The URL can be used to link to this page

95-708�� ORIG{NAL ordinance # s 4 Green Sheet # 31269 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ORDINANCE OF SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA Presented By Referred To Council File # Committee: Date �7 An ordinance amending Chapter 60 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code pertaining to zoning for the CiTy of Saint Paul and the zoning maps thereof: WI3EREAS, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §462.357 and §64.400 of the Legislative Code, GRANT TRACY (LELAND GOTTSTEIN) duly petitioned to rezone 531 SELBY AVENiJE, being legally described as Lot 15, Block 4; Woodland Park Addition, from RM-2 to B-2 to allow parking for the business located at 534 Selby Avenue, the perition having been certified by the Planning Division on April 18, 1995 as hauing been consented to by at least 67 percent of the owners of the area of the property to be rezoned, and further having been consented to by at least two-thirds of the owners of the property situated within 100 feet of the total contiguous property within one yeaz proceeding the date of the petition; and WIIEREAS, The Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public heazing on May 18, 1995, for the purpose of considering the rezoning petition, and pursuant to §107.03 of the Administrative Code, submitted its recommendation to the Planning Commission that the peti6on be granted; and WHEREAS, The Planning Commission considered the rezoning petition at its meeting held on May 26, 1995 and recommended that the City Council approve the petition; and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing before the City Council on the said rezoning petition was duly published in the official newspaper of the City and notices were duly mailed to each owner of affected property and property situated wholly or partly within 350 feet of the properry sought to be rezoned; and WHEREAS, a public hearing before the City Council having been conducted on June 14, 1995, where all interested parties were heazd, the Council having consadered all the facts and recommendations concerning the petition; now, therefore THE COTJNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAINT PAUL DOES ORDAIN: Section 1. That the zoning map of the City of Saint Paul, Sheet Number 20, as incorporated by reference in §60301 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: That property with the address of 531 SELBY AVENiTE, being more particularly described as: Lot 15, Block 4; Woodland Park Addition be and is hereby rezoned from RM-2 to B-2. Section 2. 42 43 44 ORIGINAL qs-�D� This ordinance shall take efFect and be in force tlurry (30) days from and after its passage, approval and pubiicarion. n �� I� 91IRI IC4JCR AU6 ° 51995 Adopted by Council: Date Adopti Certified by Coun� 9Acretary By: Approved by yo • / te 3� �7� S By: z,�Q� L-._ \,�jVN'/fAr+'�w itequested by Department of: Plann' Economic velo m t By: For Appr ved by City Attorney p � BY= � ( �. �. { / e Approved by Mayor for Submission to Council ` J By: `�Ut,�, qs �� ►� DEPARTMENTlOFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INRIATE� N� 312 6 9 o6�t6i9s GREEN SHEE _ CpNTACT PERSON & PHONE � DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR � CRY COUNGL R �� ASS16N GTVATTORNEY CfiYCLERK NUYBERFOR MUSTBE O COUNCILAGENDA BV (DATE) ROUTING BUDGET DIqELTOR � FIN. & MGT. SEPVICES Fi. �� A f l� Q OPDER MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN'n � Mi v TOTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES ( (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) AC710N FE�UESTED: Adopt ordinance to finalize councIl approval of a petition of GRANT TRACY to rezone property located at 531 SELBY AVENUE, from RM-2 to B-2 (public hearing held June 14, 1995). aE Approva (A) wReject (q) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TXE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _/� PLANNING COMMISSION _ CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION �� Has this person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department? � CIB COMMITTEE VES NO � STAFF _ 2. Has Mis person/Firm e�er been a city employee? VES NO _ DIS7aiCTCOUR7 _ 3. Does this personftirm possess a skill not normally po5sessed by any curtent ciry employee? SUPPORT$ WHICH GOUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 VES NO �� G � Explain alf yes answars on separate sheet antl attaeh to green sheet INITIAT�NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPOFiTUNIN (Who, at, When, Where. Why)� Finalize council approval of a petition of GRANT T4LACY to rezone property at 531 SELBY AVENLTE from RM-2 to B-2 to allow off-street pazking for the business at 534 Selby Avenue (public hearing held June 14, 1495). ADVANTAGESIFAPPpOVED. ,}UN 2 01995 y ,�_�� 1ERRY BLAKEY DISADVANTAGES IFAPPROVED: - ��'e� 't� ., . �F �y T � ��[� � � �� DISADVANTA6ES IP NOT APPROVED: TOTAL AMOUNT OP TRANSACTION S COS7/REVEMUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES NO FUNDIHG SOURCE ACTIVI7Y NUMBEH FINANCIAL INFOFiMATION: �EXPLAM) DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & F.CONOkIIC DE�IELOPMENT CITY OF SAIN'T PAUL Norm Colem¢n, Mayor May 30, 1995 Ms. Nancy Anderson City Council Research Office Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Dear Ms. Anderson: Division of Ptenning 25 West Fourth Sheet Samt Paul, MN 55l02 q�-�� Telephone. 612-266-6565 Facsimile. 612-228-3314 I would like to confirm that a public hearing before the City Council is scheduled for Wednesday June 14, 1995 for the following zoning case: Applicant: File Number: Purpose: Address: Legal Description of Property: Previous Action: GRANT TRACY (Leland Gottstein) 95-069 Rezone property from RM-2 (residentia]) to B-2 (community business) to allow parking for the business at 534 Selby Avenue. 531 Selby Avenue Lot 15, Block 4; Woodland Pazk Addition Planning Commission Recommendation: Approval, vote: unanimous, 5/26/95 Zoning Committee Recommendation: Approval, vote: 4-1, 5/18/95 My understanding is that this public hearing request will appear on the agenda for the June 7, 1995 City Council meeting and that you will publish notice of the hearing in the Saint Paul Legal Ledger. Please call me at 266-6582 if you have any questions. Sincerely, Kady D 1�\= '�� City Planner Zoning Section cc: File #95-069 Mike Kraemer Donna Sanders DEPARI'MEN'I' OF PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT' 95-708 . n �rr� oF s�r pAVr� Norm Colerrs¢n. Mayor June 5, 1995 Ms. Nancy Anderson Secretary to the City Council Room 310 City Hall Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 Divuion of P7ann"neg 15 West Fourth St'eet Samt Pau(, �LLA' S5102 RE: Zoning File #95-069: GRANT TRACY (Leland Gottstein) City Council Heazing: June 14, 1995 Telephone� 6I2-266-6565 F¢csimile: 611-228-3314 Pi.IRPOSE: To consider rezoning property at 531 Selby Avenue from RM-2 to B-2 to allow off-street pazking for the business at 534 Selby Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL • ZONING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL STAFF RECOMMENDATION: APPROVAL SUPPORT: Summit-University Planning Council supports the rezoning petition. OPPOSITION: None. Deaz Ms. Anderson: • GRANT TRACY (Leland Gottstein) submitted a petition to rezone property at 531 Selby Avenue. The Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed rezoning on May 18, 1995. The applicant addressed the committee. At the close of the public hearing, the committee voted 4-1 to recommend approval to rezone to B-2. 'I'he Ptanning Commission upheld the Zoning Committee's recommendation with a unanimous vote on May 26, 1995. This proposed rewning is scheduled to 6e heard by the City Council on June 14, 1995. Please notify me if any member of the City Council wishes to have slides of the site presented at the public hearing. Sincerely, � Ken Ford Planning Administrator KF:kd Attachments cc: City Councilmembers 9��708 city of saint paul pianning commission resolution file number 95-43 �te May 26, 1995 WHEREAS, GRANT TRACY, file #95-069 has petitioned to rezone 53I SELBY AVENUE, situated on the north side of sueet between Kettt & Mackubin, from RM-2 to B-2 to allow parking for the business located at 534 Selby; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Committee of the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 1995 at which all persons presenT were given an opportunity to be heard pursuant to said application in accordance with the requirements of Section 64.400 of the Saint Paul Legislative Code; and WHEREAS, Saint Paul Planning Commission, based on the evidence presented to its Zoning Committee at the public hearing, as substantiaily reflected in the minutes, made the following fmdings of fact: 1. The applicant owns the property and intends to sell it to allow development of a parking lot to serve the business located at 534 Selby Avenue, Mytana, a manufacturer of power sewer cleaning equipment. The company has eight employees. As proposed, the parking lot will have between 19 and 21 spaces. Since there will be extra spaces, plans include leasing parking spaces to the four-plex to the west and the cafe, salon and flower shop across the street. A variance from tiie Boazd of Zoning appeals is also being requested to allow a zero foot setback to the south and west. 2. The proposed zezoning is in conformance with the comprehensive plan for the city. The Land Use Plan identifies Selby Avenue as a mixed use strip. Land use development strategies of the Selby Avenue Plan include: 1) sites requiring a lvgher zoning classification for new development should be rezoned on a case by case basis as redevelopment proposals are submittec3, this will allow greater control over development; and 2) retain mixed uses from Arundel to Kent pp.4-5. One of the land use objectives of the District 8 Plan states, "to encourage a mixture of commercial and residential uses along Selby Avenue" p.7. In addition, the plan states, "there is a need for more off-street parking for businesses already located on Selby Avenue as well as for future commercial establistunents", p.9 #8. One of the housing moved by S@CO��d I�}/ in favor Unanimous against Morton � �� • � Zoning File #95-069 • Page Two of Resolution 95-7pg objectives of the district pian states, "to encourage and preserve the existing housing stock." p.9. The plan goes on to state, "house-moves should be encouraged if: a) the site is to be developed according to the district's plan; b) an appropriate new site is found; c) it can be done without undue delay; d) the building can be safely moved; and e) a financial program for the building's rehabilitation is worked out p.l l#21." Finally, one of the industry and commerce objectives of the District 8 Plan states, "to provide adequate off=street parking for Selby Avenue businesses" p.26. 3. The proposed rezoning is consistent and compatible with the way the area has developed and will not have an adverse impact on adjacent property provided adequate buffers are instalied to protect the residents to the north from the noise, traffic, and activity on Selby Avenue. Area residents are working with the developer to reach an agreement on buffer/screen (masonry wall, fencing, and landscaping). The proposed site is adjacent to land already zoned B-2, the requested rezoning is a logical extension of the existing zoning boundary. There is a documented need for additional off-street parking on Selby Avenue and the current proposal to try to meet some of that need is consistent and compatible with the way the area has developed. 4. The applicant submitted a sufficient petition signed by two-thirds of the property • owners within one hundred (100) feet of the property to be rezoned consenting to the rezoning (53 parceis eligible, 36 parcels needed and 38 parcels signed). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ItESOLVED, by the Saint Paul Planning Commission that the petition of GRANT TRACY to rezone property at 531 SELBY AVENi3E, more particularly described as Lot 15, Block 4; Woodland Park Addition, from an RM-2 zoning classification to a B-2 zoning classification is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that ti�e 5aint Paui Pianning Commission does hereby recommend to the Council of the City of Saint Paul that property located at 531 SELBY AVENUE be rezoned from RM-2 to B-2 in accordance with the petition for rezoning on fiie with the Saint Paul Planning Division. CJ 95-7t?� PLANNING COMNIISSION OF SAINT PAUL City Hall Conference Center 15 West Kellogg Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 A meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Saint Paul was held Friday, May 26, 1995 at 8:30 a.m. in the Conference Center of City Hall. Commissioners Mmes. Bader, Faricy, Geisser, Lund-7ohnson, Maddox, Morton, Treichel Present: and Wencl and Messrs. Chavez, Field Jr., Gordon, Gurney, Kramer, Mahoney, Mardell and Schwichtenberg. Commissioners Mmes. Carter and Messrs. *Lee, *McDonell, *Riehle and *Vaught Absent: *Excused Also Present: Jerry Segal, Assistant City Attorney; Ken Ford, Planning Administrator, Jean Birkholz, Kady Dadlez, Nancy Homans, Allen Lovajoy, Charles McGuire, Roger Ryan and Larry Soderholm of the Planning Staff: I. Approval of Minutes of May 12, 1995 � 11_ � Commissioner Geisser submitted a correction to the May 12th minutes. A motion was made and seconded to approve the corrected minutes of May 12, 1995; the motion carried unanimously. Chair's Announcements None. Planning Administrator's Announcements Mr. Ford announced that the City Council approved the Ayd Mill Scoping Document with the elimination of the downtown connection altemative and the full freeway interchange altemative. He stated that funding for the project is not yet available. He also announced that the coffee donation basket will no longer be passed azound during planning commission maetings. Zoning � #95-069 Grant Tracv (Leland Gottsteinl - Rezone to B-2 to allow pazking for the business located at 534 Selby; zoned RM-2). MOTION: Ms. Morton moved approval of the requested rezoning to allow pazking for the business located at 534 Selby Avenue that carried unanimously on a voice vote. • • • 95-708 MIN[TPES OF THE ZONING COMMITTEE � . CITY COUNCIL CI3AAIBERS, SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA ON MAY 18, 1995 PRESENT: Mmes. Faricy, Morton, and Wencl, Messrs. Gurney, Kramer and Vaught of the Zoning Committee; Mr. Warner, Assistant City Attorney; Mmes. Dadlez and Sanders; and Mr. Ryan of the Planning Division. ABSENT: Chavez, excused Field Time: 4:30 - 4:55 p.m. The meeting was chaired by Gladys Morton, Chairperson. To at Kady Dadlez, Planning Division staff, zeviewed the staff report and presented slides. SCaff recommended approval of the rezoning based on findings 1 through 4 of the staff report. Both the Summit University Planning Council and the Ramsey Hill Association voted to support the rezoning and the variances that would be required. Commissioner Kramer asked for an eacplanation for why the rezoning reguest was for B-2 (a business zoning) rather than P-1 (a parking zoning). Peter Carlson, Carlson and Frank Architects, 482 Dayton Avenue, representative • of the agplicant, spoke. Mr. Carlson said that B-2 zoning was recommended when the applicant was seeking help in the process of application, and that they were advised by staff that it would give them more flexibility in development in the £uture. Mr. Carlson, using diagrams, reviewed the proposal. Commissioner Kramer said that he did not see any potential use at this site other than parking, and questioned whether the applicant is adverse to having the P-1 parking zoning. Commissioner Kramer also addressed whether if in the future those properties are so1d, whether the B-2 zoning allows for the potential elimination of the parking. Mr. Gottstein reviewed that the proposal has arisen in an effort to devise a plan for what to do with the properties in the event his elderly uncle who owns the pzoperty passes away. In the event that someone may want to purchase all the properties for different uses, he originally felt that P-1 may restrict them in that kind of planning process. Following approximately 9 meetings that took place before this formal meeting, Mr. Gottstein said he has since questioned whether B-2 has been the best way to go. However Mr. Gottstein said he has been working with Sean Kershaw, Business Development, PED, and has decided to get a nice looking parking lot that everybody in the neighborhood likes, so that it will make this building much more viable for preferably a single tenant. Mr. Gottstein said they are working diligently to conform to F�IPC standards and the B-2 zoning gives them the freedom to think generically, rather than specifically. Greg DeShonn, Executive Director for the Summit University Planning Council, and also on behalf of the Ramsey Hill Association, spoke in support of the rezoning. Mr. DeShonn said that the two groups have been working closely together in and for the variances that are required for the rezoning and have • been looking at it as a package. Mr. DeShonn said that there have been many neighborhood meetings and that some very good compromises have been arrived at 95=708 and that the official position of the Planning Council as well as Ramsey Hill, is to support the rezoning and variances required to build the parking lot • with conditions outlined in the letter distributed to Commissioners at the meeting. Grant Tracy, owner of the property at 531 Selby spoke. Mr. Tracy said he felt the proposed plan to move the home into a residential area is an excellent one. Mr_ Tracy said he attended the neighborhood meetings and has been impressed with how well Mr. Gottstein has worked with the neighborhood. He felt that the neighborhood really needs the parking and would be a great boost for the businesses as well. Commissioner Gurney questioned what possible conseguences may arise in the event of a B-2 zoning with respect to future development of the parking lot, and parking requirements for such a development in the event of the loss of this parking lot. Ms. Dadlez said that any new development requires that parking be provided, and that either parking would have to be provided or a parking variance would have to be obtained. A building would not be allowed to be constructed without finding another location for existing reguired parking and the new required parking that would be needed with a new structure. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Gurney moved the rezoning to P-1. The motion died for lack of a second. Commissioner Rraater moved the rezoning to B-2 based on the staff recommendation. Commissioner Faricy seconded the motion. The motion carried with a voice vote o£ 4 to 1(Guraey against.) Commissioner vaught was not present for the vote. � Submitted by: Approved by; K� Da ez � Gladys Morton, Chairperson 2 • 95 • 1 2 3 4 5 6 ZONING COMMZTT88 STAFF RBPORT __ =====P=====_ � ______________ FILH #95-069 APPLICl�21'P: GRANT TRACY DATS �F HEAR2NG: OS/18/95 CLASSIFICATION: Rezoning , LOCATION: 531 SELBY AVENLIE (north side between Kent & Mackubin) PLANNING DISTRICT: 8 LBGAL D&SCRIPTION: Lot 15, Block 4; Woodland Park Addition PR858NT ZONING: RM-2 ZONING CODS RSFBRSNCB: §64.A00 7. STAFF INVSSTIGATION AND RBPORT: DAT$: 5/11/95 BY: Kady Dadlez 3 3 S 5 _S 'J' 6 A. B. C. • D. • PIIRPOSE: Rezone property from RM-2 to B-2 to allow parking for the property located at 534 Selby Avenue. PARCEL SIZB: The parcel ha5 50 feet of frontage on Selby Avenue and is 116 feet in depth for a total lot area of 5,800 square feet. BXiST2NG LAND IISS: The property is occupied by a single family home built in 1885 and a small shed at the rear of the property. There is a 3 foot chain link fence around the property. SIIRROIINDING LAND IISE• North: Low to moderate density residential uses in an RT-2 zoning district. East: Vacant commercial building in a B-2 zoning district. South: commercial uses including a flower shop, restaurant, and hair salon in a B-2 zoning district. West: A duplex, triplex, and four-plex in an RT-2 zone. E. ZONSNG CODE CITATION: Section 64.400(a) of the zoning code states in part, "the council may, from time to time, amend, supplement or change the district boundaries or the regulations herein, or subsequently established herein pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 462.357 and amendments thereto as may be made from time to time. The planning commission may, from time to time, review district boundary lines to determine if, pursuant to state laws, such district boundary lines should be changed." Section 64.400(b) states in part that "an amendment to the zoning code may be initiated by the council, the planning commission or by petition of the owners of sixty-seven (67) percent of the area of the property to be rezoned." F. HISTORY/DISCIISSION: There are two current cases concerning this property. One case is for a site plan review £or the proposed parking lot and the other is a yard setback variance for the parking lot. No action has been taken on the applications. Since the property is located within the boundary of the Historic Hill District, the Heritage Preservation Commission wi11 need to review the applicant's plans for removal of the house and construction of the parking lot. 95�708 Zoning File #95-069 Page Two DISTRICT COIINCIL RHCODIDffiNDATION: The Summit-University Planning Council had not taken a position on the rezoning at the time the staff report was drafted; they will meet May 17th to discuss the applicant. The Ramsey Hill Association will meet to discuss the application on May llth. A. FINDINGS• The applicant owns the property and intends to sell it to allow development of a parking loC to serve the business located at 534 Selby Avenue, Mytana, a manufacturer of power sewer cleaning equipment. The company has eight employees. As proposed, the parking lot will have between 19 and 21 spaces. Since there will be extra spaces, plans include leasing parking spaces to the four-plex to the west and the cafe, salon and £lower shop across the street. A variance from the Board of Zoning appeals is also being requested to allow a zero foot setback to the south and west. The BZA will consider the variance on May 22, 1995, The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the comprehensive plan for the city. The Land Use Plan identifies Selby Avenue as a mixed use strip_ Land use development strategies of the Selby Avenue Plan include: 1) sites requiring a higher zoning classification for new development should be rezoned on a case by case basis as redevelopment proposals are submitted, this will allow greater control over development; and 2) retain mixed uses from Ax to Kent pp.4-5. • One of the land use objectives of the District 8 Plan states, "to encourage a mixture of commercial and residential uses along Selby Avenue" p.7. In addition, the plan states, "there is a need for more • off-street parking for businesses already located on Se1by Avenue as well as for future commercial establishments", p.9 #8. One of the housing objectives of the district plan states, "to encourage and preserve the existing housing stock." p.9. The plan goes on to state, "house-moves should be encouraged if: a) the site is to be developed according to the district's plan; b) an appropriate new site is found; c) it can be done without undue delay; d) the building can be safely moved; and e) a financial program for the building's rehabilitation is worked out p.il #21.�� Finally, one of the industry and commerce objectives of the District 8 Plan states, "to provide adequate off- street parking for Selby Avenue businesses" p.26. Trie proposed rezoning is consistent and compatible with the way the area has developed and will not have an adverse impact on adjacent property provided adequate buffers are installed to protect the residents to the north from the noise, traffic, and activity on Selby Avenue. Area residents are working with the developer to reach an agreement on buffer/screen (masonry wall, fencing, and landscaping). The proposed site is adjacent to land already zoned B-2, the requested rezoning is a logical extension of the existing zoning boundary. There is a documented need for additional off-street parking on Selby Avenue and the current proposal to try to meet some of that need is consistent and compatible with the way the area has developed. 4. The applicant submitted a sufficient petition signed by two-thirds of the property owners within one hundred (100) feet of the property to be rezoned consenting to the rezoning (53 parcels eligible, 36 parcels needed and 38 parcels signed). STAFF RBCOt+IDiBNnATiON: Based on findings 1 through 4 staff recommends • approval of the rezoning petition. PETITION TO AMEND THE 7..ONIR'ts yODE • � Depa�tment of Planning and Economic De(�a�ii� 0 8 Zoning Section 1100 City Hall Annez 25 West Fourth Street Saint Paul, MN 55102 266-6589 APPUCANT PROPERTY LOCATfON • Property Owner l'�rnn`t, L.. � CaCV Address �3� �e�bY �v� City ��•�au� St.h�Zip�Daytime phone >.1�+� Contact person (if Address/Location��_ S�� y�C, Legal description �,�' 15 �,31 c�K. �i�j�l � la �_ dd, �', n,�_ (attach additional sheet if TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND :I"fY COUNCIL: Pursuant to Section 64.400 of the Saint Paul Zoning Ordinance and to Sect�on 467..357(5) of Minnesota Statues, �'S'(h�� —� �M.�.�.� the owner of ail the land proposed for rezoning, hereby petitions you to rezone the � bovl e described property from a _��_ zoning district to a ��. zoning district, for the purpose of: C �m�I�S�,ia, �0.C�� `�3^ �} t��ff �eCm� Ile0. IASE'.S � • (attach addifional sheet(s) if neces _/� Attachment Requi si te pian Ld' Consent petition C'1 A�davit � Subscribed and swom to before me this /O day of �.,� a � � , 19�� _� gy:�!Lr�-�-� 7� Fee owner of property Page 1 of LILLIAN J. TRUMBO 1 NOTFFV PLBLfC - AFI%J*i�SQTA � fiAtt4SEY COiiSdTY fvh� ��m:n Exv 3* 2'OJ.^. e e SUFFICIENCY CHECK SHEET RF7 0NZNG SCUP NGUP PETITIONS 95��08 FZRST SUBHITTED RESUBMITTED DATE PETITION SUBMITTED: �� (O► �� DATE SUS�IYTED: DATE OFFICIe1LLY RECEIVED: !"r►�L � a i°�5 DATE RECEIVED: PARCELS ELIGIBLE: S pARCELS ELIGIBLE: PP.RCELS NEEDED: �� PARCELS NEEDED: PARCEL SIG:IED: �� PA1tCELS SSGNED: CHECKED BY: //i[�� fi4tfsKI�1 bATE: �1�►1�L 1$� ? `1'! 5 i � ZUN�NG �1LE 3�. N • • C � 95-70g � � \ �G,�� \ r- fa� P {� C\ �`,�� Name I ww SS 10� �6h.2. ,�q3 �CrS�a�\ R'✓C� �� .�� u�-•53�t �,1� 5��.wl, I�,�t��, 2_ddress� � `� �a-��3� Telephone Nunber . $T�TG �l NT_�i1LS�lA� ; 55 GOUN� 0: R"fSEY ) \)o��e � �r^c.bPr , being first duly scorn, deposes aac states that he/she is the pzrson who ciYCUlated the i:ithin peti.tion anc. consent, consisting of , pages; that afz`iant is inior�ed and believzs �nat the parties described aze the ow-ners respectivzly ot the lo�s pleced immediately befo=e each na:.e, that affiant is in£orriled and believes that e�ch of the pe:ties described above is the oc.:ier of property r:hich is vithir. 1C0 feet fzo�a a�y property o•:.�zd or purchased by petitionzr or sold by peticicr.er within o^z (1) year precedin� ine date of this petition �:nich is con�i�cous to tne propert} dascribed in the petition; that e:ccept foz none of thz parties described above has purch�szd or is pu:chasin� pro�e:c; £rocz petitioaer contiguous to tne above described proozrty kithin one (1) }'ez' of the cate o� the petition• that this consent �:as si�ned by each of ssic ow in the presence of tnis afriant, and tnat the sig�=tures are t:e t_u= and coriect sig:iatures of each and all of the parties so dzscribed. Approved as to £orm - Jan. 1, 2991 Ylanning Depzrtment • ■ 4JNMA� � LILIfANJ. TRU�5B0 � � NCTARV PL3! �C — M1At@^aESOTA `� RAPohJCY CO ;,'iVTY 4 My �mm F�cpires Jzn 31. 2tq0 . .. ZONING �ILE � page � af � - -_ . • . . 1-?-91 Subscribed znd sworn to before ae this �( cy of Q�e;� , 19�/5 � � 3� 1 � 1/ _� I , J j �� ,: , �; � J �� CONSENT OF AD.TOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONZNG 95�°�08 � We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date o£ this petition, acknowledge that wz have been furnished with the following: . �` 1. A copy of the Petition of ��cLn� � \ C'0.C� (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �p� ,`J 3` through (�ip � S�S , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of�the uses permitted under a�_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to t.a �ezoa�ag �_° the grope.t} 3asc:ibed _.. the Petition of `g-f0.�� L, � C'c�CV to a�_ District (name of petitioner) �—� �i .�/lJ -�.J 505 Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days after a petition is received by the Plann�ng Division. Any signacor of any petition may ' a��• h�s/her name therefrom by written request within that time. �O �� i page _ of _ �r • • • � �` ��1 • CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING 5 —'lr n 5 We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . 2. A copy of Sections �0� .531 through (o� � 53.� . inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a� Distzict zoning classi£ication and we are awase that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning oi the property describeP, in t:e Petition of ��fa�` L. �('uC� to a� District (name of petitioner) 1. A copy of Che Petition of LS't'0.�� ` C0.C�( (name of peti ioner) Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) . working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator of any petition may withdraw his/her name therefrom by written request within that time. page _ of , ZQNING FiLE �_ 95~�708 CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total • contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that wz have been furnished with the £oilowing: . 1. A copy of the Petition of �('0.n� 4� , CqC� (name of p,�ti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �pQ,53� through ��,535, inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a�� District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent �o the rezoning of the property described in the Petition o£ ��-1 ['.N �� C'c�CV to a�, District (name of petitioner) r ' 1$g � �3��y��Y: ;j 5YY � • ic� > S • Petition shall not be considered as officia2ly filed until the 2apse of seven (7) working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator � of any petition may withdraw his/her name therefrom by written request within that time. page � of _ ZONING F1LE ��!- . 95'70R � J / � � 22 �� ';��' :� �, .,'1 � 2� � CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total contiguous description o£ real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . 1. A copy of the Petition of �5'�4n1 � , C0.C�( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections tp� ,5 �L through (�� , S.3s , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a R_� District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of 14-00.�� , �c'o.CV to a�_ District (name of petitioner) Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) • working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator of any petition may withdraw his/he* name therefrom by written request within that time. page _ of _ � Z ON#i�� 1 q � /� , 3�j � S 95��'08 ' CONSENT OF ADJOZNING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZ02�IING We, the undersigned, owners of the property within I00 feet of the tota2 � contiguous descziption of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . 1. A copy of the Petition of LSC'0.n� �, ��( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �0� � 53` through (�+Q , 53.� , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of aZl of the uses permitted under a�_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezaning; aad v;e hereby consent tc the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of `9-fa�� t'0.CV to a�_ District (name of petitioner)T JJ, i Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7} working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator • of any petiti ame therefrom by written request within that time. Z pN�NG FILE °t5�� , Page_of_ �' � � i� g5-708 r � CONSENT OF ADJOZNING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold hy petitioner within one year preceding the date o£ this petition, acknowledge that we have been £urnished with the following: � 1. A copy of the Yetition of �ran �, r0.C�( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �0�,53� thzough ��S3S, inclusive of che Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses peYmitted under a��__ District zoning classi£ication and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of l�fah� �, �C'ctiCV to a� District (name of petitioner) � �t � • Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) wozking days a£ter a petition is Yeceived by the Planning Division. Any signator of any petition ma w't draw his er name therefrom b ritten request within that time. Z �NING F�LE 5�W page____o£, 9��708 CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING We, the cxndersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the tatal � contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that wz have been furnished with the following: . 1. A copy of the Petition af ��0.n`r t� � CCIC�( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �0� �`-� 3` through (o�D , S3S , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of a21 of the uses permitted under a�? District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approva2 of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of l 5-fa�� .� C'c�C� to a�' Z District (name of petitioner) �� 2 z'.J S� � Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days afCer a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator • of any petition ma withdraw his/her name therefrom by written request within that time, page _ of _ ZONiNG FlLE 95 � 95 CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING . We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the £ollowing: . 1. A copy o£ the Yetition of �c'0.n� 1� ` C0.C�( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �p� ,' through j�� , 53.� , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a�_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council anproval of the Yezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of lq-00.�` `,� C'ctiCV to a�_ District (name of petitioner) �. � Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) • working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator of any petition may withdraw his/her name therefrom by written request within that time, page _ of _ Z�N�I�G FIL �� 95-70g CONSENT OF ADJOTNING P120PERTY OWNER$ TO REZONING We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of ihe total • contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . 1. A copy of the Petition of �C'4n� � \ f'�i��( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �p�, `'�3h through (�(},53�, inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we aze aware of all of the uses permitted under a�_ District zoning c2assification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in L'ne Petition of �q-fGv.� � � ��C� to a� District (name of petitioner) :� � i Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator • of any petition er name therefrom by written request within that time. �Ol.�� `�� page_of_ N F 45 • CONSENT OF ADJOINZNG PROYERTY OWNERS TO REZONZNG We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of thz tocal contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . � 1. A copy of the Petition of t'0.n� �, �0.C�( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �p� .531 through ��IQ , S3S , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses peYmitted under a�_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of l�lav.y �, �C'o.CV to a�'� District (name of petitioner) \ 5 > ' G �' • • Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator of any petition m i�/hP nam 11 efrom b written request within that time. �o�� ' page_of_ �� 95°708 Ty � ' CONSENT OF ADJOINZNG PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the total contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date o£ this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . + � 1. A copy of the Petition of ��ct�` � ` C0.Cf (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �Ofl , 53E through _(olj, S3S , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a�_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of l�fGh\ �. �C'c�CV to a��_ District (name of petitioner) � • �� 7'-�3' � Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) vorking days after a petftion is received by the PZanning'Division. Any signator of any petition may with hi s/ h er name therefrom by written request within that time. page _ of _ � ZON�I�G FI�.E ��3. � • 95 r �� CONSENT OF ADJOZNING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING • We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet of the tocal contiguous description of. real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been £urnished with the following: . + � 1. A copy o£ the Petition of �c0.n1 �. , �0.C� / (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections t�p�,�3L through (��53,�, inclusive of the Saint Paul 2oning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses pezmitted under a�"�. DisCrict zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to th= rezor.:r:g o£ the p_operty d_°�c:ibe3 -.. tre Petition of l�Caa� �. �t'c�Cy to a� � District (name of petitioner) ->- �� • • Yetition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days after a petition is received by the Planning•Division. Any signator of any petition may withdraw his/her name therefrom by written request within that time . ��+�.. - page _ of , ��f�� i.� �� 95-708� CONSENT OF ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING We, the undersigned, owners_ of the property within 100 £eet of the total • contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioner within one year preceding Che date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . � 1. A copy of the Petition of �f0.n� �_ , �0.CJ (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �p �, 5 3L through (��, S3S , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we are aware of all of the uses permitted under a�-1_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approval of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of ��fGr� �, �t`aCV to a�_ District (name of petitioner) '� D • �\ r � �u C] Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (7) working days after a petition is received by the Planning Division. Any signator • of any petition ma withdraw his/her name therefrom by written request within that time. page _ of _ ZOi�tNG F1LE ��. v �E 7 � c y iE A � � I ?�"'i" ^; I � � �'��+�� S rr o-� z' a F � �,, a�2� = ' � ^�"�'., ' x e I �� qg � � a 'S, . � r � � � �� fi �� i �' � bC 1 t� � o =�;°�� y L � �� O •.,�, p- � � �� ..Q g �� I �'�� 3 ��`"` ,� } ,�; :� t �� i y � iZZ 1 d I I I 1 I I 1 I I � � � 0 � i OQ I a� ' u n ° c � v � a� I Z 3:e e p W 3 > O T� �. �: � ° � ° v a d ^ � V b R e� e0 Z � v o c y .� .Q � R O A Q E 0 d ., N 7 LL � r 0 v V .� � � Q a y ro � � c 3 O �-C U •C � � u � Z � N � � � � L � c o0 �c V� O � � � = O m � � �.� � ` 'O A �0 N �y � b e V �, O p_ Tn � W N v� � ��0 ' ��0 � „0 � ��9 � �9 � „9 � �9 � ��9 � ��9 � ,�9 8 �9 M � O apa�8%L �0 �0-�6 � �,0 .0 6 .0 6 .0 P � 6 S .0-,6 0 .0 v � b O \ N� Eld , t6'S l t 'Td u � O = � d a�. 0 3 -� � � 3 �O -� � o° Z ,n J� �r n � d �� — _ � 70.� � � �'3 •' • C O - o = Z M, N C � y n N � tn Cu " � C �n ,-.1� t, ' � � C M � � H �� Q V ' '� d ��n �n G •- ` � m > O � ` " V QL �'' � ' o-°�°° a �, � °; N . f � V Y Q! v+ C,� � a a a � � : � C `� N y G . U > Q < Q ^ _ N C A � � C ' v in iJ= _ - � N ... :-0 J - p � �== - 4� � � � ` ' 3 $ u � 3 O N `a'- ` a Z2cVZ � J � 3 r� L U / � � J W � � � \ O _� � O'� � C " ;� O O C " C Y i i H 1 �� „ �Nv3 � d �c._� � v oY � = _ a� N � ' 'p R ^ � _a` � > 3 E m :^E> W N W K� 7i � 95 CONSENT OF AATOINZNG PROPERTY OWNERS TO REZONING � We, the undersigned, owners of the property within 100 feet oE the total contiguous description of real estate owned, purchased, or sold by petitioaer within one year preceding the date of this petition, acknowledge that we have been furnished with the following: . _ 1. A copy of the Petition of �('0.�t � 1 C0.C�( (name of peti ioner) 2. A copy of Sections �p Q 531 through fol�� S3S , inclusive of the Saint Paul Zoning Code; and acknowledge that we aze aware of all of the uses permitted under a�_ District zoning classification and we are aware that any of these uses can be established upon City Council approvaZ of the rezoning; and we hereby consent to the rezoning of the property described in the Petition of l�f4r� _�C'cxCV to a�_ District (name of petitioner) qS � . Petition shall not be considered as officially filed until the lapse of seven (�} working days after a petition is received by the P2anning IIivision. Axiy signator of any petition ma r name therefrom by written request within that time. � ON �� F �� page_of� 95 -708 2 � 6 € 8 � �_ q � z � ! i d. f � � � s .. � �$��g� � � � � �i�� x �z' i° 2a � � ..Y� = �" -�+'� �� waS - ao.e^<x� i{ II ��I ,z il II f �I �.�, ; � � � � '� �I ?� � �� b �� & " � � a� C�. I� � v p � �'� �� 'Ye � � — i �n � � � €�� _________________ I I I i I t � � � I J I I � I � I � I � �� yg wy��l :8^. � ;z��PI �y �( E iCSE��I ��(aa 'z e <��, ! �a� r�58 � �� E3� i � � I: I QI n } ' m I H � i E I ' � t � P: �" I � See� ` ��a r ; - - — �� p,. W J � -------- �- -- � 6 Q > ______a M � c� N ; �; � � J �, I 1 - � �� . � :;: � � , ( N � m � , M I � � N O � J � � � I 1 � yf �� _� �� o � f $ � � s 3 N > .` � Y _ � Q � � � .S �_` �1� � V " � � _ � • v � � � U � tn N m N Q � N � � V"' � � Y j � �o �. �� `� V � r O 'l'd ' , '�-- � a� c o Y a� 1�� 3 � _�� L � Y � N i � � N � � � C � �v�i � w�Q Vw � '-". :� l 'l'd X LLI N > �i � a��aa 0 70 8 � � N M N �.�...� � Q m J � N � � O ... � �� o 3 � � 2 w � ✓� • �� a y > � �o L � � � 1 4 U � � � � V� w w FD 95 ' i ^e i S?e ' fr _+� s � �� :J Z G . n � �L �_b _ n _ � _ J �� iefsg�s=2: z § Eem E - � - � _ - �_< - -= 6� "` " c . - £ •Y `j � zP ��` v o'�u I�s � tin - _' - ��J o�<.F _ �fe sis' _ 6 95-708 i r � i. SUNRAY•BATTLECREEK-HIGHWOOD 2. HAZEL PARK HAbEN-PROSPERITY HII.,LCREST 3. WEST SIDE 4. DAYTON'S $LUFF 5. PAYNE-PHALEN 6. NORTH END UMMTT-TJNIVERSITY 9. WEST SE 10. COMO il. HAMLINE-MIDWAY 12. ST. AN'I'HONY PARK 13. MERRIAM PARK-I.EXIIdGTON HAMLINE-SNELLING HAMLINE 14. MACALESTER GROVELAND 25. HIGIiLAND 16. SUMMIT HQ..L 17. DOWNTOWN � ZON#NG FILE �s'�� CITIZEN PARTICIFATION PLANNING DISTRICTS • • StlMMIT-UNIVERSITY ��-�o s , b .. Y� . �-....: ' �.�� y'at°`I � • i �;, ,MQR71N 'LU7HEf • �_� '�'ICtNG� ��RK^ :J �s,'7��Y.�'3��i ! £� :�} _ 3 �.." • ; �> i v �,� • �"'i �' y} .J J _ �. -: �1 F ; ^ S .J ... � . �. , .'9 to- ....-.? ._ ' J C•3 � ' . . • . . . ,j . . . . . . � . � � �� .. .... . • � ► — vevo � • r� a �. � �� • • � sec�� eo� • ..eo��e �u C•�L� � � ��, � ' �ol • • • • � �4 Y � V � � ! � • � O �o ♦ + MC`., QUf4rt.4r � I � ¢ at.��e�s; � ' c_:�,.... � � � P ��r� � �' I �� . . . �� • r�� P . �.; . . � . . . � � � • . • . . . � � . . . . � . . . v . . . . . . . • . ,. . � ` � ., � o � 06 ��¢ o�o � . • oe � � � G�t T��t PURPOSE �'G��G �'2�'� �'Z LECaEND �� zoning district boundary FILE # �5• ab� DATE �' L� ' tS � subject property PLNG. DIST SCALE 1" = 400' MAP # � o one family � � � two family _; __ �� Q multipie famity • • ^ commercial � � � industrial Y vacant