The URL can be used to link to this page

01-324�, CTTY OF ST. PAUL i�3� tZ�ti'3Z� COUNCIL FILE NO. O' 3ay (�3 By File o. SO 02 Voti g Ward 1,2,3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the fallowing locatioas: 501002 - 170 Virginia Street, 1661 Lincoln Avenue, 1657 Lincoln Avenue, 1653 Lincoln Avenue, 77 Macalester Street, 774 Delaware Avenue, 210 East Curtice Street, 1981 James Avenue, 1998 James Avenue, 2003 Palace Avenue, 1915 Palace Avenue, 1399 3tanford Avenue, 1439 Berkeley Avenue, 1456 Berkeley Avenue, 1425 Wellesley Avenue, 254 Warwick Street, 412 Warwick Street, 1450 Palace Avenue, 1458 Palace Avenue, 1451 James Avenue, 1025 Bayard Avenue, 1012 Eleanor Avenue, 897 Bayard Avenue, 883 Bayard Avenue, 622 Watson Avenue, 999 Edmund Avenue, 995 Eclmund Avenue, 879 Charles Avenue. 41-3�`} *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstxuctioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the propezty. MIJLTI-RESIDEIVTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� • a�� approved �..,..1��{�a�d� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribecl by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to saicl proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City o£ficers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �/ Benanav �/ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman .� Harris ,i Lantry J Reiter Adopted by Council: Date,��9� /-�Z�o� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �,In Favor By ��_,,� � ^—�e . a- �/ Against Mayor / �� o� -��y SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 RECEIVED �aN 2 g 2oa� RLat L DIVISION PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. CHARLES AVE. from N. Milton St. to N. Victoria St. at 879 Charles Ave. Only. � IJ'��INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTIIVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROICCT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. EDMUND AVB. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. at 995 & 999 Edmund Ave. Only. 5oI �INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled pane]s. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK S.S. SELBY AVE. from Virginia St. to Farrington St. at 170 Virginia St. Only. Sa�ZINITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... o � � 3�y SUMMARY OF ENGIiVEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE, from S. Milton St. Co S. Victoria St. at 883 & 897 Bayard Ave. Only. ,J O��INIT/ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the progerty owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. .......... . .............................................................................................. PROIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to S. Chatsworth St. at ]025 Bayard Ave. Only. 5 o I� INITIATCNG ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. .................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. CURTICE ST. from Mt. Hope Ave. to Harvard St. at 210 E. Curtice St. Only. 5 �I W�INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• XECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. DELAWARE AVE. from W. Sidney St. to W. CurCice St. at 774 Delaware Ave. On3y & N.S. W. CURTICB ST. from Delaware Ave. to !O' � Ave. J INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with scaled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Rogers Ave. to S. Chatsworth St. at 1012 Eleanor Ave. Only. o�-�� -2- �OIOOZ INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRQIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. WATSON AVE. from S. Osceola Ave. to Drake St. at 622 Watson Ave. Only. 3 o��/V� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o �.�ay SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 PRO /ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. 3AMES AVE. from Kenneth St. to S. Prior Ave. at 1981 & 1988 James Ave. Only & N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2003 Palace Ave. Only. �0��/N/TIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. FXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ....................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB N.S. LINCOLN AVE. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. at 1653, 1657 & 1661 Lincoln Ave. & 77 Macalester St. Only. ��W`� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTIN CONDITI NS: This project is reconstruction of defective standard curb. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Howell St. at 1915 Palace Ave. Only. 5D1 �'" lNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... i� � ��:�i ; : W orks - Sidewalk Division J7 PERSON & PNONE lVed1 (266•6087) �E ON COUNCIL AQENOA BY 4DATE) OFSIONATUpEPAO�S ^ (CLIP FOfl SIGNATUFE) � � �- i �.-71� 04-'��`I G EEN SHE 1 4 NO. 1�2��1 INITIAI/DATE INITIAIJOACE I� DEPAfiTMENT OIftEGTOR I� CITV ATTORNEV I� eUDGET DIRECTOR I� MAVOR (OR pSSISYAIV'n ❑CITYGOUNCII ❑ cirv ciEaK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research t Sidewalk & Reconstruct Standard Curh in Wards 1, 2& 3 'IONS: Approve Oor Relacl (Rp pERS6NJIL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TH� FOLLOWIN(i QUEST(ONS; ICOMMIBSION , CIVILSERVICECOMMISSbN 1. HasihispersoNfirmeverworkeduMlerecontract�orthisdepartment? YES NO urrEE _ 2. Has this persoMfirm aver been a city employee? YES NO � 3. Does this personKirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee? COUNCIL _ YES NO cH COUwC�L oBJECTNE9 �E%plain all yes answera on 8aparetC aheet 4nd 9Hach to green aheet WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WH`�: 7he problem "defACtive sidewalk" was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freelthaW cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature vari�tions, etc. These problems occur an a citywide basis and must be addre5sed and corrected annuallg. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to, a state where it would be unusa4lA and subject to increased pedest[ian injuries from falis and possitile litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will btlnefit from thia project because it witl provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citiz2ns. The sidewalk contraCts are done by private cOntractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beeause of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact-that up to ong-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. C�ldQSSB ��€�arr.� ��"§�� ti. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNTOFTRAN6ACTION$ 75,95Z , COSTJREVENUEBUOGETED(CIRCLEONE) VES No JGSOUqCE 0�^�M-06]� A� P{A �� x' 62��0 ACINITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-0 000 ALINFQRMATI�Nt(EXP�AIN) B� AST = 365,000 C. Cf8 00 = 50,000 O\-� �4 CITY OF ST. PAUL PitELIMILdAAY ORDER o��in�n� COUNCIL FILE N0. 0��+ By File o. S 002 Voting War _1,2,3 � In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 501002 - 170 Virginia Street, 1661 Lincoln Avenue, 1657 Lincoln Avenue, 1653 Lincoln Avenue, 77 Macalester Street, 774 Delaware Avenue, 210 East Curtice Street, 1981 James Avenue, 1998 James Avenue, 2003 Palace Avenue, 1915 Palace Avenue, 1399 Stanford Avenue, 1439 Berkeley Avenue, 1456 Berkeley Avenue, 1425 Wellesley Avenue, 254 Warwick Street, 412 Warwick Street, 1450 Palace Avenue, 1458 Palace Avenue, 1451 James Avenue, 1025 Bayard Avenue, 1012 Eleanor Avenue, 897 Bayard Avenue, 883 Bayard Avenue, 622 Watson Avenue, 999 Edmund Avenue, 995 Edmund Avenue, 879 Charles Avenue o�,�ay �I�IC�1�1�1L *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o � . �.��. RESIAENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconatruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$10.06 per fron� foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths wil] be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The CounciT of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. Tktat the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments ancl 2000 Public Tmprovement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said publia hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. .,COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date,�!!,��OC�` Yeas / Nays ✓� nanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary ✓B�.akey 1�ostrom ✓Coleman a��'"".. H�, r r i s ✓L try eiter �In Favor �Against �,� ,,,�Ntcw� , �` �- - — ` Mayor �, CTTY OF ST. PAUL i�3� tZ�ti'3Z� COUNCIL FILE NO. O' 3ay (�3 By File o. SO 02 Voti g Ward 1,2,3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the fallowing locatioas: 501002 - 170 Virginia Street, 1661 Lincoln Avenue, 1657 Lincoln Avenue, 1653 Lincoln Avenue, 77 Macalester Street, 774 Delaware Avenue, 210 East Curtice Street, 1981 James Avenue, 1998 James Avenue, 2003 Palace Avenue, 1915 Palace Avenue, 1399 3tanford Avenue, 1439 Berkeley Avenue, 1456 Berkeley Avenue, 1425 Wellesley Avenue, 254 Warwick Street, 412 Warwick Street, 1450 Palace Avenue, 1458 Palace Avenue, 1451 James Avenue, 1025 Bayard Avenue, 1012 Eleanor Avenue, 897 Bayard Avenue, 883 Bayard Avenue, 622 Watson Avenue, 999 Edmund Avenue, 995 Eclmund Avenue, 879 Charles Avenue. 41-3�`} *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstxuctioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the propezty. MIJLTI-RESIDEIVTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� • a�� approved �..,..1��{�a�d� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribecl by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to saicl proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City o£ficers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �/ Benanav �/ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman .� Harris ,i Lantry J Reiter Adopted by Council: Date,��9� /-�Z�o� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �,In Favor By ��_,,� � ^—�e . a- �/ Against Mayor / �� o� -��y SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 RECEIVED �aN 2 g 2oa� RLat L DIVISION PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. CHARLES AVE. from N. Milton St. to N. Victoria St. at 879 Charles Ave. Only. � IJ'��INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTIIVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROICCT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. EDMUND AVB. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. at 995 & 999 Edmund Ave. Only. 5oI �INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled pane]s. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK S.S. SELBY AVE. from Virginia St. to Farrington St. at 170 Virginia St. Only. Sa�ZINITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... o � � 3�y SUMMARY OF ENGIiVEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE, from S. Milton St. Co S. Victoria St. at 883 & 897 Bayard Ave. Only. ,J O��INIT/ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the progerty owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. .......... . .............................................................................................. PROIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to S. Chatsworth St. at ]025 Bayard Ave. Only. 5 o I� INITIATCNG ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. .................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. CURTICE ST. from Mt. Hope Ave. to Harvard St. at 210 E. Curtice St. Only. 5 �I W�INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• XECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. DELAWARE AVE. from W. Sidney St. to W. CurCice St. at 774 Delaware Ave. On3y & N.S. W. CURTICB ST. from Delaware Ave. to !O' � Ave. J INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with scaled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Rogers Ave. to S. Chatsworth St. at 1012 Eleanor Ave. Only. o�-�� -2- �OIOOZ INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRQIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. WATSON AVE. from S. Osceola Ave. to Drake St. at 622 Watson Ave. Only. 3 o��/V� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o �.�ay SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 PRO /ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. 3AMES AVE. from Kenneth St. to S. Prior Ave. at 1981 & 1988 James Ave. Only & N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2003 Palace Ave. Only. �0��/N/TIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. FXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ....................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB N.S. LINCOLN AVE. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. at 1653, 1657 & 1661 Lincoln Ave. & 77 Macalester St. Only. ��W`� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTIN CONDITI NS: This project is reconstruction of defective standard curb. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Howell St. at 1915 Palace Ave. Only. 5D1 �'" lNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... i� � ��:�i ; : W orks - Sidewalk Division J7 PERSON & PNONE lVed1 (266•6087) �E ON COUNCIL AQENOA BY 4DATE) OFSIONATUpEPAO�S ^ (CLIP FOfl SIGNATUFE) � � �- i �.-71� 04-'��`I G EEN SHE 1 4 NO. 1�2��1 INITIAI/DATE INITIAIJOACE I� DEPAfiTMENT OIftEGTOR I� CITV ATTORNEV I� eUDGET DIRECTOR I� MAVOR (OR pSSISYAIV'n ❑CITYGOUNCII ❑ cirv ciEaK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research t Sidewalk & Reconstruct Standard Curh in Wards 1, 2& 3 'IONS: Approve Oor Relacl (Rp pERS6NJIL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TH� FOLLOWIN(i QUEST(ONS; ICOMMIBSION , CIVILSERVICECOMMISSbN 1. HasihispersoNfirmeverworkeduMlerecontract�orthisdepartment? YES NO urrEE _ 2. Has this persoMfirm aver been a city employee? YES NO � 3. Does this personKirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee? COUNCIL _ YES NO cH COUwC�L oBJECTNE9 �E%plain all yes answera on 8aparetC aheet 4nd 9Hach to green aheet WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WH`�: 7he problem "defACtive sidewalk" was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freelthaW cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature vari�tions, etc. These problems occur an a citywide basis and must be addre5sed and corrected annuallg. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to, a state where it would be unusa4lA and subject to increased pedest[ian injuries from falis and possitile litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will btlnefit from thia project because it witl provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citiz2ns. The sidewalk contraCts are done by private cOntractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beeause of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact-that up to ong-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. C�ldQSSB ��€�arr.� ��"§�� ti. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNTOFTRAN6ACTION$ 75,95Z , COSTJREVENUEBUOGETED(CIRCLEONE) VES No JGSOUqCE 0�^�M-06]� A� P{A �� x' 62��0 ACINITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-0 000 ALINFQRMATI�Nt(EXP�AIN) B� AST = 365,000 C. Cf8 00 = 50,000 O\-� �4 CITY OF ST. PAUL PitELIMILdAAY ORDER o��in�n� COUNCIL FILE N0. 0��+ By File o. S 002 Voting War _1,2,3 � In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 501002 - 170 Virginia Street, 1661 Lincoln Avenue, 1657 Lincoln Avenue, 1653 Lincoln Avenue, 77 Macalester Street, 774 Delaware Avenue, 210 East Curtice Street, 1981 James Avenue, 1998 James Avenue, 2003 Palace Avenue, 1915 Palace Avenue, 1399 Stanford Avenue, 1439 Berkeley Avenue, 1456 Berkeley Avenue, 1425 Wellesley Avenue, 254 Warwick Street, 412 Warwick Street, 1450 Palace Avenue, 1458 Palace Avenue, 1451 James Avenue, 1025 Bayard Avenue, 1012 Eleanor Avenue, 897 Bayard Avenue, 883 Bayard Avenue, 622 Watson Avenue, 999 Edmund Avenue, 995 Edmund Avenue, 879 Charles Avenue o�,�ay �I�IC�1�1�1L *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o � . �.��. RESIAENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconatruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$10.06 per fron� foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths wil] be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The CounciT of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. Tktat the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments ancl 2000 Public Tmprovement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said publia hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. .,COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date,�!!,��OC�` Yeas / Nays ✓� nanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary ✓B�.akey 1�ostrom ✓Coleman a��'"".. H�, r r i s ✓L try eiter �In Favor �Against �,� ,,,�Ntcw� , �` �- - — ` Mayor �, CTTY OF ST. PAUL i�3� tZ�ti'3Z� COUNCIL FILE NO. O' 3ay (�3 By File o. SO 02 Voti g Ward 1,2,3 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the fallowing locatioas: 501002 - 170 Virginia Street, 1661 Lincoln Avenue, 1657 Lincoln Avenue, 1653 Lincoln Avenue, 77 Macalester Street, 774 Delaware Avenue, 210 East Curtice Street, 1981 James Avenue, 1998 James Avenue, 2003 Palace Avenue, 1915 Palace Avenue, 1399 3tanford Avenue, 1439 Berkeley Avenue, 1456 Berkeley Avenue, 1425 Wellesley Avenue, 254 Warwick Street, 412 Warwick Street, 1450 Palace Avenue, 1458 Palace Avenue, 1451 James Avenue, 1025 Bayard Avenue, 1012 Eleanor Avenue, 897 Bayard Avenue, 883 Bayard Avenue, 622 Watson Avenue, 999 Edmund Avenue, 995 Eclmund Avenue, 879 Charles Avenue. 41-3�`} *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstxuctioa (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the propezty. MIJLTI-RESIDEIVTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order �� • a�� approved �..,..1��{�a�d� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribecl by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to saicl proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City o£ficers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate a11 expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �/ Benanav �/ Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman .� Harris ,i Lantry J Reiter Adopted by Council: Date,��9� /-�Z�o� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �,In Favor By ��_,,� � ^—�e . a- �/ Against Mayor / �� o� -��y SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 1 RECEIVED �aN 2 g 2oa� RLat L DIVISION PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. CHARLES AVE. from N. Milton St. to N. Victoria St. at 879 Charles Ave. Only. � IJ'��INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTIIVG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PROICCT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. EDMUND AVB. from N. Oxford St. to N. Chatsworth St. at 995 & 999 Edmund Ave. Only. 5oI �INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled pane]s. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT 57DEWALK S.S. SELBY AVE. from Virginia St. to Farrington St. at 170 Virginia St. Only. Sa�ZINITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... o � � 3�y SUMMARY OF ENGIiVEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PR0.7ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE, from S. Milton St. Co S. Victoria St. at 883 & 897 Bayard Ave. Only. ,J O��INIT/ATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the progerty owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. .......... . .............................................................................................. PROIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BAYARD AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to S. Chatsworth St. at ]025 Bayard Ave. Only. 5 o I� INITIATCNG ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. .................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. E. CURTICE ST. from Mt. Hope Ave. to Harvard St. at 210 E. Curtice St. Only. 5 �I W�INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• XECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. DELAWARE AVE. from W. Sidney St. to W. CurCice St. at 774 Delaware Ave. On3y & N.S. W. CURTICB ST. from Delaware Ave. to !O' � Ave. J INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by the a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITION5: This walk is poured concrete with scaled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Rogers Ave. to S. Chatsworth St. at 1012 Eleanor Ave. Only. o�-�� -2- �OIOOZ INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with heaved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRQIECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. WATSON AVE. from S. Osceola Ave. to Drake St. at 622 Watson Ave. Only. 3 o��/V� INITIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o �.�ay SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 PRO /ECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. 3AMES AVE. from Kenneth St. to S. Prior Ave. at 1981 & 1988 James Ave. Only & N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2003 Palace Ave. Only. �0��/N/TIATINGACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. FXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ....................................................................................................... PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT STANDARD CURB N.S. LINCOLN AVE. from Cambridge St. to Macalester St. at 1653, 1657 & 1661 Lincoln Ave. & 77 Macalester St. Only. ��W`� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTIN CONDITI NS: This project is reconstruction of defective standard curb. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Howell St. at 1915 Palace Ave. Only. 5D1 �'" lNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ......................................................................................................... i� � ��:�i ; : W orks - Sidewalk Division J7 PERSON & PNONE lVed1 (266•6087) �E ON COUNCIL AQENOA BY 4DATE) OFSIONATUpEPAO�S ^ (CLIP FOfl SIGNATUFE) � � �- i �.-71� 04-'��`I G EEN SHE 1 4 NO. 1�2��1 INITIAI/DATE INITIAIJOACE I� DEPAfiTMENT OIftEGTOR I� CITV ATTORNEV I� eUDGET DIRECTOR I� MAVOR (OR pSSISYAIV'n ❑CITYGOUNCII ❑ cirv ciEaK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research t Sidewalk & Reconstruct Standard Curh in Wards 1, 2& 3 'IONS: Approve Oor Relacl (Rp pERS6NJIL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER TH� FOLLOWIN(i QUEST(ONS; ICOMMIBSION , CIVILSERVICECOMMISSbN 1. HasihispersoNfirmeverworkeduMlerecontract�orthisdepartment? YES NO urrEE _ 2. Has this persoMfirm aver been a city employee? YES NO � 3. Does this personKirm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee? COUNCIL _ YES NO cH COUwC�L oBJECTNE9 �E%plain all yes answera on 8aparetC aheet 4nd 9Hach to green aheet WHAT, WNEN, WHERE, WH`�: 7he problem "defACtive sidewalk" was caused by muftiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freelthaW cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature vari�tions, etc. These problems occur an a citywide basis and must be addre5sed and corrected annuallg. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to, a state where it would be unusa4lA and subject to increased pedest[ian injuries from falis and possitile litigations. IF APPROVED: The community will btlnefit from thia project because it witl provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citiz2ns. The sidewalk contraCts are done by private cOntractors generating public sector jobs as a result. Historically, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback beeause of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact-that up to ong-half the assessment is City subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue. C�ldQSSB ��€�arr.� ��"§�� ti. This option wouid allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger doilar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. AMOUNTOFTRAN6ACTION$ 75,95Z , COSTJREVENUEBUOGETED(CIRCLEONE) VES No JGSOUqCE 0�^�M-06]� A� P{A �� x' 62��0 ACINITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-0 000 ALINFQRMATI�Nt(EXP�AIN) B� AST = 365,000 C. Cf8 00 = 50,000 O\-� �4 CITY OF ST. PAUL PitELIMILdAAY ORDER o��in�n� COUNCIL FILE N0. 0��+ By File o. S 002 Voting War _1,2,3 � In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 501002 - 170 Virginia Street, 1661 Lincoln Avenue, 1657 Lincoln Avenue, 1653 Lincoln Avenue, 77 Macalester Street, 774 Delaware Avenue, 210 East Curtice Street, 1981 James Avenue, 1998 James Avenue, 2003 Palace Avenue, 1915 Palace Avenue, 1399 Stanford Avenue, 1439 Berkeley Avenue, 1456 Berkeley Avenue, 1425 Wellesley Avenue, 254 Warwick Street, 412 Warwick Street, 1450 Palace Avenue, 1458 Palace Avenue, 1451 James Avenue, 1025 Bayard Avenue, 1012 Eleanor Avenue, 897 Bayard Avenue, 883 Bayard Avenue, 622 Watson Avenue, 999 Edmund Avenue, 995 Edmund Avenue, 879 Charles Avenue o�,�ay �I�IC�1�1�1L *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES o � . �.��. RESIAENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconatruction (replacement of old sidewalk� -$10.06 per fron� foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. Al1 other widths wil] be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The CounciT of the City of Saint Pau1 having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. Tktat the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments ancl 2000 Public Tmprovement Aid. 2. That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. 3. That notice of said publia hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. .,COUNCILPERSONS Adopted by Council: Date,�!!,��OC�` Yeas / Nays ✓� nanav Certified Passed by Council Secretary ✓B�.akey 1�ostrom ✓Coleman a��'"".. H�, r r i s ✓L try eiter �In Favor �Against �,� ,,,�Ntcw� , �` �- - — ` Mayor