The URL can be used to link to this page

97-1422�L Presented By Ordinance # Green Sheet # �5 � � ! RDINANCE !�� PAUL, MINNESOTA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Referred To Council File # ` 7 /yz Zr Committee: Date An ordinance repealing Saint Paul Legislative Code Chapter 220, pertaining to dumping on private property THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Chapter 220 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety. Section 2 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and publication. Ar1�1 ieurfl � , ..., y Reguested by Llepartment of: J � ! /f��/_' �� a�/I Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By : 1 \ �� ,-.,-, Approved by Mayor: Date tLIL4 �� By : ,,. � o� � Form Approved by City Attorney By: (/L�'��) , �t�t" �-xo� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY � �i��N Adopted by Council: Date D�,�at�� " - tz OFFICE oF LIEP Date: GREEN SHEET Lawrence Zangs 266-9083 J �_ � _ �7 N° 35199 - 1 EPARTMENT DIRECTOR ZT1' COUNCIL 2 ITY ATTORNEY ITY CLE[2K ust be on CounCil Agenda by: vocsx 9ZRECTOR IN. S MGT. SVC. DZR. � YO[2 (OR ASSISTAN OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: epeal St. Paul Leg. Code Chapter 220. to consolidate permitting and enforcing authority for all land filling activities under the Office of License Inspection and Environmental Protection ECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RErECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE WNTRACTS ?3[JST ANSWER THE £OLLOIt2NG: PLANNING COt _ CIVIL SERVZCE COFMISSION 1. Has the person/firm ever wotked under a contcact for this department? CIB COMMITTE£ _ BUSINESS R£VISW COUNCIL YES NO STAFF � 2. Has this pexson/fitm ever been a City employee? DISTRICP COURT _ Y6$ NO 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any SUPPORPS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Current City employee? YES NO lain all YES ansners on a separate aheet and attach. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Currently Chapter 220 gives certain auChority to the Dept. of Public Works for issuing permits to deposit clean £ill on private property. Chapter 33 of the Leg. Code authorizes the Building Official in LIEP to issue grading permits for land filling activities in conjunction with construotion. LIEP also enforces erosion/sediment control practices associated with land filling activities. Having two permitting authorities presented enforcement problems for staff and confusion for the public. Per and agreement with Public Works in 1994, the Building Inspection Section of ZIEP took over responsibilities for issuing fill permits. The proposed amendments to the ordinance would legally recognize this a reement and provide the necessary enablin language. VANTAGES IF APPROVED: 1)Provides one place for the public to obtain a permit. 2)Eliminates historical en£orcement problem by making one agency responsible for compliance monitoring. 3)LIEP's business is issuing permits and licenses on private property. Sinoe ost of these land filling activities occur on private property the shift of this responsibility from Public Works to LIEP is appropriate. ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: one ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Continuing the dual permitting function in both Public Works and LIEP is an inefficient delivery of services to the publie and is inconsistent with current state and county rules. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED YES NO FUNDTNG SOT3RCE ACTIVITY ER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: EEXPLAIN) �� ",� 2 t� iS97 97Y/yzl CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: May 23, 1997 To: Gary Erickson - Pub. Works From: Lawrence R. Zangs - LIEP �� V RE: Changes to Legisfative Code for Permitting Dumping of Fiil on Private Property. This memo confirms the voice-mail I received from you on May 20th indicating your approval of the proposed changes to Chapter 220. and Chapter 33, concerning the above. Regarding the definition of "clean fili", this is the terminology used in the Ramsey County Solid Waste Ordinance. Since the County regulates the dumping of materiais not meeting the clean fill specifications, it is appropriate to use the same definitions for consistency of enforcement between the two jurisdictions. Also, the maximum 10% allowance for clean fill to consist of concrete, giass, brick or similar inert material is a recognition that you may have some of this type of material mixed with natural soils. As long as the size of the material doesn't present a compaction issue this would not present any problems. I am sending these ordinance changes to the City Attorney's Office for review and then on to the City Council for their consideration. cc: Stacey Becker Tom Eggum �L Presented By Ordinance # Green Sheet # �5 � � ! RDINANCE !�� PAUL, MINNESOTA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Referred To Council File # ` 7 /yz Zr Committee: Date An ordinance repealing Saint Paul Legislative Code Chapter 220, pertaining to dumping on private property THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Chapter 220 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety. Section 2 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and publication. Ar1�1 ieurfl � , ..., y Reguested by Llepartment of: J � ! /f��/_' �� a�/I Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By : 1 \ �� ,-.,-, Approved by Mayor: Date tLIL4 �� By : ,,. � o� � Form Approved by City Attorney By: (/L�'��) , �t�t" �-xo� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY � �i��N Adopted by Council: Date D�,�at�� " - tz OFFICE oF LIEP Date: GREEN SHEET Lawrence Zangs 266-9083 J �_ � _ �7 N° 35199 - 1 EPARTMENT DIRECTOR ZT1' COUNCIL 2 ITY ATTORNEY ITY CLE[2K ust be on CounCil Agenda by: vocsx 9ZRECTOR IN. S MGT. SVC. DZR. � YO[2 (OR ASSISTAN OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: epeal St. Paul Leg. Code Chapter 220. to consolidate permitting and enforcing authority for all land filling activities under the Office of License Inspection and Environmental Protection ECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RErECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE WNTRACTS ?3[JST ANSWER THE £OLLOIt2NG: PLANNING COt _ CIVIL SERVZCE COFMISSION 1. Has the person/firm ever wotked under a contcact for this department? CIB COMMITTE£ _ BUSINESS R£VISW COUNCIL YES NO STAFF � 2. Has this pexson/fitm ever been a City employee? DISTRICP COURT _ Y6$ NO 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any SUPPORPS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Current City employee? YES NO lain all YES ansners on a separate aheet and attach. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Currently Chapter 220 gives certain auChority to the Dept. of Public Works for issuing permits to deposit clean £ill on private property. Chapter 33 of the Leg. Code authorizes the Building Official in LIEP to issue grading permits for land filling activities in conjunction with construotion. LIEP also enforces erosion/sediment control practices associated with land filling activities. Having two permitting authorities presented enforcement problems for staff and confusion for the public. Per and agreement with Public Works in 1994, the Building Inspection Section of ZIEP took over responsibilities for issuing fill permits. The proposed amendments to the ordinance would legally recognize this a reement and provide the necessary enablin language. VANTAGES IF APPROVED: 1)Provides one place for the public to obtain a permit. 2)Eliminates historical en£orcement problem by making one agency responsible for compliance monitoring. 3)LIEP's business is issuing permits and licenses on private property. Sinoe ost of these land filling activities occur on private property the shift of this responsibility from Public Works to LIEP is appropriate. ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: one ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Continuing the dual permitting function in both Public Works and LIEP is an inefficient delivery of services to the publie and is inconsistent with current state and county rules. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED YES NO FUNDTNG SOT3RCE ACTIVITY ER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: EEXPLAIN) �� ",� 2 t� iS97 97Y/yzl CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: May 23, 1997 To: Gary Erickson - Pub. Works From: Lawrence R. Zangs - LIEP �� V RE: Changes to Legisfative Code for Permitting Dumping of Fiil on Private Property. This memo confirms the voice-mail I received from you on May 20th indicating your approval of the proposed changes to Chapter 220. and Chapter 33, concerning the above. Regarding the definition of "clean fili", this is the terminology used in the Ramsey County Solid Waste Ordinance. Since the County regulates the dumping of materiais not meeting the clean fill specifications, it is appropriate to use the same definitions for consistency of enforcement between the two jurisdictions. Also, the maximum 10% allowance for clean fill to consist of concrete, giass, brick or similar inert material is a recognition that you may have some of this type of material mixed with natural soils. As long as the size of the material doesn't present a compaction issue this would not present any problems. I am sending these ordinance changes to the City Attorney's Office for review and then on to the City Council for their consideration. cc: Stacey Becker Tom Eggum �L Presented By Ordinance # Green Sheet # �5 � � ! RDINANCE !�� PAUL, MINNESOTA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Referred To Council File # ` 7 /yz Zr Committee: Date An ordinance repealing Saint Paul Legislative Code Chapter 220, pertaining to dumping on private property THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1 Chapter 220 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code shall be and hereby is repealed in its entirety. Section 2 This ordinance shall take effect and be in force thirty (30) days following its passage, approval and publication. Ar1�1 ieurfl � , ..., y Reguested by Llepartment of: J � ! /f��/_' �� a�/I Adoption Certified by Council Secretary By : 1 \ �� ,-.,-, Approved by Mayor: Date tLIL4 �� By : ,,. � o� � Form Approved by City Attorney By: (/L�'��) , �t�t" �-xo� Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council BY � �i��N Adopted by Council: Date D�,�at�� " - tz OFFICE oF LIEP Date: GREEN SHEET Lawrence Zangs 266-9083 J �_ � _ �7 N° 35199 - 1 EPARTMENT DIRECTOR ZT1' COUNCIL 2 ITY ATTORNEY ITY CLE[2K ust be on CounCil Agenda by: vocsx 9ZRECTOR IN. S MGT. SVC. DZR. � YO[2 (OR ASSISTAN OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: epeal St. Paul Leg. Code Chapter 220. to consolidate permitting and enforcing authority for all land filling activities under the Office of License Inspection and Environmental Protection ECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR RErECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE WNTRACTS ?3[JST ANSWER THE £OLLOIt2NG: PLANNING COt _ CIVIL SERVZCE COFMISSION 1. Has the person/firm ever wotked under a contcact for this department? CIB COMMITTE£ _ BUSINESS R£VISW COUNCIL YES NO STAFF � 2. Has this pexson/fitm ever been a City employee? DISTRICP COURT _ Y6$ NO 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any SUPPORPS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Current City employee? YES NO lain all YES ansners on a separate aheet and attach. INITIATING PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why): Currently Chapter 220 gives certain auChority to the Dept. of Public Works for issuing permits to deposit clean £ill on private property. Chapter 33 of the Leg. Code authorizes the Building Official in LIEP to issue grading permits for land filling activities in conjunction with construotion. LIEP also enforces erosion/sediment control practices associated with land filling activities. Having two permitting authorities presented enforcement problems for staff and confusion for the public. Per and agreement with Public Works in 1994, the Building Inspection Section of ZIEP took over responsibilities for issuing fill permits. The proposed amendments to the ordinance would legally recognize this a reement and provide the necessary enablin language. VANTAGES IF APPROVED: 1)Provides one place for the public to obtain a permit. 2)Eliminates historical en£orcement problem by making one agency responsible for compliance monitoring. 3)LIEP's business is issuing permits and licenses on private property. Sinoe ost of these land filling activities occur on private property the shift of this responsibility from Public Works to LIEP is appropriate. ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: one ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED: Continuing the dual permitting function in both Public Works and LIEP is an inefficient delivery of services to the publie and is inconsistent with current state and county rules. TOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION S COST/REVENUE BUDGETED YES NO FUNDTNG SOT3RCE ACTIVITY ER FINANCIAL INFORMATION: EEXPLAIN) �� ",� 2 t� iS97 97Y/yzl CITY OF SAINT PAUL INTERDEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM Date: May 23, 1997 To: Gary Erickson - Pub. Works From: Lawrence R. Zangs - LIEP �� V RE: Changes to Legisfative Code for Permitting Dumping of Fiil on Private Property. This memo confirms the voice-mail I received from you on May 20th indicating your approval of the proposed changes to Chapter 220. and Chapter 33, concerning the above. Regarding the definition of "clean fili", this is the terminology used in the Ramsey County Solid Waste Ordinance. Since the County regulates the dumping of materiais not meeting the clean fill specifications, it is appropriate to use the same definitions for consistency of enforcement between the two jurisdictions. Also, the maximum 10% allowance for clean fill to consist of concrete, giass, brick or similar inert material is a recognition that you may have some of this type of material mixed with natural soils. As long as the size of the material doesn't present a compaction issue this would not present any problems. I am sending these ordinance changes to the City Attorney's Office for review and then on to the City Council for their consideration. cc: Stacey Becker Tom Eggum