages BApproved:
Disadvar�ges IF Not Approved:
Transaction:
Funding Source:
Financial I�ormation:
(Explain)
CosNtevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number:
March 1, 2006 225 PM Page 1
03/15/2006 �'ED 14:32 F:9� �002/002
lR
W
D1StI1Ct 1 �
March 15, 2006
Cap�tolRiver
Council
iJG-��� -
�� �,�fi�, p�.� �� �.���
332 Minnesota S[reet Sui[e W]22 Sain[ Pau1, MN 55101 (651) 221-0433 FAX (651) 221-0581
Wcbsi[c: �tinvw.capirolrivercouncil.nrg E.mail: ml'o@capitolrivercouncil.org
City Councilmember Dave Thune
City Ha11310
15 West Kellogg BTvd
St. Paul, MN 55102
Aear Councilmember Thune:
Thc CapitolRiver Council reviewed the new proposals, Option A and Option B, for increasing revenue
&om existing pazking meters at a commit�ec mccking on March 14, 2006 and reviewed by the full board
of the district council at their regulaz scheduled meeting this moming. Sincc pazking meters aze only
located downtown and a few intersections along University Avenue, the impact of Fnese proposals is most
directly targeted in the downtown district.
The Capitoll2iver Council reviewed thc new proposals with a presentation from Margaret Egan of City
Councit Resauch. Ihe district council passed the following thrce resolutions at their fv11 board meeting.
1. CapitolRiver Council reiterates its endorsement of the city's appropriate depamnents
undertaking a system-wide review o£ padang throu�hout the city of Saint Paul, with an eye
towazds both customer convenience and increasin� zevcnue.
2. CapitolRiver Council supports option A of the pazlring proposals — a unified zone system of
pricing.
3. As part of a system-wide review of parking throughout the city of Saint Paul, Capitoll2iver
Council sugports an exarniaacion of the options for capriuing pazldng revenue during events in the
Event District.
The CapitolRiver Council encoura�es the City to take a more comprehensive look at the pazking system
across the C1ty. While the current pmposals seem to be a step closer to a more equitable solution, it is in
the City's best interest to examine additional options for increasing revenue while serving custozners well_
Kind Regattis,
�y Engl d �GJ ���
Chair ofthe CapitolRiver Council
cc: St. Paul City Councii
Mazgaret Egan, City Covncil Reseazch
Paul St. Martin, Public Works
DG -�aa
Parking Management
Study
Short-Term
• Budget requirement: Increase revenues
by $350,000 — new base of $2,300,000
• Consider a variety of options:
— Original ordinance — extend hours
— Option A— unified metered zones
— Option B— 25 cent increase across the board
� March 22 — Final consideration
Long-Term
• Consider:
— Update ordinances, staffing needs, fine
revenues, management reporting, marketing,
review on-street and off-street parking
• Timeline — June through September
¢
Y
.�i 7'
v c
� V
U �
�` �+
�
"�
�
�
L"r
d
�
b7J
�
�
�
5n
c
�
�
Q+
b
�
N
s.
m
m
�
s
u
A
O
f�+
�
O
a
i�.
G
W
O
�
�
�
❑
�
�
i
3
O
W
�
N
�
N
Vi
F
�
0
N
.�
�
c�o
"�
�
.
�
O
�
0
N
F
�
w
'�
N
>
v�.
�
�
�
f�
Y
�
�
OfJ
X
a
�
h
rn
.�C
3 `o
0 0
❑
�` v
s �
`r ° o
N
m
3
.n
0
�
£'"
'Lf �
a �
° �
.'� d
V p
� n
— �o 0
pp N O
M O
� � O
q <n o
b �
O
0
N 69 F5
R N
y M
m
U
� � y �
o ..
N �
�
O � �
N � �
an
N �
m �
$ .
c y
� a A
GG F F
3
�
-�
oY
� y
N N
tL �
N d
N 9
K
� �
b �
?; 3
N �"
i �
m
i. N
o �
�+ U
�
N
>; 5
C �'
�° .5
b �
b A
� ,'
m o
oa
a �
Q. �
N �
r ^
W �
O V
� �
3 �
� o
� U
b y
'�'� Y
N Vi
�° o
O �
� O
N �
s �
'3 0
i. �
«.'
N �
F .
� o
Y o,
o �
d �
ro
�n .5
v, 3
?
0 0
O O
O O
� O O
� ', c,
V� 49
O O
o O O
' � N
a
E» cv
R
.�
Ir
O
<+i
�
� C
., �
�, '�n
« ,�
v
� c,
� �
� �
� T
� O ' T
� � C �
> � ❑
� � � �
cn � ^ �
� � m °J
`"�� u [ y
� '= m G
. �
;,�os
U � G J
w O x+
Q CJ � W
C
� O y �
p � •�-� =
N N i'' y
.n 'C j �
o � d o
00 '� Y �O
C � a�
.�+ `> s� �
� v
�e ^ > v
= 3 0 �
9 n� o �
a� X � .y
N (i� � �
Q � d O
CW v. .0
i A .�i� N
'
N
O w � Q
v y � n'
v� W �'�.
ro
U G�J � i�
w O 3 '�o
� � O �
� '� � O
N d �
U � �
i.
W p, O b
�+ N N �n
� � O O
�.�.' 'Pi y Y
x o �a an
a. " � a
V b � 'o
� �
id � � O
d b O N
N �
'd ro
� � O
�
b
9 U � a �
� o � � �
��„ � a�i 3 W
m
0
�' � ` a��i >
a� s�.
�. o �
w° � � �'«
5 � �
y � R y
`� o ° y o
Y b N
V] � N w •q
�
y � 0 O
,� ° o m 'o
,�, �° c �
w u d �
o � s�,-
m ,a� w
� p i O
v
v -� o �
. �p N
C v p O e�i
d �� �
e����
V 7 O j m
w �Vi � y N
q U
W � � 6 �
4G-a�a
�
G
M
�
�
ec � c> y y o
= .�-� 7 .�. �
.� � � '� ^ -� N
� ia '�" � O N M
c � z a z
C
W �'
� N ,a�i O �
.' � w � �
L'a �
0
r�n
T y
a
�o �2
L ' C � y
W F # z r
L �
p„ V
O O O
O O O
O O O
O O O
V
� m ro � �
� � �
L
d
�' � V (�J U
W � � G G
W V Q � �
00
� O
� U
✓� i
�
vi Vi ss
y � O
Y Q
A ,� O
n N y m
r�
O c N
� � �
d
❑
i
�
0
0
0
M
V3
�
0
G
G �
k
0
.�
R
W
�
L'
�
m
W
m
G
a
�
�� d
� �
O °
O O O
O O O
O O O
r 7 �
N M
s9 ss rs�
0 0 0
0 0 0
O O o
� m P
� � �
fA V3 V3
�
N
v �,
d �
F �
Y
b �
� � � .4'.�
❑ i �.'
� N ti
6 ��
� �
� N U
O �/] r-i
O O O
O O O
O O O
�n vi o
N � N
c��rsn
° o o ° o
O O O
t� W vi
l0 V' M
M V
6s s9 69
� �
O �
m �
� d
y 7
F
O � �
¢ � .-�i
��
w ;;
O � U v
� U
O � N �
O�-a�a
Strategic Review TimeHne
Attachment B
Goal. Make changes that enhance community sarisfaction, operations, enforcement, pricing
of this resource, general administration, and overall pazking management.
Ordinance Changes June 2006
Address outdated or uncleaz language to provide for better understanding by community of
how to use pazking and improve enforcement.
Enforcement Staffing June 2006
Needs analysis completed of adequacy of sfaffing IeveI as part of the 2007 budget process.
Management Reporting June 2006
Develop reports tu moiutor:
• Pricing of curbside spaces, ramps, lots, and garages
• Capacity use of parking resources
• Meter collection revenues
• PEO staffing levels
Fine Revenues
Develop capability to segregate fines colleeted from the State
Improve collection of bad debts
Evaluate increase in fine to Minneapolis rate of $34 vs. cun•ent rate of $29
Marketing
Expiore options for:
June2006
August 2006
• Better use of the prepaid meter card
• Signage changes that can reduce delays when attending events and exiting the
Interstates
Review On-Street System August 2006
Re��iew existing parking practices and supply to optimize on-street supply for convenient,
short-term, higher turnover parking, and to guide other changes. This includes a review of
locations where parking meters could potentially be added and night-time cleaning of
streets.
Review Off-Streef Parking Suppiy August 2006
Review existing off=street ramps, lots, garages — pazking pracfices and supply to determine
how to compliment existing parking system dynamics and to guide other changes.
Parking System Plan September 2006
Develop a plan that identifies parking supplies and establishes triggex points for better plan
management and rate structure changes.