01-732CITY OF 3T. PAIIL ��� G � NA L COUNG�IL FILE O. O�•73"�
� 4r
FINAIn ORDER By ;
File�o_501089,501093,
Voti Ward_2 , 5
Ia the Mattar of sidewalk recoastructioa at the followiag locations:
501089 - Both sides Concord Avenue from Ada Street to Highway 52.
501093 - Both sides Cumberland Street from West Cook Avenue to West Maryland Avenue.
(Laid over from Juae 27, 2001)
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or Chree family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MLTLTI-RESIDENTIAL (MoYe than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
of£icers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
✓ Benanav
✓�1 akey
✓�ostrom
,/Coleman
,/fIarris
�/Lantry
i/fFe i ter
Adopted by Council:
Certified Passed by
Date �1 �G\
Council Secretary
� Sn Favor By � � � �
� Against
���� Mayor
�
T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION Da�� July 3, 2001 Green Sheet Number: 1 � � � Qg
ontaM Person and Phone Number: EPAR1'MENT DIItECTOR 1 C11'Y COUNCII. O ,_�
Tom Sawyer 266-8850 A,�-y,og�EY c,,Ex�
xg
'J V\ �� a00� i1DGETDIItEC1'OR FFICEOFFINANCIALSVCS
be on Council Agenda by: � � YOR (OR ASS7STAN7)
OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATlJRE)
c �� N ����: r � 3 6 !V� 2
econsri�uct sidewalks in Wards 2& 5. �
COMB�NDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECI' (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACfS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
. Has the person/6rm ever worked �mder a contrac[ for this deparhnent? YES NO
PI,ANNINGCObAf6SION A STAFF
. Has this person/firm ever 6een a�ty employee? YES NO
CIVb SERVICE COMM75570N
. Does Utis person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO
C� Coamin•ree current City e�loyee?
E lain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
PORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
COUNCII. WARD(S) 2�� DISTRICT PI.ANNING COUNCb
IATING PROBLEM, 7SSUE, OPPORTONITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why?):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple pmblems, treet roots, poor subgrade materials; '
Freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variaHons,.etc: TSese problems
occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncoF""rected, the sidewalk �o�l�
would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuri��€�H:§ and
possible litigations.
DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: ,�6.E� e '
The community will beneCt from this project because it will provide safe defect free sit�ewalks for its citizens. The
sidewalk contracts aze done by private contractors generating pubGc sector jobs.
ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: "
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative Feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the Fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which iu tum, will generate more
peisonal injury siuts, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement as well as
claim payouts.
OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION: � COST/REVENUE BUDCETED (CIILCLE ONE) YES NO
ING SOURCE: ACTIVITY NOMBER:
ANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIPn
#
�
�
�
�
�
�\ - 'S!�
7une 27, 2001, City Council Acrion Minutes
Page 11
from June 6- no testimony was taken) (Ptgase note: no testimony will be taken
on June 27; public hearing is laid over to July 11, 2001.)
Laid over to 3uly 11
68. Final Order - O1-671 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction at Laurel Avenue
from Farrington Street to Nina Street (501039), Saratoga Street from Scheffer
Avenue to Hartford Avenue (S01053), Faitmount Avenue from South Prior
Avenue to South Howell Street (501067) and West University Avenue from
Aldine Street to Fry Street (501139). (Laid over from June 6) (Legislative
Hearing Officer recommends that the sidewalk not be completed at this time,
egcept for six feet to the driveway for 1515 Scheffer Avenue (501053 -
Saratoga Street from Scheffer Avenue to Hartford Avenue)
Adopted as amended (per the recommendation of the Legislative Hearing
Officer}. In addition, an amendment was made by deleting the following
addresses: S01039 - 307 Laurel Avenue and 313 Laurel Avenue.
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
69. Final Order - 01-672 - In the matter of the installation of a traffic control signal
system at the intersection of Dale and Topping Streets. (File #18948)
Adopted Yeas - 6 Nays - 0(Blakey not present)
70
71
72.
Final Order - 01-673 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new
construction in Wards 1, 4, 5, and 6. (File # 501079, S01086-S01088, 501092,
S01093, 501098, SO1100, 501107-S01109, SOl i l 1-S01113, SO1115-S01117,
SS01121, 501123, S01130, 501137, S01138, 501144}
Adopted as amended (501093 - Both sides of Cumberland Street from West
Council Meeting and �01108 - Delete the address of 358 Laurei Avenuel
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
Final Order - O1-674 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction in Wards 6 and 7.
(File #S01078, S01082, SO1110, S01114, S01129) .
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
Final Order - O1-675 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new
construction in Wards 2, 3, 4, and 7. (File #S01089, SOi 127, S01128, 501131,
S01134,S01149-501152)
Adopted as amended (S01089 - Both sides of Concord Street from Ada Street
� to Highwav 52 be laid over to July 111
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
CITY OF 3T. PAIIL ��� G � NA L COUNG�IL FILE O. O�•73"�
� 4r
FINAIn ORDER By ;
File�o_501089,501093,
Voti Ward_2 , 5
Ia the Mattar of sidewalk recoastructioa at the followiag locations:
501089 - Both sides Concord Avenue from Ada Street to Highway 52.
501093 - Both sides Cumberland Street from West Cook Avenue to West Maryland Avenue.
(Laid over from Juae 27, 2001)
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or Chree family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MLTLTI-RESIDENTIAL (MoYe than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
of£icers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
✓ Benanav
✓�1 akey
✓�ostrom
,/Coleman
,/fIarris
�/Lantry
i/fFe i ter
Adopted by Council:
Certified Passed by
Date �1 �G\
Council Secretary
� Sn Favor By � � � �
� Against
���� Mayor
�
T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION Da�� July 3, 2001 Green Sheet Number: 1 � � � Qg
ontaM Person and Phone Number: EPAR1'MENT DIItECTOR 1 C11'Y COUNCII. O ,_�
Tom Sawyer 266-8850 A,�-y,og�EY c,,Ex�
xg
'J V\ �� a00� i1DGETDIItEC1'OR FFICEOFFINANCIALSVCS
be on Council Agenda by: � � YOR (OR ASS7STAN7)
OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATlJRE)
c �� N ����: r � 3 6 !V� 2
econsri�uct sidewalks in Wards 2& 5. �
COMB�NDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECI' (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACfS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
. Has the person/6rm ever worked �mder a contrac[ for this deparhnent? YES NO
PI,ANNINGCObAf6SION A STAFF
. Has this person/firm ever 6een a�ty employee? YES NO
CIVb SERVICE COMM75570N
. Does Utis person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO
C� Coamin•ree current City e�loyee?
E lain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
PORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
COUNCII. WARD(S) 2�� DISTRICT PI.ANNING COUNCb
IATING PROBLEM, 7SSUE, OPPORTONITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why?):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple pmblems, treet roots, poor subgrade materials; '
Freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variaHons,.etc: TSese problems
occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncoF""rected, the sidewalk �o�l�
would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuri��€�H:§ and
possible litigations.
DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: ,�6.E� e '
The community will beneCt from this project because it will provide safe defect free sit�ewalks for its citizens. The
sidewalk contracts aze done by private contractors generating pubGc sector jobs.
ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: "
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative Feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the Fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which iu tum, will generate more
peisonal injury siuts, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement as well as
claim payouts.
OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION: � COST/REVENUE BUDCETED (CIILCLE ONE) YES NO
ING SOURCE: ACTIVITY NOMBER:
ANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIPn
#
�
�
�
�
�
�\ - 'S!�
7une 27, 2001, City Council Acrion Minutes
Page 11
from June 6- no testimony was taken) (Ptgase note: no testimony will be taken
on June 27; public hearing is laid over to July 11, 2001.)
Laid over to 3uly 11
68. Final Order - O1-671 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction at Laurel Avenue
from Farrington Street to Nina Street (501039), Saratoga Street from Scheffer
Avenue to Hartford Avenue (S01053), Faitmount Avenue from South Prior
Avenue to South Howell Street (501067) and West University Avenue from
Aldine Street to Fry Street (501139). (Laid over from June 6) (Legislative
Hearing Officer recommends that the sidewalk not be completed at this time,
egcept for six feet to the driveway for 1515 Scheffer Avenue (501053 -
Saratoga Street from Scheffer Avenue to Hartford Avenue)
Adopted as amended (per the recommendation of the Legislative Hearing
Officer}. In addition, an amendment was made by deleting the following
addresses: S01039 - 307 Laurel Avenue and 313 Laurel Avenue.
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
69. Final Order - 01-672 - In the matter of the installation of a traffic control signal
system at the intersection of Dale and Topping Streets. (File #18948)
Adopted Yeas - 6 Nays - 0(Blakey not present)
70
71
72.
Final Order - 01-673 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new
construction in Wards 1, 4, 5, and 6. (File # 501079, S01086-S01088, 501092,
S01093, 501098, SO1100, 501107-S01109, SOl i l 1-S01113, SO1115-S01117,
SS01121, 501123, S01130, 501137, S01138, 501144}
Adopted as amended (501093 - Both sides of Cumberland Street from West
Council Meeting and �01108 - Delete the address of 358 Laurei Avenuel
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
Final Order - O1-674 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction in Wards 6 and 7.
(File #S01078, S01082, SO1110, S01114, S01129) .
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
Final Order - O1-675 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new
construction in Wards 2, 3, 4, and 7. (File #S01089, SOi 127, S01128, 501131,
S01134,S01149-501152)
Adopted as amended (S01089 - Both sides of Concord Street from Ada Street
� to Highwav 52 be laid over to July 111
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
CITY OF 3T. PAIIL ��� G � NA L COUNG�IL FILE O. O�•73"�
� 4r
FINAIn ORDER By ;
File�o_501089,501093,
Voti Ward_2 , 5
Ia the Mattar of sidewalk recoastructioa at the followiag locations:
501089 - Both sides Concord Avenue from Ada Street to Highway 52.
501093 - Both sides Cumberland Street from West Cook Avenue to West Maryland Avenue.
(Laid over from Juae 27, 2001)
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or Chree family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MLTLTI-RESIDENTIAL (MoYe than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
of£icers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas � Nays
✓ Benanav
✓�1 akey
✓�ostrom
,/Coleman
,/fIarris
�/Lantry
i/fFe i ter
Adopted by Council:
Certified Passed by
Date �1 �G\
Council Secretary
� Sn Favor By � � � �
� Against
���� Mayor
�
T.M.SJREAL ESTATE DIVISION Da�� July 3, 2001 Green Sheet Number: 1 � � � Qg
ontaM Person and Phone Number: EPAR1'MENT DIItECTOR 1 C11'Y COUNCII. O ,_�
Tom Sawyer 266-8850 A,�-y,og�EY c,,Ex�
xg
'J V\ �� a00� i1DGETDIItEC1'OR FFICEOFFINANCIALSVCS
be on Council Agenda by: � � YOR (OR ASS7STAN7)
OTAL # OF SIGNATURE PAGES 1 (CLIP ALL LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATlJRE)
c �� N ����: r � 3 6 !V� 2
econsri�uct sidewalks in Wards 2& 5. �
COMB�NDATIONS: APPROVE (A) OR REJECI' (R) ERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACfS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
. Has the person/6rm ever worked �mder a contrac[ for this deparhnent? YES NO
PI,ANNINGCObAf6SION A STAFF
. Has this person/firm ever 6een a�ty employee? YES NO
CIVb SERVICE COMM75570N
. Does Utis person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any YES NO
C� Coamin•ree current City e�loyee?
E lain all YES answers on a se arate sheet and attach.
PORTS WHICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE?
COUNCII. WARD(S) 2�� DISTRICT PI.ANNING COUNCb
IATING PROBLEM, 7SSUE, OPPORTONITY (Who, What, When, Where, Why?):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple pmblems, treet roots, poor subgrade materials; '
Freeze/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variaHons,.etc: TSese problems
occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncoF""rected, the sidewalk �o�l�
would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuri��€�H:§ and
possible litigations.
DVANTAGESIFAPPROVED: ,�6.E� e '
The community will beneCt from this project because it will provide safe defect free sit�ewalks for its citizens. The
sidewalk contracts aze done by private contractors generating pubGc sector jobs.
ISADVANTAGES IF APPROVED: "
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative Feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the Fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
ISADVANTAGES IF NOT APPROVED:
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which iu tum, will generate more
peisonal injury siuts, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement as well as
claim payouts.
OTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION: � COST/REVENUE BUDCETED (CIILCLE ONE) YES NO
ING SOURCE: ACTIVITY NOMBER:
ANCIAL INFORMATION: (EXPLAIPn
#
�
�
�
�
�
�\ - 'S!�
7une 27, 2001, City Council Acrion Minutes
Page 11
from June 6- no testimony was taken) (Ptgase note: no testimony will be taken
on June 27; public hearing is laid over to July 11, 2001.)
Laid over to 3uly 11
68. Final Order - O1-671 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction at Laurel Avenue
from Farrington Street to Nina Street (501039), Saratoga Street from Scheffer
Avenue to Hartford Avenue (S01053), Faitmount Avenue from South Prior
Avenue to South Howell Street (501067) and West University Avenue from
Aldine Street to Fry Street (501139). (Laid over from June 6) (Legislative
Hearing Officer recommends that the sidewalk not be completed at this time,
egcept for six feet to the driveway for 1515 Scheffer Avenue (501053 -
Saratoga Street from Scheffer Avenue to Hartford Avenue)
Adopted as amended (per the recommendation of the Legislative Hearing
Officer}. In addition, an amendment was made by deleting the following
addresses: S01039 - 307 Laurel Avenue and 313 Laurel Avenue.
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
69. Final Order - 01-672 - In the matter of the installation of a traffic control signal
system at the intersection of Dale and Topping Streets. (File #18948)
Adopted Yeas - 6 Nays - 0(Blakey not present)
70
71
72.
Final Order - 01-673 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new
construction in Wards 1, 4, 5, and 6. (File # 501079, S01086-S01088, 501092,
S01093, 501098, SO1100, 501107-S01109, SOl i l 1-S01113, SO1115-S01117,
SS01121, 501123, S01130, 501137, S01138, 501144}
Adopted as amended (501093 - Both sides of Cumberland Street from West
Council Meeting and �01108 - Delete the address of 358 Laurei Avenuel
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
Final Order - O1-674 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction in Wards 6 and 7.
(File #S01078, S01082, SO1110, S01114, S01129) .
Adopted Yeas - 7 Nays - 0
Final Order - O1-675 - In the matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new
construction in Wards 2, 3, 4, and 7. (File #S01089, SOi 127, S01128, 501131,
S01134,S01149-501152)
Adopted as amended (S01089 - Both sides of Concord Street from Ada Street
� to Highwav 52 be laid over to July 111
Yeas - 7 Nays - 0