Loading...
01-325CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. ��"� 01S 4� FINAL ORDER j ,{' f By + File No. _501003 I��l�:�ic���r�. Voting Ward_4,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: (See Attached) *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) ReconBtruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. ISaw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structiures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order d`� 0 approved �.a�'�_�w�OO� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Xeas Nays ✓ Benanav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ✓ Harris ,i Lantry ,/ Reiter Adopted by Council: DateL� /�/�� � Certified Passed by Council SeCretary �In Favor By ��,� �d•__,_���„�,n.�..�„�-- �Against Mayor / '! v� �U�U(. �1 �1�� - ; � z� �EPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL ' Public Works - Sidewalk Divlsion � ;T PERSON & PHONE Tvedt (266•608 OF SIONATURE PAOE6 Z o�.3as* NO. 102772 INITIAL/DATE ❑ CITY COUNqL ❑ CITV CLEflK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. �j Council Research I I DEP7 ACC � ANT. _. _ ,_ � � � . PTEINRIATED �� I •2s-o, GREEN SHEET INITIAVDATE I� DEPAR7MENT DIRECTOR ASSI6N qTYATfORNEV �(� NUMBEH FOR I� 9Y(DATE� J C �y� I� V OHDEFG ��BUDGETDIRECTOR F WIlFR�FI `JT.�7CN�I I�MAVOR(ORASSISTANn (CLIP ALl LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Sidewa{k in W ards 4, 5, B& 7 MMENDATION9: Appmve (A) or Fe�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS: PlANNINO GOMMISSION CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1, Has ihis persoNfvm ever worked untler a contractfor this deparlment? � — YES NQ CIB COMMIT7EE _ 2 Has this pe(SOn(fiml EVef been a City eRIplOyee? STAFF _ VES NO 3. Doesthis personliirm posSess a skill not normaly possessed byany current ciry employee7 UISTRICTCOUNC�L _ VES NO" JATS WHICHCOUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 �Explaln all yes answers on separate sheot and attach to green sheet �TINQ ROBLEM, I SU , OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHA7. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewatk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and cprrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state Where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. The coinmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewa{ks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sectorjobs as a resuit. DISADVANTAOES IF Hi9torically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assess�a��LQ� City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �Gh �������� ��� �1 � '�°��� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNi OF TRANSACTION $ 5� 9� .�� COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE� J�SOURCE OO^M^O6]� A. PIA OO R LO�OOO p��NITYNUMBER C00-2T753-077 ALINFORMATION:(EXPUVN) B� AST s 3 S�OOO c, cis oo = 50,000 NO o� -��.s 15:10:19 02-OS-01 PROPERTY ADDRESS...... PROPERTIES IN PROJECT: 501003 - BY PIN PIN ............. STATUS SUBUSE................ 849 IVX AVE E 21-29-22-32-0173 1042 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0004 1026 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0007 1020 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0008 1000 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-�011 1302 FOREST ST 21-29-22-34-0021 1298 FOREST ST 21-29-22-34-0022 1007 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-34-0034 938 ORANGE AVE E 21-29-22-34-0127 1040 HAWTHORNE AVE E 21-29-22-34-0170 1126 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-43-0001 1141 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0020 1079 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0041 1111 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0047 1274 EARL ST 21-29-22-43-0060 1116 ORANGE AVE E 21-29-22-43-0106 1256 EARL ST 21-29-22-43-0116 1116 HAWTHORNE AVE E 21-29-22-43-0133 801 NEBRASKA AVE W 23-29-23-13-0092 868 IOWA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0022 920 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0057 934 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0060 993 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-21-0135 885 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0184 1008 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-22-0061 1077 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-22-0121 1016 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-23-0045 1020 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-23-0046 1548 VICTORIA ST N 23-29-23-24-0010 1476 VICTORIA ST N 23-29-23-24-0028 927 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0039 915 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0042 911 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0043 914 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0052 910 NEVADA AVE W 23-29-23-2A-0090 963 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0120 44 MAYWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0048 40 MAYWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0049 45 M}1YWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0062 865 CLAYLAND ST 28-29-23-31-0071 861 CLAYLAND ST 28-29-23-31-0�72 1837 HEW2TT AVE 28-29-23-31-0094 1671 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-41-0060 1750 HEWITT AVE 28-29-23-43-0012 1757 ENGLEWOOD AVE 28-29-23-43-0097 1755 ENGLEWOOD AVE 28-29-23-43-0098 1701 ENGLEWOOP AVE 28-29-23-43-0169 1690 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-49-0034 1694 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-44-0035 Sidewalk reconstruCtion at various locations SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE PAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 'SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 5INGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 5INGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SII3GLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX in Wards 4, 5, 6& 7 PAGE 1 AREA(SQFT) 7,560 7,920 7,260 7,260 7,260 3,920 3,920 7,656 6,000 7,260 12,100 5,000 5,885 7,260 5,000 6,300 5,000 5,929 8,742 4,800 6,834 6,834 6,200 6,193 7,250 5,355 7,050 7,050 10,000 12,600 6,850 6,900 6,900 7,000 7,560 6,400 7,812 12,410 7,120 6,580 6,580 6,160 8�460 10,443 5,000 5,240 5,779 4,800 4,800 (Waiver Sites.) Ot- 15:10:19 02-08-01 PROPERTY ADDRESS...... 1691 ENGLEWOOD AVE 774 6TH ST E 2094 TEMPLE CT 52 records listed. PROPERTIES IN PROJECT: 501003 - BX PIN PIN ............. STATUS 5UBUSE................... 28-29-23-44-0109 DOUBLE DWELLING 32-29-22-19-0045 DUPLEX 32-29-23-41-0091 SINGLE FAMILX PAGE 2 AREA(SQFT) 7,598 6,360 5,720 Sidewalk reconstruction at various locations in Wards 4, 5, 6& 7. (Waiver Sites.) a1-33-s' SUIYIMARY OF ENGTNEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 4 PROIECT: RECDNSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CLAYLAND ST. from Hewitt Ave. to Taylor Ave. at 861 & 865 Clayland St. Only & N.S. HEWITT AVE. from Clayland St. to N. 5 O � rn'f j Fairview Ave. at 1837 Hewitt Ave. Only. ��ii INITlATLNG ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. ,eXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concre[e with tree heaved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRDIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. TEMPLE CT. from N. Finn St. to N. Cleve- land Ave. at 2094 Temple Ct. Only. S��O� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the propercy owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o � - � a.s' SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 PRDIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. NEVADA AVE. from N. Milton St. to N. Victoria St. at 910 W. Nevada Ave.Only. �� INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with setded panels. ......................................................................................................... PRDIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MAYWOOD PL. from W. Jessamine Ave, to W. Jessamine Ave. at 40, 44 & 45 Maywood Pl. Only. �a �� INCTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the propeRy owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ....................................................................................................... o�- 3 a-S SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION 1�. ,�i.`JII PROT�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALX S.S. E. SIXTH ST. from Eichenwald St. to Hope 5t. at 774 E. Sixth St. Only. 5 o(W� INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. ��"� 01S 4� FINAL ORDER j ,{' f By + File No. _501003 I��l�:�ic���r�. Voting Ward_4,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: (See Attached) *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) ReconBtruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. ISaw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structiures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order d`� 0 approved �.a�'�_�w�OO� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Xeas Nays ✓ Benanav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ✓ Harris ,i Lantry ,/ Reiter Adopted by Council: DateL� /�/�� � Certified Passed by Council SeCretary �In Favor By ��,� �d•__,_���„�,n.�..�„�-- �Against Mayor / '! v� �U�U(. �1 �1�� - ; � z� �EPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL ' Public Works - Sidewalk Divlsion � ;T PERSON & PHONE Tvedt (266•608 OF SIONATURE PAOE6 Z o�.3as* NO. 102772 INITIAL/DATE ❑ CITY COUNqL ❑ CITV CLEflK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. �j Council Research I I DEP7 ACC � ANT. _. _ ,_ � � � . PTEINRIATED �� I •2s-o, GREEN SHEET INITIAVDATE I� DEPAR7MENT DIRECTOR ASSI6N qTYATfORNEV �(� NUMBEH FOR I� 9Y(DATE� J C �y� I� V OHDEFG ��BUDGETDIRECTOR F WIlFR�FI `JT.�7CN�I I�MAVOR(ORASSISTANn (CLIP ALl LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Sidewa{k in W ards 4, 5, B& 7 MMENDATION9: Appmve (A) or Fe�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS: PlANNINO GOMMISSION CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1, Has ihis persoNfvm ever worked untler a contractfor this deparlment? � — YES NQ CIB COMMIT7EE _ 2 Has this pe(SOn(fiml EVef been a City eRIplOyee? STAFF _ VES NO 3. Doesthis personliirm posSess a skill not normaly possessed byany current ciry employee7 UISTRICTCOUNC�L _ VES NO" JATS WHICHCOUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 �Explaln all yes answers on separate sheot and attach to green sheet �TINQ ROBLEM, I SU , OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHA7. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewatk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and cprrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state Where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. The coinmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewa{ks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sectorjobs as a resuit. DISADVANTAOES IF Hi9torically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assess�a��LQ� City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �Gh �������� ��� �1 � '�°��� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNi OF TRANSACTION $ 5� 9� .�� COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE� J�SOURCE OO^M^O6]� A. PIA OO R LO�OOO p��NITYNUMBER C00-2T753-077 ALINFORMATION:(EXPUVN) B� AST s 3 S�OOO c, cis oo = 50,000 NO o� -��.s 15:10:19 02-OS-01 PROPERTY ADDRESS...... PROPERTIES IN PROJECT: 501003 - BY PIN PIN ............. STATUS SUBUSE................ 849 IVX AVE E 21-29-22-32-0173 1042 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0004 1026 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0007 1020 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0008 1000 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-�011 1302 FOREST ST 21-29-22-34-0021 1298 FOREST ST 21-29-22-34-0022 1007 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-34-0034 938 ORANGE AVE E 21-29-22-34-0127 1040 HAWTHORNE AVE E 21-29-22-34-0170 1126 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-43-0001 1141 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0020 1079 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0041 1111 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0047 1274 EARL ST 21-29-22-43-0060 1116 ORANGE AVE E 21-29-22-43-0106 1256 EARL ST 21-29-22-43-0116 1116 HAWTHORNE AVE E 21-29-22-43-0133 801 NEBRASKA AVE W 23-29-23-13-0092 868 IOWA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0022 920 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0057 934 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0060 993 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-21-0135 885 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0184 1008 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-22-0061 1077 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-22-0121 1016 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-23-0045 1020 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-23-0046 1548 VICTORIA ST N 23-29-23-24-0010 1476 VICTORIA ST N 23-29-23-24-0028 927 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0039 915 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0042 911 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0043 914 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0052 910 NEVADA AVE W 23-29-23-2A-0090 963 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0120 44 MAYWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0048 40 MAYWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0049 45 M}1YWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0062 865 CLAYLAND ST 28-29-23-31-0071 861 CLAYLAND ST 28-29-23-31-0�72 1837 HEW2TT AVE 28-29-23-31-0094 1671 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-41-0060 1750 HEWITT AVE 28-29-23-43-0012 1757 ENGLEWOOD AVE 28-29-23-43-0097 1755 ENGLEWOOD AVE 28-29-23-43-0098 1701 ENGLEWOOP AVE 28-29-23-43-0169 1690 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-49-0034 1694 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-44-0035 Sidewalk reconstruCtion at various locations SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE PAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 'SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 5INGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 5INGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SII3GLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX in Wards 4, 5, 6& 7 PAGE 1 AREA(SQFT) 7,560 7,920 7,260 7,260 7,260 3,920 3,920 7,656 6,000 7,260 12,100 5,000 5,885 7,260 5,000 6,300 5,000 5,929 8,742 4,800 6,834 6,834 6,200 6,193 7,250 5,355 7,050 7,050 10,000 12,600 6,850 6,900 6,900 7,000 7,560 6,400 7,812 12,410 7,120 6,580 6,580 6,160 8�460 10,443 5,000 5,240 5,779 4,800 4,800 (Waiver Sites.) Ot- 15:10:19 02-08-01 PROPERTY ADDRESS...... 1691 ENGLEWOOD AVE 774 6TH ST E 2094 TEMPLE CT 52 records listed. PROPERTIES IN PROJECT: 501003 - BX PIN PIN ............. STATUS 5UBUSE................... 28-29-23-44-0109 DOUBLE DWELLING 32-29-22-19-0045 DUPLEX 32-29-23-41-0091 SINGLE FAMILX PAGE 2 AREA(SQFT) 7,598 6,360 5,720 Sidewalk reconstruction at various locations in Wards 4, 5, 6& 7. (Waiver Sites.) a1-33-s' SUIYIMARY OF ENGTNEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 4 PROIECT: RECDNSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CLAYLAND ST. from Hewitt Ave. to Taylor Ave. at 861 & 865 Clayland St. Only & N.S. HEWITT AVE. from Clayland St. to N. 5 O � rn'f j Fairview Ave. at 1837 Hewitt Ave. Only. ��ii INITlATLNG ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. ,eXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concre[e with tree heaved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRDIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. TEMPLE CT. from N. Finn St. to N. Cleve- land Ave. at 2094 Temple Ct. Only. S��O� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the propercy owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o � - � a.s' SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 PRDIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. NEVADA AVE. from N. Milton St. to N. Victoria St. at 910 W. Nevada Ave.Only. �� INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with setded panels. ......................................................................................................... PRDIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MAYWOOD PL. from W. Jessamine Ave, to W. Jessamine Ave. at 40, 44 & 45 Maywood Pl. Only. �a �� INCTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the propeRy owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ....................................................................................................... o�- 3 a-S SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION 1�. ,�i.`JII PROT�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALX S.S. E. SIXTH ST. from Eichenwald St. to Hope 5t. at 774 E. Sixth St. Only. 5 o(W� INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope, cracked, and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FILE N0. ��"� 01S 4� FINAL ORDER j ,{' f By + File No. _501003 I��l�:�ic���r�. Voting Ward_4,5,6,7 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: (See Attached) *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) ReconBtruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. ISaw construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structiures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100°s of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order d`� 0 approved �.a�'�_�w�OO� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Xeas Nays ✓ Benanav ✓ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ✓ Harris ,i Lantry ,/ Reiter Adopted by Council: DateL� /�/�� � Certified Passed by Council SeCretary �In Favor By ��,� �d•__,_���„�,n.�..�„�-- �Against Mayor / '! v� �U�U(. �1 �1�� - ; � z� �EPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL ' Public Works - Sidewalk Divlsion � ;T PERSON & PHONE Tvedt (266•608 OF SIONATURE PAOE6 Z o�.3as* NO. 102772 INITIAL/DATE ❑ CITY COUNqL ❑ CITV CLEflK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. �j Council Research I I DEP7 ACC � ANT. _. _ ,_ � � � . PTEINRIATED �� I •2s-o, GREEN SHEET INITIAVDATE I� DEPAR7MENT DIRECTOR ASSI6N qTYATfORNEV �(� NUMBEH FOR I� 9Y(DATE� J C �y� I� V OHDEFG ��BUDGETDIRECTOR F WIlFR�FI `JT.�7CN�I I�MAVOR(ORASSISTANn (CLIP ALl LOCATIONS FOR SIGNATURE) Sidewa{k in W ards 4, 5, B& 7 MMENDATION9: Appmve (A) or Fe�ect (R) PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING DUESTIONS: PlANNINO GOMMISSION CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION 1, Has ihis persoNfvm ever worked untler a contractfor this deparlment? � — YES NQ CIB COMMIT7EE _ 2 Has this pe(SOn(fiml EVef been a City eRIplOyee? STAFF _ VES NO 3. Doesthis personliirm posSess a skill not normaly possessed byany current ciry employee7 UISTRICTCOUNC�L _ VES NO" JATS WHICHCOUNCIL OBJECTIVE7 �Explaln all yes answers on separate sheot and attach to green sheet �TINQ ROBLEM, I SU , OPPORTUNITV (WHO, WHA7. WHEN, WHERE, WHV): The problem "defective sidewatk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and cprrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state Where it would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falis and possible litigations. The coinmunity will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewa{ks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sectorjobs as a resuit. DISADVANTAOES IF Hi9torically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-haif the assess�a��LQ� City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. �Gh �������� ��� �1 � '�°��� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNi OF TRANSACTION $ 5� 9� .�� COSTlREVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE ONE� J�SOURCE OO^M^O6]� A. PIA OO R LO�OOO p��NITYNUMBER C00-2T753-077 ALINFORMATION:(EXPUVN) B� AST s 3 S�OOO c, cis oo = 50,000 NO o� -��.s 15:10:19 02-OS-01 PROPERTY ADDRESS...... PROPERTIES IN PROJECT: 501003 - BY PIN PIN ............. STATUS SUBUSE................ 849 IVX AVE E 21-29-22-32-0173 1042 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0004 1026 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0007 1020 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-0008 1000 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-34-�011 1302 FOREST ST 21-29-22-34-0021 1298 FOREST ST 21-29-22-34-0022 1007 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-34-0034 938 ORANGE AVE E 21-29-22-34-0127 1040 HAWTHORNE AVE E 21-29-22-34-0170 1126 IVY AVE E 21-29-22-43-0001 1141 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0020 1079 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0041 1111 HYACINTH AVE E 21-29-22-43-0047 1274 EARL ST 21-29-22-43-0060 1116 ORANGE AVE E 21-29-22-43-0106 1256 EARL ST 21-29-22-43-0116 1116 HAWTHORNE AVE E 21-29-22-43-0133 801 NEBRASKA AVE W 23-29-23-13-0092 868 IOWA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0022 920 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0057 934 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0060 993 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-21-0135 885 CALIFORNIA AVE W 23-29-23-21-0184 1008 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-22-0061 1077 IDAHO AVE W 23-29-23-22-0121 1016 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-23-0045 1020 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-23-0046 1548 VICTORIA ST N 23-29-23-24-0010 1476 VICTORIA ST N 23-29-23-24-0028 927 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0039 915 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0042 911 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0043 914 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0052 910 NEVADA AVE W 23-29-23-2A-0090 963 MONTANA AVE W 23-29-23-24-0120 44 MAYWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0048 40 MAYWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0049 45 M}1YWOOD PL 26-29-23-11-0062 865 CLAYLAND ST 28-29-23-31-0071 861 CLAYLAND ST 28-29-23-31-0�72 1837 HEW2TT AVE 28-29-23-31-0094 1671 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-41-0060 1750 HEWITT AVE 28-29-23-43-0012 1757 ENGLEWOOD AVE 28-29-23-43-0097 1755 ENGLEWOOD AVE 28-29-23-43-0098 1701 ENGLEWOOP AVE 28-29-23-43-0169 1690 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-49-0034 1694 HEWTTT AVE 28-29-23-44-0035 Sidewalk reconstruCtion at various locations SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE PAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 'SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 5INGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY 5INGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SII3GLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY DUPLEX in Wards 4, 5, 6& 7 PAGE 1 AREA(SQFT) 7,560 7,920 7,260 7,260 7,260 3,920 3,920 7,656 6,000 7,260 12,100 5,000 5,885 7,260 5,000 6,300 5,000 5,929 8,742 4,800 6,834 6,834 6,200 6,193 7,250 5,355 7,050 7,050 10,000 12,600 6,850 6,900 6,900 7,000 7,560 6,400 7,812 12,410 7,120 6,580 6,580 6,160 8�460 10,443 5,000 5,240 5,779 4,800 4,800 (Waiver Sites.) Ot- 15:10:19 02-08-01 PROPERTY ADDRESS...... 1691 ENGLEWOOD AVE 774 6TH ST E 2094 TEMPLE CT 52 records listed. PROPERTIES IN PROJECT: 501003 - BX PIN PIN ............. STATUS 5UBUSE................... 28-29-23-44-0109 DOUBLE DWELLING 32-29-22-19-0045 DUPLEX 32-29-23-41-0091 SINGLE FAMILX PAGE 2 AREA(SQFT) 7,598 6,360 5,720 Sidewalk reconstruction at various locations in Wards 4, 5, 6& 7. (Waiver Sites.) a1-33-s' SUIYIMARY OF ENGTNEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 4 PROIECT: RECDNSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CLAYLAND ST. from Hewitt Ave. to Taylor Ave. at 861 & 865 Clayland St. Only & N.S. HEWITT AVE. from Clayland St. to N. 5 O � rn'f j Fairview Ave. at 1837 Hewitt Ave. Only. ��ii INITlATLNG ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. ,eXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concre[e with tree heaved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRDIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. TEMPLE CT. from N. Finn St. to N. Cleve- land Ave. at 2094 Temple Ct. Only. S��O� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the propercy owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o � - � a.s' SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 PRDIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. NEVADA AVE. from N. Milton St. to N. Victoria St. at 910 W. Nevada Ave.Only. �� INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with setded panels. ......................................................................................................... PRDIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. MAYWOOD PL. from W. Jessamine Ave, to W. Jessamine Ave. at 40, 44 & 45 Maywood Pl. Only. �a �� INCTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the propeRy owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ....................................................................................................... o�- 3 a-S SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION 1�. ,�i.`JII PROT�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALX S.S. E. SIXTH ST. from Eichenwald St. to Hope 5t. at 774 E. Sixth St. Only. 5 o(W� INlTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope, cracked, and uneven panels. .........................................................................................................