03-630` ...City.Qt 5� Paul
RESOLUTION RATIFYING ASSSSSMENT
� rnc.v.�.� — �.,.Y.c �-s, ac�m3
03 -�3�
COUNCI F �LE NO.
�
BY �'✓��
File No. SEE BELOW
Assessment No. SEE BELOW � /
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and e�penses for
J0301VW (9937) Towing of abandoned vehicles from private property.
located at 1688 York Ave, during the month of
October, 2002. - �-c4;a1.�:.�� �l��*-:w. O-Q�;� � ,,.
- - �
J0302AAA (9942) SummaTy batements (property clean-up during the .
month of February, 2003 for the property located at
928 Maryland Ave. East.
J0302BB
J0301V2
(9943)
(9946)
Boarding -up of vacant building at 928 Maryland Ave.
East during the month of February, 2003.
Towing of abandoned vehicles from private property
at 1607 Carroll Ave. during the month of October,
2002.
LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 5-28-03 TO 6-25-03
LEGISLATIVE HEARING WAS 6-10-03
A public hearing having been had upon the assessment for the above
improvement, and said assessment having been further considered by the Council, and
having been considered finally satisfactory, therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the said assessment be and the same is hereby in all respects
ratified.
RHSOLVED FURTHER, That the said assessment be and it is hereby determined
to be payable in One equal installments.
COUNCILPfiRSON
Yeas Nays
✓�enanav
�B'lakey
�ostrom
�oleman
vI#arris
Yl,antry
�3"Eer
�In Favor
D Against
Adopted by the Council: Date , doc'1�
Certified Passes by Council Secretary
City of St. Paul
Real Estate Division
Dept. of Technology & Management Serv
RSPORT OF COMPL$TION OF ASSSSSMENT
COUNCIL FILE NO.
File No. SEE BELOW
03 -�3�
Assessment No. SEE BELOW
Voting
Ward In the matter of the assessment of benefits, cost and expenses for
J0301WV
J0302AAA
J0302BB
J0301V2
(9937)
(9942)
(9943)
(9946)
Towing of abandoned vehicles from private property
located at 1688 York Ave, during the month of
October, 2002.
Summary abatements (property clean-up) during the
month of February, 2003 for the property located at
928 Maryland Ave. East.
Boarding -up of vacant building at 928 Maryland Ave.
East during the month of February, 2003.
Towing of abandoned vehicles from private property
at 1607 Carroll Ave. during the month of Oct•ober,
2002.
LAID OVER BY COUNCIL ON 5-28-03 TO 6-25-03
LEGISLATIVE AEARING WAS 6-10-03
To the Council of the City of St. Paul
The Valuation and Assessment Engineer hereby reports to the Council the
following as a statement of the expenditures necessarily incurred for and in
connection with the making of the above improvement, viz:
Total costs $1,367.70
Charge-Code Enforcement $100.00
Abatement Service Charge $80.00
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Charge To
Net Assessment
$1,547.70
$1,547.70
Said Valuation and Assessment Engineer further reports that he has assessed and
levied the total amount as above ascertained, to-wit: the sum of $1,547_70 upon
each and every lot, part or parcel of land deemed benefitted by the said improvement,
and in the case of each lot, part or parcel of land in accordance with the benefits
conferred thereon; that the said assessment has been completed, and that hereto
attached, identified by the signature of the said Valuation and Assessment Engineer,
and made a part hereof, is the said assessment as completed by him, and which is
herewith submitted to the Council for such action thereon as may be considered
proper.
Dated � � �l"�3
� "�"li"'""'�"�
� Valuation and Assessment Engineer
., � D
� Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet Green Sheet �
Depar[mentlofficelcouncil: : Date Initiated:
"�E — Technology and Managemen[ Serv ' 'I'I-JUN-03
CoMact Person & Pho�e� ' �
' Bruce Engelbrekt �
266-8854 ' A5,5ign
- ' Number
' 25-JUN-03 _ � � ,� � ,, For
—� D Routing
� Order
Green Sheet NO: 3001361
Deoartment Sent To Person Initial/Date
0 Technolo_w aod blanao S�
I Council tiancrAnderson
. ToWI # of Signature Pages �(Clip All Locations for Signature)
� Adion Requested: ^
At council's request these items were laid over�o 6-25-03, Towing of aband vehilce at 1688 York Ave, Suinm abatement at 928
Maryland Ave, Boarding-up at 928 Maryland Ave and Towin vehicle at 1607 Carroll Ave. File No.'s J0301 W V, J0302AAA, J0302BB
I and70301V2.
�, Recommendations: Approve (A) or Reject (R): � Personal Service Contracts Must Answer the Following Questions: �,
, Planning Commission ; 1. Has ihis person/firm ever worked under a contract for this department?
� CIB Committee � Yes No �
' Civii Service Commission i 2. Has this persoNfirm ever been a city empioyee?
Yes No
3. Does this perso�/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any
current ciry employee? ,
Yes No
. Expiain aIl yes answers on separete sheet and attach to green sheet ,
� — - � ------------ — �- -�- ------------
----- - - --- --
Initiating Probiem, Issues, Opportunity (Who, What, When, Where, Why): '
" SEE ORIGINAL GREEN SHEET 1VCJMBER 204138 "
AdvanWqes If Approved:
DisadvanWqes If Approved:
—�t� �nt�r —
Disadvantapes If Not Approved: ',
JJ�! ; � 2063
Total Amount of � 547.70
Trensaction:
Fundinp Source: `
CosURevenue Budgeted:
Activity Number:
Financial information:
(Explain) 4 Property owners will be notified of the public heazing and charges.
03 � �30
N
�
a
Q
I�
a
w
a y
£
M
�
m
a
E
�
�
a
0
�
0
�
0
ti
0
�
ti
,�
I N
Q I 'i
F1 O
1
E�a
x��
W�N
CL i N
a � o+
a�N
�
��
� N
U} I 0 0 0 II O
E� o 0 o n o
� . . . n
� o �n o n �n
O� m N�v n r�
� � CZTLT II tn
� N II �
; I
E � ii
u � n
i n
w n
i
m�000
H�000
H i O O O
� � O O O
� . . .
1 O� ri
a��
O�v
� �
wi
W�000
F�000
rL � o0 0
a � . . .
���o
F � N N
H i
� I
I
I �]
�a
i U
i H
w�x w
�a' �>ww
z �zww
�z �o u
o � caz�
c � �Ea
w��4�
,
1
1
I
�
i
i
�
I
i
i
1
�
i
1
i
i
�
1
�
�
i
�
; w �
�o� �
�..a �
�Fa �
z��a �
o �ca �
��Aq �
F��z� �
a �
H�q �
aiym i
U�N
m1 F �
W i m O
Q F] M 1
���aHx �
F�xwa
CL I C� W
W i 2 in
a i .+ m
O � E W i
[# i (L' E �
a��xo �
�mwa
�
�
�
i M i
ix o
�z �
i [x] l� N
�a M ��
a i� l0 N �
M O I
w� �
a�N w�>o�
X i�C 7 tn �C i
H i FC 'a.'£a� i
o�a oa°z�
� w a�� � �
w�xNmamz�
� � H �
o�s��m�.
0 0 o n o
0 0 o ii o
• 11 •
o in o n in
Ol N N II M
Ct?L} II N
� II�
w u
a u
U II
H II
x w n
W w n
>wwu
O ii �
q 2 H n H
�-+> II O
� a n E
mown
aa�llu
aaanw
aaauh
FFF��O
00o ii a
m
a
w
U
�
a
F
a
W
X
w
0
�
a
w
u
�
a
�
�
�
Q
a
�
a
a
W
�
Q
�
E
N
�
m
�
F
�
m
4
M
�
N
0
�
0
�a
�o
q o
H O
� � N
E � N
a �
W N
LL i N
o�� �
a i rn
a � <v �
im
� N
V] � O O O II O i
E i o 0 o n o i
z � . n
a i c"� u� o n m �
Q � a] N N II N �
� i N iRLT II [�1 �
i � 11 N �
11
x n
p i n i
E � II �
U � ��
Q �I
� I I
1
[n 1 000
[-� � 000 I
H i O O O
z I O O O I
� �
� M.i.ti
ai �
O N
E � �
V �
� i i
w�
� �
w o00
�i000 �
i000
� � ,y in o i
E� NN
H
z� �
a�
�
�
�
�
�
a
�
•ww
� wmc�
�H a
w � �C E �C
� �
2
r�.' W i
0.< � 0.'UU
O � FC W �+
E � E x >
a��aww
w� cn a ur i
i i
� i
i
z�
o�
H i
a � u] •• �o i
�-+ � E W io i
U � � O ti �
m�� zN �
W�W x �
o�xNm �
.�.+ i W �.' FC W
H � aawca �
a�awaa �
w�� ao �
a�>M
o � H . x
a�mF.a
a � �co 0
�wa 3 �
� �
� �
i � �
0
� �
� �
i m o�
�w�
w �o �,
p� 1 N�E] O I
N i j o � .. �
ut � W FC ,� [4 �
a � o u,qo �
� aram �
F � `��az�aa �
�waEN �
o��aaaz�
F, �
a � a��Q�o �
w�Q amz�
z�.�m Nw�
3 � arv Fo+a �
o� F m m� z�
0 0 o n o
0 0 o n o
•��
cn ui o n m
m N N II N
N LT t? II t"�
.n n vr
i
n
n
II
11
II
n
•w W ii
W cn C9 ii
F a��
� E � II
mo���
a� UU n
�I
ac ii �
aw�+nE.
�x>��o
� uanH
wwn
u�amnF
II U
aaanw
r� r� � n h
EEF�iO
000ua
EEF ii a
�
a
W
U
�
a
E
a
E
W
x
W
0
�
xs
�
03 - b3a
�
�
�
a
a
a
w'
W
�
�
4
f .'
C
�
a
E
E
N
�
Q
M
0
m
N
0
�
C
.
,�
�o
A�o
H � O �
I 1
N i N �
(y � N i
a�
�z] � N
a�N
o�
ce � o, �
a�N
� �
m
� N �
U} i �fl O O il N i
N� N O O II N�
g i • II
�� CE N O II m�
�� C N N II QJ i
£ i LtL}+/t II i? �
R� 1 II I
��
a n
O ��
[� i n i
U � II
� II
G� � II
i
f n i o O o
Ei i 000
H � 1f1 O O
Z i N O O
�
� M 'i .-V
a 1 � I
� �
F � �
U �
Q �
W i i
Wi000 i
[� i o00 �
cC � o0 o i
fk �
� rl Itl O
F � N N �
H �
�
1 ;
I
I i
I
I
W
�
a
w � am�C
� i �c i
z�c�o
zuw
x � u �
o�AZ� �
H�a�>
c� � a'sa
a � ocaw �
�. � mam �
� I
�
�
�
�
z �
0
H
E i
a�m
H E �
a��
U U'
U} � H I
WiW
o xN
�
�+ � W �.'
F�aa �
x�aw �
[x] I H
LL '> M i
O F
°';wo �
�
� �
� M �
0
i i i
O I
Ot ri
� .ti W i
W �o ri �
!K � NWO i
� i W� ti Q W i
x W� O N Q O�
2C C �
i
F � w.7�N� i
o��aa�z�
ry' 'l H i
3�aNFrna�
o � F mcn� � �
tn O O II Ifl
N O O I I N
•u
MNO II OJ
C N N II W
v2 v� vt n vr
n
n
II
i
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
II
II
W 1l
acna ii
] U U li
i il �
C]2� u E
a�>vo
�CEanE+
oow��
fA FC tn n F
II U
aaanw
Q [( c( II h
EFH II O
000��a
EFF �� a
�
�
�
m
w
U
4
a
ti
03 - �3b
�
�
�
w
�
a
a
W
�
�
�
�
�
�
E
£
�
�
�
0
0
N
0
�
r
��
��
o,o
H 1 O
1
� I �
E � d'
a
w�M
a�N
o �
a��+
a�N �
� � �
n �
�n
i
y i in o o n�n
E� a o o n c �
z� .��
a � N�;o ���
Q i N N N 11 T
� 1 �N� il N i
� II �
i I I
a n
p i n i
E � ��
U � II i
� i II
[u � II i
Uj I 000
N�000
H 1 N O O
� ; C O O
I �—I `i 'i I
a � �n
o � �n �
E �
U � �
� i i
w i
i
W�000
[y i o0 o i
rC i o0 0
a
� ,a in o
F N N
H � �
z�
.��
� �
� �
� �
�w
�a w �
i V C�
H p:
W 1 .T. A'i �
��JWU
z w
�zww
a�o u
o � caz�
u��a�a �
�C�mow
w � RC RC m
i �
i
i �
i �
i
z
o �
H 1
E. � �
a �
�+ � w m
a HN �
u o �o �
�n z �
w � xc ac �
Q � � �.' c 0.5
a� � aaaw
H t �qWQ
a�w aa �
w � c� .-+ a o �
a�wrv
o�a *x �
a�aH�a
aioo � �
i
� �
i
M �
� N O i
�
� H ro �
� U' H P N�
� W � M N i
a�x �nwo�
� � a � o� ..
RC � FC a,a w�
a�x �ao�
� c� a �n a
a om�
H�o ozaa�
C x�C �
O � Exr.C.]UZ �
0.' � C7C U ��q
w�zz�aoz�
3 � 2x � �
o � a E. .-� m . . �
�oa���
� o o n a
•II
rl N O II 19
N N N I I O 1
NLti? II tfl
vr n �
n
i
u
n
n
n
n
n
n
II
II
II
u
w n
U L�9 ii
i+ a n
w xii
,WUII
W II
zww�ia
° n y z�IIF
FC�z n °
0.l 0 W 11
��
aaa u�a
aaanh
F H E n O
000��a
E+ H E+ n a
�
a
w
U
�
a
E
a
�
w
x
�
0
�
r7
W
U
�
a
N
03- �30
03 - �3a
REPORT
Date: June 10, 2003
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Place: Room 330 City Hall
15 West Kellogg Boulevazd
LEGISLA'I`IVE HEARING FOR ORDERS TO REMOVE/REPAIR,
CONDEMNATIONS, SUMMAI2Y ABATEMENT ORDERS, ABATEMENT
ASSESSMENTS
Marcia Moermond
Legislative Hearing Officer
� 1. Laid over summary abatements:
J0302AAA Property cleanup at 928 Maryland Avenue East.
(Laid over from 5-13-03)
J0302BB Boarding-up of vacant building at 928 Marvland Avenue East
(Laid over from 5-13-03)
J0301V2 Towing of abandoned vehicles from 1607 Carroll Avenue
(Laid over from 5-27-03)
J0301VVV Towing of abandoned vehicles from 1688 York Avenue
(Laid over from 5-27-03)
928 Maryland Avenue East
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
928 Marvland Avenue East
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
1688 York Avenue
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends spreading the assessment over a five-year period.
1607 Carroll Avenue
(Recommendation is forthcoming.)
2. Appeal of Summary Abatement Order at 928 Marvland Avenue East.
(Laid over from 5-13-03)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends denying the appeal.
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 928 Maryland
Avenue East. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is
ordered to remove the building.
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends laying over to the June 17, 2003, Legislative
Hearing.
D3 - �3a
LEGISLATIVE HEARING REPORT FOR JUNE 10, 2003 Page 2
4. Summary Abatements:
J0303A Property cleanup for part of February 2003 to part of Apri12003;
J0302SNOW Snow/ice removal and/or sanding of walks for part of February 2003
to part of March 2003;
J0302C Demolirion of buildings for part of March 2003;
J0303B Boarding-up of vacant buildings for March 2003.
690 Central Avenue West (J0303A)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
574 State Street (J0303A)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends spreading the assessment over a five-year period.
1820 Stillwater Avenue (J0302SN0�
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends reducing the assessment from $195 to $75 plus
the $45 administrative fees for a total assessment of $120.
595 Edmund Avenue (J0303A)
Legislative Heazing Officer recommends laying over to the July 8, 2003, Legislative
Hearing.
1237 Matilda Street (J0303A)
Legislative Heazing Officer recommends laying over to the June 23, 2003, Legislative
Hearing.
1374 Ames Avenue (J0303A)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
958 Bradlev Street (J0302SN0�
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
817 Dauton Avenue (J0303A)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
994 Earl Street (J0303A)
Legislafive Hearing O�cer recommends approval of the assessment.
1093 Hudson Road (J0303A)
Legislarive Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
983 James Avenue (J0303A)
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
03 - �30
LEGISLA'ITVE HEARING REPORT FOR JCJNE 10, 2003
604 Jessamine Avenue East (J0303A)
Legislarive Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
1848 Seventh Street West
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
659 Westem Avenue North (J0302SNOV�
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
124 Winter Street (J0302SN0�
Legislative Hearing Officer recommends approval of the assessment.
Page 3
5. Appeal of Summary Abatement Order at 1555 Iglehart Avenue; Daniel Jambor,
owner.
(VJithdrawn)
�
a 3- �3D
MINUTES OF THE LEGISLATIVE HEARING
ORDERS TO REMOVE/REPAIR, CONDEMNATTONS,
Si.JMMARY ABATEMENT ORDERS, ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS
Tuesday, June 10, 2003
Room 330 City Hall, 15 West Kellogg Boulevard
Marcia Mcermond, Legislative Hearing Officer
(Note: 9:00 a.m. is scheduled to discuss issues concerning 928 Maryland Avenue East. 10:00
a.m. is scheduled for the rest of the agenda.)
STAFF PRESENT: John Betz, Code Enforcement; Steve Magner, Code Enforcement; Ruifen
Zhuang, Technology and Management Services
The meeting was called to order at 9:10 a.m.
J0302AAA Property cleanup at 928 Maryland Avenue East. (Laid over from 5-13-03)
J0302BB Boarding-up of vacant building at 928 Maryland Avenue East
(Laid over from 5-13-03)
Appeal of Summary Abatement Order at 928 Maryland Avenue East
(Laid over from 5-13-03)
Resolution ordering the owner to remove or repair the property at 928 Maryland Avenue
East. If the owner fails to comply with the resolution, Code Enforcement is ordered to
remove the building.
Mazcia Moermond stated there are four issues here: two are assessments, one is an appeal of a
suiximary abatement order, and there is an order to remove or repair the house. She will start
with the assessments because they are straight forward. J0302B is about open and unsecured
windows on the north side of the house. J0302A is about tires, mattress, trash, and truck in the
yazd. Ms. Moerxnond asked about the vehicle abatement order on the truck. Mr. Magner
responded the truck is not one of the items in front of Ms. Moermond right now. On the
siiminary abatement issue to secure the windows, there was a compliance date of February 17,
2003, the building was rechecked on February 18, the windows were still open, and a summary
abatement was issued. A work order went to the contractor, who secured the north side window.
There was also a snmmary abatement issued for cleaning up the yard at the same time. They did
the reinspection on the 18�'. There was no compliance. They sent the work order to Parks to
clean up the yazd.
The following appeared: Trudy May Gloe, owner, 18140 Fenway, Forest Lake, Minnesota; Bob
Korf, friend of Ms. Gloe, 18140 Fenway, Forest Lake, Minnesota; and Brandon, Ms. Gloe's son.
Ms. Moermond stated it appears the building had been condemned prior to the fire. Mr. Magner
responded no. Mr. Karf also responded no, but said the documents appear that way.
Ms. Gloe stated that is what she is upset about. She cailed the cops because the doors were open
fl3 - �3�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MII�IIJTES OF JUNE 10, 2003
Page 2
again. The cops told her she could not go into the house and could not take anything out of the
house. She could not even lock up her house. Mr. Korf stated the most important fact here is
that Ms. Gloe has been out of her house for over seven months because the City inspector
informed the insurance company that the house was condemned before the fire; therefore, the
insurance company discontinued all work. Mr. Korf does not understand why the inspector is
talking to the insurance adjuster.
Ms. Moermond asked how Mr. Korf knows the inspector said that. Mr. Korf responded the
adjuster told him. When the adjuster did not come back in three of four days as he said, Mr. Korf
called and asked why. The adjuster said the City inforxned him that the house was condemned
before the Fire.
Ms. Moermond asked aze there any records of what the inspector said during the meeting with
the insurance adjuster. NIr. Magner responded that there is no indication in the records that
anyone in the City told the fire adjuster anything. Mr. Magner spoke to the fire adjuster at the
properiy, and told him the property was condemned. The building was inspected at the time of
the fire, which was November 7. The condemnation was posted on the building and a vacant
building file was opened, which is standard practice following a fire. Uniess it is minor, the City
does not allow people to stay in a building after a fue. There were also other conditions present
that constituted a condemnation. The building had previously been condemned, but not at the
time of the fire. The building was not already declared unfit for human habitation at the time of
the fire. There were previous pending exterior violations—yazd, storage, etc.—but no pending
condemnation.
Ms. Gloe said she has photographs of the house. She met with a mortgage company the next day
and had the house looking good. The code guy told her she had to pick up a11 this stuff, and the
insurance said not to touch nothing. She cannot deal with this.
Mr. Korf asked where the City has the right to tell Ms. Gloe that she has to remove everything
from her house including silverware and have it inspected before she moves back in. Ms.
Moermond asked was this indicated in any of the orders. Mr. Magner responded he does not
believe so.
Ms. Gloe stated the only thing that caught on fire was her son's bedroom. According to her
insurance agency the only thing that needed to be done was painting because of smoke damage in
the living room. Mr. Korf responded to Ms. Gloe that there was smoke and water damage
throughout the house.
Ms. Gloe showed a photograph to Ms. Moermond and said this is all that caught on fire. When
the fire department got there, the fire was out. It was unnecessary for them to do all this. Mr.
Korf responded to Ms. Gloe that the Fire Department had to check because it was so smoky in
the house. They wanted to make sure nothing was smoldering.
If there is a concern with the insurance company, Mr. Magner stated, the owner should go back
to the company or get legal counsel. If the insurance company is unwilling to honor its
03 - ��
LEGISLATIVE HEAItING MINUTES OF JLJNE 10, 2003 Page 3
commitment, the City does not have any responsibiliry to compel them to do so. If the insurance
company says the building is condemned and that is why they aze not paying, they would have to
have proof of that in the form of condemnation. There is no proof because there was no
condemnarion prior to the fire.
Ms. Gloe stated Mike Kalis (Code Enforcement) told the insurance company that the house was
condemned before the fire. They investigated, but by tt�at time, the code guy had other things on
her. NIr. Korf added that insurance adjusters aze hard to deal with, and Ms. Gioe is not in a
position to deal with them.
Ms. Gloe stated she was painting the walls until she got a stop-work order. The code guy was
coming out every other day. He came with a police officer one day, and they went through the
whole house. She showed them the list of what she was doing. Three days before she was
complete, he put a stop work order on her because Mr. Magner was not infomung him.
Ms. Moermond asked did she understand that the house had to be in the vacant building program
because it was condemned. Ms. Gloe responded the house should not have been condemned
because she had it done. Ms. Korf added that Ms. Gloe received the vacant building information
on December 19. When he read through the codes, an owner has 90 days to register. Mr.
Magner responded the code states there is an exemption from the vacant building fee, but the
owner is still required to register the building. They have 90 days from the date of the fire to pay
the $200 vacant building fee. Mr. Magner was at the building with Mr. Kalis on November 7
when this property was condemned, and he instructed Mr. Kalis to condemn the building for
more than just the fire. There was a material endangerment issue based on the conditions.
Ultimately, it was the responsibility of the occupant to clean the building and make the fire
repairs. If Ms. Gloe had cleaned up the building and made the repairs within 90 days, she would
not have had to pay the $200 vacant building fee, Code Enforcement would have lifted the
condemnation, and she would be back in the property.
Ms. Gloe stated she and her two sons worked on that house for three months. She tried to do
what the City wanted her to do, but she did not get from them a list of things to do. She had
people in there that trashed her house, who were alcoholics. When she was sick, she could not
get out of bed to clean up after them. She had a restraining order against her mom's boyfriend,
and he would ca11 the code guy and Child Protection. Every three to six months for seven years
is a lot times to come out to her house. Ms. Kalis was peaking through her windows, said Ms.
Gloe.
For the vacant building, Mr. Korf asked, the house was registered November 7. Mr. Magner
responded it is standard procedure that when a building is condemned and there is a fire, it
automatically becomes a vacant building. On November 8, there was a Notice for Unfit for
Human Habitation. Also on November 8, the vacant building registration was mailed to Ms.
Gloe. At this point, Mr. Korf asked was he aware that they don't deliver mail to a vacant
building. Mr. Magner responded that is generally a policy of the U.S. Post Office. There may be
a forwazding order at the post office also.
a3-�3D
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINLJTES OF J(JNE 10, 2003 Page 4
Ms. Moermond stated that it seems Ms. Gloe was in the registered vacant building program by
the time the two suuuuary abatements occurred in Febivary because the fire was in early
November, the building was posted, she knew the building was to be boarded, and the items were
still in the yazd in February when they did the cleanup.
Mr. Gloe stated that someone dumped junk in her yard and she called the cops two weeks ago.
(The videotape was shown.)
Mr. Korf asked how much was the charge. Ms. Moermond responded $328. Ms. Gloe
responded the City did not pick up any of that stuff:
Ms. Gloe stated Mr. Kalis broke her windows. Ms. Moermond responded she can not deal with
Mr. Kalis here. Ms. Gloe can file a claim with Risk Management for damages.
Mr. Korf asked about the other items being appealed. Ms. Moermond responded the assessment
for boarding up the windows is for $88.25. The smmnary abatement order was appealed, but the
work has already been done by the City. Mr. Magner responded the windows were broken open
and the sliding glass door was open on a number of occasions. A suuunary abatement order for
securing has to be inspected that day or the next day. Once the building was boarded, his office
found out that the appellant had asked for an appeal on that issue.
Brandon stated the sliding glass door had two boards in there and it was nailed shut from the
inside.
Ms. Gloe stated the neighbor kept throwing cats in her building also.
Ms. Moermond stated the last thing is the order to remove or repair the house. If the Council
issues the order to remove or repair, the department can demolish the place. That is the biggest
issue here. She asked has there been a code compliance inspection. Mr. Korf responded Ms.
Gloe cannot come up with the $2,000 bond to work on her house. She cannot get medication
because she's out of the county. Her son could not go to school and got truancy because he had
to change schools. Her house is immaculate on the first floor. Right before she was about to
wrap it up, she got gets a stop work order on the house. She has been working there all the
while. Mr. Kalis has been stopping by at night. When he sees she's about to get done, he puts a
stop work order on it. He could have put the stop work order on a month ago.
Ms. Moermond stated her paperwork says that Ms. Gloe is on disability. From looking at the
videotape, things were cleaned and the properry was boarded by the City. She will recommend
that these assessments aze approved. These assessments can be paid over five yeazs or Ms. Gloe
can talk to the Real Estate Office about getting the assessment deferred unfil the properiy is sold
because of her disability.
Louise Langberg explained the requirements for deferring the assessment. It can be deferred for
a m�imum of twenty years or until the properry is no longer homesteaded.
03 �3v
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINiJTES OF JLTNE 10, 2003 Page 5
Ms. Moermond explained that the owner may qualify for a property taz abatement because there
was a fire and the property was condemned.
Ms. Gloe stated she had the door nailed shut, so she does not understand how the City had to do
it again. The inspector wanted to be let in through the sliding glass doors. She would pop out
the nails for him to come in.
Ms. Moermond asked is there any information about how the property was entered and is there
standard operating procedure to open a nailed door. Mr. Magner responded the only time the
inspectors entered the properry was when Ms. Gloe was there or someone else in control of the
property. He does not know about entering the property any other times. He found the property
to be unsecured at times and the door was physically open. Mr. Magner put his head through the
window, looked around, didn't see anything, shut the door, and was unable to secure it because it
is a sliding glass door. They issued the Summary Abatement Order. When they did the
reinspection, the sliding glass door was wide open again. Ms. Gloe responded she has witnesses
that they were in her house with flashlights without her there. The code guys have telling her
neighbors that there are animal feces a11 over her house. She is embarrassed to go back there.
Ms. Moermond stated that she recommends denying the appeal on the Suunnary Abatement
Order. The owner can also appeal the cost of the assessment when it comes before Ms.
Moermond at a later time.
Mr. Korf asked about what happened to her cazs. Mr. Magner responded they sent a work order
on a Suburu and the Suuunary Abatement was mailed to her property at 928 Maryland. It lacked
current license tabs. Vehicles have to be licensed. Ms. Gloe responded she has a lot going on in
her life with her mother being sick and other things she is dealing with.
Ms. Moermond suggested to Ms. Gloe that she go to Southem Minnesota Regional Legal
Services; they should be able to help her with the insurance company and saving the house. She
has a lot going on here and counsel would help.
(Ms. Moermond supplied Ms. Gloe with an"Application for Abatement-Local Option Disaster")
Ms. Moermond stated she will lay this over to June 17, 930 a.m. to deal with the resolution to
remove or repair the properiy. They are mm�ing out of time this morning.
Mr. Magner stated that Ms. Gloe said she was going to sell the house. If you are going to sell the
house, you are required to get a Truth-in-Housing report, but a person can use the code
compliance inspection instead.
(There was further discussion about the code compliance inspection.)
Mr. Korf asked about the curfew for working on the properry. Mr. Magner responded that is 8:00
a.m. to 8:00 pm. There is no ordinance that says it, rather it is a policy out of Code Enforcement
that is enforced on all vacant properties they monitar. If someone was in the dwelling occupying
D 3' (�3a
LEGISLATTVE HEARING MII�Ii.7TES OF JLJNE 10, 2003
Page 6
it, that person could bave been tagged, and the City Attomey would make a decision about
prosecuting the case.
Mr. Korf stated the Ms. Gloe was painting and then she was told she had to be out of the house at
8:00. Also, he asked why the enforcement guy was there at 8:00 p.m. and three nights a week.
Mr. Magner responded the inspectors will be on duty if they are there at night. Mr. Magner is the
only other person that would be going with those individuals. A number of times the property
was inspected at night. Ms. Gloe and other individuals were on site and not engaged in working
on the building. If Inspector Kalis was at the property other times than what was documented in
the reports, Mr. Magner does not know about that. Ms. Gloe responded Mr. Magner is lying.
Ms. Moermond stated Ms. Gloe wrote a letter to the Mayor about this situation, and the Mayor
had an investigation conducted of this alleged behavor, but Ms. Moermond cannot deal with
behavior in this forum.
Ms. Moermond recommends approval of both assessments. She recommends denying the appeal
on the Summary Abatement Order dated Apri12003. The resolution to remove or repair will be
laid over to Tuesday, June 17, 9:30 a.m.
(Recess from 10:15 to 10:18)
Laid over summary abatements from May 13, 2003:
J0301V2 Towing of abandoned vehicle at 1607 Carroll Avenue;
J0301WV Towing of abandoned vehicle at 1688 York Avenue.
1688 York Avenue
Marcia Moermond stated orders were mailed on September 25, 2002, and the work was done on
October 24.
Karen Mazza, owner, appeazed and stated she called the inspector. She does not know why it
was towed. He said he looked under the hood and it did not have a battery. She found that odd
because her son always kept it locked. One morning, they showed up with a tow huck. Her son
was asked if could it be driven azound the block. He was told no; therefore, it was towed.
John Betz reported the inspector issued arders on September 25 for an abandoned vehicle that
was inoperable and missing parts. The compliance date was October 2. He went back on
October 9 on another issue; therefore, he was doing the vehicle inspection in conjuction with
another inspection. On October 9, there was no change in the vehicle ordered abated. He went
back on October 17, it had flat tires, and it was still missing a battery. He agreed to meet the
property owner at the property. No one showed for the inspection. He took pichues of the
vehicles, and sent a work order to the police department to tow the vehicle. Ms. Mazza
responded that she called the inspector as soon as she Irnew she would not be able to leave work
in time to get there.
b3� t�3D
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINI JTES OF JLJNE 10, 2003
Page 7
Ms. Moermond asked was that the same day it was towed. Ms. Mazza responded it was towed
later.
Ms. Moermond asked was she able to reschedule an appointment. Ms. Mazza responded he
never called her back, and she did not call him. Ms. Moermond responded the responsibility is
on her to do the calling.
Ms. Mazza stated she drives by houses with cazs sitting on blocks for weeks. Ms. Moermond
responded there are one of three ways abandoned vehicles are identified: 1) The City has a
complaint-driven system, and someone could have called in to say there was a property in
violation; 2) in some cases, the City does sweeps in neighborhoods; 3) if an inspector is already
there on a problem and sees another problem, it was be noted.
Ms. Mazza stated she has to pay all this money because they towed her son's caz. Another way
to look at this, responded Ms. Moermond, is that she has to pay this money because she did not
take care of this situation herself. It is her property, and she is responsible for maintaining her
property in compliance with the code. The owner can also appeal to the City Council. Ms.
Moermond can recommend that the assessment is spread over a five year time period. Ms.
Mazza responded that is what she wants to do.
Ms. Moermond recommends spreading the assessment over a five-year time period.
1607 Carroll Avenue
Pheng Thao, owner, Route 2, Box 39A Bear Road, Hinckley, Minnesota, stated this is about a
vehicle towed for $551.45 plus fees. He did not get a notice. He got a notice for court. He
talked to the tenant, who said he did not want the car anymore. Later, Mr. Thao got a citation.
He read the code and it says the owner should take care of this. He did not lrnow this beforehand.
He felt it was his fault, so he paid the citation of $100. Now, he has this assessment. He was
told to talk to a man who told him the fee was the storage for the car. Mr. Thao asked how there
can be storage for the car when the owner did not want the car.
Ms. Moermond stated the City is required to hold the vehicle for at least two weeks. That is
State law. During that time period, the owner can get it. Also, there were other issues at this
property in the last couple of yeazs regazding refuse.
Mr. Betz stated his office does not have the correct address. There have been other tags issued
for trash. The tags were undeliverable, so there may be a warrant out for the owner. Mr. Betz
suggested the owner change his address with Ramsey County Taxation Records. There is another
assessment for properiy cleanup that is pending. Mr. Thao responded he went to the post office
and changed his address.
Ms. Moermond stated he should go to Ramsey County and take care of the warrants today. Also,
he should notify Ramsey County TaYation regarding the correct address.
D3 - (v3i�
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF NNE 10, 2003 Page 8
Mr. Thao stated the tenant had called and said he did not want the caz anymore. Ms. Moermond
responded she is going to call the Impound Lot where the car was stored to bave them look at the
records to see when he called and see if that effects their charges. If it does, she will recommend
the CiTy Council decrease the assessment accordingly.
(Decision forthcoming.)
Summary Abatements:
J0303A Property cleanup for part of February 2003 to part of Apri12003;
J0302SNOW Snow/ice removal and/or sanding of walks for part of February 2003 to part
of March 2003;
J0302C Demolition of buildings for part of March 2003;
J0303B Boarding-up of vacant buildings for March 2003.
690 Central Avenue West _
(No one appeared.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
574 State Street
(Ruifen Zhuang translated Cantonese and English for this issue.)
Hon Wong, owner, appeazed and stated that he cannot understand English. When he received the
letter on Apri13, he was not living in the house. He was temporarily living in his brother's
house. He was in China when the mail was delivered. On March 18, he came back to the United
States. He gave the letter to his son.
Mr. Betz explained the owner was issued a letter to clean up the property by a particular date.
The inspector went out there, it was not cleaned up, and the City cleaned it up. That is what the
chazge is for.
Ms. Moermond asked is the property in his name. Mr. Wong responded yes.
Ms. Moermond asked who did he ask to be in chazge of his property while he was not living
there. Mr. Wong responded that when he came back from China, he temporarily lived in his
brother's home. His oldest son helped him paint the house.
Ms. Moermond asked when the junk was in the yard, was he awaze of it. Mr. Wong responded
he already removed the garbage. The sofa was heavy. He needed someone's help to remove it.
(A videotape was shown.)
03- �30
LEGISLATiVE HEARING MINi.7T'ES OF JiINE 10, 2003 Page 9
Ms. Moermond asked what he is disputing. Mr. Wong responded this is his first tnne. He is not
cleaz on the rules. He has been retired two yeazs and bas no job.
Ms. Moermond asked would it be heipful to divide the assessment over five years with interest.
The total of tl�e assessment is $330. Mr. Wong responded he would prefer five yeazs.
He added that it is hazd to find someone that speaks Cantonese. It is difficult for him to
communicate. When he calls, no one can understand him.
Ms. Moermond asked does he have a relative or someone close to translate for him. Mr. Wong
responded everyone is busy. Ms. Moermond responded tt�at is true with everyone's kids these
days.
Ms. Moermond recommends spreading the assessment over five years.
1820 Stillwater Avenue (J0302SNOR�
Gary Blair, owner, 1769 Reaney Avenue, appeared and stated this is rental properry. He received
a notice on about February 28, 2003, that the properry had snow that had to be removed. The
notice he received says that on or after February 27, there could be an inspection. He went to the
property after February 28, inspected the walk, and it had been shoveled. He talked to the
resident at that time, and she said she had sanded it. There had not been much snow. He does
not live far from there. He received a notice that the City had cleaned it. He felt it had already
been cleaned. He wonders what they cleaned.
John Betz reported an order was issued on February 28. A reinspection was made. The inspector
sent a work order to the Pazks Department which cleaned it on March 5. The next occurrence
resulted in a tag being issued. Mr. Blair responded he was out there on March i, and it had
already been sanded and shoveled. He is not sure if there was snow in between. There were
flurries all winter.
(A videotape was shown.)
Mr. Blair stated there must haue been snow in between. There is only about 30 feet of sidewalk,
and the charge was almost $200. Ms. Moermond responded there is a minimum fee to have a
work crew to go out there. Mr. Betz explained there is a one hour minimum chazge of $150, and
that is to bring the equipment out there, and shovel the properry.
Mr. Blair said that his paperwork indicates that the cost of snow removal is $150 with a half hour
minimum. Mr. Betz responded he is not awaze of a half hour minimum.
Ms. Moermond recommends reducing the assessment from $195 to $75 plus the $45
administrative fees for a total assessment of $120.
D3- ��d
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MIIVUTES OF JLJNE 10, 2003
595 Edmund Avenue (J0303A)
Kazla Johnson, owner, appeared. Code Enforcement did not have a files available on this
properry.
Marcia Moermond recommends laying over to the July 8, 2003, Legislative Hearing.
1237 Matilda Street (J0303A)
(No one appeazed.)
Page 10
Mazcia Moerxnond recommends laying over to the June 23, 2003, Legislative Heazing, at the
owner's request.
Appeal of Summary Abatement Order at 1555 Iglehart Avenue; Daniel Jambor, owner.
Appeal is withdrawn as the owner and inspectar have warked things out, and a hearing is no
longer necessary.
The meeting was adjoumed at 11:25 a.m.
���
Note: no one appeared at the Legislative Heazing on the addresses listed below. These addresses
were not read at the hearing.
1374 Ames Avenue (J0303A)
(No one appeazed.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
958 Bradle,�et (J0302SN0�
(No one appeared.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
817 Davton Avenue (J0303A)
(No one appeazed.)
Mazcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
D3" (o3D
LEGISLATIVE HEARING MINUTES OF JiINE 10, 2003
994 Earl Street (J0303A)
(No one appeazed.)
Mazcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
1093 Hudson Road (J0303A)
(No one appeared.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
983 James Avenue (J0303A)
(No one appeared.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
604 Jessamine Avenue East (J0303A)
(No one appeared.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
1848 Seventh Street West (J0302SN0�
(No one appeared.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
659 Western Avenue North (J0302SN0�
(No one appeazed.)
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
124 Winter Street (J0302SN0�
(No one appeared.)
Page 11
Marcia Moermond recommends approval of the assessment.
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
U
C
h
F
�
�
F�
Q
Z
=Q0
� � >
F Z '
z¢
'�U4
o°�
�
FzQ
U V C
c.]
F
cz
O
F
z
�
�
C
Q
�
C
�
�
6
z
�
�
G
/
>
0
M
°
z
N
fs.
�
0
� N
Y O
� N
ap
� o
O �
w Q
� a,
,� o
� Y
v �
> �
oY
� �
p �
� �
w
O pj
C�' ❑
N
o¢'
N �
y O
F �
O
L p�p
.-°�. `�
R
� �
Y �
V y
R
� U
� O
U
� �
E a
3
z §
� z
3 °
U �
T C
U 0.
�
N
n
4
_
s
">
i
G
C
.
C�
�
F
C
<
�
U
Q
\
bs ss bs
.�
a
M
t
a
0
.i o
��
�
�
V
�
1
8
i
°
�
a
.�.
O
eo
_
� u
u � L R
� � �
� �
u
c � E
0. Z �
� � V
0 0 _
R R A
� � N
. . .`
C C a
ti
�
z
c:
a
x
c
¢
F
ti
O
U
�
6
z
�
fn
O
��
o �
i�
0
���
� m
� o
� N
N
� O
8
u =
>
o ti
? c
� Q
� `" (� I _ T `
N V ,V
O � (\
V
L
m �
.�.
�
bD Z
� `
a � 9
c O �
0 0
a n
G G
7
C C �
�
;
�
M
l
�
» «s ea ze » c> v± sv
ti
C �
C�i 'J
u
�°_ c
C V %
c� 'Z w
� � �
0
" V � F o
U
w v w
R � R
F U < U
�
o r
� �
� �
i
c
O
w
.: c
i
� U
` o u
a
T R
W �
en
. G
z
�
}
ss zs
� u
c
W
s '
C '� O
� E E
c ¢
y � e
e u
¢ ¢ E �=
� c a `u
Z " ° U
e E �
e � `
x
• a k. c
- x a
> F c7
.
� �
V "
_ ���
�
� �
V �
� �
� ��
u
< � �
�" u
_ �.;
a v \ �
o Z " �
� ( �� �� �
a
�
�
c. i �
`u A ( \ ,�
u � } ��V
o W �
a C �
V �
V �'
c `u �
�: � Z' �
q
�
�
�
�
�
U
C
k:
ti
F
Z
�
�
w
Q
z
=Qo
a�_
F Z >
:a
¢rF
��a
o°�
�
F � Q
U V C
�
F
k
O
F
Z
W
�
C
6
a
m
c
1
N
Q
C.1
P
0
z
E
G
a
a
0
5
6
z
�
Y
C
�
r °
.� ¢]
W �
C C
'�O �
aF
c `tl
v �
U �
�` w
� N
CL �
O �
a �
� N
� U
> O
N L'
p A,
Q O
sa
��
� �
w
u"' O
O p
� N
C m
i' N
W
� o
� �
� �
z ;
� z
3 Q
� �
U =
T m
U a
�0
D a ry 0
J
y
s
L
�
m
G
L
0.
�
i
s
�
�:
F
<
C
�
a
�
U
Q
» » c�
M
0
�
0
�
>
O
�
p O
w
o O I
m
_
V W
� �
a 'm
� � u
."�.
� y
G � �
� z _
� _ U
O O =
is m �
V
� �
.�
C C �
0
h
v
0
C�
Q
�
N
O
8
> u
O e
� c
n G
.7 Q �^
C/
r Q , � �
O `�, �y
N � ,N
O O �
U
� a
tO E
C �
� Z
c y
u
� a �
S O =
�
0 0
R V C1
= ` 4
. . >
C C �
�:
z
�
a
x
�:
O
a
F
O
U
�
Q
Z
�
F» vj vi s� ss vf Fn
�
� -V
��
� `�
� Q �
� � �
,�.� 1 I � � L E
\l
\ .9 Q
i� c � � Z
� �° � �
u
I` � Y K Q
O v -` `� m
�
� Cy F U
�
Z �
�
�, �'� �
O 0.
� O
O � U
�
O Q Y o Z
� H I
�
` Q _
0
.; c N
�
�
m �? � .. �
c . u }
a�+ V L �
� C `e
ia R �
� � � y �
V '
" `' e u E
. C c � Z
�
1
�
1
�
�
c
�
d
�
s
R
� �
c
'
E
°_ Q
o �
E !_
c �j
E V
ie
�: �
x =
�
E- c
�
� �
�
�
ti
\
�
�
.�
� �
� �
� �
�
\ �
� �
V �
_�
�
\
�
�� v
q
�
�
�
�
�
�
.
C
W
F
Z
�
�
W
U
az
�Qo
a�>
F z �
Z Q �
Q r F
O .�j �
W
F � Q
U V C
W
F
w
O
F
Z
[r7
�i
a
m
C
�
a
�
z
�
E
y
<
�
�
0
5
z
�
v
�
v
>
C
N
�
�
N
�
A
G
b
a
�
� M
O
N N
O
} R
� p
��
w
0 0
P �
� �
�
w
O �
L Y
�
� ti
G �
� �
V
y
R
H W
9 �-
3 D
z 3
a Z
c �
U �
� R
U a
co
�
ea
�
s
.c
9
c
L
C.
�
O
C.
�,
�:
¢
C
�
Q
�
U
Q
es F» v�
0
0
O
e�.
>
0
�
O O
w ^
0 0
e�
c
� u
a 'A �
� � u
i � ..
c " �
L ' O �
F. Z V
c e
O O =
V V N
G: !�
C C ,a
0
�
N
O
�
•
�.�.
O 9
>
7 L
a c
.7 Q
Q �
t�
� � �
o O �
;: a
m �
C �
^-o Z
'C i
V L u
C O R
O O '�"
V R Y
V
� � O
n >
C C -°.
�
�:
�
z
�
�
x
�
G
Z
Q
F
O
U
�
Q
Z
�
F» F» » Fn » F» ss
� �
\
�' w
!� j ���
� � � E
� � V �
JV � � <
� � 'c
� �C }� � z
�� � y x o
O ` � l '� ' m
{` v � F U
O S'j
z �
Q
C� , �
� � c
� O
d �
� L
� �
Q � } o Z
V
:: �
� e "
.".
c
v
s ..
3 �
i c•
W '3 V U
� U ` � }
� u i w
� � 9 � e
d i a
i C u �
� o n = z
n
0
�
i
�9
0
C
C
c � rp
°
E
C Q
o �
� �
a -
c �j
"' u
x
w e
x ?
w
F C
c� j L
� �
V
G�
,
� �L�
�
� � �\
�)
���
� J\
� �`
\^� �
�
`\(`� �
V �
��)\� �
C \�
J L �
\ Z
v �
r�
J �f
n
�
�
�
V
�
P
0
z
�
�
<
�
0
M
0
ti �
U
>
w z
� �
Z �"
�
�
�
U
a
�Qo
a�>
F Z
:a
tr]
Q } F
'AL�6
p��
�
F z ¢
U V C
�
F
w
O
F �
� �
a,
c a
a v
m �
❑ �
a .
� N
O �
w o �
� C
�s
� v
> o
�wz
0
o -c
G �
0
A �
� �
w �
0
c c
�o a
v °'
� �
�. �
O ¢
y ''
R �
C E @
� d U
�� s �
0
ti �
�
a
� E
z �
a Z
3 -
c �
U �
T C
U 0..
m
ro
`�
y
s
a
9
L
u
�
�
.
6
V]
�
E
Q
C
a
�
U
Q
ss » bs
e
b
0
E
u
>
9
�
e
�
j o
�
_
� �
a 'm �
� � �
L `
m � •E
� � E
0 0
o. Z V
G C
oa _
V V • y
!� C ,
C C �
ti
[z]
y
Z
�i
G
x
�:
c
z
¢
F
y
O
U
�
a
z
�
0
N
V
0
�
�
N
N
�
S
i �
a
O e
9�
� a �
M m �
c � N
� �N
e � �
L
.Y L
`� E
o �
� z
'C u
m a �
S O `-'
C �
0 0
V U d
t� 4 �O
m m �
0.' C �
n zs s9 » F» es ss s3
�
C �
v 'S
e
4 y G
�C V �
>
a � ,`°,
o `� e
= � ; F o
U � E �
N R CJ
F U G U
G
E
Q
Z
�
o ,�
z y
�, a � 1 W
O `
� �
Q � a
E
p � >` o z
m I � �
C
.�
e
� �
•3 ` ` ..
L
c (j ° B+ u
O • L W 4
� c. a y
T W
� � `.'' � a
ad. C ai E
. C Ci ..�, Z
V
\
�
�
v yi
'
E
e <
�
L �
Q �
� V
u y
x �
x a
a
F n
y
� �
�
�QA
� �
I �\
� J�
� �
�
� �
r- �
r �
��
� �
5 �