01-674CITY OF ST. PAUL
FINAL ORDER
COUNC L FILE TO. O, � C� �"I �'
By
File No._ 01078,5 1082,501110,501114,
501129
Voting Ward_6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
S01078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street.
501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501110 - Both Sides Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street.
501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501129 - Both Sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel
Street.
41-�?�
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has hearfl all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓ 3�1 akey
� s trom
,�2'oleman
�rris
vLantry
�iter
Adopted by Council: Date 3� 2-0�'1
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
? In Favor By � c�- . 1�-! �-- --
� Against __ /�--'�����
Mayor
7�i%/
��$u�Ri�
Works - Sidewalk Division
fPER50N&PHONE
BEONCOUNGLAGENDA
�cur
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7
Z7
� ��; �-�o ��
GREEN SHEET NO. 1�0437
INRIAVDATE INRIA�iT]GTF
� DEPARTTAEM DIRECTOR
FOR �CfTVATTORNEV
O BUDGET DIRECTOR
� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT)
❑ CITY CqUNCIL
❑ CfTY CLERK �
❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES �I0.
� Council Research
RGWMMENDATIONS:Approv¢(A)O�R¢j2tt(R) ' p�RSONALSER;ICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWiNGQUESTIONS:
_PLANNINGCOMMI$$ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION " � Hd51hi5person/fiRneVEfwofkedUndefaCOntfdClfo�thl5departmEnt?
CIBCAMMITfEE YES NO
— 2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
A �pFF _ YES NO
_DISTRICT CAUNQL 3. Does Mis person/firtn possess a sldll not nortnaly possessed by any current city employee?
YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECfIVE? Explain ali yes answers on separete sheet anA attach to green sheet
WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�:
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade.materials, free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIF
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personal injury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replace Ce �yei�l�a�s
i��
�`fpt� �i e3. fLMoi
iOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ J 4� JVL � LV COSLREVENUE BUDCaETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES No
FUNDMGSOURCE O7-M-0672 A . Ph{� = ia,oao pCINITYNUMBER ' C01-2T754-0784-00000
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � ,,,�..._.�.....�,.-..,---.,..._..,.... - _%
0 �-�1�1
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS
Wazd 7
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Forest St. to Cypress
St.
L�O' O�C� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
fJ 0 necessiry on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphait
patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Johnson Pkwy. to
Clazence St.
INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
��,,�� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt
patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennard St. to
Flandrau St.
�( D� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, settled,
cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from N. White Beaz Ave. to N.
� l� Aazel St.
INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk.
�1- ���
-Z-
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt
patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
a � _ �'�'�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION
Wazd 6
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennazd St. to
Flandrau St.
s � ���� INITIATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of thirteen (13) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setded,
cracked, and uneven panels.
CITY OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
COUNCIL FILE NO. C��— SFIY Ol,
i
By
File No.SO 078,501 82,501110,501114
501129
Voting Ward_ 6 & 7
In tha Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following
locations:
501078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street.
501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
SO1110 - Both sicles Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street.
501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501129 - Both sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel
Street.
0
o�-��y
o�-s��
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approrimately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
NNLTI-RE5IDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
E
G
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of June, 200I
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�enanav
�lakey
✓BOStrom
✓Coleman
✓Harris
�/Lantry
�Reiter
� In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date������
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY� �-� 1� � ° i ��
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL
FINAL ORDER
COUNC L FILE TO. O, � C� �"I �'
By
File No._ 01078,5 1082,501110,501114,
501129
Voting Ward_6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
S01078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street.
501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501110 - Both Sides Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street.
501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501129 - Both Sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel
Street.
41-�?�
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has hearfl all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓ 3�1 akey
� s trom
,�2'oleman
�rris
vLantry
�iter
Adopted by Council: Date 3� 2-0�'1
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
? In Favor By � c�- . 1�-! �-- --
� Against __ /�--'�����
Mayor
7�i%/
��$u�Ri�
Works - Sidewalk Division
fPER50N&PHONE
BEONCOUNGLAGENDA
�cur
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7
Z7
� ��; �-�o ��
GREEN SHEET NO. 1�0437
INRIAVDATE INRIA�iT]GTF
� DEPARTTAEM DIRECTOR
FOR �CfTVATTORNEV
O BUDGET DIRECTOR
� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT)
❑ CITY CqUNCIL
❑ CfTY CLERK �
❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES �I0.
� Council Research
RGWMMENDATIONS:Approv¢(A)O�R¢j2tt(R) ' p�RSONALSER;ICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWiNGQUESTIONS:
_PLANNINGCOMMI$$ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION " � Hd51hi5person/fiRneVEfwofkedUndefaCOntfdClfo�thl5departmEnt?
CIBCAMMITfEE YES NO
— 2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
A �pFF _ YES NO
_DISTRICT CAUNQL 3. Does Mis person/firtn possess a sldll not nortnaly possessed by any current city employee?
YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECfIVE? Explain ali yes answers on separete sheet anA attach to green sheet
WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�:
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade.materials, free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIF
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personal injury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replace Ce �yei�l�a�s
i��
�`fpt� �i e3. fLMoi
iOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ J 4� JVL � LV COSLREVENUE BUDCaETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES No
FUNDMGSOURCE O7-M-0672 A . Ph{� = ia,oao pCINITYNUMBER ' C01-2T754-0784-00000
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � ,,,�..._.�.....�,.-..,---.,..._..,.... - _%
0 �-�1�1
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS
Wazd 7
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Forest St. to Cypress
St.
L�O' O�C� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
fJ 0 necessiry on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphait
patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Johnson Pkwy. to
Clazence St.
INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
��,,�� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt
patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennard St. to
Flandrau St.
�( D� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, settled,
cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from N. White Beaz Ave. to N.
� l� Aazel St.
INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk.
�1- ���
-Z-
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt
patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
a � _ �'�'�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION
Wazd 6
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennazd St. to
Flandrau St.
s � ���� INITIATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of thirteen (13) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setded,
cracked, and uneven panels.
CITY OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
COUNCIL FILE NO. C��— SFIY Ol,
i
By
File No.SO 078,501 82,501110,501114
501129
Voting Ward_ 6 & 7
In tha Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following
locations:
501078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street.
501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
SO1110 - Both sicles Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street.
501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501129 - Both sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel
Street.
0
o�-��y
o�-s��
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approrimately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
NNLTI-RE5IDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
E
G
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of June, 200I
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�enanav
�lakey
✓BOStrom
✓Coleman
✓Harris
�/Lantry
�Reiter
� In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date������
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY� �-� 1� � ° i ��
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL
FINAL ORDER
COUNC L FILE TO. O, � C� �"I �'
By
File No._ 01078,5 1082,501110,501114,
501129
Voting Ward_6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations:
S01078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street.
501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501110 - Both Sides Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street.
501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501129 - Both Sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel
Street.
41-�?�
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
under Preliminary
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has hearfl all persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓ 3�1 akey
� s trom
,�2'oleman
�rris
vLantry
�iter
Adopted by Council: Date 3� 2-0�'1
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
? In Favor By � c�- . 1�-! �-- --
� Against __ /�--'�����
Mayor
7�i%/
��$u�Ri�
Works - Sidewalk Division
fPER50N&PHONE
BEONCOUNGLAGENDA
�cur
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7
Z7
� ��; �-�o ��
GREEN SHEET NO. 1�0437
INRIAVDATE INRIA�iT]GTF
� DEPARTTAEM DIRECTOR
FOR �CfTVATTORNEV
O BUDGET DIRECTOR
� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT)
❑ CITY CqUNCIL
❑ CfTY CLERK �
❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES �I0.
� Council Research
RGWMMENDATIONS:Approv¢(A)O�R¢j2tt(R) ' p�RSONALSER;ICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWiNGQUESTIONS:
_PLANNINGCOMMI$$ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION " � Hd51hi5person/fiRneVEfwofkedUndefaCOntfdClfo�thl5departmEnt?
CIBCAMMITfEE YES NO
— 2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee?
A �pFF _ YES NO
_DISTRICT CAUNQL 3. Does Mis person/firtn possess a sldll not nortnaly possessed by any current city employee?
YES NO
SUPPORTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECfIVE? Explain ali yes answers on separete sheet anA attach to green sheet
WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�:
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade.materials, free/thaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it
would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations.
ADVANTAGESIF
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and
assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personal injury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replace Ce �yei�l�a�s
i��
�`fpt� �i e3. fLMoi
iOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ J 4� JVL � LV COSLREVENUE BUDCaETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES No
FUNDMGSOURCE O7-M-0672 A . Ph{� = ia,oao pCINITYNUMBER ' C01-2T754-0784-00000
FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � ,,,�..._.�.....�,.-..,---.,..._..,.... - _%
0 �-�1�1
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS
Wazd 7
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Forest St. to Cypress
St.
L�O' O�C� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
fJ 0 necessiry on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphait
patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Johnson Pkwy. to
Clazence St.
INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
��,,�� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt
patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennard St. to
Flandrau St.
�( D� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, settled,
cracked, and uneven panels.
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from N. White Beaz Ave. to N.
� l� Aazel St.
INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk.
�1- ���
-Z-
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt
patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels.
a � _ �'�'�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION
Wazd 6
PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennazd St. to
Flandrau St.
s � ���� INITIATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public
necessity on the basis of thirteen (13) complaints and an inspection of the walk.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setded,
cracked, and uneven panels.
CITY OF ST. PAUL
ORDER
COUNCIL FILE NO. C��— SFIY Ol,
i
By
File No.SO 078,501 82,501110,501114
501129
Voting Ward_ 6 & 7
In tha Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following
locations:
501078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street.
501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
SO1110 - Both sicles Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street.
501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street.
501129 - Both sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel
Street.
0
o�-��y
o�-s��
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approrimately $4.50 per square foot.
Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
NNLTI-RE5IDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $6.09 per square foot.
The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
E
G
That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of June, 200I
5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
�enanav
�lakey
✓BOStrom
✓Coleman
✓Harris
�/Lantry
�Reiter
� In Favor
� Against
Adopted by Council: Date������
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
BY� �-� 1� � ° i ��
Mayor