The URL can be used to link to this page

01-733ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNC FILE NO. �� ' By File No.501085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,501119,501122 Voting Ward_1,2,4,5,6,7 In the Matter of'sidewalk recoastructioa at the following locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both Sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both Sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. S01122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. �R1GiNAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��-' �� a' approved � v�.-` �-O �-aas � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WfiEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓Bostrom �oleman �farr i s �antry �Pteiter Adopted by Council: Date \\ 2-c�� 1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By `�� a ��-�-��—�-�.r� d Against ��j��i/ � r � Mayor �r/A�m/ 1 ) ; ti.t�l�: ic Works - Sidewalk Division 1CT PERSON 8 PHONE � Tvedt (266-608� BEONCOUNQLAGENDABY(DAT� � � �G�$�� i1�r�G � �� .iOFSIGNANREPAGE$ _ (CLJPALL [� Z�o I �GREEN O �EPARiMEtd� DIRECS'Of O Cltt ATTOFNEV I� &1DGEf �IRECrOR O MA��A (�R ASS�STANi, FOR 9GNANRE) �� 4-II-0� NO. 71�438 iNmnwa� ❑ CRV COUNCiL ❑ cm ciwK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES Dlfl. � Council Research � �DEPT.ACCO � Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstruct Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Wards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6& 7 v I ' FII�E ' S 5 5 9 5fl ZZ aECOMMENDAilONS: Approve (A) of Fiejeq pEqgONAL SERVtCE CO CTS MUST AN THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION �, �}hisperson/firtnevervrorkedunderacontmctforihisdepartment? CIBCOntMI17EE YES NO A �� F — 2. Has ihis pe S� NOer been a ciry empbyee? Di5rttiC7 COUNaL 3. Does this personffirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current city employee? YES NO WHICH COUNqL OBJEGTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to green sheet WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES The community wiil benefit from this project because it wiii provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. �pUgyC� ;�,@°'a�28�n ��ilTc�! DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beeause of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is Gity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. '- � IF NOTAPPflOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of iarger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION $ 7� �4L`J �09 COST/PEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No JGSOURCE 0��6]_2 A, P�a = 6��Q0� ACiNffYNUMBER C01-2T754-0784-00000 AL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 3 O� QOQ r O�-'►�3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Ward 1 PRQIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FLJLLER AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Chatsworth St. & B.S. N. OXFORD ST. from W. Central Ave. to Fuller Ave. ti� O ��q� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as publ]c necessiry � on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, reverse slope, setded, cracked, and uneven panels. ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELgSINARY ORDER � o ,.�� COUNCI FILE NO. Al� L3'� 3� g ti� File No.S01085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,S01119,501122 Voting Ward 1,2,4,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidemalk recoastructioa aad/or aew coastruction at tha followiag locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. S01119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Dulurh Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. ORfGINAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o�_'�'33 bl-G�} RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2001 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the ll dav of Julv, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓B� nanav r/Blakey ✓ 3�os trom PbSe r� — Col eman AhSerf —Harris ✓L'antry �iter 5 In Favor d Against a S�b�� n�- Adopted by Council : Date��-a0 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� c�- 0'�-.r.l� � Mayor ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNC FILE NO. �� ' By File No.501085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,501119,501122 Voting Ward_1,2,4,5,6,7 In the Matter of'sidewalk recoastructioa at the following locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both Sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both Sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. S01122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. �R1GiNAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��-' �� a' approved � v�.-` �-O �-aas � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WfiEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓Bostrom �oleman �farr i s �antry �Pteiter Adopted by Council: Date \\ 2-c�� 1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By `�� a ��-�-��—�-�.r� d Against ��j��i/ � r � Mayor �r/A�m/ 1 ) ; ti.t�l�: ic Works - Sidewalk Division 1CT PERSON 8 PHONE � Tvedt (266-608� BEONCOUNQLAGENDABY(DAT� � � �G�$�� i1�r�G � �� .iOFSIGNANREPAGE$ _ (CLJPALL [� Z�o I �GREEN O �EPARiMEtd� DIRECS'Of O Cltt ATTOFNEV I� &1DGEf �IRECrOR O MA��A (�R ASS�STANi, FOR 9GNANRE) �� 4-II-0� NO. 71�438 iNmnwa� ❑ CRV COUNCiL ❑ cm ciwK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES Dlfl. � Council Research � �DEPT.ACCO � Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstruct Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Wards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6& 7 v I ' FII�E ' S 5 5 9 5fl ZZ aECOMMENDAilONS: Approve (A) of Fiejeq pEqgONAL SERVtCE CO CTS MUST AN THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION �, �}hisperson/firtnevervrorkedunderacontmctforihisdepartment? CIBCOntMI17EE YES NO A �� F — 2. Has ihis pe S� NOer been a ciry empbyee? Di5rttiC7 COUNaL 3. Does this personffirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current city employee? YES NO WHICH COUNqL OBJEGTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to green sheet WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES The community wiil benefit from this project because it wiii provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. �pUgyC� ;�,@°'a�28�n ��ilTc�! DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beeause of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is Gity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. '- � IF NOTAPPflOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of iarger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION $ 7� �4L`J �09 COST/PEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No JGSOURCE 0��6]_2 A, P�a = 6��Q0� ACiNffYNUMBER C01-2T754-0784-00000 AL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 3 O� QOQ r O�-'►�3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Ward 1 PRQIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FLJLLER AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Chatsworth St. & B.S. N. OXFORD ST. from W. Central Ave. to Fuller Ave. ti� O ��q� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as publ]c necessiry � on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, reverse slope, setded, cracked, and uneven panels. ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELgSINARY ORDER � o ,.�� COUNCI FILE NO. Al� L3'� 3� g ti� File No.S01085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,S01119,501122 Voting Ward 1,2,4,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidemalk recoastructioa aad/or aew coastruction at tha followiag locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. S01119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Dulurh Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. ORfGINAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o�_'�'33 bl-G�} RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2001 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the ll dav of Julv, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓B� nanav r/Blakey ✓ 3�os trom PbSe r� — Col eman AhSerf —Harris ✓L'antry �iter 5 In Favor d Against a S�b�� n�- Adopted by Council : Date��-a0 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� c�- 0'�-.r.l� � Mayor ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNC FILE NO. �� ' By File No.501085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,501119,501122 Voting Ward_1,2,4,5,6,7 In the Matter of'sidewalk recoastructioa at the following locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both Sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both Sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. 501119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Duluth Street. S01122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. �R1GiNAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. Naw construction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��-' �� a' approved � v�.-` �-O �-aas � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WfiEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav �lakey ✓Bostrom �oleman �farr i s �antry �Pteiter Adopted by Council: Date \\ 2-c�� 1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By `�� a ��-�-��—�-�.r� d Against ��j��i/ � r � Mayor �r/A�m/ 1 ) ; ti.t�l�: ic Works - Sidewalk Division 1CT PERSON 8 PHONE � Tvedt (266-608� BEONCOUNQLAGENDABY(DAT� � � �G�$�� i1�r�G � �� .iOFSIGNANREPAGE$ _ (CLJPALL [� Z�o I �GREEN O �EPARiMEtd� DIRECS'Of O Cltt ATTOFNEV I� &1DGEf �IRECrOR O MA��A (�R ASS�STANi, FOR 9GNANRE) �� 4-II-0� NO. 71�438 iNmnwa� ❑ CRV COUNCiL ❑ cm ciwK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES Dlfl. � Council Research � �DEPT.ACCO � Reconstruct Sidewalk & Reconstruct Sidewalk With Integral Curb in Wards 1, 2, 4, 5, 6& 7 v I ' FII�E ' S 5 5 9 5fl ZZ aECOMMENDAilONS: Approve (A) of Fiejeq pEqgONAL SERVtCE CO CTS MUST AN THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _CMLSERVICECOMMISSION �, �}hisperson/firtnevervrorkedunderacontmctforihisdepartment? CIBCOntMI17EE YES NO A �� F — 2. Has ihis pe S� NOer been a ciry empbyee? Di5rttiC7 COUNaL 3. Does this personffirtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any current city employee? YES NO WHICH COUNqL OBJEGTIVE? Explain all yes answers on separate sheet and attaeh to green sheet WHEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freekhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGES The community wiil benefit from this project because it wiii provide safe defect free sidewaiks for its citizens. The sidewaik contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. �pUgyC� ;�,@°'a�28�n ��ilTc�! DISADVANTAGESIFAPPROVED� Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beeause of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is Gity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiai issue. '- � IF NOTAPPflOVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of iarger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OFTRANSACTION $ 7� �4L`J �09 COST/PEVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE) YES No JGSOURCE 0��6]_2 A, P�a = 6��Q0� ACiNffYNUMBER C01-2T754-0784-00000 AL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIN) B� AST = 3 O� QOQ r O�-'►�3 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Ward 1 PRQIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FLJLLER AVE. from N. Lexington Pkwy. to N. Chatsworth St. & B.S. N. OXFORD ST. from W. Central Ave. to Fuller Ave. ti� O ��q� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as publ]c necessiry � on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, scaled, reverse slope, setded, cracked, and uneven panels. ORIGINAL CITY OF ST. PAIIL PRELgSINARY ORDER � o ,.�� COUNCI FILE NO. Al� L3'� 3� g ti� File No.S01085,501090,501091,501095- 501097,S01119,501122 Voting Ward 1,2,4,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidemalk recoastructioa aad/or aew coastruction at tha followiag locations: 501085 - Both sides Asbury Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501090 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Jessie Street to Edgerton Street. 501091 - Both sides East Cook Avenue from Edgerton Street to Payne Avenue & West side Payne Avenue from East Cook Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01095 - West side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. S01096 - East side Edgerton Street from East Lawson Avenue to East Magnolia Avenue. 501097 - Both sides Fuller Avenue from North Lexington Parkway to North Chatsworth Street & Both sides North Oxford Street from West Central Avenue to Fuller Avenue. S01119 - Both sides Ross Avenue from Earl Street to Dulurh Street. 501122 - East side West Seventh Street from Chestnut Street to Eagle Street. ORfGINAL *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o�_'�'33 bl-G�} RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New constructioa iWhere no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2001 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the ll dav of Julv, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓B� nanav r/Blakey ✓ 3�os trom PbSe r� — Col eman AhSerf —Harris ✓L'antry �iter 5 In Favor d Against a S�b�� n�- Adopted by Council : Date��-a0 � Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY �� c�- 0'�-.r.l� � Mayor