02-236` ^ "a �
�6 1
: : �.� o : u � - : �. da-a3�
CITY OF ST. PASTA � COUNCIL FTLE N0.
FSNAL ORDER By .E�i�/%�TY/� � �
Eile No.S02001
Voting Ward 2-7
Ia the Mattar of sideooalk recoastruction at the followiag locatious:
502001 - 637 South Smith Avenue, 844,870,917 Grand Avenue, 1304 Juno Avenue, 164 k
176 North Snelling Avenue, 240 Milford Street, 1528,1532,1536 & 1542
Westminster Street, 1174 Arcade Street, 1551 Payne Avenue, 1743 & 1747
Margaret Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTTAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
M[TLTI-RE52DENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot_
under Preliminary order ��. — �� O approved �.Qn. � �r.c� �
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓�3enanav
vff'].akey
v�'ostrom
�leman
�rris
�ntry
(��„�� --Reiter
�In Favor
O Against
� AbseY.t'
Adopted by Council: Date'�� a.0 3oaa—
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�����u�
Works - Sidewalk Division
Tvedt
Z?i 2�)DZ
PAGES
WR SIGNANR�
GREEN
CRYATfORNEY
O MAVOR (OR ASSI5TANT)
Da-a��
SHEET ND- 11a44'�
_INlIIAVDAiE INfilAl/DA7E
� ❑CfIYCOUNCII
❑ CfT1' CLEAK
❑ FfN. & MGT. SEFVICES DIR
0 Council Research -
� �DEPf. N! � •
Reconstruct Sidewalk, Reconstruct Crossing & ConsUUCt Driveway Apron R Cut Curb in Wards 2, 3, 4, 5, 6& 7
"� "" PERSONAL SERVICE CON7RACT5 MUST ANSWER iHE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION �, �SMiSpe(Son(fiRn6Y¢CWOfkedundef2Wnh3CtfOfU4iSdepaM1Tent?
YES NO
2. Has this personlf rtn ever 6sen a city ertployee?
sra� VES NO
Di57Rlci CoUNCn. ! 3. Does this perso�Rn possess a skill not normafly possessed by any curterrc cily employee?
JRTSWHICHCOUNCILO&lECT1VE? VES NO
EXOlain all yes answers on separeM sheet antl aHaeh to green sheet
(WHO. WHAT, NMEN, N?IERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical addftives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
musi be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorcected, the sidewaik condition wouid worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it wilt provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sectorjobs as a result. {
'e�i': u � ^,h' ,S r ��i S
� ��°��� � �,•�•
�
�,JRO�? �1 ��d�
pkAfti+Y� „4.
APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beca�se of construction procedures and
assessments. Properiy owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one,-taalf the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEP.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tu'rn, will generate more personal injury
suits, resuVting in the expenditure of larger dotlar amounts in repairs and repfacement, as weil as claim payouts.
IOUM OF TRANSACf10N $
souacE 01 -M-06
(EXPLAIN)
�
A
�ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE OME) YES No
Nunta�t C014T754-0784-0 0
�
�d-o73�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMiVIENDATIONS
Wazd 2
PRD.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K N.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ottawa Ave. to S. Smith
Ave. at 637 S. Smith Ave. Only.
�D�� I INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner.
EXISTIIVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete wath cracked and setfled panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GRAND AVE. from 3. Milton St. to S. Victoria
St. at 917 & 870 Grand Ave. Only.
�O , no' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
w
EXISTING CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Victoria St. to S. Avon St.
at 844 Grand Ave. Only.
�/O �/� ( INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved ganels.
�.� -�.3c
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMD�NDAT'ION
Ward 3
PRO.TECT.• RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALK S.S. JiTNO AVE. from S. Hamiine Ave. to 3. Syndicate
St. at 1304 7uno Ave. Only.
�� � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels.
D�47 -�3G
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATTON
Wazd 4
PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. SNELLING from Hague Ave. to Selby Ave.
��� at 164 N. Snelling Ave. Only & E.S. N. SNELLING AVE. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. & N.S.
SELBY AVE. from N. Snelling Ave. to N. Saratoga St. at 176 N. Snelling Ave. Only.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner.
EXISTING CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with undulating panels.
Da-�3�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS
Wazd 5
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK, RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK CROSSING.
CONSTUCTDRIVEWAYAPRON & CUT CURB S.S. MII.FORD ST. from Galtier St. to Marion
5 (� m` St. at 240 Milford St. Only.
��,,,
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: No driveway access for new garage.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. WESTMINSTER ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to
E. Wheelock Pkwy. at 1528, 1532, 1536 & 1542 Westminster St. Only.
5 U L1JV I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with settled panels.
Oa-a3c
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS
Ward 6
5o Zoo(
5D2ool
PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. ARCADE ST. fromE. Rose Ave. to E. Maryland
Ave. & N.S. E. ROSE AVE. form Arcade St. to Mendota St. at 1174 Arcade St. Only.
INITIATING ACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTR UCT SIDEWALK W.S. PAYNE AVE. from Pazkway Dr. to E. Hoyt Ave.
& S.S. E. HOYT AVE. from Edgerton St. to Payne ave. at 1551 Payne Ave. Only.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels.
��7 -�36
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATION
Ward 7
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK N.S. MARGARET ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White
Beaz Ave. at 1743 & 1747 Margaret St. Only.
5 0 "'�/ I INITIATING ACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels.
�'• ��t :�' .;;�,;
CI'PY OF 5T. PBIIL �; ; 1� i= � i � '°
PRELI22SI3ARY ORDER
COUNCIL FILE NO. O�. � �00
BY --�cJ f"��l�—
Fi1e No_502001
Voting bVard, 2-7
In *_hs-t3atter of si$awalk raconstructioa andlor aew coastruction at trie frol]�owiag
locations:
°02G01 - 637 South Smith Avenue, A�4,�70,917 Grand Aver.ue, 1304 Juno Avenue, 164 &
176 North Snelling Avense, 240 Milfor3 S�zaet, 15i8,1532,1536 & 1542
Westminster Street, 1174 Arcade St-eet, 1551 Payne Avenue, 1743 & 1747
Margaret Street.
*ES'PIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAI�,(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. �
�U
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the dav of March, 2002
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul. _
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓Blakey
�/BOStrom
Pcbae. Coleman
✓Harris
✓I,antry
�Eeiter
�m�r.�..�. - l=�o . �, �..QO 2_ �a,.�..36
�In Favor
O Against
� {�bsr_..�
Adopted by Council: Date ��_ G aoo�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By� �. � ���
Mayor
` ^ "a �
�6 1
: : �.� o : u � - : �. da-a3�
CITY OF ST. PASTA � COUNCIL FTLE N0.
FSNAL ORDER By .E�i�/%�TY/� � �
Eile No.S02001
Voting Ward 2-7
Ia the Mattar of sideooalk recoastruction at the followiag locatious:
502001 - 637 South Smith Avenue, 844,870,917 Grand Avenue, 1304 Juno Avenue, 164 k
176 North Snelling Avenue, 240 Milford Street, 1528,1532,1536 & 1542
Westminster Street, 1174 Arcade Street, 1551 Payne Avenue, 1743 & 1747
Margaret Street.
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTTAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
wa1k. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
M[TLTI-RE52DENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot_
under Preliminary order ��. — �� O approved �.Qn. � �r.c� �
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓�3enanav
vff'].akey
v�'ostrom
�leman
�rris
�ntry
(��„�� --Reiter
�In Favor
O Against
� AbseY.t'
Adopted by Council: Date'�� a.0 3oaa—
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
�����u�
Works - Sidewalk Division
Tvedt
Z?i 2�)DZ
PAGES
WR SIGNANR�
GREEN
CRYATfORNEY
O MAVOR (OR ASSI5TANT)
Da-a��
SHEET ND- 11a44'�
_INlIIAVDAiE INfilAl/DA7E
� ❑CfIYCOUNCII
❑ CfT1' CLEAK
❑ FfN. & MGT. SEFVICES DIR
0 Council Research -
� �DEPf. N! � •
Reconstruct Sidewalk, Reconstruct Crossing & ConsUUCt Driveway Apron R Cut Curb in Wards 2, 3, 4, 5, 6& 7
"� "" PERSONAL SERVICE CON7RACT5 MUST ANSWER iHE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
_CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION �, �SMiSpe(Son(fiRn6Y¢CWOfkedundef2Wnh3CtfOfU4iSdepaM1Tent?
YES NO
2. Has this personlf rtn ever 6sen a city ertployee?
sra� VES NO
Di57Rlci CoUNCn. ! 3. Does this perso�Rn possess a skill not normafly possessed by any curterrc cily employee?
JRTSWHICHCOUNCILO&lECT1VE? VES NO
EXOlain all yes answers on separeM sheet antl aHaeh to green sheet
(WHO. WHAT, NMEN, N?IERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical addftives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
musi be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorcected, the sidewaik condition wouid worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it wilt provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sectorjobs as a result. {
'e�i': u � ^,h' ,S r ��i S
� ��°��� � �,•�•
�
�,JRO�? �1 ��d�
pkAfti+Y� „4.
APPROVED:
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beca�se of construction procedures and
assessments. Properiy owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one,-taalf the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �
DISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVEP.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewaik stock to deteriorate, which in tu'rn, will generate more personal injury
suits, resuVting in the expenditure of larger dotlar amounts in repairs and repfacement, as weil as claim payouts.
IOUM OF TRANSACf10N $
souacE 01 -M-06
(EXPLAIN)
�
A
�ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE OME) YES No
Nunta�t C014T754-0784-0 0
�
�d-o73�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMiVIENDATIONS
Wazd 2
PRD.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI.K N.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ottawa Ave. to S. Smith
Ave. at 637 S. Smith Ave. Only.
�D�� I INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the properiy owner.
EXISTIIVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete wath cracked and setfled panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. GRAND AVE. from 3. Milton St. to S. Victoria
St. at 917 & 870 Grand Ave. Only.
�O , no' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
w
EXISTING CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALK S.S. GRAND AVE. from S. Victoria St. to S. Avon St.
at 844 Grand Ave. Only.
�/O �/� ( INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved ganels.
�.� -�.3c
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMD�NDAT'ION
Ward 3
PRO.TECT.• RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALK S.S. JiTNO AVE. from S. Hamiine Ave. to 3. Syndicate
St. at 1304 7uno Ave. Only.
�� � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked panels.
D�47 -�3G
SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATTON
Wazd 4
PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. SNELLING from Hague Ave. to Selby Ave.
��� at 164 N. Snelling Ave. Only & E.S. N. SNELLING AVE. from Selby Ave. to Dayton Ave. & N.S.
SELBY AVE. from N. Snelling Ave. to N. Saratoga St. at 176 N. Snelling Ave. Only.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the properry owner.
EXISTING CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with undulating panels.
Da-�3�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS
Wazd 5
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK, RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK CROSSING.
CONSTUCTDRIVEWAYAPRON & CUT CURB S.S. MII.FORD ST. from Galtier St. to Marion
5 (� m` St. at 240 Milford St. Only.
��,,,
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: No driveway access for new garage.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. WESTMINSTER ST. from E. Arlington Ave. to
E. Wheelock Pkwy. at 1528, 1532, 1536 & 1542 Westminster St. Only.
5 U L1JV I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with settled panels.
Oa-a3c
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMII�NDATIONS
Ward 6
5o Zoo(
5D2ool
PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. ARCADE ST. fromE. Rose Ave. to E. Maryland
Ave. & N.S. E. ROSE AVE. form Arcade St. to Mendota St. at 1174 Arcade St. Only.
INITIATING ACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTR UCT SIDEWALK W.S. PAYNE AVE. from Pazkway Dr. to E. Hoyt Ave.
& S.S. E. HOYT AVE. from Edgerton St. to Payne ave. at 1551 Payne Ave. Only.
INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with multi-cracked panels.
��7 -�36
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATION
Ward 7
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK N.S. MARGARET ST. from Flandrau St. to N. White
Beaz Ave. at 1743 & 1747 Margaret St. Only.
5 0 "'�/ I INITIATING ACTION.• This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled and cracked panels.
�'• ��t :�' .;;�,;
CI'PY OF 5T. PBIIL �; ; 1� i= � i � '°
PRELI22SI3ARY ORDER
COUNCIL FILE NO. O�. � �00
BY --�cJ f"��l�—
Fi1e No_502001
Voting bVard, 2-7
In *_hs-t3atter of si$awalk raconstructioa andlor aew coastruction at trie frol]�owiag
locations:
°02G01 - 637 South Smith Avenue, A�4,�70,917 Grand Aver.ue, 1304 Juno Avenue, 164 &
176 North Snelling Avense, 240 Milfor3 S�zaet, 15i8,1532,1536 & 1542
Westminster Street, 1174 Arcade St-eet, 1551 Payne Avenue, 1743 & 1747
Margaret Street.
*ES'PIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruation (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAI�,(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100% of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. �
�U
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the dav of March, 2002
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul. _
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓Blakey
�/BOStrom
Pcbae. Coleman
✓Harris
✓I,antry
�Eeiter
�m�r.�..�. - l=�o . �, �..QO 2_ �a,.�..36
�In Favor
O Against
� {�bsr_..�
Adopted by Council: Date ��_ G aoo�
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
By� �. � ���
Mayor