Loading...
01-326� �����e� CITY OF 5T. PAUL FINAL ORDER t?`:e�;-�i�`9���_ �-Z�/.�/ G COUNCIL FILE NO. ��� 3 �G `OJ By I� File No. 01004 01018 Voting Ward_2 & 7 . In the Matter ot sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: �J iQ — �d �`� ai 501005 - Both sides West Curtice Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Sttreet. 501006 - Both Sides West King Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501007 - Both Sides Manomin Avenue from West Annapolis Street to West Page Street. 501008 - Both Sides Manomin Avenue from West Page Street to West George Street. 501009 - Both Sides Morton Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501010 - Both sides Orleans Street from West Page Street to West George Street. 501011 - Both Sides West Page Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501012 - Both sides West Sidney Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501013 - Both sides West Stevens Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501014 - Both sides West Winona Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501015 - North side West Wyoming Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501016 - North side Euclid Street from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 501017 - Both sides East Fourth Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. & West side Flandrau Street from Fremont Avenue to East Fourth Street. 501018 - Both sides Fremont Avenue from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 0�.3>4 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6� foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existedl - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order � �� sZ �y approved M..� �1 �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav /Blakey �ostrom ✓C�oleman ✓f-Iarris �/f, ntry yl�eiter Adopted by Council : Date __�•...J�a�_ e�c1C � Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By a" �� �Against — �2 � Mayor 7�� / o� - �2-� STJMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. W. BAKER ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 oI � INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITlONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, lsphalt patches, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. ..................................................................................................... PROILCT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. CURTICE ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 0l � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, sc�led, settled, and cracked panels. ................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDE'WALK B,S. W. KING ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MANOMIN AVE. from W. Annapolis St. to � A^n W. Page St. W� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. o� -�z� -2- EXI5TCN CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ........................................................................................................ PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIAEWALK B.S. MANOMIN AVE. from W. Page St, to W. George St. �I � INITIATINC ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ........................................................................................................ PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. MORTON ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDlTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt gatches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK B.S. ORLEANS ST. from W. Page St. to W. George St. 501 O) O INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity oa the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROJ�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. PAGE ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 OIOI 1 lNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. � � -'� a�- -3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, offgrade, �sphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. SIDNEY ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 0 ' � (NITIATING ACTIOlJ: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public Z necessity on the basis of seven (7) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTIIVG CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven pane]s. ......................................................................................................... 501ql3 PRDIECT• RECONSTRIICT SIDEWALK B.5. W. STEVENS 5T. from S. Smith ave, to Ohio St. IN/TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ............................................................................... . ......................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. WINONA ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio 5t. �� nl� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as pubilc V necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection oF the walk. EXISTING CONDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, scaled, setCled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... S01015 PROTECT• R�CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. WYOMING ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. o�.,�a� � EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... o � .aa� 5UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 PRO/ECT• CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK N.S. EUCLID 5T. from Flndrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. �O� O� � INITlATING ACTCON: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COND TIONS: This walk is first time construction. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FOURTH ST. from Kennard St. to Flandrau St. & W.S. FLANDRAU ST. from Fremont Ave. to E. Fourth St. 5 01 O� �] INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public � necessiCy on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... Pp0 ECT• RECONST,RUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FREMONT AVE. from Flandrau St, to N. White Bear Ave. �� O�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, cracked, and uneven panels, ........................................................................................................ r v � � �IIT� llC�` ��L DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL Public W orks - S(dewalk � CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE Jerry 7vedt (266-6087) MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE) � ��' WBUC HE� N6' Oi� Yl'Ih TOTALMOFSIQNATUflEPAOES _. I�-� �. /.s� v� a I REEN SHEET_ ' NO. 102773 SIGNATUHE) I� DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR !� CITY ATTORNEV I� BUDGET DIRECTOR I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) I IASSOCIHTE ❑ CITV COUNCIL ❑ CRY CLERK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES Dip Qj Council Research I I DEPT. ACCOkI' A Sidewalk & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2& 7 4 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OBIECTIVE7 PR06lEM,ISSUE. PERSONAL SERVICE CON7pAC7S MUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUES710N5: i. Has ihis person/firfn everworked undera contract torthis depaRment7 - YES NO 2. Has Ihis pereon/firm ever been a city employee? VES- NO 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answera orl separete sheet and Qttach to gre9n sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk Condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fa!!s and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmen�t,i,g���y subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiat issue. e „�,�C� -"' �,pUt��E1 ���� ��+� �� � �0� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wfiich in tum, will generate more persona! injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION JQSOURCE O� �M"O AL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) ,000 ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE NUM9ER C01-2T75 NO Q 1 � � ��- CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER � `..� i �..; s f'�:' /� L COUNCI FILE 0. O�"a.I� BY _a�J �� -,�_ � � File No. _501004 - 501018 Voting Ward_ 2 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 501004 - Both sides West Baker Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501005 - Both sides West Curtice Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501006 - Both sides West King Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501007 - Soth sides Manomin Avenue from West Annapolis Street to West Page S�reet. 501008 - Both sicles Manomin Avenue from West Page Street to West George Street. 501009 - Aoth sides West Morton Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501010 - IIoth sides Orleans Street from West Page Street to West George Street. 501011 - Both sides West Page Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501012 - Doth sides West Sidney Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501013 - Both sides WesC Stevens Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501014 - Both sides West Winona Street from Sou�h Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501015 - North side West Wyoming Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501016 - North side Euclid Street from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 501017 - Both sides East Fourth Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street & West side Flandrau Sttreet from Fremont Avenue to East Fourth Street. 50101II - Both sides Fremont Avenue from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. �� �3a6 ��������� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o�-s��! RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walJc existed) - 100� oE the ac�ual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. R11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately 56.09 per square £oot. The Counail of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the'above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of' the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓'�enanav v'�3lakey «''f3� strom 1/C'oleman aq�.,� Harris s�antry �Keiter � In Favor �Against � ,�„ �ew� Adopted by Council: Date �__r�� r10<D` Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` ` Mayor � �����e� CITY OF 5T. PAUL FINAL ORDER t?`:e�;-�i�`9���_ �-Z�/.�/ G COUNCIL FILE NO. ��� 3 �G `OJ By I� File No. 01004 01018 Voting Ward_2 & 7 . In the Matter ot sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: �J iQ — �d �`� ai 501005 - Both sides West Curtice Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Sttreet. 501006 - Both Sides West King Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501007 - Both Sides Manomin Avenue from West Annapolis Street to West Page Street. 501008 - Both Sides Manomin Avenue from West Page Street to West George Street. 501009 - Both Sides Morton Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501010 - Both sides Orleans Street from West Page Street to West George Street. 501011 - Both Sides West Page Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501012 - Both sides West Sidney Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501013 - Both sides West Stevens Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501014 - Both sides West Winona Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501015 - North side West Wyoming Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501016 - North side Euclid Street from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 501017 - Both sides East Fourth Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. & West side Flandrau Street from Fremont Avenue to East Fourth Street. 501018 - Both sides Fremont Avenue from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 0�.3>4 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6� foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existedl - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order � �� sZ �y approved M..� �1 �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav /Blakey �ostrom ✓C�oleman ✓f-Iarris �/f, ntry yl�eiter Adopted by Council : Date __�•...J�a�_ e�c1C � Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By a" �� �Against — �2 � Mayor 7�� / o� - �2-� STJMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. W. BAKER ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 oI � INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITlONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, lsphalt patches, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. ..................................................................................................... PROILCT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. CURTICE ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 0l � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, sc�led, settled, and cracked panels. ................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDE'WALK B,S. W. KING ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MANOMIN AVE. from W. Annapolis St. to � A^n W. Page St. W� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. o� -�z� -2- EXI5TCN CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ........................................................................................................ PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIAEWALK B.S. MANOMIN AVE. from W. Page St, to W. George St. �I � INITIATINC ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ........................................................................................................ PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. MORTON ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDlTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt gatches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK B.S. ORLEANS ST. from W. Page St. to W. George St. 501 O) O INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity oa the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROJ�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. PAGE ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 OIOI 1 lNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. � � -'� a�- -3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, offgrade, �sphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. SIDNEY ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 0 ' � (NITIATING ACTIOlJ: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public Z necessity on the basis of seven (7) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTIIVG CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven pane]s. ......................................................................................................... 501ql3 PRDIECT• RECONSTRIICT SIDEWALK B.5. W. STEVENS 5T. from S. Smith ave, to Ohio St. IN/TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ............................................................................... . ......................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. WINONA ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio 5t. �� nl� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as pubilc V necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection oF the walk. EXISTING CONDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, scaled, setCled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... S01015 PROTECT• R�CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. WYOMING ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. o�.,�a� � EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... o � .aa� 5UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 PRO/ECT• CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK N.S. EUCLID 5T. from Flndrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. �O� O� � INITlATING ACTCON: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COND TIONS: This walk is first time construction. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FOURTH ST. from Kennard St. to Flandrau St. & W.S. FLANDRAU ST. from Fremont Ave. to E. Fourth St. 5 01 O� �] INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public � necessiCy on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... Pp0 ECT• RECONST,RUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FREMONT AVE. from Flandrau St, to N. White Bear Ave. �� O�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, cracked, and uneven panels, ........................................................................................................ r v � � �IIT� llC�` ��L DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL Public W orks - S(dewalk � CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE Jerry 7vedt (266-6087) MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE) � ��' WBUC HE� N6' Oi� Yl'Ih TOTALMOFSIQNATUflEPAOES _. I�-� �. /.s� v� a I REEN SHEET_ ' NO. 102773 SIGNATUHE) I� DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR !� CITY ATTORNEV I� BUDGET DIRECTOR I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) I IASSOCIHTE ❑ CITV COUNCIL ❑ CRY CLERK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES Dip Qj Council Research I I DEPT. ACCOkI' A Sidewalk & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2& 7 4 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OBIECTIVE7 PR06lEM,ISSUE. PERSONAL SERVICE CON7pAC7S MUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUES710N5: i. Has ihis person/firfn everworked undera contract torthis depaRment7 - YES NO 2. Has Ihis pereon/firm ever been a city employee? VES- NO 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answera orl separete sheet and Qttach to gre9n sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk Condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fa!!s and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmen�t,i,g���y subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiat issue. e „�,�C� -"' �,pUt��E1 ���� ��+� �� � �0� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wfiich in tum, will generate more persona! injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION JQSOURCE O� �M"O AL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) ,000 ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE NUM9ER C01-2T75 NO Q 1 � � ��- CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER � `..� i �..; s f'�:' /� L COUNCI FILE 0. O�"a.I� BY _a�J �� -,�_ � � File No. _501004 - 501018 Voting Ward_ 2 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 501004 - Both sides West Baker Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501005 - Both sides West Curtice Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501006 - Both sides West King Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501007 - Soth sides Manomin Avenue from West Annapolis Street to West Page S�reet. 501008 - Both sicles Manomin Avenue from West Page Street to West George Street. 501009 - Aoth sides West Morton Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501010 - IIoth sides Orleans Street from West Page Street to West George Street. 501011 - Both sides West Page Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501012 - Doth sides West Sidney Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501013 - Both sides WesC Stevens Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501014 - Both sides West Winona Street from Sou�h Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501015 - North side West Wyoming Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501016 - North side Euclid Street from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 501017 - Both sides East Fourth Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street & West side Flandrau Sttreet from Fremont Avenue to East Fourth Street. 50101II - Both sides Fremont Avenue from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. �� �3a6 ��������� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o�-s��! RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walJc existed) - 100� oE the ac�ual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. R11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately 56.09 per square £oot. The Counail of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the'above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of' the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓'�enanav v'�3lakey «''f3� strom 1/C'oleman aq�.,� Harris s�antry �Keiter � In Favor �Against � ,�„ �ew� Adopted by Council: Date �__r�� r10<D` Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` ` Mayor � �����e� CITY OF 5T. PAUL FINAL ORDER t?`:e�;-�i�`9���_ �-Z�/.�/ G COUNCIL FILE NO. ��� 3 �G `OJ By I� File No. 01004 01018 Voting Ward_2 & 7 . In the Matter ot sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: �J iQ — �d �`� ai 501005 - Both sides West Curtice Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Sttreet. 501006 - Both Sides West King Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501007 - Both Sides Manomin Avenue from West Annapolis Street to West Page Street. 501008 - Both Sides Manomin Avenue from West Page Street to West George Street. 501009 - Both Sides Morton Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501010 - Both sides Orleans Street from West Page Street to West George Street. 501011 - Both Sides West Page Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501012 - Both sides West Sidney Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501013 - Both sides West Stevens Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501014 - Both sides West Winona Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501015 - North side West Wyoming Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501016 - North side Euclid Street from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 501017 - Both sides East Fourth Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street. & West side Flandrau Street from Fremont Avenue to East Fourth Street. 501018 - Both sides Fremont Avenue from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 0�.3>4 *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATE5 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6� foot wide walk. Al1 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existedl - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order � �� sZ �y approved M..� �1 �� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓Benanav /Blakey �ostrom ✓C�oleman ✓f-Iarris �/f, ntry yl�eiter Adopted by Council : Date __�•...J�a�_ e�c1C � Certified Passed by Council Secretary � In Favor By a" �� �Against — �2 � Mayor 7�� / o� - �2-� STJMMAI2Y OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. W. BAKER ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 oI � INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of five (5) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITlONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, lsphalt patches, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. ..................................................................................................... PROILCT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. CURTICE ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 0l � INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, sc�led, settled, and cracked panels. ................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDE'WALK B,S. W. KING ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the waik. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MANOMIN AVE. from W. Annapolis St. to � A^n W. Page St. W� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of three (3) complaints and an inspection of the walk. o� -�z� -2- EXI5TCN CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ........................................................................................................ PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIAEWALK B.S. MANOMIN AVE. from W. Page St, to W. George St. �I � INITIATINC ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of six (6) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ........................................................................................................ PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. MORTON ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of two (2) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDlTIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, water pockets, asphalt gatches, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK B.S. ORLEANS ST. from W. Page St. to W. George St. 501 O) O INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity oa the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROJ�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. PAGE ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 OIOI 1 lNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of four (4) complaints and an inspection of the walk. � � -'� a�- -3 - EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, offgrade, �sphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. SIDNEY ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. 5 0 ' � (NITIATING ACTIOlJ: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public Z necessity on the basis of seven (7) complaints and an inspection of the walk. EXISTIIVG CONDITIDNS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, settled, cracked, and uneven pane]s. ......................................................................................................... 501ql3 PRDIECT• RECONSTRIICT SIDEWALK B.5. W. STEVENS 5T. from S. Smith ave, to Ohio St. IN/TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ............................................................................... . ......................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. W. WINONA ST. from S. Smith Ave. to Ohio 5t. �� nl� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Pubiic Works as pubilc V necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection oF the walk. EXISTING CONDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, scaled, setCled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... S01015 PROTECT• R�CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. W. WYOMING ST. from 5. Smith Ave. to Ohio St. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as pubiic necessity on the basis of an inspection of the walk. o�.,�a� � EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, reverse slope, scaled, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... o � .aa� 5UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 7 PRO/ECT• CONSTRUCT NEW SIDEWALK N.S. EUCLID 5T. from Flndrau St. to N. White Bear Ave. �O� O� � INITlATING ACTCON: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on an inspection of the walk. EXISTING COND TIONS: This walk is first time construction. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. E. FOURTH ST. from Kennard St. to Flandrau St. & W.S. FLANDRAU ST. from Fremont Ave. to E. Fourth St. 5 01 O� �] INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public works as public � necessiCy on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, asphalt patches, scaled, settled, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... Pp0 ECT• RECONST,RUCT SIDEWALK B.S. FREMONT AVE. from Flandrau St, to N. White Bear Ave. �� O�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the Director of Public Works as public necessity on the basis of one (1) complaint and an inspection of the walk. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaves, cracked, and uneven panels, ........................................................................................................ r v � � �IIT� llC�` ��L DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL Public W orks - S(dewalk � CONTACT PERSON 8 PHONE Jerry 7vedt (266-6087) MUSTBEONCOUNCILAGENDABV(DATE) � ��' WBUC HE� N6' Oi� Yl'Ih TOTALMOFSIQNATUflEPAOES _. I�-� �. /.s� v� a I REEN SHEET_ ' NO. 102773 SIGNATUHE) I� DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR !� CITY ATTORNEV I� BUDGET DIRECTOR I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) I IASSOCIHTE ❑ CITV COUNCIL ❑ CRY CLERK ❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES Dip Qj Council Research I I DEPT. ACCOkI' A Sidewalk & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 2& 7 4 CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION OBIECTIVE7 PR06lEM,ISSUE. PERSONAL SERVICE CON7pAC7S MUS7 ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUES710N5: i. Has ihis person/firfn everworked undera contract torthis depaRment7 - YES NO 2. Has Ihis pereon/firm ever been a city employee? VES- NO 3. Does this person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee? YES NO Explain all yes answera orl separete sheet and Qttach to gre9n sheet The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materiais, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk Condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from fa!!s and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmen�t,i,g���y subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversiat issue. e „�,�C� -"' �,pUt��E1 ���� ��+� �� � �0� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, wfiich in tum, will generate more persona! injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger doliar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION JQSOURCE O� �M"O AL INFORMATION: (E%PLAIN) ,000 ENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE NUM9ER C01-2T75 NO Q 1 � � ��- CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER � `..� i �..; s f'�:' /� L COUNCI FILE 0. O�"a.I� BY _a�J �� -,�_ � � File No. _501004 - 501018 Voting Ward_ 2 & 7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 501004 - Both sides West Baker Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501005 - Both sides West Curtice Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501006 - Both sides West King Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501007 - Soth sides Manomin Avenue from West Annapolis Street to West Page S�reet. 501008 - Both sicles Manomin Avenue from West Page Street to West George Street. 501009 - Aoth sides West Morton Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501010 - IIoth sides Orleans Street from West Page Street to West George Street. 501011 - Both sides West Page Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501012 - Doth sides West Sidney Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501013 - Both sides WesC Stevens Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501014 - Both sides West Winona Street from Sou�h Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501015 - North side West Wyoming Street from South Smith Avenue to Ohio Street. 501016 - North side Euclid Street from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. 501017 - Both sides East Fourth Street from Kennard Street to Flandrau Street & West side Flandrau Sttreet from Fremont Avenue to East Fourth Street. 50101II - Both sides Fremont Avenue from Flandrau Street to North White Bear Avenue. �� �3a6 ��������� *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o�-s��! RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walJc existed) - 100� oE the ac�ual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. R11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately 56.09 per square £oot. The Counail of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the'above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of' the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays ✓'�enanav v'�3lakey «''f3� strom 1/C'oleman aq�.,� Harris s�antry �Keiter � In Favor �Against � ,�„ �ew� Adopted by Council: Date �__r�� r10<D` Certified Passed by Council Secretary ` ` Mayor