01-322CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI E NO. � ��
FINAL ORUER By �
Fi o. 500155
Vo ing Ward_2,4,6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk xeconstruction at the following locations:
500155 - 1010 Tuscarora Avenue, 745 Sims Avenue, 674 Sims Avenue, 670 Sims Avenue,
661 York Avenue, A41 Bates Avenue, 1660 Edmund Avenue
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTSAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Aecoastxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.32 per square foot.
All cornGr residential properties will
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk
the property.
receive a credit up to the first 150
along and abutting the "long side" of
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $5.84 per square foot.
under Preliminary order ��.. a�� approved M�..,�.h _�.dp�
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the Citv Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COCTNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓ Benanav
✓ Blakey
,/ Bostrom
�/ Coleman
✓ Harris
,/ Lantry
�/ Reiter
�
Adopted by Council: DateL�
/
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
? In Favor
�Against
[.FJ
01 • � i�-
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Wud 2
PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. TUSCARORA AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to
S. Chatsworth St. at 1010 Tuscarora Ave. Only.
5 00155 INITIATTNG ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
�XISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
.........................................................................................................
o�-�sr
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 4
PRO TECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. EDMUND AVE. from Aldine St. to Fry St.
�� _ I at 1660 Edmund Ave. Only.
�lf'f
�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved and scaled panels.
........................................................................................................
o� -�sa�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 6
PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. YORK AVE. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier
St. at 661 York Ave. Only, S.S. SIMS AVE. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier St. at 670 & 674
5 /�I� Sims Ave. Only & N.S. SIMS AVE. from Walsh St. to Weide St. at 745 Sims Ave. Only.
w
IN/TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels.
.........................................................................................................
O\—��'y'
SUMMARY OF EIVGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 7
PRO TECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. NORTH ST. from E. Eighth St. to Bates
Ave. at 441 Bates Ave. Only.
5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
..... . ..............................................................................
r�t��V � �wnr.uw ��u�nv
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL
Public Works - Sidewalk Dlvision
CONTACTPERSON&PHONE
Jerry Tvedt (266•6087)
MUST BE ON COUNGL AOENDA BV (DATE) �
`r� y�`� PVguc rfEh�ln��-
OTALbOFSiQNATUAEPAqEB _
INITIATED
FOH
(CLIP ALL IOCATION3 FOR SIONATUPE)
"' 1��'� L cJv�U� a�•'���-
GREEIV SHEET
INITIAUDA7E
DIflECTOR
I� CIN ATTOFNEY
I� BUDGET DIRECTOR
I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT)
NO. 102742
INITIAUDATE �
❑ qTY COUNC14
❑ CITV CLERK
❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES DIR.
Q Councll Research
� OEPT. ACCOU N ii ��"i
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards �`¢�(See attached list)
✓S 7
9ECOMMENDATION3: Approve (A) or Relect (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION5:
_PLANNINaCOMMIS&ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION �, Hasthi5person/firtneverworkedUnderacontractforthisdepertmenl7
YES NO
_cia cOMM177ee — 2, Has this pereoNfirm ever been a ciry employee7
!1 STAFF — YES NO
COUNCIL
COl1NCIL O&IECTIVE7
3. Does this pereon/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes anawers on aeparate sheat antl attach to green sheet
WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected'annually. Left urtcorrected, the sidewalk condition evould worsen to a state where it
would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls.and possible litigations.
IFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction proced �s and
assessments. Property owners puestion the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half t�h�e���ss�ent is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.�
r i� 4 �i � 8"���
� 9wY
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts.
AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ � � � � � � ° ' COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE
IO SOURCE 99-M-o66g � R 1 ACINITY NUMBER� C99-2T75
4LINFORMATION:(EXPLAINj � °� �
C, CIB 99 ° 5o,o0Q
L`L9
o�-��a�
CITY OF 8T. PAUL
ORDER
COUN IL FIL N0. 0��.�0
gy 0� I
Fi N . 500155
Voting Ward 2,4,6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reao�nstructioa and/or new construction at the following
locations:
500155 - 1010 Tuscarora Avenue, 745 Sims Avenue, 674 Sims Avenue, 670 8ims Avenue,
661 York Avenue, 441 Bates Avenue, 1660 Edmund Avenue.
�ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replaoement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and 510.38 per front foot Eor a six (6) foot- wide
walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately 54.32 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet oE new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately 55.84 per square £oot.
The.Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereoE is *SEE AHOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvemen� on
at 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
the ° dav of March, 2001
City Hall and Court House
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓�lakey
�strom
�leman
Ab.KV�'� Harris
✓�antry
4/1�e i ter
�s In Favor
�Against
s Ab a�w�"
Adopted by Council : Date_M��_��p V,
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
1 � ____. _
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI E NO. � ��
FINAL ORUER By �
Fi o. 500155
Vo ing Ward_2,4,6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk xeconstruction at the following locations:
500155 - 1010 Tuscarora Avenue, 745 Sims Avenue, 674 Sims Avenue, 670 Sims Avenue,
661 York Avenue, A41 Bates Avenue, 1660 Edmund Avenue
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTSAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Aecoastxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.32 per square foot.
All cornGr residential properties will
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk
the property.
receive a credit up to the first 150
along and abutting the "long side" of
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $5.84 per square foot.
under Preliminary order ��.. a�� approved M�..,�.h _�.dp�
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the Citv Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COCTNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓ Benanav
✓ Blakey
,/ Bostrom
�/ Coleman
✓ Harris
,/ Lantry
�/ Reiter
�
Adopted by Council: DateL�
/
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
? In Favor
�Against
[.FJ
01 • � i�-
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Wud 2
PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. TUSCARORA AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to
S. Chatsworth St. at 1010 Tuscarora Ave. Only.
5 00155 INITIATTNG ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
�XISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
.........................................................................................................
o�-�sr
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 4
PRO TECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. EDMUND AVE. from Aldine St. to Fry St.
�� _ I at 1660 Edmund Ave. Only.
�lf'f
�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved and scaled panels.
........................................................................................................
o� -�sa�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 6
PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. YORK AVE. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier
St. at 661 York Ave. Only, S.S. SIMS AVE. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier St. at 670 & 674
5 /�I� Sims Ave. Only & N.S. SIMS AVE. from Walsh St. to Weide St. at 745 Sims Ave. Only.
w
IN/TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels.
.........................................................................................................
O\—��'y'
SUMMARY OF EIVGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 7
PRO TECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. NORTH ST. from E. Eighth St. to Bates
Ave. at 441 Bates Ave. Only.
5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
..... . ..............................................................................
r�t��V � �wnr.uw ��u�nv
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL
Public Works - Sidewalk Dlvision
CONTACTPERSON&PHONE
Jerry Tvedt (266•6087)
MUST BE ON COUNGL AOENDA BV (DATE) �
`r� y�`� PVguc rfEh�ln��-
OTALbOFSiQNATUAEPAqEB _
INITIATED
FOH
(CLIP ALL IOCATION3 FOR SIONATUPE)
"' 1��'� L cJv�U� a�•'���-
GREEIV SHEET
INITIAUDA7E
DIflECTOR
I� CIN ATTOFNEY
I� BUDGET DIRECTOR
I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT)
NO. 102742
INITIAUDATE �
❑ qTY COUNC14
❑ CITV CLERK
❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES DIR.
Q Councll Research
� OEPT. ACCOU N ii ��"i
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards �`¢�(See attached list)
✓S 7
9ECOMMENDATION3: Approve (A) or Relect (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION5:
_PLANNINaCOMMIS&ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION �, Hasthi5person/firtneverworkedUnderacontractforthisdepertmenl7
YES NO
_cia cOMM177ee — 2, Has this pereoNfirm ever been a ciry employee7
!1 STAFF — YES NO
COUNCIL
COl1NCIL O&IECTIVE7
3. Does this pereon/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes anawers on aeparate sheat antl attach to green sheet
WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected'annually. Left urtcorrected, the sidewalk condition evould worsen to a state where it
would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls.and possible litigations.
IFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction proced �s and
assessments. Property owners puestion the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half t�h�e���ss�ent is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.�
r i� 4 �i � 8"���
� 9wY
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts.
AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ � � � � � � ° ' COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE
IO SOURCE 99-M-o66g � R 1 ACINITY NUMBER� C99-2T75
4LINFORMATION:(EXPLAINj � °� �
C, CIB 99 ° 5o,o0Q
L`L9
o�-��a�
CITY OF 8T. PAUL
ORDER
COUN IL FIL N0. 0��.�0
gy 0� I
Fi N . 500155
Voting Ward 2,4,6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reao�nstructioa and/or new construction at the following
locations:
500155 - 1010 Tuscarora Avenue, 745 Sims Avenue, 674 Sims Avenue, 670 8ims Avenue,
661 York Avenue, 441 Bates Avenue, 1660 Edmund Avenue.
�ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replaoement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and 510.38 per front foot Eor a six (6) foot- wide
walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately 54.32 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet oE new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately 55.84 per square £oot.
The.Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereoE is *SEE AHOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvemen� on
at 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
the ° dav of March, 2001
City Hall and Court House
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓�lakey
�strom
�leman
Ab.KV�'� Harris
✓�antry
4/1�e i ter
�s In Favor
�Against
s Ab a�w�"
Adopted by Council : Date_M��_��p V,
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
1 � ____. _
Mayor
CITY OF ST. PAUL COUNCIL FI E NO. � ��
FINAL ORUER By �
Fi o. 500155
Vo ing Ward_2,4,6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk xeconstruction at the following locations:
500155 - 1010 Tuscarora Avenue, 745 Sims Avenue, 674 Sims Avenue, 670 Sims Avenue,
661 York Avenue, A41 Bates Avenue, 1660 Edmund Avenue
*ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTSAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Aecoastxuction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a five (5)
foot wide walk and $10.38 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide
walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 1000 of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately $4.32 per square foot.
All cornGr residential properties will
feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk
the property.
receive a credit up to the first 150
along and abutting the "long side" of
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (MOre than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be
approximately $5.84 per square foot.
under Preliminary order ��.. a�� approved M�..,�.h _�.dp�
The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the
above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City
Charter; and
WHEREAS, The Council has heard a11 persons, objections and recommendations
pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fully considered the same; now,
therefore, be it
RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Paul does hereby order that the
above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed
and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it
FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City
officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to
the Citv Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter.
COCTNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓ Benanav
✓ Blakey
,/ Bostrom
�/ Coleman
✓ Harris
,/ Lantry
�/ Reiter
�
Adopted by Council: DateL�
/
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
? In Favor
�Against
[.FJ
01 • � i�-
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Wud 2
PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. TUSCARORA AVE. from Pleasant Ave. to
S. Chatsworth St. at 1010 Tuscarora Ave. Only.
5 00155 INITIATTNG ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
�XISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
.........................................................................................................
o�-�sr
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 4
PRO TECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. EDMUND AVE. from Aldine St. to Fry St.
�� _ I at 1660 Edmund Ave. Only.
�lf'f
�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved and scaled panels.
........................................................................................................
o� -�sa�
SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 6
PROIECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. YORK AVE. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier
St. at 661 York Ave. Only, S.S. SIMS AVE. from Payne Ave. to Greenbrier St. at 670 & 674
5 /�I� Sims Ave. Only & N.S. SIMS AVE. from Walsh St. to Weide St. at 745 Sims Ave. Only.
w
IN/TIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by requests from the property owners.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels.
.........................................................................................................
O\—��'y'
SUMMARY OF EIVGINEERING RECOMMENDATION
Ward 7
PRO TECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. NORTH ST. from E. Eighth St. to Bates
Ave. at 441 Bates Ave. Only.
5 �� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels.
..... . ..............................................................................
r�t��V � �wnr.uw ��u�nv
DEPARTMENT/OFFICE/COUNCIL
Public Works - Sidewalk Dlvision
CONTACTPERSON&PHONE
Jerry Tvedt (266•6087)
MUST BE ON COUNGL AOENDA BV (DATE) �
`r� y�`� PVguc rfEh�ln��-
OTALbOFSiQNATUAEPAqEB _
INITIATED
FOH
(CLIP ALL IOCATION3 FOR SIONATUPE)
"' 1��'� L cJv�U� a�•'���-
GREEIV SHEET
INITIAUDA7E
DIflECTOR
I� CIN ATTOFNEY
I� BUDGET DIRECTOR
I� MAVOR (OR ASSISTANT)
NO. 102742
INITIAUDATE �
❑ qTY COUNC14
❑ CITV CLERK
❑ FIN.B MGT. SERVICES DIR.
Q Councll Research
� OEPT. ACCOU N ii ��"i
Reconstruct Sidewalk in Wards �`¢�(See attached list)
✓S 7
9ECOMMENDATION3: Approve (A) or Relect (R) pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MUST ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION5:
_PLANNINaCOMMIS&ION _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION �, Hasthi5person/firtneverworkedUnderacontractforthisdepertmenl7
YES NO
_cia cOMM177ee — 2, Has this pereoNfirm ever been a ciry employee7
!1 STAFF — YES NO
COUNCIL
COl1NCIL O&IECTIVE7
3. Does this pereon/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any current ciry employee?
YES NO
Explain all yes anawers on aeparate sheat antl attach to green sheet
WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY):
The problem "defective sidewalk" was caused by multiple problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freeRhaw cycles,
service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and
must be addressed and corrected'annually. Left urtcorrected, the sidewalk condition evould worsen to a state where it
would be unusabie and subject to increased pedestrian injuries from falls.and possible litigations.
IFAPPROVED:
The community will benefit from this project because it will provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk
contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a result.
Historically, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction proced �s and
assessments. Property owners puestion the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half t�h�e���ss�ent is City
subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a controversial issue.�
r i� 4 �i � 8"���
� 9wY
This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personal injury
suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts.
AMOUNT OF TRANSACTION $ � � � � � � ° ' COST/REVENUE BUDGETED (CIRCLE
IO SOURCE 99-M-o66g � R 1 ACINITY NUMBER� C99-2T75
4LINFORMATION:(EXPLAINj � °� �
C, CIB 99 ° 5o,o0Q
L`L9
o�-��a�
CITY OF 8T. PAUL
ORDER
COUN IL FIL N0. 0��.�0
gy 0� I
Fi N . 500155
Voting Ward 2,4,6 & 7
In the Matter of sidewalk reao�nstructioa and/or new construction at the following
locations:
500155 - 1010 Tuscarora Avenue, 745 Sims Avenue, 674 Sims Avenue, 670 8ims Avenue,
661 York Avenue, 441 Bates Avenue, 1660 Edmund Avenue.
�ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES
RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures)
Reconstruction (replaoement of old sidewalk) -$8.65 per front foot for a
five (5) foot wide walk and 510.38 per front foot Eor a six (6) foot- wide
walk. All other widths wi11 be prorated accordingly. New construction
(where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be
approximately 54.32 per square foot.
All corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150
feet oE new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of
the property.
MULTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES
For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be
approximately 55.84 per square £oot.
The.Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon
the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves:
1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, �
that the estimated cost thereoE is *SEE AHOVE for estimated construction rates,
financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid.
2. That a public hearing be had on said improvemen� on
at 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Building in the City of Saint Paul.
the ° dav of March, 2001
City Hall and Court House
3. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner
provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of
the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated.
COUNCILPERSONS
Yeas Nays
✓Benanav
✓�lakey
�strom
�leman
Ab.KV�'� Harris
✓�antry
4/1�e i ter
�s In Favor
�Against
s Ab a�w�"
Adopted by Council : Date_M��_��p V,
Certified Passed by Council Secretary
1 � ____. _
Mayor