Loading...
01-905CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER COUNCI FILE NO. Ol" �I OS O S By File No.S 1085,50 090,501091,501095- 501097,501101,S01119,501122 Voting Ward_1-7 Ia tha Matter ot sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street_ 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both sides Euller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from Wst Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501101 - Both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East side South Hamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. o t -qas *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order � -- �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Qbs�r.'� -Benanav (��<,.��- -Blakey ✓Bostrom ✓Coleman '� arr i s `�antry I�bs<,r��!' —Reiter Adopted by Council: Date aoc� Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` In Favor � Against 3 {�bser.� or �� Works - Sidewalk Division GREEN �� (GL1P RLL Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward f �DEPARIMEMDIPEGTOR � �CfiVATTORNEV � &IOGET OIRE4TOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) SIGNATUH� �i ?-Z�-01 NO. 110439 IN(i1AVDATE ❑C(fYLOUNCiL ❑ CfTY CLFAK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SEAVICES DIR ❑7 Council Researc�� eC �"� / � PERSONALSEFNICECONiRAET5MUS7AN$WERTHEFO�LOWIN6 GVILSEflVICECOMMISSION 7, Hasihisperson/firtneverworkedunderacontrac[forthisdepartment? YES NO 2. Has ihis personlfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, 3. Does this persoMfirtn possess a sifill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Expiain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attaeh M green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by mulNple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community witl benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its cftizens. The sidewafk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and repla�cem�ent as wel a cta�'m payouts. t ��^I� JtlL � � 2001 IOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ Jv ���v � �v C0.ST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� LYE� NO souece Ol-M-0672 A. PF = , ACINffYNUMBEH C01-2T754-0754-00000 INFOFMAiION. (IXPLAIN) • - � . , .., _ .. ._ . _ . O► -�1�5 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 1 PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FULLER AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Chatsworth St. & B.S. N. OXFORD ST. from W. Central Ave. to Fuller Ave. 5 0���� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, reverse slope, setfled, cracked, and uneven panels. pt �qOS SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Ward 2 PROIECT• RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALKWITHINTEGRALCURB E.S. W. SEVENTH ST. from Chestnut St. to Eagle St. 5 0''�� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessiry on the basis of six (6) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION,S: This walk is poured concrete with water pockets, asphalt patches, and settled panels. 01-q� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 3 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI,K B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. & E.S. S. HAMT.TNF AVE. from Jefferson Ave. to Wellesley Ave. �' I D � INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONII��NDATTON Wazd 4 Ot -`�°s PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRtJCT SIDEWALK B.S. ASBL3RY ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Chazles Ave. ✓�/� V y� INITIATINGACTION.• This orderwas initiated by the Director ofPublic Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. O � -�los SUMMARY OF ENGIIVEERING RECOlVIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 5 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. COOK AVE. from Jessie St. to Fdgerton St. `�� M� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiatedby the Director of Public Works as public necessity a �� on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. EDGERTON ST. from E. Lawson Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. S /�� � INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by ihe Director of Public Warks as public necessiry �� on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphaltpatches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATIONS � 1'�IOS Wazd 6 PROIECT: RECONSTRUCTSIAEWAI,KB.S.E.COOKAVE.fromEdgertonSt.toPayneAve. & W.S. PAYNE AVE. - E. Cook Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. �4 ��R � INITIATINGACTION: This order was inifiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO IECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. EDGERTON ST. from E. Lawson Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. S���� INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (i) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUNINIARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIIV�NDATION 6 I—�I OS Wazd 7 PROIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ROSS AVE. from Eazl St. to Duluth St. � O� I�� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, reverse slope, setfled, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIDSINARY ORDER � ct-yos COUNCI FILE NO. O�" �I��J �O BY _���la� � File No_Sb1085,5 1090,501091,501095- 501097,501101,501119,S01122 Voting Ward 1-7 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction andJor aew coastructioa at the followiag locatioas: 501085 - Both sides Asbusy Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook �ivenue £rom Sessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street £rom East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 301097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street £rom West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501101 - Both sides Jef€erson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East sicie South Xamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Ciiestnut Street to Eagle Street. 01-q4s' Ot-1�5 . *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considezed said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22 dav of Auaust,2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner providecl by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓B� nanav ✓�kakey ,/YP strom �COleman arris Lantry �eiter � In Favor QAgainst i �or Adopted by Council:•Date � 2� � Certified Passed by Council Secretary CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER COUNCI FILE NO. Ol" �I OS O S By File No.S 1085,50 090,501091,501095- 501097,501101,S01119,501122 Voting Ward_1-7 Ia tha Matter ot sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street_ 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both sides Euller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from Wst Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501101 - Both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East side South Hamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. o t -qas *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order � -- �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Qbs�r.'� -Benanav (��<,.��- -Blakey ✓Bostrom ✓Coleman '� arr i s `�antry I�bs<,r��!' —Reiter Adopted by Council: Date aoc� Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` In Favor � Against 3 {�bser.� or �� Works - Sidewalk Division GREEN �� (GL1P RLL Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward f �DEPARIMEMDIPEGTOR � �CfiVATTORNEV � &IOGET OIRE4TOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) SIGNATUH� �i ?-Z�-01 NO. 110439 IN(i1AVDATE ❑C(fYLOUNCiL ❑ CfTY CLFAK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SEAVICES DIR ❑7 Council Researc�� eC �"� / � PERSONALSEFNICECONiRAET5MUS7AN$WERTHEFO�LOWIN6 GVILSEflVICECOMMISSION 7, Hasihisperson/firtneverworkedunderacontrac[forthisdepartment? YES NO 2. Has ihis personlfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, 3. Does this persoMfirtn possess a sifill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Expiain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attaeh M green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by mulNple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community witl benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its cftizens. The sidewafk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and repla�cem�ent as wel a cta�'m payouts. t ��^I� JtlL � � 2001 IOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ Jv ���v � �v C0.ST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� LYE� NO souece Ol-M-0672 A. PF = , ACINffYNUMBEH C01-2T754-0754-00000 INFOFMAiION. (IXPLAIN) • - � . , .., _ .. ._ . _ . O► -�1�5 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 1 PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FULLER AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Chatsworth St. & B.S. N. OXFORD ST. from W. Central Ave. to Fuller Ave. 5 0���� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, reverse slope, setfled, cracked, and uneven panels. pt �qOS SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Ward 2 PROIECT• RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALKWITHINTEGRALCURB E.S. W. SEVENTH ST. from Chestnut St. to Eagle St. 5 0''�� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessiry on the basis of six (6) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION,S: This walk is poured concrete with water pockets, asphalt patches, and settled panels. 01-q� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 3 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI,K B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. & E.S. S. HAMT.TNF AVE. from Jefferson Ave. to Wellesley Ave. �' I D � INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONII��NDATTON Wazd 4 Ot -`�°s PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRtJCT SIDEWALK B.S. ASBL3RY ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Chazles Ave. ✓�/� V y� INITIATINGACTION.• This orderwas initiated by the Director ofPublic Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. O � -�los SUMMARY OF ENGIIVEERING RECOlVIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 5 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. COOK AVE. from Jessie St. to Fdgerton St. `�� M� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiatedby the Director of Public Works as public necessity a �� on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. EDGERTON ST. from E. Lawson Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. S /�� � INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by ihe Director of Public Warks as public necessiry �� on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphaltpatches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATIONS � 1'�IOS Wazd 6 PROIECT: RECONSTRUCTSIAEWAI,KB.S.E.COOKAVE.fromEdgertonSt.toPayneAve. & W.S. PAYNE AVE. - E. Cook Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. �4 ��R � INITIATINGACTION: This order was inifiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO IECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. EDGERTON ST. from E. Lawson Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. S���� INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (i) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUNINIARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIIV�NDATION 6 I—�I OS Wazd 7 PROIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ROSS AVE. from Eazl St. to Duluth St. � O� I�� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, reverse slope, setfled, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIDSINARY ORDER � ct-yos COUNCI FILE NO. O�" �I��J �O BY _���la� � File No_Sb1085,5 1090,501091,501095- 501097,501101,501119,S01122 Voting Ward 1-7 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction andJor aew coastructioa at the followiag locatioas: 501085 - Both sides Asbusy Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook �ivenue £rom Sessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street £rom East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 301097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street £rom West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501101 - Both sides Jef€erson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East sicie South Xamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Ciiestnut Street to Eagle Street. 01-q4s' Ot-1�5 . *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considezed said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22 dav of Auaust,2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner providecl by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓B� nanav ✓�kakey ,/YP strom �COleman arris Lantry �eiter � In Favor QAgainst i �or Adopted by Council:•Date � 2� � Certified Passed by Council Secretary CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAL ORDER COUNCI FILE NO. Ol" �I OS O S By File No.S 1085,50 090,501091,501095- 501097,501101,S01119,501122 Voting Ward_1-7 Ia tha Matter ot sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street_ 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both sides Euller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from Wst Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501101 - Both sides Jefferson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East side South Hamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. o t -qas *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order � -- �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays Qbs�r.'� -Benanav (��<,.��- -Blakey ✓Bostrom ✓Coleman '� arr i s `�antry I�bs<,r��!' —Reiter Adopted by Council: Date aoc� Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` In Favor � Against 3 {�bser.� or �� Works - Sidewalk Division GREEN �� (GL1P RLL Reconstruct Sidewalk in Ward f �DEPARIMEMDIPEGTOR � �CfiVATTORNEV � &IOGET OIRE4TOR � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANT) SIGNATUH� �i ?-Z�-01 NO. 110439 IN(i1AVDATE ❑C(fYLOUNCiL ❑ CfTY CLFAK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SEAVICES DIR ❑7 Council Researc�� eC �"� / � PERSONALSEFNICECONiRAET5MUS7AN$WERTHEFO�LOWIN6 GVILSEflVICECOMMISSION 7, Hasihisperson/firtneverworkedunderacontrac[forthisdepartment? YES NO 2. Has ihis personlfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO (WHO, WHAT, WHEN. WHERE, 3. Does this persoMfirtn possess a sifill not nortnally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Expiain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attaeh M green sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by mulNple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. IFAPPROVED: The community witl benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its cftizens. The sidewafk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and repla�cem�ent as wel a cta�'m payouts. t ��^I� JtlL � � 2001 IOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ Jv ���v � �v C0.ST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ON� LYE� NO souece Ol-M-0672 A. PF = , ACINffYNUMBEH C01-2T754-0754-00000 INFOFMAiION. (IXPLAIN) • - � . , .., _ .. ._ . _ . O► -�1�5 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 1 PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FULLER AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Chatsworth St. & B.S. N. OXFORD ST. from W. Central Ave. to Fuller Ave. 5 0���� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, reverse slope, setfled, cracked, and uneven panels. pt �qOS SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATION Ward 2 PROIECT• RECONSTRUCTSIDEWALKWITHINTEGRALCURB E.S. W. SEVENTH ST. from Chestnut St. to Eagle St. 5 0''�� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessiry on the basis of six (6) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITION,S: This walk is poured concrete with water pockets, asphalt patches, and settled panels. 01-q� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 3 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWAI,K B.S. JEFFERSON AVE. from S. Hamline Ave. to S. Syndicate St. & E.S. S. HAMT.TNF AVE. from Jefferson Ave. to Wellesley Ave. �' I D � INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONII��NDATTON Wazd 4 Ot -`�°s PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRtJCT SIDEWALK B.S. ASBL3RY ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Chazles Ave. ✓�/� V y� INITIATINGACTION.• This orderwas initiated by the Director ofPublic Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. O � -�los SUMMARY OF ENGIIVEERING RECOlVIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 5 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. COOK AVE. from Jessie St. to Fdgerton St. `�� M� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiatedby the Director of Public Works as public necessity a �� on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. EDGERTON ST. from E. Lawson Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. S /�� � INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by ihe Director of Public Warks as public necessiry �� on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphaltpatches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUNIMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMI��NDATIONS � 1'�IOS Wazd 6 PROIECT: RECONSTRUCTSIAEWAI,KB.S.E.COOKAVE.fromEdgertonSt.toPayneAve. & W.S. PAYNE AVE. - E. Cook Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. �4 ��R � INITIATINGACTION: This order was inifiated by the D'uector of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO IECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. EDGERTON ST. from E. Lawson Ave. to E. Magnolia Ave. S���� INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (i) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. SUNINIARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIIV�NDATION 6 I—�I OS Wazd 7 PROIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. ROSS AVE. from Eazl St. to Duluth St. � O� I�� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, reverse slope, setfled, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELIDSINARY ORDER � ct-yos COUNCI FILE NO. O�" �I��J �O BY _���la� � File No_Sb1085,5 1090,501091,501095- 501097,501101,501119,S01122 Voting Ward 1-7 Ia the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction andJor aew coastructioa at the followiag locatioas: 501085 - Both sides Asbusy Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook �ivenue £rom Sessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street £rom East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 301097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street £rom West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501101 - Both sides Jef€erson Avenue from South Hamline Avenue to South Syndicate Street & East sicie South Xamline Avenue from Jefferson Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Ciiestnut Street to Eagle Street. 01-q4s' Ot-1�5 . *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstructioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considezed said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 22 dav of Auaust,2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers o£ the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner providecl by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓B� nanav ✓�kakey ,/YP strom �COleman arris Lantry �eiter � In Favor QAgainst i �or Adopted by Council:•Date � 2� � Certified Passed by Council Secretary