The URL can be used to link to this page

01-323CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC L F�ILE N, O I� 3i�� ( FINAL ORDER By } 6��) ` � File o._501001 J��.s�i�� Vot' gWard_2,3,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES 1986, 1988, 1031 Eleanor Street, 499 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESTDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��.. e1r�� approved �_�,�� .b0� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓ Benanav �lakey Bostrom �Coleman ,/Harris �/Lantry ✓Reiter Adopted by Council: Date- 1��pp� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �y �,_P-�- �.----.�.�-� QAgainst , / ��y��i� Mayor �� o�-�a� m SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION W ard 2 PROi�CT• RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to Rogers St, at 1031 Eleanor Ave. Only. 5 � oo ( INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope and water ponding problem panels. ......................................................................................................... o�-�as $UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATI NS Ward 3 , " ' PRO i�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BERKELEY AVE. from Kenneth 5t. to S. Prior Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, setded, and cracked panels. ....................................................................................................... ��I PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BERKELEY AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2105 Berkeley Ave. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �I WI PROiECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Cleveland Ave. at 1835 Palace Ave. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... 0�-3.'�� . SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 5 p�� PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BURGESS ST. from Mackubin St. to Aiundel St. at 499 Burgess St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by request from the proper[y owner. EX�STING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled ganels. ......................................................................................................... �� W I PRO,TECT: R�CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CUMBERLAND ST. from W. Jessamine Ave, to W. Cook Ave. at 1089 Cumberland St. Oniy. iNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... �OI OOI PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK N.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Dale 5t. to Kent St. at 581 Hatch Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, helved, and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. STINSON ST. from Kent St, to Mackubin St. at 557 Stinson St. Only. 5a �QI TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. .................................................................................................... '�441 : Works • Sidewalk Division :T PERSON 8 PHONE Tvedt (266-6087) EONWUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) M 2 � , PU c NG0 ��' � NOFSIONATUHEPAOES ,_,_ (C41P Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3& 5 ATE INITIATED -17-01 FOfl SIGNATURE) �F,; z-Z4'� l GREEN SHEET INITIAUDATE �� DEPAflTMENT OIRECTOP I� CITY ATTORNEY I� BUDGET DIFECTOR I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) NO. o� - a,�� 102770 ` —INI7IAVDATE _ ❑ CITY COUNCIL ❑ CITY CLERK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research I IDEPT.ACC� u . � ia: nppmve �n� ar neiac� �n� pERSONAL SERVICE CONTqACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: IMMISSION CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION i, HaSthispersoNflrmeverworkedunderaconiractforthistlepartment? � — YES NO EE _ 2. Ha5 this person(firm ever been a c{ty employee4 � YES NO — 3. Does ihis persoMfirm possess a skill not rtormally possessed by airy cuneM ciry employee7 lNCIL _ YES NO' � COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? Ezplain all yes answers on separate sheet antl apach to green sheet WHAT, WMEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycies, service fife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it -, would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. �ISADVANTAQES IF Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmen��'qity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversial issue: � � � � `�, �➢ �� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate m9r� personaV injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well"a"s claim payouts. iOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ �G y9v,}v COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUN�INGSOURCE ��-M"06]� �. PTA 00 °a 2�� ACRVITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-0 000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:�EXPLAINJ B� AST ° � C. CtB 00 � 50,000 0�-3�.3 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARX �RDER rJ�I�IN/1L COUN L �ILE (�. Jj,_ �+ t_ IY� gy 41tA'��_ Fil o. 501001 Voting Ward_ 2,3,5 FJ In Che Matter of sidewalk recosastruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, 1031 Eleanor Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Street, 499 Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot far a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wallc. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and zeconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatiives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of , the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Benanav ✓�lakey ✓1�� strom ✓C`o 1 eman {�b xarris ✓�antry �ter �In Favor � Against �� MI �t �� Adopted by Council: Date��,_'�_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary sY_�..s,, � . A..�..,....._ .,. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC L F�ILE N, O I� 3i�� ( FINAL ORDER By } 6��) ` � File o._501001 J��.s�i�� Vot' gWard_2,3,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES 1986, 1988, 1031 Eleanor Street, 499 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESTDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��.. e1r�� approved �_�,�� .b0� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓ Benanav �lakey Bostrom �Coleman ,/Harris �/Lantry ✓Reiter Adopted by Council: Date- 1��pp� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �y �,_P-�- �.----.�.�-� QAgainst , / ��y��i� Mayor �� o�-�a� m SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION W ard 2 PROi�CT• RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to Rogers St, at 1031 Eleanor Ave. Only. 5 � oo ( INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope and water ponding problem panels. ......................................................................................................... o�-�as $UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATI NS Ward 3 , " ' PRO i�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BERKELEY AVE. from Kenneth 5t. to S. Prior Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, setded, and cracked panels. ....................................................................................................... ��I PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BERKELEY AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2105 Berkeley Ave. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �I WI PROiECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Cleveland Ave. at 1835 Palace Ave. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... 0�-3.'�� . SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 5 p�� PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BURGESS ST. from Mackubin St. to Aiundel St. at 499 Burgess St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by request from the proper[y owner. EX�STING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled ganels. ......................................................................................................... �� W I PRO,TECT: R�CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CUMBERLAND ST. from W. Jessamine Ave, to W. Cook Ave. at 1089 Cumberland St. Oniy. iNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... �OI OOI PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK N.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Dale 5t. to Kent St. at 581 Hatch Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, helved, and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. STINSON ST. from Kent St, to Mackubin St. at 557 Stinson St. Only. 5a �QI TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. .................................................................................................... '�441 : Works • Sidewalk Division :T PERSON 8 PHONE Tvedt (266-6087) EONWUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) M 2 � , PU c NG0 ��' � NOFSIONATUHEPAOES ,_,_ (C41P Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3& 5 ATE INITIATED -17-01 FOfl SIGNATURE) �F,; z-Z4'� l GREEN SHEET INITIAUDATE �� DEPAflTMENT OIRECTOP I� CITY ATTORNEY I� BUDGET DIFECTOR I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) NO. o� - a,�� 102770 ` —INI7IAVDATE _ ❑ CITY COUNCIL ❑ CITY CLERK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research I IDEPT.ACC� u . � ia: nppmve �n� ar neiac� �n� pERSONAL SERVICE CONTqACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: IMMISSION CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION i, HaSthispersoNflrmeverworkedunderaconiractforthistlepartment? � — YES NO EE _ 2. Ha5 this person(firm ever been a c{ty employee4 � YES NO — 3. Does ihis persoMfirm possess a skill not rtormally possessed by airy cuneM ciry employee7 lNCIL _ YES NO' � COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? Ezplain all yes answers on separate sheet antl apach to green sheet WHAT, WMEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycies, service fife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it -, would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. �ISADVANTAQES IF Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmen��'qity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversial issue: � � � � `�, �➢ �� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate m9r� personaV injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well"a"s claim payouts. iOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ �G y9v,}v COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUN�INGSOURCE ��-M"06]� �. PTA 00 °a 2�� ACRVITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-0 000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:�EXPLAINJ B� AST ° � C. CtB 00 � 50,000 0�-3�.3 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARX �RDER rJ�I�IN/1L COUN L �ILE (�. Jj,_ �+ t_ IY� gy 41tA'��_ Fil o. 501001 Voting Ward_ 2,3,5 FJ In Che Matter of sidewalk recosastruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, 1031 Eleanor Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Street, 499 Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot far a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wallc. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and zeconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatiives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of , the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Benanav ✓�lakey ✓1�� strom ✓C`o 1 eman {�b xarris ✓�antry �ter �In Favor � Against �� MI �t �� Adopted by Council: Date��,_'�_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary sY_�..s,, � . A..�..,....._ .,. Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNC L F�ILE N, O I� 3i�� ( FINAL ORDER By } 6��) ` � File o._501001 J��.s�i�� Vot' gWard_2,3,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction at the following locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES 1986, 1988, 1031 Eleanor Street, 499 RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wa1k. A11 other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESTDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��.. e1r�� approved �_�,�� .b0� The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers shall calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas � Nays ✓ Benanav �lakey Bostrom �Coleman ,/Harris �/Lantry ✓Reiter Adopted by Council: Date- 1��pp� Certified Passed by Council Secretary �In Favor By �y �,_P-�- �.----.�.�-� QAgainst , / ��y��i� Mayor �� o�-�a� m SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION W ard 2 PROi�CT• RECON5TRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. ELEANOR AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to Rogers St, at 1031 Eleanor Ave. Only. 5 � oo ( INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with reverse slope and water ponding problem panels. ......................................................................................................... o�-�as $UMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATI NS Ward 3 , " ' PRO i�CT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. BERKELEY AVE. from Kenneth 5t. to S. Prior Ave. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, setded, and cracked panels. ....................................................................................................... ��I PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BERKELEY AVE. from S. Cleveland Ave. to Kenneth St. at 2105 Berkeley Ave. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... �I WI PROiECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. PALACE AVE. from S. Prior Ave. to S. Cleveland Ave. at 1835 Palace Ave. Only. TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled, heaved, settled, and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... 0�-3.'�� . SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 5 5 p�� PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. BURGESS ST. from Mackubin St. to Aiundel St. at 499 Burgess St. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by request from the proper[y owner. EX�STING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled ganels. ......................................................................................................... �� W I PRO,TECT: R�CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. CUMBERLAND ST. from W. Jessamine Ave, to W. Cook Ave. at 1089 Cumberland St. Oniy. iNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... �OI OOI PRO.iECT: RECONSTRUCT 5IDEWALK N.S. HATCH AVE. from N. Dale 5t. to Kent St. at 581 Hatch Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, helved, and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. STINSON ST. from Kent St, to Mackubin St. at 557 Stinson St. Only. 5a �QI TNITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is poured concrete with undulations, multi-cracked, heaved, and settled panels. .................................................................................................... '�441 : Works • Sidewalk Division :T PERSON 8 PHONE Tvedt (266-6087) EONWUNCILAGENDABY(DATE) M 2 � , PU c NG0 ��' � NOFSIONATUHEPAOES ,_,_ (C41P Sidewalk in Wards 2, 3& 5 ATE INITIATED -17-01 FOfl SIGNATURE) �F,; z-Z4'� l GREEN SHEET INITIAUDATE �� DEPAflTMENT OIRECTOP I� CITY ATTORNEY I� BUDGET DIFECTOR I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT) NO. o� - a,�� 102770 ` —INI7IAVDATE _ ❑ CITY COUNCIL ❑ CITY CLERK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research I IDEPT.ACC� u . � ia: nppmve �n� ar neiac� �n� pERSONAL SERVICE CONTqACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING �UESTIONS: IMMISSION CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION i, HaSthispersoNflrmeverworkedunderaconiractforthistlepartment? � — YES NO EE _ 2. Ha5 this person(firm ever been a c{ty employee4 � YES NO — 3. Does ihis persoMfirm possess a skill not rtormally possessed by airy cuneM ciry employee7 lNCIL _ YES NO' � COUNCIL O&IECTIVE? Ezplain all yes answers on separate sheet antl apach to green sheet WHAT, WMEN, WHERE, WHY): The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, free/thaw cycies, service fife limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewalk condition would worsen to a state where it -, would be unusable and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result. �ISADVANTAQES IF Historicaliy, the sidewalk reconstruction has created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the assessmen��'qity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversial issue: � � � � `�, �➢ �� This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate m9r� personaV injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well"a"s claim payouts. iOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ �G y9v,}v COST/REVENUEBUDGETED(CIHCLEONE) YES No FUN�INGSOURCE ��-M"06]� �. PTA 00 °a 2�� ACRVITYNUMBER C00-2T753-0784-0 000 FINANCIALINFORMATION:�EXPLAINJ B� AST ° � C. CtB 00 � 50,000 0�-3�.3 CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARX �RDER rJ�I�IN/1L COUN L �ILE (�. Jj,_ �+ t_ IY� gy 41tA'��_ Fil o. 501001 Voting Ward_ 2,3,5 FJ In Che Matter of sidewalk recosastruction and/or new construction at the following locations: 501001 - 1942, 1950, 1954, 1956, 1957, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1968, 1975, 1986, 1988, 1992, 1993, 1998, 2015 Berkeley Avenue, 1835 Palace Avenue, 1031 Eleanor Avenue, 1089 Cumberland Street, 581 Hatch Avenue, 557 Stinson Street, 499 Burgess Street. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Raconstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot far a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide wallc. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100$ of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties wi11 receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and zeconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatiives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. 2 3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28 dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of , the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays �Benanav ✓�lakey ✓1�� strom ✓C`o 1 eman {�b xarris ✓�antry �ter �In Favor � Against �� MI �t �� Adopted by Council: Date��,_'�_ Certified Passed by Council Secretary sY_�..s,, � . A..�..,....._ .,. Mayor