01-1223Council Fite # � l— l.1.�3
��� V��Y�t�
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # �� �
ORDINANCE
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Refened To
�� C
�
Committee Date :
a�, - taa�,
1
An ordinance to amend Section 9A1
Z of the Saint Paul Charter in accordance
3 with Minn. Stat. §410.12 to eliminate the
q limitation of six administrative departments
5
6 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
7
$ Section 1
9
10 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, section 9.01 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul is
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9.01. Executive Departments
There shall be an office of the mayor, office of the city attorney, office of the city clerk
and such additional executive deparhnents, � as may be established by
ordinance. Each executive department so established shall have such functions as are prescribed
by ordinance. Excep[ as hereinafter provided, the head of each executive department shall be
appointed and removed as provided by Section 3.013, and shall have such educational and
professional qualifications as may be prescribed by ardinance. If an executive department so
established shall be restricted in function to police activities, then, and only in such event, the
chief of police appointed pursuant to Section 12.12 shall be head of such department. Every
office, agency or function of city government not otherwise assigned by this Charter or by
ordinance shall be included in the office of the mayor, and no power or duty confened by this
Charter upon a particular office or agency shall be transfened to any other.
PIt�LISNf��
'�117 'UZ
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
Section 2
This ordinance shall be effective 90 days a$er its passa�e, approval and publication
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, Subd. 7(2001).
�'�I������
a � -��.a
Requested by Department of:
By:
Form Approved b� City
By:
Appiaved b Mayor :o�
Hy:
Submission to Covncil
PL'8? 1��1i:�
�i7ro2
P3opCed by Council: Date yp�_�stc10�
P.doption Certified by Couni`1 Seczetary
�.
Charter Co�nission 10/30/O1
�OMAG7 Pff2SON 8 PFiONE -
M han Ril
IUST BEOP! COUPICILAGEN�A BY (DATQ
�� AsE�GN
IiIAA� FOR
pqflDlf
ORDOt
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET
oa.A,�rtmetctoR
o t - tza3
No �10 �� � � 4
, , .,
dneawct
� arr►nrneav ( �� ❑ uu�xxasxK
ole
� RIWCMLfEANCA➢R � ❑ AUMCLLiaNlACR6
�11FYORI�M11smi11Mi) �
(CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Pass ordiP.ance , which amends the St. Paul City Charter
or
PLANNING CObIb11SS10N
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION
Hasthis PersoNFirtn everwoYted under a wMraciforthis tlepartmenl? �
YES NO
Hestlde P�� ever heen e dhi �DbY�'+
Y6 NO
Does this peraorvF'm P� a SIdN 1rot �y�ssecsaA CY anY WrreM city employee?
YES NO'
ia Mis persoMirm a targeRed vendoYt
YES NO
Ctiarter Amendment needed to more accurately ref�zct the number of
City departments. Allows fo .r�;znore flexibility for Cheir creation.
More flexibility.
�� �����Y�'� f„,�fi���uF
���e � � 2��1
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO
Nisnber of departments will be �eft as an unknown quan��ty
de�artments wiZl be in coaiflict with Ch�.ter �.
)TAL AMOUNT OF TR0.NSACTIOH 5 COST�REYENU6 BUDf:EfED (CIRCLE CiNk7 `!EE
INDING SOURCE
ANCW. MFORMATION (IXPWN)
ACTNRY NI1MBfiR
m'
�
� � • • , � � � � � � � I � , , , ' , i , '
� � � � �totrr�ra'�o�xn� . � � � � � � �
, � � „
� �
�
� � � ��� �. � � � � �� � � �
' aelow are � routings forthe sQC mo�`&equmftypes of iioc�mts:
corizRncrs,<� ���cex�j couflc�,lz�soiv�ox(��a�ec�s)
�
� � i � � ,�u�e a�.y � � � � � � i , �pa�m�ncD�,�co� � � , , �
z. Depmtu�eatD'aecinx, z. 0fficeofF'm�ciatSeavicesD'qec(ru, ; '
�
� �� 3;� CiEy�Attomey� ' � � 3. Gity.Atbosney�;� � ,�
4_ Maya�lXssistant(facca�ntesctsover$25,046) , 4. Magix/As�gt�f `
�
� � � � � � � �.,,I3�amI2ights�(�'orconhactsoviaSS(Y.I�bO}' �S..Cit}rCo�1', � � �
b�
,� ; 6. O�cu �F'
6. Office�masc�a}Seevices Ac�B ��,=��8
� � � +- � � �
ADMINISTRATiVE'ORDERS(BadgetReaisi�), COUNCII.RESOLUTION(e�l'ofl�s�dOrdinaoce.c)-
i. 'Acfivirylvfauager�Depmin,�tiA«�oimtaot , 1. De�mentD;tectoc
�� 2. Depak�tDdec6or ��,' '. �, � ��, , 2- ' �, ' p� ,.' ��'� �
� 3. O�ce'ofF'ma�cial Seivices Diredot ' 3. bfa}!aslAss��t, � � �
' 4 '.'�ty Cle�c ,'� � � � � � 4 �CiFpCoti�l � � � � �
5` OSice, o�E"�al Se�dices Acconnting . � ,
, t1D1vIII�IISTRATFVE ORDEILS (aIl others) ,.' ' F.XE?CEITIVFs ORDA2
i`. Depa�D¢e� � 1 D�im�Di�� .
� ,
2.''Cd9AtXome9 � "'' � � 3.C�y`Attotney�.' � � ,.
' , , 3. 08`ice':afFi�ciatSavicesDuectdr 3. Map,or! ',A "s�ant`
4. �CityCleik � � � 4:��Qi(gCt� ,� �� � , �;
, � �
'', � � � �
GNATC�REPAGES
� �UTAL29FINIBER'OFSI
.
�
��
IndicaYetfie # ofigages om whick stgnatutes'sre req�iired mid prpercl'yp orflag wch of,tLacpages.
� �� � ,, , „ �i ,
AGTIOI�FR.F �"� s � � ' � ' � ,: � � � ,�' � �
Desen�bewLatt}�epmgecUrequestseeYstoacx�ompli�metfl�'e�rcOnolagical>orderoraodetof�enpottanee sv�iehevetis,
' „ . w � r' � . r � � �
° ' � . �..,,;�. ,, ' ' � �
tARR[C 1CIeS�fEIICe'S .�
���4„ ���� �� � � � {lCCt1 �CBC� ���•6 �� ItCmIIly �Wl�t „ �
, epjll6pII8OC � J COID�7 �� OUC �8
' ����.�� .---�---y,L«.� � � �� Y`"",11C�F7RV8fC.�. , �
�� . , - ,� �. �
..
'� � ,� i' � , �, , , �
„
. ,' � � �, , , � � , � �
aIIisoxaL s�v1c� corr�acis: `- , " , , ' , � , �
� �� � ' �ns info�aaonvn7l be � � � � �-.� —
` "- used to det�iiine the ciiy's ltabilityfo�workers epmpmsalion alawvq ta�ces sad ptopec e:v� ''
'seiviceh�riugnite.s. � �
� � �. —
INiTFATiNGPROBLEM, fSSUE, OPPORTUA7I'fY
���
F�spisinflwsjtuati�oicoadifi�sthatcreatedaneedforyo� ,project.or;Gqaest �
� � � � `,, , � � , " �, �
,
� �
�
�
� �
O „
ADVA21T.4GES.IEAPPR VED
.
i
� � .
�� � �
,' 7ndicatewhetheitlusis �d ci6zenswili- ��tyus�proect/�acfion, orwhetfier4hereare�ficwaysm
�^ � WhichHteCx ofSamtP`auE ' � ��
� � � � , ��
� D3SADVANfAOESIFAPX'RO�ED � � � ' � ; ` �� � � �
VPhat�Bati•ie effects Ex.majorcLeuge.g"Lo ews4ng oc`Qas�'Pme�.s miShf?tusPmJectf�ue�Produce'sfrtts pacsed
e'' tsfficdela7is To�'whdm2 . ,Wliieq?PorLow'Iong?
' '' ,., , � � � � � � � � � ' ��" � � � � � �
W6af wt7lbe the negative� af1i� ptomised achon is aot appro,ved? InabrlAyto
tagh tratHe �TSe. aacident rate7 Loss,of 'revenue? -, '
� � ��
FI�PANCIAL�IluIPACT �' .�, : � � � ' ��, : � ' ; � � � � �
?;If�ngfiY�imasttaHa�fhemfoimstionyonprovidehaetoihe�sneyonaread�sn�mg�atyo6mustanswer " �
, iwo,4ucstions; How �cfi is rt gomg to c�l Who is 8�8�'P� ,
� � � � �� � � � �„ ,, � ��, . n „
, � � '
� �� , � � ,
� � � �, i �
r„
„
„
�
�
, �
, �
� ��. � �
� � � � � � � � , ii �`;iS� r r ' i i
{
� � � � �,
�� � � ���
� �� , i��,� �, �„� ' �� ��,n„� �
_„ . + ... � � it., il. � � �
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Narm Colentan, M¢yor
October 30, 2001
Council President Bostrom
Offices of the City Council
3'� Floor
City Hali and Court House
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Councii President Bostrom:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
C!¢yton M. Robinson, Jr., Ciry Attorn¢y Q`_ y ,�,��
c,v,t �;,.rston
400CityHall Telephone:65I26b-8770
ISWestKelloggBlvd Facsimile.�6i1298-5619
Saint P¢ul, Minnesota 55l02
Attached is a draft of an ordinance that amends Sec. 9.01 of the City of Saint Paul
Charier. The Saint Paul Charter Commission voted to submit such language to the City Council
at its regular meeting on October 15, 200L The Charter Commission approved the language by a
majority vote of its members.
The language was submitted to the Commission by the Charter Revision Committee, a
subcomxnittee of the Commission. After two readings, the Commission voted to submit the
ordinance to the Council pursuant to Minn. Stat. §41 Q.12, subd. 7. On behalf of Greg Copeland,
Chair of the St. Paui Charter Commission, I ask that the Councii consider the attached ordinance.
Truly yours,
eghan Riley
�� !
Assist ity Attorney
Attorney for the St. Paul Charter Commission
cs�-Saa3
SAINT PAUL C
OMMISSiON a�
SAINT PAUL,
December 20, 2001
TO: Members of the Saint Paul City Council
FROM: The Saint Paui Charter Commission
RE: Amending Section 9.01 of the Charter
NNESOTA 55102
At the November 28, 2001 City Council meeting, the third reading of the ordinance to amend the
City Charter was presented. It was requested that the Charter Commission's reasons for the
proposal be provided to CouncIl members in writing.
The Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting in September and
again in October and voted unanimously to recommend the change to strike the words:
". .. not to exceed six (6)" in Section 9.01
REASONS FOR CHANGE
1. It is a"housekeeping" change to make the Charter designation of administrative strucwres consistent
with cunent operating practices.
2. Specifically setting the nuinber of departments in the Charter is an artificial limitation on the flexibility
needed manage the functions of city government as conditions change.
3. The philosophy for a basic governing charter has been defined by the L,eague of Minnesota Cities as "A
city charter shouid deal only with the fundamentals of govemmental organization of the clty and leave the
council free to exercise its grant of authoxity by ordinancz." This would include specific lunitations which
may become obsolete, or ignored.
4. On the City Web page, under the "Departments" heading there are actually 22 different entities listed.
Five of them are formally defined as "departments" but Community Services is not listed at all. Others are
very large, manage many assets and function as departmants. For instance, Parks and Recreat3on is named
a"Division" yet iYs manager is appointed by the mayor and holds the title of "department director."
There is also a"deputy director."
5. In the St. Paul I,eague of Women Voters' study of the City Charter, one of the fmdings from
interviewing a large cross-section of off'icials and former mayors who have worked under the City Charter,
limiting the number of departments in the Ciry Charter is inflexible and often circumvented in actual
practice. In comparing ciues of a similar size, the study found that six is a very small number of
departments.
6. In former management theory the thought had been that six departments was the optimal span of control
for one chief administrator to manage. Today in St. Paui there aze many more than six non-departments
under the adnunistration of the mayor's ofFice.
� s
PBINTED ON qECVGLED PAPER
Council File # O �� �.1.�3
�RIGi�JAL
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # l0 �l l 5 i "'E
ORDINANCE
Presented By
Refened To
Committee Date :_
d�.-1�3
1
CTTY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
An ordinance to amend Section 9.01
2 of the Saint Paul Charter in accordance
3 with Minn. Stat. §410.12 to eluninate the
4 limitation of six administrative departments
5
6 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
7
$ Section 1
9
10 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, section 9.01 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul is
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9.01. Executive Departments
There shall be an office of the mayor, office of the city attorney, office of the city clerk
and such additional executive departments, ' as may be established by
ordinance. Each executive department so established sha11 have such functions as are prescribed
by ordinance. Except as hereinafter provided, the head of each executive department shall be
appointed and removed as provided by Section 3.013, and shall have such educational and
professional qualifications as may be prescribed by ordinance. If an executive department so
established shall be restricted in function to police activities, then, and only in such event, the
chief of police appointed pursuant to Section 12.12 shall be head of such department. Every
office, agency or function of city government not otherwise assigned by this Charter or by
ordinance shall be included in the office of the mayor, and no power or duty confened by this
Charter upon a particular office or agency shall be transferred to any other.
PtlBLISH�=�
�� i 7 ro2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Section 2
This ordinance shall be effective 90 days after its passage, approval and publication
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, Subd. 7(2001).
�������`��
C � —��-b3
Requested by Department of:
By:
Form Approved b City
By:
Approved b Mayor fo
By:
gnbmission to Council
PEl3Li�t�e.:�
1�117 'D2
Adopted by Council: Date �b�
Adoption Certified by Counci Secretary
Charter Commission
r�m
�����
10/30/O1
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET
�''
O � -1a>3
No1Q!��54
� � �.�� � «�,.� _
.� 0 �,,.,� !�{'I LI� ❑ ��„�
� ,�� �. �— ❑ ..w,�.,a,,,,�.a
� WvortloRASatsfMrt) ❑
(CLJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Pass ordiasc�ce , which amends the St. Paul Gity Charter
aurv ivrv Apprrne („� or rte�ecc
PLANNING COMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
-� � 1. Hes this persoMrm ever xwked uMer a contrac[ for this departmeM?
VES NO
2. Has this pewoMrm ever heen a cdY emPbyce'7
YES NO
3. Does this peisoNf,m possess a sld� not noimalypossessetl by any cuirent city employee7
YES �
4. Is this peisaJ(1rm a farpe[etl vendo(7 �
YES NO
Charter Amendment n2eded tb more accurately ref�ect the rnsnber of
City departments. Allows fornRnore flexibility for their creation.
More flexibility.
(''�/ry,r�ag �°ofiF���
.'p...9u�Y�'��J+..d. t
48 J 3 5H e8 L93��
IVtunbex of departments will be deft,as an unknown quan�s.ty
rtAGESIFNOTAPPROVED ' ' � "
departments will be in co�iflict with Cha �,
�OUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGEfm (qRCLE ON� YES NO
SOURCE ACTNITYNUMBER
(EJ�WN)
Y
CITY OF SA1NT PAUL
Norm Coleman, Mayor
October 30, 2001
Council President Bosirom
Offices of the City Council
3' Floor
City Hall and Court House
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Councii President Bostrom:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Clayaon M. Kobinson, Jr., C{ry Aatorney
O \ -\i.
Civil Division
400 Ciry Hall Telephone: 65l 266-8710
I S West Keilogg B[vd. F¢csimile: 651 298-5619
Saint Paul, Mannesota 55102
Attached is a draft of an ordinance that amends Sec. 9.01 of the City of Saint Paul
Charter. The Saint Paul Charter Commission voted to submit such language to the City Councii
at its regular meeting on October 15, 2001. The Charter Commission approved the language by a
majority vote of its members.
The language was submitted to the Commission by the Charter Revision Committee, a
subcommittee of the Commission. After two readings, the Commission voted to submit the
ordinance to the Council pursuant to Minn. Stat. §41012, subd. 7. On behalf of Greg Copeland,
Chair of the St. Paul Charter Commission, I ask that the Council consider the attached ordinance.
Truly yours,
eghan Riley
���
Assist ity Attorney
Attorney for the St. Paul Charter Commission
��-�aa3
SAINT PAUL CH `�� �'R COMMISSION a�
G� 9 � �`�L
'=�'s:.,,� x ;�
SAINT PAUL, ��n� '�'��`�_����� ��MINNESOTA55102
- — ����=_�
December 20, 2001
TO: Members of the Saint Pau1 City Council
FROM: The Saint Paul Charter Commission
RE: Amending Section 9.01 of the Charter
At the November 28, 2001 City Council meeting, the third reading of the ordinance to amend the
City Charter was presented. It was requested that the Charter Commission's reasons for the
proposal be provided to Council members in writing.
The Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting in September and
again in October and voted unanimously to recommend the change to strike the words:
". .. not to exceed six (6)" in Section 9.01
REASONS FOR CfIANGE
1. It is a"housekeeping" change to make the Charter desi�ation of administrative structures consistent
with current operating practices.
2. Specifically setting the number of departments in the Charter is an artificial limitation on the flexibility
needed manage the functions of city govermnent as conditions change.
3. The philosophy for a basic governing cl�arter has been defined by the League of Minnesota Cities as "A
city charter should deal only with the fundamentals of governmental organization of the city and leave the
council free to exercise its grant of authority by ordinance." This would include specific limitations which
may become obsolete, or ignored.
4. On the City Web page, under the "Departments" heading there are actually 22 different entities listed.
Five of them are formally defined as "departments" but Community Services is not listed at all. Others are
very large, manage many assets and function as deparhnents. For instance, Pazks and Recreation is named
a"Division" yet iPs manager is appointed by the mayor and holds the title of "department director."
There is also a"deputy director."
5. In the St. Paul I,eague of Women Voters' study of the City Charter, one of the findings from
interviewing a large cross-section of officials and former mayors who have worked under the City Charter,
luniting the number of departments in the City Charter is inflexible and often circumvented in actual
practice. In comparing cities of a similaz size, the study found that six is a very small number of
deparrments.
6. In former management theory the thought had been that six departments was the optimal span of control
for one chief adminisuator to manage. Today in St. Paul there aze many more than six non-deparUnents
under the administration of the mayor's office.
�
PRINTED ON flECVCLED PAPER
Council Fite # � l— l.1.�3
��� V��Y�t�
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # �� �
ORDINANCE
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Refened To
�� C
�
Committee Date :
a�, - taa�,
1
An ordinance to amend Section 9A1
Z of the Saint Paul Charter in accordance
3 with Minn. Stat. §410.12 to eliminate the
q limitation of six administrative departments
5
6 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
7
$ Section 1
9
10 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, section 9.01 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul is
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9.01. Executive Departments
There shall be an office of the mayor, office of the city attorney, office of the city clerk
and such additional executive deparhnents, � as may be established by
ordinance. Each executive department so established shall have such functions as are prescribed
by ordinance. Excep[ as hereinafter provided, the head of each executive department shall be
appointed and removed as provided by Section 3.013, and shall have such educational and
professional qualifications as may be prescribed by ardinance. If an executive department so
established shall be restricted in function to police activities, then, and only in such event, the
chief of police appointed pursuant to Section 12.12 shall be head of such department. Every
office, agency or function of city government not otherwise assigned by this Charter or by
ordinance shall be included in the office of the mayor, and no power or duty confened by this
Charter upon a particular office or agency shall be transfened to any other.
PIt�LISNf��
'�117 'UZ
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
Section 2
This ordinance shall be effective 90 days a$er its passa�e, approval and publication
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, Subd. 7(2001).
�'�I������
a � -��.a
Requested by Department of:
By:
Form Approved b� City
By:
Appiaved b Mayor :o�
Hy:
Submission to Covncil
PL'8? 1��1i:�
�i7ro2
P3opCed by Council: Date yp�_�stc10�
P.doption Certified by Couni`1 Seczetary
�.
Charter Co�nission 10/30/O1
�OMAG7 Pff2SON 8 PFiONE -
M han Ril
IUST BEOP! COUPICILAGEN�A BY (DATQ
�� AsE�GN
IiIAA� FOR
pqflDlf
ORDOt
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET
oa.A,�rtmetctoR
o t - tza3
No �10 �� � � 4
, , .,
dneawct
� arr►nrneav ( �� ❑ uu�xxasxK
ole
� RIWCMLfEANCA➢R � ❑ AUMCLLiaNlACR6
�11FYORI�M11smi11Mi) �
(CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Pass ordiP.ance , which amends the St. Paul City Charter
or
PLANNING CObIb11SS10N
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION
Hasthis PersoNFirtn everwoYted under a wMraciforthis tlepartmenl? �
YES NO
Hestlde P�� ever heen e dhi �DbY�'+
Y6 NO
Does this peraorvF'm P� a SIdN 1rot �y�ssecsaA CY anY WrreM city employee?
YES NO'
ia Mis persoMirm a targeRed vendoYt
YES NO
Ctiarter Amendment needed to more accurately ref�zct the number of
City departments. Allows fo .r�;znore flexibility for Cheir creation.
More flexibility.
�� �����Y�'� f„,�fi���uF
���e � � 2��1
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO
Nisnber of departments will be �eft as an unknown quan��ty
de�artments wiZl be in coaiflict with Ch�.ter �.
)TAL AMOUNT OF TR0.NSACTIOH 5 COST�REYENU6 BUDf:EfED (CIRCLE CiNk7 `!EE
INDING SOURCE
ANCW. MFORMATION (IXPWN)
ACTNRY NI1MBfiR
m'
�
� � • • , � � � � � � � I � , , , ' , i , '
� � � � �totrr�ra'�o�xn� . � � � � � � �
, � � „
� �
�
� � � ��� �. � � � � �� � � �
' aelow are � routings forthe sQC mo�`&equmftypes of iioc�mts:
corizRncrs,<� ���cex�j couflc�,lz�soiv�ox(��a�ec�s)
�
� � i � � ,�u�e a�.y � � � � � � i , �pa�m�ncD�,�co� � � , , �
z. Depmtu�eatD'aecinx, z. 0fficeofF'm�ciatSeavicesD'qec(ru, ; '
�
� �� 3;� CiEy�Attomey� ' � � 3. Gity.Atbosney�;� � ,�
4_ Maya�lXssistant(facca�ntesctsover$25,046) , 4. Magix/As�gt�f `
�
� � � � � � � �.,,I3�amI2ights�(�'orconhactsoviaSS(Y.I�bO}' �S..Cit}rCo�1', � � �
b�
,� ; 6. O�cu �F'
6. Office�masc�a}Seevices Ac�B ��,=��8
� � � +- � � �
ADMINISTRATiVE'ORDERS(BadgetReaisi�), COUNCII.RESOLUTION(e�l'ofl�s�dOrdinaoce.c)-
i. 'Acfivirylvfauager�Depmin,�tiA«�oimtaot , 1. De�mentD;tectoc
�� 2. Depak�tDdec6or ��,' '. �, � ��, , 2- ' �, ' p� ,.' ��'� �
� 3. O�ce'ofF'ma�cial Seivices Diredot ' 3. bfa}!aslAss��t, � � �
' 4 '.'�ty Cle�c ,'� � � � � � 4 �CiFpCoti�l � � � � �
5` OSice, o�E"�al Se�dices Acconnting . � ,
, t1D1vIII�IISTRATFVE ORDEILS (aIl others) ,.' ' F.XE?CEITIVFs ORDA2
i`. Depa�D¢e� � 1 D�im�Di�� .
� ,
2.''Cd9AtXome9 � "'' � � 3.C�y`Attotney�.' � � ,.
' , , 3. 08`ice':afFi�ciatSavicesDuectdr 3. Map,or! ',A "s�ant`
4. �CityCleik � � � 4:��Qi(gCt� ,� �� � , �;
, � �
'', � � � �
GNATC�REPAGES
� �UTAL29FINIBER'OFSI
.
�
��
IndicaYetfie # ofigages om whick stgnatutes'sre req�iired mid prpercl'yp orflag wch of,tLacpages.
� �� � ,, , „ �i ,
AGTIOI�FR.F �"� s � � ' � ' � ,: � � � ,�' � �
Desen�bewLatt}�epmgecUrequestseeYstoacx�ompli�metfl�'e�rcOnolagical>orderoraodetof�enpottanee sv�iehevetis,
' „ . w � r' � . r � � �
° ' � . �..,,;�. ,, ' ' � �
tARR[C 1CIeS�fEIICe'S .�
���4„ ���� �� � � � {lCCt1 �CBC� ���•6 �� ItCmIIly �Wl�t „ �
, epjll6pII8OC � J COID�7 �� OUC �8
' ����.�� .---�---y,L«.� � � �� Y`"",11C�F7RV8fC.�. , �
�� . , - ,� �. �
..
'� � ,� i' � , �, , , �
„
. ,' � � �, , , � � , � �
aIIisoxaL s�v1c� corr�acis: `- , " , , ' , � , �
� �� � ' �ns info�aaonvn7l be � � � � �-.� —
` "- used to det�iiine the ciiy's ltabilityfo�workers epmpmsalion alawvq ta�ces sad ptopec e:v� ''
'seiviceh�riugnite.s. � �
� � �. —
INiTFATiNGPROBLEM, fSSUE, OPPORTUA7I'fY
���
F�spisinflwsjtuati�oicoadifi�sthatcreatedaneedforyo� ,project.or;Gqaest �
� � � � `,, , � � , " �, �
,
� �
�
�
� �
O „
ADVA21T.4GES.IEAPPR VED
.
i
� � .
�� � �
,' 7ndicatewhetheitlusis �d ci6zenswili- ��tyus�proect/�acfion, orwhetfier4hereare�ficwaysm
�^ � WhichHteCx ofSamtP`auE ' � ��
� � � � , ��
� D3SADVANfAOESIFAPX'RO�ED � � � ' � ; ` �� � � �
VPhat�Bati•ie effects Ex.majorcLeuge.g"Lo ews4ng oc`Qas�'Pme�.s miShf?tusPmJectf�ue�Produce'sfrtts pacsed
e'' tsfficdela7is To�'whdm2 . ,Wliieq?PorLow'Iong?
' '' ,., , � � � � � � � � � ' ��" � � � � � �
W6af wt7lbe the negative� af1i� ptomised achon is aot appro,ved? InabrlAyto
tagh tratHe �TSe. aacident rate7 Loss,of 'revenue? -, '
� � ��
FI�PANCIAL�IluIPACT �' .�, : � � � ' ��, : � ' ; � � � � �
?;If�ngfiY�imasttaHa�fhemfoimstionyonprovidehaetoihe�sneyonaread�sn�mg�atyo6mustanswer " �
, iwo,4ucstions; How �cfi is rt gomg to c�l Who is 8�8�'P� ,
� � � � �� � � � �„ ,, � ��, . n „
, � � '
� �� , � � ,
� � � �, i �
r„
„
„
�
�
, �
, �
� ��. � �
� � � � � � � � , ii �`;iS� r r ' i i
{
� � � � �,
�� � � ���
� �� , i��,� �, �„� ' �� ��,n„� �
_„ . + ... � � it., il. � � �
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Narm Colentan, M¢yor
October 30, 2001
Council President Bostrom
Offices of the City Council
3'� Floor
City Hali and Court House
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Councii President Bostrom:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
C!¢yton M. Robinson, Jr., Ciry Attorn¢y Q`_ y ,�,��
c,v,t �;,.rston
400CityHall Telephone:65I26b-8770
ISWestKelloggBlvd Facsimile.�6i1298-5619
Saint P¢ul, Minnesota 55l02
Attached is a draft of an ordinance that amends Sec. 9.01 of the City of Saint Paul
Charier. The Saint Paul Charter Commission voted to submit such language to the City Council
at its regular meeting on October 15, 200L The Charter Commission approved the language by a
majority vote of its members.
The language was submitted to the Commission by the Charter Revision Committee, a
subcomxnittee of the Commission. After two readings, the Commission voted to submit the
ordinance to the Council pursuant to Minn. Stat. §41 Q.12, subd. 7. On behalf of Greg Copeland,
Chair of the St. Paui Charter Commission, I ask that the Councii consider the attached ordinance.
Truly yours,
eghan Riley
�� !
Assist ity Attorney
Attorney for the St. Paul Charter Commission
cs�-Saa3
SAINT PAUL C
OMMISSiON a�
SAINT PAUL,
December 20, 2001
TO: Members of the Saint Paul City Council
FROM: The Saint Paui Charter Commission
RE: Amending Section 9.01 of the Charter
NNESOTA 55102
At the November 28, 2001 City Council meeting, the third reading of the ordinance to amend the
City Charter was presented. It was requested that the Charter Commission's reasons for the
proposal be provided to CouncIl members in writing.
The Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting in September and
again in October and voted unanimously to recommend the change to strike the words:
". .. not to exceed six (6)" in Section 9.01
REASONS FOR CHANGE
1. It is a"housekeeping" change to make the Charter designation of administrative strucwres consistent
with cunent operating practices.
2. Specifically setting the nuinber of departments in the Charter is an artificial limitation on the flexibility
needed manage the functions of city government as conditions change.
3. The philosophy for a basic governing charter has been defined by the L,eague of Minnesota Cities as "A
city charter shouid deal only with the fundamentals of govemmental organization of the clty and leave the
council free to exercise its grant of authoxity by ordinancz." This would include specific lunitations which
may become obsolete, or ignored.
4. On the City Web page, under the "Departments" heading there are actually 22 different entities listed.
Five of them are formally defined as "departments" but Community Services is not listed at all. Others are
very large, manage many assets and function as departmants. For instance, Parks and Recreat3on is named
a"Division" yet iYs manager is appointed by the mayor and holds the title of "department director."
There is also a"deputy director."
5. In the St. Paul I,eague of Women Voters' study of the City Charter, one of the fmdings from
interviewing a large cross-section of off'icials and former mayors who have worked under the City Charter,
limiting the number of departments in the Ciry Charter is inflexible and often circumvented in actual
practice. In comparing ciues of a similar size, the study found that six is a very small number of
departments.
6. In former management theory the thought had been that six departments was the optimal span of control
for one chief administrator to manage. Today in St. Paui there aze many more than six non-departments
under the adnunistration of the mayor's ofFice.
� s
PBINTED ON qECVGLED PAPER
Council File # O �� �.1.�3
�RIGi�JAL
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # l0 �l l 5 i "'E
ORDINANCE
Presented By
Refened To
Committee Date :_
d�.-1�3
1
CTTY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
An ordinance to amend Section 9.01
2 of the Saint Paul Charter in accordance
3 with Minn. Stat. §410.12 to eluninate the
4 limitation of six administrative departments
5
6 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
7
$ Section 1
9
10 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, section 9.01 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul is
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9.01. Executive Departments
There shall be an office of the mayor, office of the city attorney, office of the city clerk
and such additional executive departments, ' as may be established by
ordinance. Each executive department so established sha11 have such functions as are prescribed
by ordinance. Except as hereinafter provided, the head of each executive department shall be
appointed and removed as provided by Section 3.013, and shall have such educational and
professional qualifications as may be prescribed by ordinance. If an executive department so
established shall be restricted in function to police activities, then, and only in such event, the
chief of police appointed pursuant to Section 12.12 shall be head of such department. Every
office, agency or function of city government not otherwise assigned by this Charter or by
ordinance shall be included in the office of the mayor, and no power or duty confened by this
Charter upon a particular office or agency shall be transferred to any other.
PtlBLISH�=�
�� i 7 ro2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Section 2
This ordinance shall be effective 90 days after its passage, approval and publication
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, Subd. 7(2001).
�������`��
C � —��-b3
Requested by Department of:
By:
Form Approved b City
By:
Approved b Mayor fo
By:
gnbmission to Council
PEl3Li�t�e.:�
1�117 'D2
Adopted by Council: Date �b�
Adoption Certified by Counci Secretary
Charter Commission
r�m
�����
10/30/O1
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET
�''
O � -1a>3
No1Q!��54
� � �.�� � «�,.� _
.� 0 �,,.,� !�{'I LI� ❑ ��„�
� ,�� �. �— ❑ ..w,�.,a,,,,�.a
� WvortloRASatsfMrt) ❑
(CLJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Pass ordiasc�ce , which amends the St. Paul Gity Charter
aurv ivrv Apprrne („� or rte�ecc
PLANNING COMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
-� � 1. Hes this persoMrm ever xwked uMer a contrac[ for this departmeM?
VES NO
2. Has this pewoMrm ever heen a cdY emPbyce'7
YES NO
3. Does this peisoNf,m possess a sld� not noimalypossessetl by any cuirent city employee7
YES �
4. Is this peisaJ(1rm a farpe[etl vendo(7 �
YES NO
Charter Amendment n2eded tb more accurately ref�ect the rnsnber of
City departments. Allows fornRnore flexibility for their creation.
More flexibility.
(''�/ry,r�ag �°ofiF���
.'p...9u�Y�'��J+..d. t
48 J 3 5H e8 L93��
IVtunbex of departments will be deft,as an unknown quan�s.ty
rtAGESIFNOTAPPROVED ' ' � "
departments will be in co�iflict with Cha �,
�OUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGEfm (qRCLE ON� YES NO
SOURCE ACTNITYNUMBER
(EJ�WN)
Y
CITY OF SA1NT PAUL
Norm Coleman, Mayor
October 30, 2001
Council President Bosirom
Offices of the City Council
3' Floor
City Hall and Court House
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Councii President Bostrom:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Clayaon M. Kobinson, Jr., C{ry Aatorney
O \ -\i.
Civil Division
400 Ciry Hall Telephone: 65l 266-8710
I S West Keilogg B[vd. F¢csimile: 651 298-5619
Saint Paul, Mannesota 55102
Attached is a draft of an ordinance that amends Sec. 9.01 of the City of Saint Paul
Charter. The Saint Paul Charter Commission voted to submit such language to the City Councii
at its regular meeting on October 15, 2001. The Charter Commission approved the language by a
majority vote of its members.
The language was submitted to the Commission by the Charter Revision Committee, a
subcommittee of the Commission. After two readings, the Commission voted to submit the
ordinance to the Council pursuant to Minn. Stat. §41012, subd. 7. On behalf of Greg Copeland,
Chair of the St. Paul Charter Commission, I ask that the Council consider the attached ordinance.
Truly yours,
eghan Riley
���
Assist ity Attorney
Attorney for the St. Paul Charter Commission
��-�aa3
SAINT PAUL CH `�� �'R COMMISSION a�
G� 9 � �`�L
'=�'s:.,,� x ;�
SAINT PAUL, ��n� '�'��`�_����� ��MINNESOTA55102
- — ����=_�
December 20, 2001
TO: Members of the Saint Pau1 City Council
FROM: The Saint Paul Charter Commission
RE: Amending Section 9.01 of the Charter
At the November 28, 2001 City Council meeting, the third reading of the ordinance to amend the
City Charter was presented. It was requested that the Charter Commission's reasons for the
proposal be provided to Council members in writing.
The Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting in September and
again in October and voted unanimously to recommend the change to strike the words:
". .. not to exceed six (6)" in Section 9.01
REASONS FOR CfIANGE
1. It is a"housekeeping" change to make the Charter desi�ation of administrative structures consistent
with current operating practices.
2. Specifically setting the number of departments in the Charter is an artificial limitation on the flexibility
needed manage the functions of city govermnent as conditions change.
3. The philosophy for a basic governing cl�arter has been defined by the League of Minnesota Cities as "A
city charter should deal only with the fundamentals of governmental organization of the city and leave the
council free to exercise its grant of authority by ordinance." This would include specific limitations which
may become obsolete, or ignored.
4. On the City Web page, under the "Departments" heading there are actually 22 different entities listed.
Five of them are formally defined as "departments" but Community Services is not listed at all. Others are
very large, manage many assets and function as deparhnents. For instance, Pazks and Recreation is named
a"Division" yet iPs manager is appointed by the mayor and holds the title of "department director."
There is also a"deputy director."
5. In the St. Paul I,eague of Women Voters' study of the City Charter, one of the findings from
interviewing a large cross-section of officials and former mayors who have worked under the City Charter,
luniting the number of departments in the City Charter is inflexible and often circumvented in actual
practice. In comparing cities of a similaz size, the study found that six is a very small number of
deparrments.
6. In former management theory the thought had been that six departments was the optimal span of control
for one chief adminisuator to manage. Today in St. Paul there aze many more than six non-deparUnents
under the administration of the mayor's office.
�
PRINTED ON flECVCLED PAPER
Council Fite # � l— l.1.�3
��� V��Y�t�
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # �� �
ORDINANCE
CITY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Presented By
Refened To
�� C
�
Committee Date :
a�, - taa�,
1
An ordinance to amend Section 9A1
Z of the Saint Paul Charter in accordance
3 with Minn. Stat. §410.12 to eliminate the
q limitation of six administrative departments
5
6 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
7
$ Section 1
9
10 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, section 9.01 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul is
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9.01. Executive Departments
There shall be an office of the mayor, office of the city attorney, office of the city clerk
and such additional executive deparhnents, � as may be established by
ordinance. Each executive department so established shall have such functions as are prescribed
by ordinance. Excep[ as hereinafter provided, the head of each executive department shall be
appointed and removed as provided by Section 3.013, and shall have such educational and
professional qualifications as may be prescribed by ardinance. If an executive department so
established shall be restricted in function to police activities, then, and only in such event, the
chief of police appointed pursuant to Section 12.12 shall be head of such department. Every
office, agency or function of city government not otherwise assigned by this Charter or by
ordinance shall be included in the office of the mayor, and no power or duty confened by this
Charter upon a particular office or agency shall be transfened to any other.
PIt�LISNf��
'�117 'UZ
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
S
9
10
Section 2
This ordinance shall be effective 90 days a$er its passa�e, approval and publication
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, Subd. 7(2001).
�'�I������
a � -��.a
Requested by Department of:
By:
Form Approved b� City
By:
Appiaved b Mayor :o�
Hy:
Submission to Covncil
PL'8? 1��1i:�
�i7ro2
P3opCed by Council: Date yp�_�stc10�
P.doption Certified by Couni`1 Seczetary
�.
Charter Co�nission 10/30/O1
�OMAG7 Pff2SON 8 PFiONE -
M han Ril
IUST BEOP! COUPICILAGEN�A BY (DATQ
�� AsE�GN
IiIAA� FOR
pqflDlf
ORDOt
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET
oa.A,�rtmetctoR
o t - tza3
No �10 �� � � 4
, , .,
dneawct
� arr►nrneav ( �� ❑ uu�xxasxK
ole
� RIWCMLfEANCA➢R � ❑ AUMCLLiaNlACR6
�11FYORI�M11smi11Mi) �
(CUP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Pass ordiP.ance , which amends the St. Paul City Charter
or
PLANNING CObIb11SS10N
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE CAMMISSION
Hasthis PersoNFirtn everwoYted under a wMraciforthis tlepartmenl? �
YES NO
Hestlde P�� ever heen e dhi �DbY�'+
Y6 NO
Does this peraorvF'm P� a SIdN 1rot �y�ssecsaA CY anY WrreM city employee?
YES NO'
ia Mis persoMirm a targeRed vendoYt
YES NO
Ctiarter Amendment needed to more accurately ref�zct the number of
City departments. Allows fo .r�;znore flexibility for Cheir creation.
More flexibility.
�� �����Y�'� f„,�fi���uF
���e � � 2��1
DISADVANTAGES IF APPROVEO
Nisnber of departments will be �eft as an unknown quan��ty
de�artments wiZl be in coaiflict with Ch�.ter �.
)TAL AMOUNT OF TR0.NSACTIOH 5 COST�REYENU6 BUDf:EfED (CIRCLE CiNk7 `!EE
INDING SOURCE
ANCW. MFORMATION (IXPWN)
ACTNRY NI1MBfiR
m'
�
� � • • , � � � � � � � I � , , , ' , i , '
� � � � �totrr�ra'�o�xn� . � � � � � � �
, � � „
� �
�
� � � ��� �. � � � � �� � � �
' aelow are � routings forthe sQC mo�`&equmftypes of iioc�mts:
corizRncrs,<� ���cex�j couflc�,lz�soiv�ox(��a�ec�s)
�
� � i � � ,�u�e a�.y � � � � � � i , �pa�m�ncD�,�co� � � , , �
z. Depmtu�eatD'aecinx, z. 0fficeofF'm�ciatSeavicesD'qec(ru, ; '
�
� �� 3;� CiEy�Attomey� ' � � 3. Gity.Atbosney�;� � ,�
4_ Maya�lXssistant(facca�ntesctsover$25,046) , 4. Magix/As�gt�f `
�
� � � � � � � �.,,I3�amI2ights�(�'orconhactsoviaSS(Y.I�bO}' �S..Cit}rCo�1', � � �
b�
,� ; 6. O�cu �F'
6. Office�masc�a}Seevices Ac�B ��,=��8
� � � +- � � �
ADMINISTRATiVE'ORDERS(BadgetReaisi�), COUNCII.RESOLUTION(e�l'ofl�s�dOrdinaoce.c)-
i. 'Acfivirylvfauager�Depmin,�tiA«�oimtaot , 1. De�mentD;tectoc
�� 2. Depak�tDdec6or ��,' '. �, � ��, , 2- ' �, ' p� ,.' ��'� �
� 3. O�ce'ofF'ma�cial Seivices Diredot ' 3. bfa}!aslAss��t, � � �
' 4 '.'�ty Cle�c ,'� � � � � � 4 �CiFpCoti�l � � � � �
5` OSice, o�E"�al Se�dices Acconnting . � ,
, t1D1vIII�IISTRATFVE ORDEILS (aIl others) ,.' ' F.XE?CEITIVFs ORDA2
i`. Depa�D¢e� � 1 D�im�Di�� .
� ,
2.''Cd9AtXome9 � "'' � � 3.C�y`Attotney�.' � � ,.
' , , 3. 08`ice':afFi�ciatSavicesDuectdr 3. Map,or! ',A "s�ant`
4. �CityCleik � � � 4:��Qi(gCt� ,� �� � , �;
, � �
'', � � � �
GNATC�REPAGES
� �UTAL29FINIBER'OFSI
.
�
��
IndicaYetfie # ofigages om whick stgnatutes'sre req�iired mid prpercl'yp orflag wch of,tLacpages.
� �� � ,, , „ �i ,
AGTIOI�FR.F �"� s � � ' � ' � ,: � � � ,�' � �
Desen�bewLatt}�epmgecUrequestseeYstoacx�ompli�metfl�'e�rcOnolagical>orderoraodetof�enpottanee sv�iehevetis,
' „ . w � r' � . r � � �
° ' � . �..,,;�. ,, ' ' � �
tARR[C 1CIeS�fEIICe'S .�
���4„ ���� �� � � � {lCCt1 �CBC� ���•6 �� ItCmIIly �Wl�t „ �
, epjll6pII8OC � J COID�7 �� OUC �8
' ����.�� .---�---y,L«.� � � �� Y`"",11C�F7RV8fC.�. , �
�� . , - ,� �. �
..
'� � ,� i' � , �, , , �
„
. ,' � � �, , , � � , � �
aIIisoxaL s�v1c� corr�acis: `- , " , , ' , � , �
� �� � ' �ns info�aaonvn7l be � � � � �-.� —
` "- used to det�iiine the ciiy's ltabilityfo�workers epmpmsalion alawvq ta�ces sad ptopec e:v� ''
'seiviceh�riugnite.s. � �
� � �. —
INiTFATiNGPROBLEM, fSSUE, OPPORTUA7I'fY
���
F�spisinflwsjtuati�oicoadifi�sthatcreatedaneedforyo� ,project.or;Gqaest �
� � � � `,, , � � , " �, �
,
� �
�
�
� �
O „
ADVA21T.4GES.IEAPPR VED
.
i
� � .
�� � �
,' 7ndicatewhetheitlusis �d ci6zenswili- ��tyus�proect/�acfion, orwhetfier4hereare�ficwaysm
�^ � WhichHteCx ofSamtP`auE ' � ��
� � � � , ��
� D3SADVANfAOESIFAPX'RO�ED � � � ' � ; ` �� � � �
VPhat�Bati•ie effects Ex.majorcLeuge.g"Lo ews4ng oc`Qas�'Pme�.s miShf?tusPmJectf�ue�Produce'sfrtts pacsed
e'' tsfficdela7is To�'whdm2 . ,Wliieq?PorLow'Iong?
' '' ,., , � � � � � � � � � ' ��" � � � � � �
W6af wt7lbe the negative� af1i� ptomised achon is aot appro,ved? InabrlAyto
tagh tratHe �TSe. aacident rate7 Loss,of 'revenue? -, '
� � ��
FI�PANCIAL�IluIPACT �' .�, : � � � ' ��, : � ' ; � � � � �
?;If�ngfiY�imasttaHa�fhemfoimstionyonprovidehaetoihe�sneyonaread�sn�mg�atyo6mustanswer " �
, iwo,4ucstions; How �cfi is rt gomg to c�l Who is 8�8�'P� ,
� � � � �� � � � �„ ,, � ��, . n „
, � � '
� �� , � � ,
� � � �, i �
r„
„
„
�
�
, �
, �
� ��. � �
� � � � � � � � , ii �`;iS� r r ' i i
{
� � � � �,
�� � � ���
� �� , i��,� �, �„� ' �� ��,n„� �
_„ . + ... � � it., il. � � �
CITY OF SAINT PAUL
Narm Colentan, M¢yor
October 30, 2001
Council President Bostrom
Offices of the City Council
3'� Floor
City Hali and Court House
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Councii President Bostrom:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
C!¢yton M. Robinson, Jr., Ciry Attorn¢y Q`_ y ,�,��
c,v,t �;,.rston
400CityHall Telephone:65I26b-8770
ISWestKelloggBlvd Facsimile.�6i1298-5619
Saint P¢ul, Minnesota 55l02
Attached is a draft of an ordinance that amends Sec. 9.01 of the City of Saint Paul
Charier. The Saint Paul Charter Commission voted to submit such language to the City Council
at its regular meeting on October 15, 200L The Charter Commission approved the language by a
majority vote of its members.
The language was submitted to the Commission by the Charter Revision Committee, a
subcomxnittee of the Commission. After two readings, the Commission voted to submit the
ordinance to the Council pursuant to Minn. Stat. §41 Q.12, subd. 7. On behalf of Greg Copeland,
Chair of the St. Paui Charter Commission, I ask that the Councii consider the attached ordinance.
Truly yours,
eghan Riley
�� !
Assist ity Attorney
Attorney for the St. Paul Charter Commission
cs�-Saa3
SAINT PAUL C
OMMISSiON a�
SAINT PAUL,
December 20, 2001
TO: Members of the Saint Paul City Council
FROM: The Saint Paui Charter Commission
RE: Amending Section 9.01 of the Charter
NNESOTA 55102
At the November 28, 2001 City Council meeting, the third reading of the ordinance to amend the
City Charter was presented. It was requested that the Charter Commission's reasons for the
proposal be provided to CouncIl members in writing.
The Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting in September and
again in October and voted unanimously to recommend the change to strike the words:
". .. not to exceed six (6)" in Section 9.01
REASONS FOR CHANGE
1. It is a"housekeeping" change to make the Charter designation of administrative strucwres consistent
with cunent operating practices.
2. Specifically setting the nuinber of departments in the Charter is an artificial limitation on the flexibility
needed manage the functions of city government as conditions change.
3. The philosophy for a basic governing charter has been defined by the L,eague of Minnesota Cities as "A
city charter shouid deal only with the fundamentals of govemmental organization of the clty and leave the
council free to exercise its grant of authoxity by ordinancz." This would include specific lunitations which
may become obsolete, or ignored.
4. On the City Web page, under the "Departments" heading there are actually 22 different entities listed.
Five of them are formally defined as "departments" but Community Services is not listed at all. Others are
very large, manage many assets and function as departmants. For instance, Parks and Recreat3on is named
a"Division" yet iYs manager is appointed by the mayor and holds the title of "department director."
There is also a"deputy director."
5. In the St. Paul I,eague of Women Voters' study of the City Charter, one of the fmdings from
interviewing a large cross-section of off'icials and former mayors who have worked under the City Charter,
limiting the number of departments in the Ciry Charter is inflexible and often circumvented in actual
practice. In comparing ciues of a similar size, the study found that six is a very small number of
departments.
6. In former management theory the thought had been that six departments was the optimal span of control
for one chief administrator to manage. Today in St. Paui there aze many more than six non-departments
under the adnunistration of the mayor's ofFice.
� s
PBINTED ON qECVGLED PAPER
Council File # O �� �.1.�3
�RIGi�JAL
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # l0 �l l 5 i "'E
ORDINANCE
Presented By
Refened To
Committee Date :_
d�.-1�3
1
CTTY OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
An ordinance to amend Section 9.01
2 of the Saint Paul Charter in accordance
3 with Minn. Stat. §410.12 to eluninate the
4 limitation of six administrative departments
5
6 THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN:
7
$ Section 1
9
10 Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, section 9.01 of the Charter of the City of Saint Paul is
I1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
hereby amended to read as follows:
Sec. 9.01. Executive Departments
There shall be an office of the mayor, office of the city attorney, office of the city clerk
and such additional executive departments, ' as may be established by
ordinance. Each executive department so established sha11 have such functions as are prescribed
by ordinance. Except as hereinafter provided, the head of each executive department shall be
appointed and removed as provided by Section 3.013, and shall have such educational and
professional qualifications as may be prescribed by ordinance. If an executive department so
established shall be restricted in function to police activities, then, and only in such event, the
chief of police appointed pursuant to Section 12.12 shall be head of such department. Every
office, agency or function of city government not otherwise assigned by this Charter or by
ordinance shall be included in the office of the mayor, and no power or duty confened by this
Charter upon a particular office or agency shall be transferred to any other.
PtlBLISH�=�
�� i 7 ro2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Section 2
This ordinance shall be effective 90 days after its passage, approval and publication
pursuant to Minn. Stat. §410.12, Subd. 7(2001).
�������`��
C � —��-b3
Requested by Department of:
By:
Form Approved b City
By:
Approved b Mayor fo
By:
gnbmission to Council
PEl3Li�t�e.:�
1�117 'D2
Adopted by Council: Date �b�
Adoption Certified by Counci Secretary
Charter Commission
r�m
�����
10/30/O1
TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES
GREEN SHEET
�''
O � -1a>3
No1Q!��54
� � �.�� � «�,.� _
.� 0 �,,.,� !�{'I LI� ❑ ��„�
� ,�� �. �— ❑ ..w,�.,a,,,,�.a
� WvortloRASatsfMrt) ❑
(CLJP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE)
Pass ordiasc�ce , which amends the St. Paul Gity Charter
aurv ivrv Apprrne („� or rte�ecc
PLANNING COMMISSION
CIB COMMITTEE
CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
-� � 1. Hes this persoMrm ever xwked uMer a contrac[ for this departmeM?
VES NO
2. Has this pewoMrm ever heen a cdY emPbyce'7
YES NO
3. Does this peisoNf,m possess a sld� not noimalypossessetl by any cuirent city employee7
YES �
4. Is this peisaJ(1rm a farpe[etl vendo(7 �
YES NO
Charter Amendment n2eded tb more accurately ref�ect the rnsnber of
City departments. Allows fornRnore flexibility for their creation.
More flexibility.
(''�/ry,r�ag �°ofiF���
.'p...9u�Y�'��J+..d. t
48 J 3 5H e8 L93��
IVtunbex of departments will be deft,as an unknown quan�s.ty
rtAGESIFNOTAPPROVED ' ' � "
departments will be in co�iflict with Cha �,
�OUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGEfm (qRCLE ON� YES NO
SOURCE ACTNITYNUMBER
(EJ�WN)
Y
CITY OF SA1NT PAUL
Norm Coleman, Mayor
October 30, 2001
Council President Bosirom
Offices of the City Council
3' Floor
City Hall and Court House
Saint Paul, MN 55102
Dear Councii President Bostrom:
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Clayaon M. Kobinson, Jr., C{ry Aatorney
O \ -\i.
Civil Division
400 Ciry Hall Telephone: 65l 266-8710
I S West Keilogg B[vd. F¢csimile: 651 298-5619
Saint Paul, Mannesota 55102
Attached is a draft of an ordinance that amends Sec. 9.01 of the City of Saint Paul
Charter. The Saint Paul Charter Commission voted to submit such language to the City Councii
at its regular meeting on October 15, 2001. The Charter Commission approved the language by a
majority vote of its members.
The language was submitted to the Commission by the Charter Revision Committee, a
subcommittee of the Commission. After two readings, the Commission voted to submit the
ordinance to the Council pursuant to Minn. Stat. §41012, subd. 7. On behalf of Greg Copeland,
Chair of the St. Paul Charter Commission, I ask that the Council consider the attached ordinance.
Truly yours,
eghan Riley
���
Assist ity Attorney
Attorney for the St. Paul Charter Commission
��-�aa3
SAINT PAUL CH `�� �'R COMMISSION a�
G� 9 � �`�L
'=�'s:.,,� x ;�
SAINT PAUL, ��n� '�'��`�_����� ��MINNESOTA55102
- — ����=_�
December 20, 2001
TO: Members of the Saint Pau1 City Council
FROM: The Saint Paul Charter Commission
RE: Amending Section 9.01 of the Charter
At the November 28, 2001 City Council meeting, the third reading of the ordinance to amend the
City Charter was presented. It was requested that the Charter Commission's reasons for the
proposal be provided to Council members in writing.
The Charter Commission has reviewed the proposed amendment at its meeting in September and
again in October and voted unanimously to recommend the change to strike the words:
". .. not to exceed six (6)" in Section 9.01
REASONS FOR CfIANGE
1. It is a"housekeeping" change to make the Charter desi�ation of administrative structures consistent
with current operating practices.
2. Specifically setting the number of departments in the Charter is an artificial limitation on the flexibility
needed manage the functions of city govermnent as conditions change.
3. The philosophy for a basic governing cl�arter has been defined by the League of Minnesota Cities as "A
city charter should deal only with the fundamentals of governmental organization of the city and leave the
council free to exercise its grant of authority by ordinance." This would include specific limitations which
may become obsolete, or ignored.
4. On the City Web page, under the "Departments" heading there are actually 22 different entities listed.
Five of them are formally defined as "departments" but Community Services is not listed at all. Others are
very large, manage many assets and function as deparhnents. For instance, Pazks and Recreation is named
a"Division" yet iPs manager is appointed by the mayor and holds the title of "department director."
There is also a"deputy director."
5. In the St. Paul I,eague of Women Voters' study of the City Charter, one of the findings from
interviewing a large cross-section of officials and former mayors who have worked under the City Charter,
luniting the number of departments in the City Charter is inflexible and often circumvented in actual
practice. In comparing cities of a similaz size, the study found that six is a very small number of
deparrments.
6. In former management theory the thought had been that six departments was the optimal span of control
for one chief adminisuator to manage. Today in St. Paul there aze many more than six non-deparUnents
under the administration of the mayor's office.
�
PRINTED ON flECVCLED PAPER