Loading...
01-356CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAI, ORDER 02lGi�lAL cotmrc E o. D/— By File No. 5010 4 Voting Ward 2 2a the Mattar of sidevralk reconstruction at the followissg locations: 501004 - Both sides West Baker Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. (Laid over from March 28, 2001.) *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �J RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruetion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a creclit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESZDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommenc�Fations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey ,�$ostrom Abst.i,# cOleman �t-Iarris �� —Lantry �eiter S In Favor �_Against a +�-bse�.t Adopted by Council: Date f�ltL�-� \ 3-�0\ --i Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor P�� - Sidewalk Division 5E1' PL`�tIG H�It�f OTAL � OF SMaNANPE PAGES GREEN BUDGET DIflECTOR MAYOF (OftA$$ISTAN() ��'� Z-z�'o��� NO. �'QF ET �Nmwonre _ ❑crtrcoun�ca _ ❑CRYCIERK __ ❑ FlN.B MGT. SERNCES DI0. _ Oj Council Research \GTIONRE9UESTED �,r � �� �� OV�.( ,(] �r re { • r 3econsfruct Sidewalk & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2& 7 �'� {+ ��(� r��1 //��� � ' W�� T�I� sal1Y�� C�t�E.��S ��100'1� 5D1 ��`� �ECOwrnErvDAnons nppm�a (a) or Re�ect (tc) pERSONAL SEHYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER iHE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNINGCAMMISSION CIVILSERVICECAMMISSION 7. Ha5Ni5p8�S0�rtI1C`/O�W�fkeduMEfdCAn[2CI — — YES NO CIB COMMfTTEE __ 2 Has Mis persoNRrtn ever been a ary employee? A �� — YES NO 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? qsiqipcouNCa � YES NO SUaPOFrrS wwCH CAUNCiL OBJECnvEY FxP�ain aIl yes answers on separote sheet and attech to green sheet VITIATING PflOBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WFiV): The problem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect �ree sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk ' contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. I APPROVED: Historically, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPROVE6. This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure ofi larger doliar amounts in repairs and replacement, as we11 as ctaim payouts. SIGNATURE) fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N$ t76 316 •g� COSTlREVENUE6UDGETED(CIRCLE FUNDINGSOURCE ol-rt-o672 A . P�A � 6����0� ACINfTYNUMBER C'�i FINANC�ALINFOflMAT10N:(EXPIAIN) 6� AST = 380,000 NO CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAI, ORDER 02lGi�lAL cotmrc E o. D/— By File No. 5010 4 Voting Ward 2 2a the Mattar of sidevralk reconstruction at the followissg locations: 501004 - Both sides West Baker Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. (Laid over from March 28, 2001.) *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �J RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruetion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a creclit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESZDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommenc�Fations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey ,�$ostrom Abst.i,# cOleman �t-Iarris �� —Lantry �eiter S In Favor �_Against a +�-bse�.t Adopted by Council: Date f�ltL�-� \ 3-�0\ --i Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor P�� - Sidewalk Division 5E1' PL`�tIG H�It�f OTAL � OF SMaNANPE PAGES GREEN BUDGET DIflECTOR MAYOF (OftA$$ISTAN() ��'� Z-z�'o��� NO. �'QF ET �Nmwonre _ ❑crtrcoun�ca _ ❑CRYCIERK __ ❑ FlN.B MGT. SERNCES DI0. _ Oj Council Research \GTIONRE9UESTED �,r � �� �� OV�.( ,(] �r re { • r 3econsfruct Sidewalk & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2& 7 �'� {+ ��(� r��1 //��� � ' W�� T�I� sal1Y�� C�t�E.��S ��100'1� 5D1 ��`� �ECOwrnErvDAnons nppm�a (a) or Re�ect (tc) pERSONAL SEHYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER iHE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNINGCAMMISSION CIVILSERVICECAMMISSION 7. Ha5Ni5p8�S0�rtI1C`/O�W�fkeduMEfdCAn[2CI — — YES NO CIB COMMfTTEE __ 2 Has Mis persoNRrtn ever been a ary employee? A �� — YES NO 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? qsiqipcouNCa � YES NO SUaPOFrrS wwCH CAUNCiL OBJECnvEY FxP�ain aIl yes answers on separote sheet and attech to green sheet VITIATING PflOBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WFiV): The problem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect �ree sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk ' contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. I APPROVED: Historically, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPROVE6. This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure ofi larger doliar amounts in repairs and replacement, as we11 as ctaim payouts. SIGNATURE) fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N$ t76 316 •g� COSTlREVENUE6UDGETED(CIRCLE FUNDINGSOURCE ol-rt-o672 A . P�A � 6����0� ACINfTYNUMBER C'�i FINANC�ALINFOflMAT10N:(EXPIAIN) 6� AST = 380,000 NO CITY OF ST. PAIIL FINAI, ORDER 02lGi�lAL cotmrc E o. D/— By File No. 5010 4 Voting Ward 2 2a the Mattar of sidevralk reconstruction at the followissg locations: 501004 - Both sides West Baker Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. (Laid over from March 28, 2001.) *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES �J RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruetion (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New coastruction (where no walk existed) - 100% of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a creclit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESZDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order approved The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommenc�Fations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all e�cpenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav ✓�lakey ,�$ostrom Abst.i,# cOleman �t-Iarris �� —Lantry �eiter S In Favor �_Against a +�-bse�.t Adopted by Council: Date f�ltL�-� \ 3-�0\ --i Certified Passed by Council Secretary By Mayor P�� - Sidewalk Division 5E1' PL`�tIG H�It�f OTAL � OF SMaNANPE PAGES GREEN BUDGET DIflECTOR MAYOF (OftA$$ISTAN() ��'� Z-z�'o��� NO. �'QF ET �Nmwonre _ ❑crtrcoun�ca _ ❑CRYCIERK __ ❑ FlN.B MGT. SERNCES DI0. _ Oj Council Research \GTIONRE9UESTED �,r � �� �� OV�.( ,(] �r re { • r 3econsfruct Sidewalk & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2& 7 �'� {+ ��(� r��1 //��� � ' W�� T�I� sal1Y�� C�t�E.��S ��100'1� 5D1 ��`� �ECOwrnErvDAnons nppm�a (a) or Re�ect (tc) pERSONAL SEHYICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER iHE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: PIANNINGCAMMISSION CIVILSERVICECAMMISSION 7. Ha5Ni5p8�S0�rtI1C`/O�W�fkeduMEfdCAn[2CI — — YES NO CIB COMMfTTEE __ 2 Has Mis persoNRrtn ever been a ary employee? A �� — YES NO 3. Does this perso�rtn possess a skill not nortnally possessed by any curtent city employee? qsiqipcouNCa � YES NO SUaPOFrrS wwCH CAUNCiL OBJECnvEY FxP�ain aIl yes answers on separote sheet and attech to green sheet VITIATING PflOBIEM, ISSUE, OPPORTUNITY (WHO. WHAT, WHEN, WHERE. WFiV): The problem "defective sidewaik" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annualiy. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition wouid worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect �ree sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk ' contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. I APPROVED: Historically, the sidewaik reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. IF NOT APPROVE6. This option wouid ailow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure ofi larger doliar amounts in repairs and replacement, as we11 as ctaim payouts. SIGNATURE) fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSAC710N$ t76 316 •g� COSTlREVENUE6UDGETED(CIRCLE FUNDINGSOURCE ol-rt-o672 A . P�A � 6����0� ACINfTYNUMBER C'�i FINANC�ALINFOflMAT10N:(EXPIAIN) 6� AST = 380,000 NO