The URL can be used to link to this page

01-676CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. � �"' �+� �A /�/� J BY -�!1l�oc/;�rrL� ' , File No. S01080,501081,501083,501084, 501094,501099,501124,S01145-501148 Voting Ward 1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidawalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 5�1081 - Both sides Bellows Street £rom West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both Sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. 501084 - Both Sides Burr Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both Sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. 501099 - Both Sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton Street. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. oi-G�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary O\� Sg structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES of actual cost estimated to be � , �-�. 0 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bs��--Benanav ✓Blakey +/�ostrom �oleman ✓�-Iarr i s �antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �� \ 1�-� �— — ��– � Against � ,� 4 _ w � Mayor r � �/v��i ��l�UG : Works - Sidewalk Division :T PERSON 8 PHONE Tved[ (266-6087) OFSIGNATUREPAGES (CLJPALL Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 4& 6 _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _ _qB COMMIT'iEE _ A STAFF _ _DISTFIGTCOUNdL _ iUPPOHTS W HICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Wk4�s � �2 �N �1- 4 INITIATING PROBL M, I UE, OPPORTUN 1-01 SIGNnNfi� � �� IGREEN S � DEPAK�MENT DIFECTOR_ �cmnrroaNev _ O BU�GET DIRECTOF _ � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn _ NO. 110435 ❑ CEN COUNCIL � ❑GITYCLERK V I ❑ FlN. 8 MGL SERVICES �j Councii Research PERSONAL SERVICE COIITRACTS MUST ANSWER 7AE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS: 1. Ha5 this person/firtn ever worked under a contract for this depattrnent? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does Nis person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subjeet to increased pedestrian injuries trom falls and possibte litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. " APPROVED. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. ��+a�;i3 ��s��a�h ��2�r E?�'^' � � 2��1 fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N$ �>>vv/,v� COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE O��M�OFi�Z . s : ACiN1TYNUMBER C01-2T754-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFOHMATION:IEXPLAIN) • ° � ., ,' .... ........ .. .... . ..' _ _ , bt-GZ4 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERLNG RECOMMENDATION Wazd 1 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from Blair Ave. to Thomas Ave. 6' �� INITIATINGACTION: This arder was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. Ol�� 1� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. �� I�f INITIATING ACTION: 'I'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic f necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BELLOWS ST. from W. Robie St. to W. Isabel St. ��I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. CURTICE ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. & W.S. CHARLTON ST. from W. Curtice St. to W. Sidney St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HUMBOLDT AVE. from E. Sidney St. to E. Morton St. �I � INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the wa1k. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. o �., �� -2- PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. WINONA ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. 5 (\'��(] INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public C! / necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ot�c�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS Ward 4 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from Blair Ave. to Thomas Ave. � I I� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SHERBURNE AVE. from N. Pascal St. to N. Albert St. & E.S. N. PASCAL ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Charles Ave. ��'� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. 0 � �G�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 6 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BEDFORD ST. from Beaumont St. to E. Minnehaha Ave. � O� (�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public V V necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, multi-cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BURR ST. from Beaumont St. to E. Minnehaha Ave. �� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public w � necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BURR ST. from Tedesco St. to Beaumont St. o( INITIATING ACTION: This arder was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public s � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAVL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. � � — � � �' � � "� B y �� File No.S01080,501081,501083,501084, 50194,501099,501124,501145-501148 Voting Wazd_1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidewalk raconstruction and/or new coastruction at the following ' locations: S01080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. S01081 - Soth sides Bellows Street from West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. S01084 - Both sides Burr Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. 501099 - Both sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton Street. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. o�-s�y 6�,-' (�� (� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. F7 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of 3une , 206'1 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Hous� Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓B,lakey ��Bpstrom ✓Coleman ✓Hj rris ✓L� ntry 1/Reiter ? In Favor v Against Adopted by Council: Date�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � a �F---4 _ — �---J Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. � �"' �+� �A /�/� J BY -�!1l�oc/;�rrL� ' , File No. S01080,501081,501083,501084, 501094,501099,501124,S01145-501148 Voting Ward 1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidawalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 5�1081 - Both sides Bellows Street £rom West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both Sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. 501084 - Both Sides Burr Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both Sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. 501099 - Both Sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton Street. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. oi-G�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary O\� Sg structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES of actual cost estimated to be � , �-�. 0 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bs��--Benanav ✓Blakey +/�ostrom �oleman ✓�-Iarr i s �antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �� \ 1�-� �— — ��– � Against � ,� 4 _ w � Mayor r � �/v��i ��l�UG : Works - Sidewalk Division :T PERSON 8 PHONE Tved[ (266-6087) OFSIGNATUREPAGES (CLJPALL Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 4& 6 _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _ _qB COMMIT'iEE _ A STAFF _ _DISTFIGTCOUNdL _ iUPPOHTS W HICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Wk4�s � �2 �N �1- 4 INITIATING PROBL M, I UE, OPPORTUN 1-01 SIGNnNfi� � �� IGREEN S � DEPAK�MENT DIFECTOR_ �cmnrroaNev _ O BU�GET DIRECTOF _ � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn _ NO. 110435 ❑ CEN COUNCIL � ❑GITYCLERK V I ❑ FlN. 8 MGL SERVICES �j Councii Research PERSONAL SERVICE COIITRACTS MUST ANSWER 7AE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS: 1. Ha5 this person/firtn ever worked under a contract for this depattrnent? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does Nis person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subjeet to increased pedestrian injuries trom falls and possibte litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. " APPROVED. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. ��+a�;i3 ��s��a�h ��2�r E?�'^' � � 2��1 fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N$ �>>vv/,v� COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE O��M�OFi�Z . s : ACiN1TYNUMBER C01-2T754-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFOHMATION:IEXPLAIN) • ° � ., ,' .... ........ .. .... . ..' _ _ , bt-GZ4 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERLNG RECOMMENDATION Wazd 1 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from Blair Ave. to Thomas Ave. 6' �� INITIATINGACTION: This arder was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. Ol�� 1� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. �� I�f INITIATING ACTION: 'I'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic f necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BELLOWS ST. from W. Robie St. to W. Isabel St. ��I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. CURTICE ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. & W.S. CHARLTON ST. from W. Curtice St. to W. Sidney St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HUMBOLDT AVE. from E. Sidney St. to E. Morton St. �I � INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the wa1k. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. o �., �� -2- PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. WINONA ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. 5 (\'��(] INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public C! / necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ot�c�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS Ward 4 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from Blair Ave. to Thomas Ave. � I I� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SHERBURNE AVE. from N. Pascal St. to N. Albert St. & E.S. N. PASCAL ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Charles Ave. ��'� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. 0 � �G�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 6 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BEDFORD ST. from Beaumont St. to E. Minnehaha Ave. � O� (�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public V V necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, multi-cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BURR ST. from Beaumont St. to E. Minnehaha Ave. �� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public w � necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BURR ST. from Tedesco St. to Beaumont St. o( INITIATING ACTION: This arder was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public s � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAVL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. � � — � � �' � � "� B y �� File No.S01080,501081,501083,501084, 50194,501099,501124,501145-501148 Voting Wazd_1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidewalk raconstruction and/or new coastruction at the following ' locations: S01080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. S01081 - Soth sides Bellows Street from West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. S01084 - Both sides Burr Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. 501099 - Both sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton Street. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. o�-s�y 6�,-' (�� (� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. F7 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of 3une , 206'1 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Hous� Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓B,lakey ��Bpstrom ✓Coleman ✓Hj rris ✓L� ntry 1/Reiter ? In Favor v Against Adopted by Council: Date�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � a �F---4 _ — �---J Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. � �"' �+� �A /�/� J BY -�!1l�oc/;�rrL� ' , File No. S01080,501081,501083,501084, 501094,501099,501124,S01145-501148 Voting Ward 1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidawalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 5�1081 - Both sides Bellows Street £rom West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both Sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. 501084 - Both Sides Burr Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both Sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. 501099 - Both Sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton Street. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. oi-G�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary O\� Sg structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES of actual cost estimated to be � , �-�. 0 1 The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City o£ Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �bs��--Benanav ✓Blakey +/�ostrom �oleman ✓�-Iarr i s �antry �iter Adopted by Council: Date \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �� \ 1�-� �— — ��– � Against � ,� 4 _ w � Mayor r � �/v��i ��l�UG : Works - Sidewalk Division :T PERSON 8 PHONE Tved[ (266-6087) OFSIGNATUREPAGES (CLJPALL Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 4& 6 _PLANNINGCOMMISSION _ _qB COMMIT'iEE _ A STAFF _ _DISTFIGTCOUNdL _ iUPPOHTS W HICH COUNCIL OBJECTIVE? Wk4�s � �2 �N �1- 4 INITIATING PROBL M, I UE, OPPORTUN 1-01 SIGNnNfi� � �� IGREEN S � DEPAK�MENT DIFECTOR_ �cmnrroaNev _ O BU�GET DIRECTOF _ � MAYOR (OR ASSISTANn _ NO. 110435 ❑ CEN COUNCIL � ❑GITYCLERK V I ❑ FlN. 8 MGL SERVICES �j Councii Research PERSONAL SERVICE COIITRACTS MUST ANSWER 7AE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS: 1. Ha5 this person/firtn ever worked under a contract for this depattrnent? YES NO 2. Has this persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? YES NO 3. Does Nis person/firm possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? YES NO Explain all yes answers on separete sheet antl attach to green sheet (WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subjeet to increased pedestrian injuries trom falls and possibte litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. " APPROVED. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. ��+a�;i3 ��s��a�h ��2�r E?�'^' � � 2��1 fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N$ �>>vv/,v� COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUNDINGSOURCE O��M�OFi�Z . s : ACiN1TYNUMBER C01-2T754-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFOHMATION:IEXPLAIN) • ° � ., ,' .... ........ .. .... . ..' _ _ , bt-GZ4 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERLNG RECOMMENDATION Wazd 1 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N. HAMI.INE AVE. from Blair Ave. to Thomas Ave. 6' �� INITIATINGACTION: This arder was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. Ol�� 1� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. BAKER ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. �� I�f INITIATING ACTION: 'I'his order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic f necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BELLOWS ST. from W. Robie St. to W. Isabel St. ��I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. CURTICE ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. & W.S. CHARLTON ST. from W. Curtice St. to W. Sidney St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the wa1k. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. HUMBOLDT AVE. from E. Sidney St. to E. Morton St. �I � INITIATINGACTION.• This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the wa1k. This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. o �., �� -2- PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. WINONA ST. from Ohio St. to Charlton St. 5 (\'��(] INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public C! / necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ot�c�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMIVIENDATIONS Ward 4 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. N. HAMLINE AVE. from Blair Ave. to Thomas Ave. � I I� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SHERBURNE AVE. from N. Pascal St. to N. Albert St. & E.S. N. PASCAL ST. from Sherburne Ave. to Charles Ave. ��'� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, disintegrated, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. 0 � �G�� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECONIlVIENDATIONS Wazd 6 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BEDFORD ST. from Beaumont St. to E. Minnehaha Ave. � O� (�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public V V necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, multi-cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.� RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BURR ST. from Beaumont St. to E. Minnehaha Ave. �� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public w � necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BURR ST. from Tedesco St. to Beaumont St. o( INITIATING ACTION: This arder was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public s � necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAVL PRELIMINARY ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. � � — � � �' � � "� B y �� File No.S01080,501081,501083,501084, 50194,501099,501124,501145-501148 Voting Wazd_1,2,4&6 In the Matter of sidewalk raconstruction and/or new coastruction at the following ' locations: S01080 - Both sides Bedford Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. S01081 - Soth sides Bellows Street from West Robie Street to West Isabel Street. 501083 - Both sides Burr Street from Tedesco Street to Beaumont Street. S01084 - Both sides Burr Street from Beaumont Street to East Minnehaha Avenue. 501094 - Both sides West Curtice Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street & West side Charlton Street from West Curtice Street to West Sidney Street. 501099 - Both sides Humboldt Avenue from East Sidney Street to East Morton Street. 501124 - Both sides Sherburne Avenue from North Pascal Street to North Albert Street & East side North Pascal Street from Sherburne Avenue to Charles Avenue. 501145 - East side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. 501146 - Both sides West Baker Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501147 - Both sides West Winona Street from Ohio Street to Charlton Street. 501148 - West side North Hamline Avenue from Blair Avenue to Thomas Avenue. o�-s�y 6�,-' (�� (� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. F7 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of 3une , 206'1 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court Hous� Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav ✓B,lakey ��Bpstrom ✓Coleman ✓Hj rris ✓L� ntry 1/Reiter ? In Favor v Against Adopted by Council: Date�� \ Certified Passed by Council Secretary By � a �F---4 _ — �---J Mayor