The URL can be used to link to this page

01-674CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNC L FILE TO. O, � C� �"I �' By File No._ 01078,5 1082,501110,501114, 501129 Voting Ward_6 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: S01078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street. 501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501110 - Both Sides Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street. 501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501129 - Both Sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 41-�?� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has hearfl all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓ 3�1 akey � s trom ,�2'oleman �rris vLantry �iter Adopted by Council: Date 3� 2-0�'1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary ? In Favor By � c�- . 1�-! �-- -- � Against __ /�--'�� Mayor 7�i%/ ��$u�Ri� Works - Sidewalk Division fPER50N&PHONE BEONCOUNGLAGENDA �cur Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7 Z7 � ��; �-�o �� GREEN SHEET NO. 1�0437 INRIAVDATE INRIA�iT]GTF � DEPARTTAEM DIRECTOR FOR �CfTVATTORNEV O BUDGET DIRECTOR � MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) ❑ CITY CqUNCIL ❑ CfTY CLERK � ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES �I0. � Council Research RGWMMENDATIONS:Approv¢(A)O�R¢j2tt(R) ' p�RSONALSER;ICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWiNGQUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMI$$ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION " � Hd51hi5person/fiRneVEfwofkedUndefaCOntfdClfo�thl5departmEnt? CIBCAMMITfEE YES NO — 2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? A �pFF _ YES NO _DISTRICT CAUNQL 3. Does Mis person/firtn possess a sldll not nortnaly possessed by any current city employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECfIVE? Explain ali yes answers on separete sheet anA attach to green sheet WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade.materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIF The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replace Ce �yei�l�a�s i�� `fpt� �i e3. fLMoi iOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ J 4� JVL � LV COSLREVENUE BUDCaETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES No FUNDMGSOURCE O7-M-0672 A . Ph{� = ia,oao pCINITYNUMBER ' C01-2T754-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � ,,,�..._.�.....�,.-..,---.,..._..,.... - _% 0 �-�1�1 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Wazd 7 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Forest St. to Cypress St. L�O' O�C� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public fJ 0 necessiry on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphait patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Johnson Pkwy. to Clazence St. INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public ��,,�� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennard St. to Flandrau St. �( D� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from N. White Beaz Ave. to N. � l� Aazel St. INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. �1- �� -Z- EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. a � _ �'�'� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 6 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennazd St. to Flandrau St. s � �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of thirteen (13) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setded, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. C��— SFIY Ol, i By File No.SO 078,501 82,501110,501114 501129 Voting Ward_ 6 & 7 In tha Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street. 501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. SO1110 - Both sicles Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street. 501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501129 - Both sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 0 o�-��y o�-s�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approrimately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RE5IDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. E G That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of June, 200I 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey ✓BOStrom ✓Coleman ✓Harris �/Lantry �Reiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� �-� 1� � ° i �� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNC L FILE TO. O, � C� �"I �' By File No._ 01078,5 1082,501110,501114, 501129 Voting Ward_6 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: S01078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street. 501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501110 - Both Sides Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street. 501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501129 - Both Sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 41-�?� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has hearfl all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓ 3�1 akey � s trom ,�2'oleman �rris vLantry �iter Adopted by Council: Date 3� 2-0�'1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary ? In Favor By � c�- . 1�-! �-- -- � Against __ /�--'�� Mayor 7�i%/ ��$u�Ri� Works - Sidewalk Division fPER50N&PHONE BEONCOUNGLAGENDA �cur Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7 Z7 � ��; �-�o �� GREEN SHEET NO. 1�0437 INRIAVDATE INRIA�iT]GTF � DEPARTTAEM DIRECTOR FOR �CfTVATTORNEV O BUDGET DIRECTOR � MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) ❑ CITY CqUNCIL ❑ CfTY CLERK � ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES �I0. � Council Research RGWMMENDATIONS:Approv¢(A)O�R¢j2tt(R) ' p�RSONALSER;ICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWiNGQUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMI$$ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION " � Hd51hi5person/fiRneVEfwofkedUndefaCOntfdClfo�thl5departmEnt? CIBCAMMITfEE YES NO — 2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? A �pFF _ YES NO _DISTRICT CAUNQL 3. Does Mis person/firtn possess a sldll not nortnaly possessed by any current city employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECfIVE? Explain ali yes answers on separete sheet anA attach to green sheet WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade.materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIF The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replace Ce �yei�l�a�s i�� `fpt� �i e3. fLMoi iOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ J 4� JVL � LV COSLREVENUE BUDCaETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES No FUNDMGSOURCE O7-M-0672 A . Ph{� = ia,oao pCINITYNUMBER ' C01-2T754-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � ,,,�..._.�.....�,.-..,---.,..._..,.... - _% 0 �-�1�1 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Wazd 7 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Forest St. to Cypress St. L�O' O�C� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public fJ 0 necessiry on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphait patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Johnson Pkwy. to Clazence St. INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public ��,,�� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennard St. to Flandrau St. �( D� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from N. White Beaz Ave. to N. � l� Aazel St. INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. �1- �� -Z- EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. a � _ �'�'� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 6 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennazd St. to Flandrau St. s � �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of thirteen (13) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setded, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. C��— SFIY Ol, i By File No.SO 078,501 82,501110,501114 501129 Voting Ward_ 6 & 7 In tha Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street. 501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. SO1110 - Both sicles Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street. 501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501129 - Both sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 0 o�-��y o�-s�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approrimately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RE5IDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. E G That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of June, 200I 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey ✓BOStrom ✓Coleman ✓Harris �/Lantry �Reiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� �-� 1� � ° i �� Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNC L FILE TO. O, � C� �"I �' By File No._ 01078,5 1082,501110,501114, 501129 Voting Ward_6 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: S01078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street. 501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501110 - Both Sides Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street. 501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501129 - Both Sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 41-�?� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk alonq and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has hearfl all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all e�enses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓ 3�1 akey � s trom ,�2'oleman �rris vLantry �iter Adopted by Council: Date 3� 2-0�'1 Certified Passed by Council Secretary ? In Favor By � c�- . 1�-! �-- -- � Against __ /�--'�� Mayor 7�i%/ ��$u�Ri� Works - Sidewalk Division fPER50N&PHONE BEONCOUNGLAGENDA �cur Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards 6& 7 Z7 � ��; �-�o �� GREEN SHEET NO. 1�0437 INRIAVDATE INRIA�iT]GTF � DEPARTTAEM DIRECTOR FOR �CfTVATTORNEV O BUDGET DIRECTOR � MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) ❑ CITY CqUNCIL ❑ CfTY CLERK � ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES �I0. � Council Research RGWMMENDATIONS:Approv¢(A)O�R¢j2tt(R) ' p�RSONALSER;ICECOMRACTSMUSTANSWERTHEFOLLOWiNGQUESTIONS: _PLANNINGCOMMI$$ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION " � Hd51hi5person/fiRneVEfwofkedUndefaCOntfdClfo�thl5departmEnt? CIBCAMMITfEE YES NO — 2. Has ihis persoNfirtn ever been a ciry employee? A �pFF _ YES NO _DISTRICT CAUNQL 3. Does Mis person/firtn possess a sldll not nortnaly possessed by any current city employee? YES NO SUPPORTS WHICH CWNCIL OBJECfIVE? Explain ali yes answers on separete sheet anA attach to green sheet WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WH1�: The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade.materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. ADVANTAGESIF The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, wili generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replace Ce �yei�l�a�s i�� `fpt� �i e3. fLMoi iOTAL AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ J 4� JVL � LV COSLREVENUE BUDCaETED (CIHCLE ONE) YES No FUNDMGSOURCE O7-M-0672 A . Ph{� = ia,oao pCINITYNUMBER ' C01-2T754-0784-00000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:(EXPLAIN) • � ,,,�..._.�.....�,.-..,---.,..._..,.... - _% 0 �-�1�1 SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATIONS Wazd 7 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Forest St. to Cypress St. L�O' O�C� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public fJ 0 necessiry on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphait patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT.• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MARGARET ST. from Johnson Pkwy. to Clazence St. INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public ��,,�� necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennard St. to Flandrau St. �( D� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. THII2D ST. from N. White Beaz Ave. to N. � l� Aazel St. INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint, a petition with one (1) signer, and an inspection of the walk. �1- �� -Z- EXISTING CONDITIONS: Tlus walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt patches, reverse slope, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. a � _ �'�'� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMNIENDATION Wazd 6 PRO.IECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. E. MINNEHAHA AVE. from Kennazd St. to Flandrau St. s � �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was uutiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of thirteen (13) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, setded, cracked, and uneven panels. CITY OF ST. PAUL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. C��— SFIY Ol, i By File No.SO 078,501 82,501110,501114 501129 Voting Ward_ 6 & 7 In tha Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501078 - Both sides Margaret Street from Forest Street to Cypress Street. 501082 - South side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. SO1110 - Both sicles Margaret Street from Johnson Parkway to Clarence Street. 501114 - North side East Minnehaha Avenue from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. 501129 - Both sides East Third Street from North White Bear Avenue to North Hazel Street. 0 o�-��y o�-s�� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approrimately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. NNLTI-RE5IDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100o of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. E G That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 27 dav of June, 200I 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �enanav �lakey ✓BOStrom ✓Coleman ✓Harris �/Lantry �Reiter � In Favor � Against Adopted by Council: Date�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary BY� �-� 1� � ° i �� Mayor