The URL can be used to link to this page

99-477q°I -tl�l? *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construcfion (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approa�imately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order Rq - 3 � �t approved � � �. \ � �`�q°� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard ali persons, objections and recommendationsperta.iningto saidproposed improvement and has fully considered the satne; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o�cers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �� anav '�Blakey �strom Coleman —C��u s�,,.'�— �3arris ��antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date�\qqe� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By� � � 1._ _ �Against �`��!'I X_/"//�� Sen� �i�/ Mayor PUBLIC HEARING DATE — 3UNE 2, 1999 RE 4-16-99 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INfI1ATED PublicWorksSidewalks zs-ss GREEN SHEET °' N l� A`a� — AGTPEFISON&PHONE �DEPAqTMENfDIqECTOR ❑CRYCOUNCIL JerryTved[-2666087 ^�cn �crrvnnoaNer ❑cmrc�mK NUMBEit FOR � MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DA"fE) A�7T1Z LS 1999 Qp O��ETDIRECTOR ❑FlN.&MGLSERVICESDIR For public hearing on June 2, 1999 ��wOR(ORASSI5fANn � Council Research OTALiOFSIGNpTUflEPAC.ES _ (CLIPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNANR� u ASSOGATE ENTALACCOUMANT REQUESiED Reconstruc[ Sidewalk in Wards 1& 2(See attached list) f7ECAMMENDA'f�oNS: Appmve (a) or Reject (A) p�ONAI SERYICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOINING QUESTIONS_ PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION t, HasihispersoNfirmeverworkeduntleraconLactforthisdepartrnent? qeCOMM17'TEE YES NO — — Z. Has this persoNfirm ever been a cily employee? A siarF _ YES NO DiSTR�C7 COUNp� 3. Does this person/firtn possess a Skill no[ nortnally possessed by any Curtent city employee? — — YES NO SUPPOFT3 WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? �p�� yes answers on separate shee[ and attach to green sheet INRIAi1NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPoHRINITY (WHO, Wl1AT, WHEN. WHERE, WHh: The problem "defective sidewalk' was caused by multiple Qroblems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it wouid be unusable and subject to increased pedestria� injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVAMAGES IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question ihe assessments, despite 1he fact that up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized. Ffaving to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrudure ot sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar arnounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Go�;� g��a�`� �ar;:a� AP� �. � 1��9 OTALAMOUN70FTRANSACTION$ $6 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE� YES NO PUNDINGSOURCE 99-�M z�669 /� prA 99 � 6 3Q�� ACINfTYNUMBER 99-2T752-0784-00000 FINANCIAL MFORMAiION: (IXPLAIN) B� AST = 351 aao C; et$ 99 = Sa�QOo a�-�� SUMMAR'Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS Wazd 1 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.5_ DAI'TON AVE. from N. Griggs St. to N_ Dunlap St. S j� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, �, , � , � disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ENGLEWOOD AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Oxford St. IIVITIATING ACTIOIV: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................... '� + PROTECT: 12ECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: ThJs walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... ��) PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. �a-4�1? -a- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ....... ....... .............. ...... .............................................. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SHERBL7RNE AVE. from N. Chatsworth St. to N. Milton St. �� (�j�j ITTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic r �� necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches and settled panels. ............................................................................... aq-4�? SUMiVIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATIONS Ward 2 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ERIE ST. from Michigan St. to Superior St. S` f �✓ � IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessiry on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ............................................................. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK S.S. MICHIGAN ST. from Webster St. to W. to Dead-End. ��1�3 I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, setded and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... i �' , PRO TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director or Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... ., ,' PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SUPERIOR ST. from Erie St. to Duke St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. a°�-'��7 �� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................... .......................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINaL COUNCIL FILE NO. By_ File In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 1 S99029 - 599030 - S99031 - 599032 - S99033 - WARD 2 S99034 - 599035 - S99036 - S99037 - Both sides Dayton Ave. from N. Griggs St. to N. Dunlap St. Both sides Englewood Ave. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Oxford St. Both sides N. Griggs St. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. North side Portland Ave. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. Both sides Sherburne Ave. from N. Chatsworth St. to N. Milton St. Both sides Erie St. from Michigan St. to Superior St. South side Michigan St. from Webster St. to W. to Dead-End. South side Portland Ave. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. Both sides Super'sor St. fram Erie St. to Duke St. �9-N�1 i� a�-y�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family sttuctures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide wallc and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be appro�mately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a czedit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per squaze foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd day of June, 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of heazing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COLTNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey �Bostrom ✓�oleman v�Iarris t�antry �iter Certified Passed by Council Secretary '� In Favor � Against BY L�� -_�� — Mayor q°I -tl�l? *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construcfion (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approa�imately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order Rq - 3 � �t approved � � �. \ � �`�q°� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard ali persons, objections and recommendationsperta.iningto saidproposed improvement and has fully considered the satne; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o�cers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �� anav '�Blakey �strom Coleman —C��u s�,,.'�— �3arris ��antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date�\qqe� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By� � � 1._ _ �Against �`��!'I X_/"//�� Sen� �i�/ Mayor PUBLIC HEARING DATE — 3UNE 2, 1999 RE 4-16-99 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INfI1ATED PublicWorksSidewalks zs-ss GREEN SHEET °' N l� A`a� — AGTPEFISON&PHONE �DEPAqTMENfDIqECTOR ❑CRYCOUNCIL JerryTved[-2666087 ^�cn �crrvnnoaNer ❑cmrc�mK NUMBEit FOR � MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DA"fE) A�7T1Z LS 1999 Qp O��ETDIRECTOR ❑FlN.&MGLSERVICESDIR For public hearing on June 2, 1999 ��wOR(ORASSI5fANn � Council Research OTALiOFSIGNpTUflEPAC.ES _ (CLIPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNANR� u ASSOGATE ENTALACCOUMANT REQUESiED Reconstruc[ Sidewalk in Wards 1& 2(See attached list) f7ECAMMENDA'f�oNS: Appmve (a) or Reject (A) p�ONAI SERYICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOINING QUESTIONS_ PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION t, HasihispersoNfirmeverworkeduntleraconLactforthisdepartrnent? qeCOMM17'TEE YES NO — — Z. Has this persoNfirm ever been a cily employee? A siarF _ YES NO DiSTR�C7 COUNp� 3. Does this person/firtn possess a Skill no[ nortnally possessed by any Curtent city employee? — — YES NO SUPPOFT3 WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? �p�� yes answers on separate shee[ and attach to green sheet INRIAi1NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPoHRINITY (WHO, Wl1AT, WHEN. WHERE, WHh: The problem "defective sidewalk' was caused by multiple Qroblems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it wouid be unusable and subject to increased pedestria� injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVAMAGES IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question ihe assessments, despite 1he fact that up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized. Ffaving to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrudure ot sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar arnounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Go�;� g��a�`� �ar;:a� AP� �. � 1��9 OTALAMOUN70FTRANSACTION$ $6 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE� YES NO PUNDINGSOURCE 99-�M z�669 /� prA 99 � 6 3Q�� ACINfTYNUMBER 99-2T752-0784-00000 FINANCIAL MFORMAiION: (IXPLAIN) B� AST = 351 aao C; et$ 99 = Sa�QOo a�-�� SUMMAR'Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS Wazd 1 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.5_ DAI'TON AVE. from N. Griggs St. to N_ Dunlap St. S j� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, �, , � , � disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ENGLEWOOD AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Oxford St. IIVITIATING ACTIOIV: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................... '� + PROTECT: 12ECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: ThJs walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... ��) PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. �a-4�1? -a- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ....... ....... .............. ...... .............................................. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SHERBL7RNE AVE. from N. Chatsworth St. to N. Milton St. �� (�j�j ITTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic r �� necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches and settled panels. ............................................................................... aq-4�? SUMiVIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATIONS Ward 2 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ERIE ST. from Michigan St. to Superior St. S` f �✓ � IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessiry on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ............................................................. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK S.S. MICHIGAN ST. from Webster St. to W. to Dead-End. ��1�3 I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, setded and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... i �' , PRO TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director or Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... ., ,' PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SUPERIOR ST. from Erie St. to Duke St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. a°�-'��7 �� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................... .......................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINaL COUNCIL FILE NO. By_ File In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 1 S99029 - 599030 - S99031 - 599032 - S99033 - WARD 2 S99034 - 599035 - S99036 - S99037 - Both sides Dayton Ave. from N. Griggs St. to N. Dunlap St. Both sides Englewood Ave. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Oxford St. Both sides N. Griggs St. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. North side Portland Ave. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. Both sides Sherburne Ave. from N. Chatsworth St. to N. Milton St. Both sides Erie St. from Michigan St. to Superior St. South side Michigan St. from Webster St. to W. to Dead-End. South side Portland Ave. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. Both sides Super'sor St. fram Erie St. to Duke St. �9-N�1 i� a�-y�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family sttuctures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide wallc and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be appro�mately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a czedit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per squaze foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd day of June, 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of heazing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COLTNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey �Bostrom ✓�oleman v�Iarris t�antry �iter Certified Passed by Council Secretary '� In Favor � Against BY L�� -_�� — Mayor q°I -tl�l? *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstrucfion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construcfion (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approa�imately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per square foot. under Preliminary order Rq - 3 � �t approved � � �. \ � �`�q°� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard ali persons, objections and recommendationsperta.iningto saidproposed improvement and has fully considered the satne; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City o�cers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �� anav '�Blakey �strom Coleman —C��u s�,,.'�— �3arris ��antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date�\qqe� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By� � � 1._ _ �Against �`��!'I X_/"//�� Sen� �i�/ Mayor PUBLIC HEARING DATE — 3UNE 2, 1999 RE 4-16-99 DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL DATE INfI1ATED PublicWorksSidewalks zs-ss GREEN SHEET °' N l� A`a� — AGTPEFISON&PHONE �DEPAqTMENfDIqECTOR ❑CRYCOUNCIL JerryTved[-2666087 ^�cn �crrvnnoaNer ❑cmrc�mK NUMBEit FOR � MUSTBEONCAUNCILAGENDABY(DA"fE) A�7T1Z LS 1999 Qp O��ETDIRECTOR ❑FlN.&MGLSERVICESDIR For public hearing on June 2, 1999 ��wOR(ORASSI5fANn � Council Research OTALiOFSIGNpTUflEPAC.ES _ (CLIPALLLOCATONSFORSIGNANR� u ASSOGATE ENTALACCOUMANT REQUESiED Reconstruc[ Sidewalk in Wards 1& 2(See attached list) f7ECAMMENDA'f�oNS: Appmve (a) or Reject (A) p�ONAI SERYICE CONiRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOINING QUESTIONS_ PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION t, HasihispersoNfirmeverworkeduntleraconLactforthisdepartrnent? qeCOMM17'TEE YES NO — — Z. Has this persoNfirm ever been a cily employee? A siarF _ YES NO DiSTR�C7 COUNp� 3. Does this person/firtn possess a Skill no[ nortnally possessed by any Curtent city employee? — — YES NO SUPPOFT3 WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? �p�� yes answers on separate shee[ and attach to green sheet INRIAi1NG PROBLEM, ISSUE, OPPoHRINITY (WHO, Wl1AT, WHEN. WHERE, WHh: The problem "defective sidewalk' was caused by multiple Qroblems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freezeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it wouid be unusable and subject to increased pedestria� injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: The community wili benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating private sector jobs as a result. DISADVAMAGES IFAPPROVED: Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question ihe assessments, despite 1he fact that up to one-half ihe assessment is City subsidized. Ffaving to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. DISADVANTAGESIFNOTAPPROVED: This option would allow the infrastrudure ot sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tum, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar arnounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. Go�;� g��a�`� �ar;:a� AP� �. � 1��9 OTALAMOUN70FTRANSACTION$ $6 COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIRCLEONE� YES NO PUNDINGSOURCE 99-�M z�669 /� prA 99 � 6 3Q�� ACINfTYNUMBER 99-2T752-0784-00000 FINANCIAL MFORMAiION: (IXPLAIN) B� AST = 351 aao C; et$ 99 = Sa�QOo a�-�� SUMMAR'Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS Wazd 1 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.5_ DAI'TON AVE. from N. Griggs St. to N_ Dunlap St. S j� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, �, , � , � disintegrated, scaled, setded and cracked panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ENGLEWOOD AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Oxford St. IIVITIATING ACTIOIV: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, offgrade, asphalt patches, scaled, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................... '� + PROTECT: 12ECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. N. GRIGGS ST. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: ThJs walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... ��) PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. �a-4�1? -a- EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled and cracked panels. ....... ....... .............. ...... .............................................. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SHERBL7RNE AVE. from N. Chatsworth St. to N. Milton St. �� (�j�j ITTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic r �� necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches and settled panels. ............................................................................... aq-4�? SUMiVIARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATIONS Ward 2 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ERIE ST. from Michigan St. to Superior St. S` f �✓ � IPTITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as public necessiry on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches and cracked panels. ............................................................. PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK S.S. MICHIGAN ST. from Webster St. to W. to Dead-End. ��1�3 I1vITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, setded and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... i �' , PRO TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. PORTLAND AVE. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director or Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) compiaints and an inspection of the walk. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... ., ,' PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SUPERIOR ST. from Erie St. to Duke St. IIVITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of a petition with one (1) signer and an inspection of the walk. a°�-'��7 �� EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled and cracked panels. ............................................................................... .......................... CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ORIGINaL COUNCIL FILE NO. By_ File In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: WARD 1 S99029 - 599030 - S99031 - 599032 - S99033 - WARD 2 S99034 - 599035 - S99036 - S99037 - Both sides Dayton Ave. from N. Griggs St. to N. Dunlap St. Both sides Englewood Ave. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Oxford St. Both sides N. Griggs St. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. North side Portland Ave. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. Both sides Sherburne Ave. from N. Chatsworth St. to N. Milton St. Both sides Erie St. from Michigan St. to Superior St. South side Michigan St. from Webster St. to W. to Dead-End. South side Portland Ave. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. Both sides Super'sor St. fram Erie St. to Duke St. �9-N�1 i� a�-y�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family sttuctures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide wallc and $1038 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be appro�mately $3.87 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a czedit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be approximately $5.23 per squaze foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 1998 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 2nd day of June, 1999 at 530 P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of heazing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COLTNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey �Bostrom ✓�oleman v�Iarris t�antry �iter Certified Passed by Council Secretary '� In Favor � Against BY L�� -_�� — Mayor