00-269- �° Council File # Op � Gf.( q
—�
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # (�2-�7 � �o
Presented By
ORDINANCE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Referred To Committee: Date
1 An ordinance to repeal
2 existing Chapter 431 of the Legislative Code
3 which provided for the grant of franchises to teiecommunications companies.
4
5 Section 1.
6
7 Chapter 431 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code is hereby repealed in its entirety.
8
9 Section 2.
10
11 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and
12 publication
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Requested by Department of:
Public Works ��/�'
By:
For.
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary B�,
By= �\� C "� ��L ��� �" by Mayor for Submission to Council
Approved by Ma Date / Z�s-ayv J Jj 1 y� �„
J g �� IY�'L� u � C��i ��vvl�
By: �–�!� � W�
��
'�'.,�� .� .�'..� .
Adopted by Council: Date Q,� � '�oc�
—� ,
• , _. �
pEPARTMENr/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINff1ATED nO_~ ✓
Public Works Depariment Z�5 n -d GREEN SHE� No. 10271 s
NTACTPEFSON&PHONE �/� � ��! � INRIAUDATE
�{ r/ I�iDEPARThIENTDIREGTOR �t"i Q4 CT'CAUNCIL
omas Kuhfeld 266-6111 G � �
� UMBEp FOp I� CRYATTORNEY n7y - 3�-� ❑ CrtY CLERK
� BEONCO�AGENDA�'fE) �//�•� � �G I—l���p�qE�pq ❑FIN.8MCaT.SEHVICESDIR.
. 6 � � �Z.� / 1_J
fl � MAYOR (OR ASS�STANn � ❑
LCJ�'f�191 fy
ILLtOF51CaNR7UREPAGES l (CLIPALLLOCATIONSPoRSIGNANfl� U0.S.A(:IAiE UDEPT.ACCAUfJiANT
fiEWESiID
roval of the attached ordinance which repeals the existing telecommunications franchise ordinance.
Cotan�ENDA'noNS npWOVe �A) «Aejm (a� pEpgpNpL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
PLANNINGCOMMISSION _C��SERVICECOMMISSIIXJ �. HasMisperson/firtneverworketlunderacontractforihisdepartment?
CIBCAMMRTEE YES NO
— — 2. Has Mis pecsoNficm eve( been a city empfuyee?
A SrAFF _ YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curreM ciry employee?
— — YES NO
PPORTS WHICH CAUNCII�&IEGTIVE? Explain afl yes a�swers on separate sheet and attach to green shcet
ITNTIATITIG PROBLEM.ISSUE.OP�pF1iUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN. WHEFE. WH1�.
Recent State legislation prohibits franchising telecommunications companies. Chapter 431 of the Legislative Code is no
longer legal.
ADVAMAGES IF APPRO�ED:
Removes unenforceabie language from the Legislative Code.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED:
None
����°��.'���:��
s: ���� �.
��� � E z���
DISADVAMAGES IF NOTAPPROVED: �
Chapter 43� of the Legisiative Code wiil remain on the books even though it is unenforceable. -
C�+����? �+a�eaPCh C��o#�'
� MRR � 6 2fl�1
OSAL AMOUTYT OF SRANSAC710N $ Not Applicable COSTIHEVENUE BUDGE(ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES wo
FUNDMG SOURCE � AqNfTY NUMBER
PINANQALINGORMATIOR(IXPWN) : � .. � ..� .,,. __. - --
\.
- �° Council File # Op � Gf.( q
—�
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # (�2-�7 � �o
Presented By
ORDINANCE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Referred To Committee: Date
1 An ordinance to repeal
2 existing Chapter 431 of the Legislative Code
3 which provided for the grant of franchises to teiecommunications companies.
4
5 Section 1.
6
7 Chapter 431 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code is hereby repealed in its entirety.
8
9 Section 2.
10
11 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and
12 publication
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Requested by Department of:
Public Works ��/�'
By:
For.
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary B�,
By= �\� C "� ��L ��� �" by Mayor for Submission to Council
Approved by Ma Date / Z�s-ayv J Jj 1 y� �„
J g �� IY�'L� u � C��i ��vvl�
By: �–�!� � W�
��
'�'.,�� .� .�'..� .
Adopted by Council: Date Q,� � '�oc�
—� ,
• , _. �
pEPARTMENr/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINff1ATED nO_~ ✓
Public Works Depariment Z�5 n -d GREEN SHE� No. 10271 s
NTACTPEFSON&PHONE �/� � ��! � INRIAUDATE
�{ r/ I�iDEPARThIENTDIREGTOR �t"i Q4 CT'CAUNCIL
omas Kuhfeld 266-6111 G � �
� UMBEp FOp I� CRYATTORNEY n7y - 3�-� ❑ CrtY CLERK
� BEONCO�AGENDA�'fE) �//�•� � �G I—l���p�qE�pq ❑FIN.8MCaT.SEHVICESDIR.
. 6 � � �Z.� / 1_J
fl � MAYOR (OR ASS�STANn � ❑
LCJ�'f�191 fy
ILLtOF51CaNR7UREPAGES l (CLIPALLLOCATIONSPoRSIGNANfl� U0.S.A(:IAiE UDEPT.ACCAUfJiANT
fiEWESiID
roval of the attached ordinance which repeals the existing telecommunications franchise ordinance.
Cotan�ENDA'noNS npWOVe �A) «Aejm (a� pEpgpNpL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
PLANNINGCOMMISSION _C��SERVICECOMMISSIIXJ �. HasMisperson/firtneverworketlunderacontractforihisdepartment?
CIBCAMMRTEE YES NO
— — 2. Has Mis pecsoNficm eve( been a city empfuyee?
A SrAFF _ YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curreM ciry employee?
— — YES NO
PPORTS WHICH CAUNCII�&IEGTIVE? Explain afl yes a�swers on separate sheet and attach to green shcet
ITNTIATITIG PROBLEM.ISSUE.OP�pF1iUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN. WHEFE. WH1�.
Recent State legislation prohibits franchising telecommunications companies. Chapter 431 of the Legislative Code is no
longer legal.
ADVAMAGES IF APPRO�ED:
Removes unenforceabie language from the Legislative Code.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED:
None
����°��.'���:��
s: ���� �.
��� � E z���
DISADVAMAGES IF NOTAPPROVED: �
Chapter 43� of the Legisiative Code wiil remain on the books even though it is unenforceable. -
C�+����? �+a�eaPCh C��o#�'
� MRR � 6 2fl�1
OSAL AMOUTYT OF SRANSAC710N $ Not Applicable COSTIHEVENUE BUDGE(ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES wo
FUNDMG SOURCE � AqNfTY NUMBER
PINANQALINGORMATIOR(IXPWN) : � .. � ..� .,,. __. - --
\.
- �° Council File # Op � Gf.( q
—�
Ordinance #
Green Sheet # (�2-�7 � �o
Presented By
ORDINANCE
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA
Referred To Committee: Date
1 An ordinance to repeal
2 existing Chapter 431 of the Legislative Code
3 which provided for the grant of franchises to teiecommunications companies.
4
5 Section 1.
6
7 Chapter 431 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code is hereby repealed in its entirety.
8
9 Section 2.
10
11 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and
12 publication
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Requested by Department of:
Public Works ��/�'
By:
For.
Adoption Certified by Council Secretary B�,
By= �\� C "� ��L ��� �" by Mayor for Submission to Council
Approved by Ma Date / Z�s-ayv J Jj 1 y� �„
J g �� IY�'L� u � C��i ��vvl�
By: �–�!� � W�
��
'�'.,�� .� .�'..� .
Adopted by Council: Date Q,� � '�oc�
—� ,
• , _. �
pEPARTMENr/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATEINff1ATED nO_~ ✓
Public Works Depariment Z�5 n -d GREEN SHE� No. 10271 s
NTACTPEFSON&PHONE �/� � ��! � INRIAUDATE
�{ r/ I�iDEPARThIENTDIREGTOR �t"i Q4 CT'CAUNCIL
omas Kuhfeld 266-6111 G � �
� UMBEp FOp I� CRYATTORNEY n7y - 3�-� ❑ CrtY CLERK
� BEONCO�AGENDA�'fE) �//�•� � �G I—l���p�qE�pq ❑FIN.8MCaT.SEHVICESDIR.
. 6 � � �Z.� / 1_J
fl � MAYOR (OR ASS�STANn � ❑
LCJ�'f�191 fy
ILLtOF51CaNR7UREPAGES l (CLIPALLLOCATIONSPoRSIGNANfl� U0.S.A(:IAiE UDEPT.ACCAUfJiANT
fiEWESiID
roval of the attached ordinance which repeals the existing telecommunications franchise ordinance.
Cotan�ENDA'noNS npWOVe �A) «Aejm (a� pEpgpNpL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS:
PLANNINGCOMMISSION _C��SERVICECOMMISSIIXJ �. HasMisperson/firtneverworketlunderacontractforihisdepartment?
CIBCAMMRTEE YES NO
— — 2. Has Mis pecsoNficm eve( been a city empfuyee?
A SrAFF _ YES NO
DISTRICT COUNCIL 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normalty possessed by any curreM ciry employee?
— — YES NO
PPORTS WHICH CAUNCII�&IEGTIVE? Explain afl yes a�swers on separate sheet and attach to green shcet
ITNTIATITIG PROBLEM.ISSUE.OP�pF1iUNITY (WHO. WHAT. WHEN. WHEFE. WH1�.
Recent State legislation prohibits franchising telecommunications companies. Chapter 431 of the Legislative Code is no
longer legal.
ADVAMAGES IF APPRO�ED:
Removes unenforceabie language from the Legislative Code.
DISADVANTAGES IF APPflOVED:
None
����°��.'���:��
s: ���� �.
��� � E z���
DISADVAMAGES IF NOTAPPROVED: �
Chapter 43� of the Legisiative Code wiil remain on the books even though it is unenforceable. -
C�+����? �+a�eaPCh C��o#�'
� MRR � 6 2fl�1
OSAL AMOUTYT OF SRANSAC710N $ Not Applicable COSTIHEVENUE BUDGE(ED (CIRCLE ONE) YES wo
FUNDMG SOURCE � AqNfTY NUMBER
PINANQALINGORMATIOR(IXPWN) : � .. � ..� .,,. __. - --
\.