Loading...
02-174CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAI. ORDER � �� �.E: �; z € "�� � i��3 'a'.� COUNCIL FILE NO. �� � �� �'+'i BY ����1f�- 51 FILE NO. AE2001-02 VOTING WARD 6, 7 Ia the Matter of replacing the Earl Street Bridge over East Seventh Street, the Union Pacific Railroad and Ramsey County Regional Rail property by removing the existing bridge(No. 90412) and constructing a new bridge (No. 62545) and doing a11 other work necessary to complete said improvements, including acquiring the necessary right-of- way and easements (see attached map). under Preliminary Order O�— (�� approved �.��.. � 3ooa� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RE30LVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it E'URTHER RESOLVED, That the Council hereby determines the estate required for this improvement to be £ee simple, absolute and easements as described above, and the City officers and City Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to acquire said real estate by purchase or eminent domain, including Quick Take; and be it FINALLY RESOLVED, That the Council hereby determines that the property rights required for this improvement be as described above, and that the proper City officers submit a report to the City Council for the purpose of the Council's making an awazd of damages for the interest acquirecl and determination of assessments, if any, against the benefitted property. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r�enanav ,�lakey ,�o s trom ,�'oleman ✓Ffarri s �a� try v7�eiter Adopted by Council: Date�.�. a11 �o�_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor O Against G:\USERS\Engel\wp£iles\acquisiC\AE2001-02.EarlStBridge.FO.wpd Public Hearin Date Re uested: Februar 27, 2002 °�-' `�'� T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DNISION Date: January 28, 2002 Green Sheet Number: 111613 tactPersonandPhoneNi�ber: EPARTMENTDIRBCTOR CTTYCOi7NCII. nPearson266-6151 (PUBWKS) '°"N � AITORNEY �J�/l ( �j Q.ERK r -.. • DDGETDTRECTOR FFICEOFFINANCIALSVCS. nst be on CONSENT Comcil Agenda by: Z�U�VZ YOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 COI7NCII. RESEARCH OTAL # OF SIGNATLTRE PAGES 1 (CLIPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: Set Public Hearing date for reconstruction improvements. Approve the reconstruction of the Earl Street Bridge and all work as needed to complete said improvement. fAMh1ENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONI'RACTS MUST ANSWER 1'HE FOLLON'IIVG: . Has the person/Srm ever worked under a contract For this department? YE$ NO PLANNA`G COhIMI5510N A STAFF . Has this person/�rm ever been a City employee? YES NO C[VIL SERVICE COMMISSION . Does this persodFrm pwssess a sloll not normally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? Cffi COMMITTEE lain aIl YES answers on a se azate sheet and attach. UPPORTS WI�IICH COUNCII, OBJECI'IVL? covivcn, wa��s> 6 7 DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCIL 4 S � 17ATING PROBLEM, ISSiJE, OPPOATRNII'P (Who, What, When, 4Vhere, Why?): The e�sting Earl Street Bridge, which was built in 1912, is in need of replacement. Although extensive rehabilitation work was done in 1956, and sidewalk and railing replacement in 1969, it was necessary to downgrade the maximum load limit to 15 tons in 1992, and finally to 5 tons in 1997. Vertical geometry and sight distances are well below current standards. vnrrrncES u� nrrxovEn: A new bridge would increase the load limit and bring vertical geometry and sight distances up to current standazds. ISADVANI'AGES IF APPROVED: Various property interests, including fee takings and easements, would need to be acquired for the project ISADVANI'AGES IF NOT APPROVED: To not proceed with this improvement could result in the eventual closing of the bridge. oTai, nMOVrrr oF T�uvsac�zox: $6,044,000 cosra�vE� suncE�n �czxc�,E o�> �s No micsouxcE: CIB, M5A, Federal, State Bridge Bonds A�Ti°iTYNm`�ER: �,,,:,,,�:,y ;�-�;-�rL:i'� ����:�' ANCW. IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAIl� � A. ;^� � � , zs'. �. G:W SERS�Eugel\wpfiles�acquisit41E2001-02.Eaz15tBndge.GST.wpd � .,� , oz--1�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS EARL STREET BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION City Project No. B-1180 Existing Bridge No. 90412 New Bridge No. 62545 Report Prepared - 1!7/02 Public Hearing - To be scheduled PROJECT: 12emove the existing bridge and reconstruct a new Earl Street Bridge along with approach roadways over East Seventh Street, UP Railroad and Ramsey County Regional Rail property. Also, acquire the necessary right-of-way and easements to accomplish this work. INITIATING ACTION: The project is being initiated by the Department of Public Warks. EXI5TING CONDITIONS: The existing Eazl Street Bridge was built in 1912. Aithough extensive rehabilitation work was done in 1956 and sidewalk and railing replacement was done in 1969, it was necessary to downgrade the maximum load limit to 15 tons in 1992, and finally to 5 tons in 1997. While the roadway and sidewalk widths (40 ft. & 8 ft.) aze adequate, the vertical geometry and sight distances are well below current standards. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The project involves the removal of the existing bridge and approaches, followed by the construction of a new bridge and approaches. Due to the existing substandard geometrics resulting in unsafe sight distances and deficient veftical clearances, the roadway grade will have to be reconstructed from Ross Avenue on the south to York Avenue on the north. Due to the required change in grade, preliminary design indicates it will be necessary to acquire temporary and permanent easements as shown on the attached map. The proposed bridge roadway will have a width of 36 feet with 8 foot sidewalks. The railings will be a combination of a concrete base section with an ornamental railing (including lantern lighting). This railingJlighting design will be consistent with that used on the new Edgerton and Arcade Street bridges. Due to inadequate sight distance and safety concems, the two one-way street connections between Ross Ave. and East Seventh Street paralleling the bridge approach will be eliminated. Access to all adjacent properties and the alley on the east will be maintained. The York Ave. roadway connection from the properties below the bridge adjacent to the north approach will be relocated westerly to improve the safety of the York/Earl intersection. Page 1 of Z o �--���k ALTERNATIVES: To do nothing would result in the eventual closing and subsequent removal of the existing bridge. This would by default result in the elimination of the Eazl Street crossing which is contrary to the City Comprehensive Plan as well as to the neighborhood's goals. POSITIVE BENEFITS: New aesthetically pleasing bridge capable of carrying le�al loads. ADVERSE EFFECTS: Normal impacts from construction such as noise, dust and general disruption will be present. There will be times when East Seventh Street will need to be closed to traffic. TIME SCHEDULE: It is intended to award a contract for the removal of the existing bridge in November of 2002. This activity would be immediately followed by the awazd of a contract for the construction of the new bridge beginning in January or Febmary of 2003. Completion of the project would occur in the fall of 2003. COSTS AND FUNDING: COST ESTIMATE: Construction Right of Way and Misc. Engineering Total FINANCING: CIB MSA Federal State Br. Bonds Total $3,886,000 $1,186,000 $ 972.000 $6,�44,OOQ $ 480,000 $2,713,000 $2,281,000 $ 570,000 $6,044,000 SOURCE OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For additional information, contact the Bridge Engineer, Leon Pearson at 266-6181. SUMMARY AND RECOMIVIENDATION: The Department of Public Works feels that this is a necessary and worthwhile project and the Engineering Recommendation is for approval of the project and financing. Page 2 of 2 _ ' `� o-> I ' I '�s K a) �' C si) i C ' _ o z4(so� a .. w �.. 3 , .. . ,� �v'o C „ ) I �� � I ., k�� /ozs I. I.. iaas 7 I 1 I L o� i a� ^ ' CSZ) (F4 (ss) � �_ 1 40 �130 il z�J�bl� /083 �� .. � n im zn 2l.�9 ro „ • yo x� � YORK � � q/^ {7r� p � N _ �. . ,. .. ; ' y �ta 5z � Y i�a`° e � d���1y � o .. ^ E;y� �3.3yS ..YO.., �A .. .. .. , .� 2 R2 7 � ll � /io Ze�b� Yn' •. •. •. •• •� Ya 9.h SB � il II ` i I �/OD �Z �� 4� � 1 � �� I �y , � .� :' � � � � � - �� � � � �� I � � � � � � � � 4 � ' I., I : � I d. ` � ' i4 i 7 6 i 5 �� r � ^ � � � t i� io�,9 ; 8 � f I 6s ,� I � .. \ ' (6s� ° ,°v � i �t.7 i •� �i� S l �.� z� ` o � � a � �4 I �� ) � /� '` '�1 ( - y. !41 (t72) � ceHS��'{��oH/��p 3 � � r. I � 8 LL ' � aas� �- �t � =� O�- b�l Y a E 36 ' a _ ---- �� - ,M, �� I. ��. � � 1 N �'1 � �� � � �i I � IJ�� ' I ,. , ' � . O �� f � ,i, � ��i o i �'. , ��S'Ir. FaSe�^e i � 5���'"�}'� �� '� � �: � � �� lz�exl,.s�'�z � �' �� �► � ; . �¢ . 2zts3-- - - zz�.�sz-- - -.... ........i��.4s--.:._..� ; i 0 1 - � . � f �ea'�s' � p,R . /�. i �� l R" v � / ` � � p i �`` ao9` 2 � µ67 � � - � ' ' /' � � _ � � Z�'p� �{�q,v-�D_ - � � d ' �. � /a o90 � ' � ' ' QpkS`�f. eas�.NS I �� kr, - �j) 75 ' �I 'I' �-� _ .._._ __. _ � ( / �' .8ao�.. ' � i L) ''- A92.18 ' OL "' ---- - z-�. --- --- ncr tr o ,� � - �n�-r---�-i. V�-1'd �! , .0 S a v so .. „ ,. .. ., s i.e � t' } / nal (ne) I C�v or��£ na �(n3 nz ��� ln�� 2 � y9� 33 � \ � ar IOBe t � � . � � ) /,�..., ` 3" p°� c p;4 C7�s' s�,� I °' ' � 6 �) :� � 1l l0 9 � 7 � 6 5 4 3 � �} ^ (e p. 1 �) rv � �� � Iiry� " m e� . e I' � 2 m �� ' o� �� oi 'S .. � 5 4 o n D ; .yo., z x r /r V � � � I} o` n i Q 2� p 2 ' ( �Y m�"I y � �oo o ° y B 6 � 7 I) o (_ seJ � ° q�l I 5 � � 8 9 I _ I.I_. .�I,...�i i ;�14 �5 �6 7 IB 19 20 2/ 22 6Q o 6 � 1 7 0 � i c l - -� �A IPt"� , 5 � ��` �12a� .. 34.(f� �# � C'96 �„ � '� �a�: � e- ���� I Gzo� (�z� �2z) za u� C�zc) (�z�) Ciza)I . . 3a ,� .. � ..� . .. .. .� ra � AV�• ns� is Z5 �YO' • ` ° RO55 i � 3 50 , .. „ �. . �, �� . .� i „ , 9 � (z ) � 0/8 / / is �n)` � i4i . , . 6� (zx} � � I1'9) � � ��J� �K) � I ) SO 1 �ao3) ��I� ��/Oi0 � �/39� �IdB� �f37� �36) (135� //A6 �133� n I Q� /\`�F. o u � Ca t � 1 � U � . . . .. . , � g �j CITY OF ST. PAUL s� � �' `- '�' ? COUNCIL FTLE NO. O.�L � �O a a �"" �� l .�,����:��-:� ��f�- PRELIMINARY ORDER BY 3O FILE NO. l AE2001-02 � VOTING W11RD _6,7 Ia the Matter of replacing the Ear1 Street Bridge over East Seventh Street, the Union Pacific Railroad and Ramsey County Regional Rail property by r�noving the existing br_idge(No. 90a12} and constructing a new bridge (No. E25"5). and doing all other work necessary to complete said improvements, including acquiring the nECessazy right-of- way and ease-nents (see attached map;. �.. The Council of the CiCy of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is $6,044,000.00 financed by project funds. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27"' of Februarv. 2002,at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom Abse.�.t' —Coleman .�Iarri s ✓Lantry vReiter � In Favor O Against \ Y-F�ASa w\ G:\USERS\Engel\wpfiles\acquisiC\AE2001-02.Edr15tBridge.PO.wpd Adopted by Council: Date �.�. G � aoo�, Certified Passed by Council Secretary By l9 \� � a- � �—�`-°--��� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAI. ORDER � �� �.E: �; z € "�� � i��3 'a'.� COUNCIL FILE NO. �� � �� �'+'i BY ����1f�- 51 FILE NO. AE2001-02 VOTING WARD 6, 7 Ia the Matter of replacing the Earl Street Bridge over East Seventh Street, the Union Pacific Railroad and Ramsey County Regional Rail property by removing the existing bridge(No. 90412) and constructing a new bridge (No. 62545) and doing a11 other work necessary to complete said improvements, including acquiring the necessary right-of- way and easements (see attached map). under Preliminary Order O�— (�� approved �.��.. � 3ooa� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RE30LVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it E'URTHER RESOLVED, That the Council hereby determines the estate required for this improvement to be £ee simple, absolute and easements as described above, and the City officers and City Attorney are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to acquire said real estate by purchase or eminent domain, including Quick Take; and be it FINALLY RESOLVED, That the Council hereby determines that the property rights required for this improvement be as described above, and that the proper City officers submit a report to the City Council for the purpose of the Council's making an awazd of damages for the interest acquirecl and determination of assessments, if any, against the benefitted property. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r�enanav ,�lakey ,�o s trom ,�'oleman ✓Ffarri s �a� try v7�eiter Adopted by Council: Date�.�. a11 �o�_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor O Against G:\USERS\Engel\wp£iles\acquisiC\AE2001-02.EarlStBridge.FO.wpd Public Hearin Date Re uested: Februar 27, 2002 °�-' `�'� T.M.S./REAL ESTATE DNISION Date: January 28, 2002 Green Sheet Number: 111613 tactPersonandPhoneNi�ber: EPARTMENTDIRBCTOR CTTYCOi7NCII. nPearson266-6151 (PUBWKS) '°"N � AITORNEY �J�/l ( �j Q.ERK r -.. • DDGETDTRECTOR FFICEOFFINANCIALSVCS. nst be on CONSENT Comcil Agenda by: Z�U�VZ YOR (OR ASSISTANT) 1 COI7NCII. RESEARCH OTAL # OF SIGNATLTRE PAGES 1 (CLIPALLLOCATIONSFORSIGNATURE) CTION REQUESTED: Set Public Hearing date for reconstruction improvements. Approve the reconstruction of the Earl Street Bridge and all work as needed to complete said improvement. fAMh1ENDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECT (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONI'RACTS MUST ANSWER 1'HE FOLLON'IIVG: . Has the person/Srm ever worked under a contract For this department? YE$ NO PLANNA`G COhIMI5510N A STAFF . Has this person/�rm ever been a City employee? YES NO C[VIL SERVICE COMMISSION . Does this persodFrm pwssess a sloll not normally possessed by any YES NO current City employee? Cffi COMMITTEE lain aIl YES answers on a se azate sheet and attach. UPPORTS WI�IICH COUNCII, OBJECI'IVL? covivcn, wa��s> 6 7 DISTRICT PLANNING COUNCIL 4 S � 17ATING PROBLEM, ISSiJE, OPPOATRNII'P (Who, What, When, 4Vhere, Why?): The e�sting Earl Street Bridge, which was built in 1912, is in need of replacement. Although extensive rehabilitation work was done in 1956, and sidewalk and railing replacement in 1969, it was necessary to downgrade the maximum load limit to 15 tons in 1992, and finally to 5 tons in 1997. Vertical geometry and sight distances are well below current standards. vnrrrncES u� nrrxovEn: A new bridge would increase the load limit and bring vertical geometry and sight distances up to current standazds. ISADVANI'AGES IF APPROVED: Various property interests, including fee takings and easements, would need to be acquired for the project ISADVANI'AGES IF NOT APPROVED: To not proceed with this improvement could result in the eventual closing of the bridge. oTai, nMOVrrr oF T�uvsac�zox: $6,044,000 cosra�vE� suncE�n �czxc�,E o�> �s No micsouxcE: CIB, M5A, Federal, State Bridge Bonds A�Ti°iTYNm`�ER: �,,,:,,,�:,y ;�-�;-�rL:i'� ����:�' ANCW. IlVFORMATION: (EXPLAIl� � A. ;^� � � , zs'. �. G:W SERS�Eugel\wpfiles�acquisit41E2001-02.Eaz15tBndge.GST.wpd � .,� , oz--1�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS EARL STREET BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION INCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION City Project No. B-1180 Existing Bridge No. 90412 New Bridge No. 62545 Report Prepared - 1!7/02 Public Hearing - To be scheduled PROJECT: 12emove the existing bridge and reconstruct a new Earl Street Bridge along with approach roadways over East Seventh Street, UP Railroad and Ramsey County Regional Rail property. Also, acquire the necessary right-of-way and easements to accomplish this work. INITIATING ACTION: The project is being initiated by the Department of Public Warks. EXI5TING CONDITIONS: The existing Eazl Street Bridge was built in 1912. Aithough extensive rehabilitation work was done in 1956 and sidewalk and railing replacement was done in 1969, it was necessary to downgrade the maximum load limit to 15 tons in 1992, and finally to 5 tons in 1997. While the roadway and sidewalk widths (40 ft. & 8 ft.) aze adequate, the vertical geometry and sight distances are well below current standards. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The project involves the removal of the existing bridge and approaches, followed by the construction of a new bridge and approaches. Due to the existing substandard geometrics resulting in unsafe sight distances and deficient veftical clearances, the roadway grade will have to be reconstructed from Ross Avenue on the south to York Avenue on the north. Due to the required change in grade, preliminary design indicates it will be necessary to acquire temporary and permanent easements as shown on the attached map. The proposed bridge roadway will have a width of 36 feet with 8 foot sidewalks. The railings will be a combination of a concrete base section with an ornamental railing (including lantern lighting). This railingJlighting design will be consistent with that used on the new Edgerton and Arcade Street bridges. Due to inadequate sight distance and safety concems, the two one-way street connections between Ross Ave. and East Seventh Street paralleling the bridge approach will be eliminated. Access to all adjacent properties and the alley on the east will be maintained. The York Ave. roadway connection from the properties below the bridge adjacent to the north approach will be relocated westerly to improve the safety of the York/Earl intersection. Page 1 of Z o �--���k ALTERNATIVES: To do nothing would result in the eventual closing and subsequent removal of the existing bridge. This would by default result in the elimination of the Eazl Street crossing which is contrary to the City Comprehensive Plan as well as to the neighborhood's goals. POSITIVE BENEFITS: New aesthetically pleasing bridge capable of carrying le�al loads. ADVERSE EFFECTS: Normal impacts from construction such as noise, dust and general disruption will be present. There will be times when East Seventh Street will need to be closed to traffic. TIME SCHEDULE: It is intended to award a contract for the removal of the existing bridge in November of 2002. This activity would be immediately followed by the awazd of a contract for the construction of the new bridge beginning in January or Febmary of 2003. Completion of the project would occur in the fall of 2003. COSTS AND FUNDING: COST ESTIMATE: Construction Right of Way and Misc. Engineering Total FINANCING: CIB MSA Federal State Br. Bonds Total $3,886,000 $1,186,000 $ 972.000 $6,�44,OOQ $ 480,000 $2,713,000 $2,281,000 $ 570,000 $6,044,000 SOURCE OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: For additional information, contact the Bridge Engineer, Leon Pearson at 266-6181. SUMMARY AND RECOMIVIENDATION: The Department of Public Works feels that this is a necessary and worthwhile project and the Engineering Recommendation is for approval of the project and financing. Page 2 of 2 _ ' `� o-> I ' I '�s K a) �' C si) i C ' _ o z4(so� a .. w �.. 3 , .. . ,� �v'o C „ ) I �� � I ., k�� /ozs I. I.. iaas 7 I 1 I L o� i a� ^ ' CSZ) (F4 (ss) � �_ 1 40 �130 il z�J�bl� /083 �� .. � n im zn 2l.�9 ro „ • yo x� � YORK � � q/^ {7r� p � N _ �. . ,. .. ; ' y �ta 5z � Y i�a`° e � d���1y � o .. ^ E;y� �3.3yS ..YO.., �A .. .. .. , .� 2 R2 7 � ll � /io Ze�b� Yn' •. •. •. •• •� Ya 9.h SB � il II ` i I �/OD �Z �� 4� � 1 � �� I �y , � .� :' � � � � � - �� � � � �� I � � � � � � � � 4 � ' I., I : � I d. ` � ' i4 i 7 6 i 5 �� r � ^ � � � t i� io�,9 ; 8 � f I 6s ,� I � .. \ ' (6s� ° ,°v � i �t.7 i •� �i� S l �.� z� ` o � � a � �4 I �� ) � /� '` '�1 ( - y. !41 (t72) � ceHS��'{��oH/��p 3 � � r. I � 8 LL ' � aas� �- �t � =� O�- b�l Y a E 36 ' a _ ---- �� - ,M, �� I. ��. � � 1 N �'1 � �� � � �i I � IJ�� ' I ,. , ' � . O �� f � ,i, � ��i o i �'. , ��S'Ir. FaSe�^e i � 5���'"�}'� �� '� � �: � � �� lz�exl,.s�'�z � �' �� �► � ; . �¢ . 2zts3-- - - zz�.�sz-- - -.... ........i��.4s--.:._..� ; i 0 1 - � . � f �ea'�s' � p,R . /�. i �� l R" v � / ` � � p i �`` ao9` 2 � µ67 � � - � ' ' /' � � _ � � Z�'p� �{�q,v-�D_ - � � d ' �. � /a o90 � ' � ' ' QpkS`�f. eas�.NS I �� kr, - �j) 75 ' �I 'I' �-� _ .._._ __. _ � ( / �' .8ao�.. ' � i L) ''- A92.18 ' OL "' ---- - z-�. --- --- ncr tr o ,� � - �n�-r---�-i. V�-1'd �! , .0 S a v so .. „ ,. .. ., s i.e � t' } / nal (ne) I C�v or��£ na �(n3 nz ��� ln�� 2 � y9� 33 � \ � ar IOBe t � � . � � ) /,�..., ` 3" p°� c p;4 C7�s' s�,� I °' ' � 6 �) :� � 1l l0 9 � 7 � 6 5 4 3 � �} ^ (e p. 1 �) rv � �� � Iiry� " m e� . e I' � 2 m �� ' o� �� oi 'S .. � 5 4 o n D ; .yo., z x r /r V � � � I} o` n i Q 2� p 2 ' ( �Y m�"I y � �oo o ° y B 6 � 7 I) o (_ seJ � ° q�l I 5 � � 8 9 I _ I.I_. .�I,...�i i ;�14 �5 �6 7 IB 19 20 2/ 22 6Q o 6 � 1 7 0 � i c l - -� �A IPt"� , 5 � ��` �12a� .. 34.(f� �# � C'96 �„ � '� �a�: � e- ���� I Gzo� (�z� �2z) za u� C�zc) (�z�) Ciza)I . . 3a ,� .. � ..� . .. .. .� ra � AV�• ns� is Z5 �YO' • ` ° RO55 i � 3 50 , .. „ �. . �, �� . .� i „ , 9 � (z ) � 0/8 / / is �n)` � i4i . , . 6� (zx} � � I1'9) � � ��J� �K) � I ) SO 1 �ao3) ��I� ��/Oi0 � �/39� �IdB� �f37� �36) (135� //A6 �133� n I Q� /\`�F. o u � Ca t � 1 � U � . . . .. . , � g �j CITY OF ST. PAUL s� � �' `- '�' ? COUNCIL FTLE NO. O.�L � �O a a �"" �� l .�,����:��-:� ��f�- PRELIMINARY ORDER BY 3O FILE NO. l AE2001-02 � VOTING W11RD _6,7 Ia the Matter of replacing the Ear1 Street Bridge over East Seventh Street, the Union Pacific Railroad and Ramsey County Regional Rail property by r�noving the existing br_idge(No. 90a12} and constructing a new bridge (No. E25"5). and doing all other work necessary to complete said improvements, including acquiring the nECessazy right-of- way and ease-nents (see attached map;. �.. The Council of the CiCy of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1 2 3 That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, and that the estimated cost thereof is $6,044,000.00 financed by project funds. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27"' of Februarv. 2002,at 5:30 o'clock P.M., in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓Blakey ✓Bostrom Abse.�.t' —Coleman .�Iarri s ✓Lantry vReiter � In Favor O Against \ Y-F�ASa w\ G:\USERS\Engel\wpfiles\acquisiC\AE2001-02.Edr15tBridge.PO.wpd Adopted by Council: Date �.�. G � aoo�, Certified Passed by Council Secretary By l9 \� � a- � �—�`-°--��� Mayor