Loading...
01-321CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. OI- � GO By� _ Fi o.,_50000 Voting Ward_1,2,3,4,5 Ia tha Mattar of sidewalk reconstruction at the Eollowing locations: S00001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Front AVeIIUe, 1621 Wheelock Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTI2UCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recosistructioxi (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 10�o of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side'� of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��� .7-O d1 approved M� ^. a-Ca! � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r/ Benanav �' Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ` Harris ,� Lantry ,/ Reiter 21n Favor dAgainst Adopted by Council: Date����v� Certified Passed by Council Secretary [.� o�-�a�, SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 Ilii PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SBLBY AVE. from N. Dale St. to N. St. Albans 5t. at 613-619, 642 & 644 Selby Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the propei�ty owner. EXI5TTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. ......................................................................................................... o�•�z� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. MONTREAL AVE. from W. Seventh St. to Selma Lane at 1136 Montreal Ave. Only. 5 1AJ�' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING COIVDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N.120BERT ST. from E. Kellogg Blvd. to E. Fourth St. at 316 N. Robert St. Only. (United States Federal Courts Building). S O�) INTTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING COlYDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with uneven and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... o� •�a� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S.IVORBERT LANE from St. Paul Ave. to Dorothea Ave. at 1160 Norbert Lane Only. g�I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORBERT LANE from Norbert Pl. to Dorothel Ave. at 1175 Norbert Lane Only. 5 �) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o �-�s� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 4 PR03ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LAFOND AVE. from N. Pascal St. to Simpson St. at 1463 Lafond Ave. Only. 5 �) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is old tile with broken tile. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIOIVS Ward 5 �� -'�>♦ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. COTTAGE AVE, from Galtier St. to Farrington St. at 288 W. Cottage Ave. Only. ✓ Vl/1NI INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaeved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRO E T: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. MACKTJBIN ST, from Front Ave, to W. Lawson Ave. at 543 Front Ave. Only. (Crossroads Elementary School). 5 �/w�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. ........................................................................................................ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. WHEELOCK R1DGE RD. from E. Hoyt Ave. to E. Idaho Ave. at 1621 Wheelock Ridge Rd. Only. 5�) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request £rom the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ..... . ................................................................................................... � ��f�l��l � Works - Sidewalk Division OFSIQNATUpE PAQES �n� ��r �- GREEN SHEE' � I� OEPARTMENT DIRECTOR " ASSIGN I�dTVATTORNEV `�-(� NUMBERFOR , ' . � M `� OpDEfl G I� BUDGEf DIRECTOR �r LIA/I I� MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN7) (CLIP FOqSIQNATUflE) � �ASSOCIATE Reconstruct & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3, 4& 5(See attached list) o�_�y�,� NO. 102741 INITIAUDATE ❑ GTY CAUNCIL ❑ CIT' CLERK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research em tn� pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION t. Hasthispei'soNfirtneverworkedunderawnUacttorthisdepartmeat?� YES NO — 2. Has this person/tirm ever been a city employ9e? _— YES NO 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any curren[ city employee? YES NO Explaln all yes answera on saparete sheei and atteeh to green sheet The problam "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipie problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject ta increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from ihis project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuit. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: Hisloricaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the asses�Srr�e,ra�5lsiCity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversiat issue. �,:;x�`�a���'� "' � �, v �; `� , p , ` .o- g a p d1 q p' � �'Ci i�; t�„ s.,°'°�' §' �.i) DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ ���»��" WST/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIRCLEONE) FUNDIN4SOURCE 99 "M -o�� 6 9 . °` 1 ACINITYNUMBER C99-2T752-07� FINANCIALINFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) � � 1 c, cra 99 - So,000 NO o�-a�.� CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ���ci�ni_ COUNCIL FILE N0. D��a4 By a,�P F' e o. 50000 Voting Ward_,1,2,3,4,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 500001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Front Avenue, 1621 Wheelock Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reaonstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstr.ucted sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. ra [�3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28�" dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of , the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays �Benanav ✓�1 akey I/�ostrom �leman Q��sCh�- x�r r i s ✓L a try eiter 6 In Favor �Against � 1'��1tV�� Adopted by Council: Date��_�f�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � , — Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. OI- � GO By� _ Fi o.,_50000 Voting Ward_1,2,3,4,5 Ia tha Mattar of sidewalk reconstruction at the Eollowing locations: S00001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Front AVeIIUe, 1621 Wheelock Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTI2UCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recosistructioxi (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 10�o of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side'� of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��� .7-O d1 approved M� ^. a-Ca! � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r/ Benanav �' Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ` Harris ,� Lantry ,/ Reiter 21n Favor dAgainst Adopted by Council: Date����v� Certified Passed by Council Secretary [.� o�-�a�, SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 Ilii PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SBLBY AVE. from N. Dale St. to N. St. Albans 5t. at 613-619, 642 & 644 Selby Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the propei�ty owner. EXI5TTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. ......................................................................................................... o�•�z� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. MONTREAL AVE. from W. Seventh St. to Selma Lane at 1136 Montreal Ave. Only. 5 1AJ�' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING COIVDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N.120BERT ST. from E. Kellogg Blvd. to E. Fourth St. at 316 N. Robert St. Only. (United States Federal Courts Building). S O�) INTTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING COlYDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with uneven and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... o� •�a� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S.IVORBERT LANE from St. Paul Ave. to Dorothea Ave. at 1160 Norbert Lane Only. g�I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORBERT LANE from Norbert Pl. to Dorothel Ave. at 1175 Norbert Lane Only. 5 �) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o �-�s� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 4 PR03ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LAFOND AVE. from N. Pascal St. to Simpson St. at 1463 Lafond Ave. Only. 5 �) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is old tile with broken tile. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIOIVS Ward 5 �� -'�>♦ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. COTTAGE AVE, from Galtier St. to Farrington St. at 288 W. Cottage Ave. Only. ✓ Vl/1NI INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaeved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRO E T: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. MACKTJBIN ST, from Front Ave, to W. Lawson Ave. at 543 Front Ave. Only. (Crossroads Elementary School). 5 �/w�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. ........................................................................................................ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. WHEELOCK R1DGE RD. from E. Hoyt Ave. to E. Idaho Ave. at 1621 Wheelock Ridge Rd. Only. 5�) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request £rom the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ..... . ................................................................................................... � ��f�l��l � Works - Sidewalk Division OFSIQNATUpE PAQES �n� ��r �- GREEN SHEE' � I� OEPARTMENT DIRECTOR " ASSIGN I�dTVATTORNEV `�-(� NUMBERFOR , ' . � M `� OpDEfl G I� BUDGEf DIRECTOR �r LIA/I I� MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN7) (CLIP FOqSIQNATUflE) � �ASSOCIATE Reconstruct & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3, 4& 5(See attached list) o�_�y�,� NO. 102741 INITIAUDATE ❑ GTY CAUNCIL ❑ CIT' CLERK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research em tn� pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION t. Hasthispei'soNfirtneverworkedunderawnUacttorthisdepartmeat?� YES NO — 2. Has this person/tirm ever been a city employ9e? _— YES NO 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any curren[ city employee? YES NO Explaln all yes answera on saparete sheei and atteeh to green sheet The problam "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipie problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject ta increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from ihis project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuit. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: Hisloricaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the asses�Srr�e,ra�5lsiCity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversiat issue. �,:;x�`�a���'� "' � �, v �; `� , p , ` .o- g a p d1 q p' � �'Ci i�; t�„ s.,°'°�' §' �.i) DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ ���»��" WST/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIRCLEONE) FUNDIN4SOURCE 99 "M -o�� 6 9 . °` 1 ACINITYNUMBER C99-2T752-07� FINANCIALINFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) � � 1 c, cra 99 - So,000 NO o�-a�.� CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ���ci�ni_ COUNCIL FILE N0. D��a4 By a,�P F' e o. 50000 Voting Ward_,1,2,3,4,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 500001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Front Avenue, 1621 Wheelock Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reaonstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstr.ucted sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. ra [�3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28�" dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of , the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays �Benanav ✓�1 akey I/�ostrom �leman Q��sCh�- x�r r i s ✓L a try eiter 6 In Favor �Against � 1'��1tV�� Adopted by Council: Date��_�f�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � , — Mayor CITY OF ST. PAUL FINAL ORDER COUNCIL FILE NO. OI- � GO By� _ Fi o.,_50000 Voting Ward_1,2,3,4,5 Ia tha Mattar of sidewalk reconstruction at the Eollowing locations: S00001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Front AVeIIUe, 1621 Wheelock Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTI2UCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Recosistructioxi (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construation (where no walk existed) - 10�o of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. A11 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side'� of the property. MULTI-RESIDENTIAL (More than three family structures), NON RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstructed sidewalk; 1000 of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. under Preliminary order ��� .7-O d1 approved M� ^. a-Ca! � The Council of the City of Saint Paul has conducted a public hearing upon the above improvement, due notice thereof having been given as prescribed by the City Charter; and WHEREAS, The Council has heard all persons, objections and recommendations pertaining to said proposed improvement and has fu11y considered the same; now, therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Council of the City of Saint Pau1 does hereby order that the above-described improvement be made, and the proper City officers are hereby directed and authorized to proceed with the improvement; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, That upon the completion of said improvement, the proper City officers sha11 calculate all expenses incurred therein and shall report the same to the City Council in accordance with Chapter 14 of the City Charter. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas Nays r/ Benanav �' Blakey ✓ Bostrom ✓ Coleman ` Harris ,� Lantry ,/ Reiter 21n Favor dAgainst Adopted by Council: Date����v� Certified Passed by Council Secretary [.� o�-�a�, SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 1 Ilii PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK B.S. SBLBY AVE. from N. Dale St. to N. St. Albans 5t. at 613-619, 642 & 644 Selby Ave. Only. INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the propei�ty owner. EXI5TTNG CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with settled panels. ......................................................................................................... o�•�z� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 2 PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. MONTREAL AVE. from W. Seventh St. to Selma Lane at 1136 Montreal Ave. Only. 5 1AJ�' INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING COIVDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. PRO.TECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S. N.120BERT ST. from E. Kellogg Blvd. to E. Fourth St. at 316 N. Robert St. Only. (United States Federal Courts Building). S O�) INTTIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING COlYDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with uneven and settled panels. ......................................................................................................... o� •�a� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIONS Ward 3 PROTECT• RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK E.S.IVORBERT LANE from St. Paul Ave. to Dorothea Ave. at 1160 Norbert Lane Only. g�I INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with scaled panels. ......................................................................................................... PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. NORBERT LANE from Norbert Pl. to Dorothel Ave. at 1175 Norbert Lane Only. 5 �) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with tree heaved panels. ......................................................................................................... o �-�s� SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATION Ward 4 PR03ECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK N.S. LAFOND AVE. from N. Pascal St. to Simpson St. at 1463 Lafond Ave. Only. 5 �) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. This walk is old tile with broken tile. SUMMARY OF ENGINEERING RECOMMENDATIOIVS Ward 5 �� -'�>♦ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK S.S. W. COTTAGE AVE, from Galtier St. to Farrington St. at 288 W. Cottage Ave. Only. ✓ Vl/1NI INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This waik is poured concrete with tree heaeved and cracked panels. ......................................................................................................... PRO E T: CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. MACKTJBIN ST, from Front Ave, to W. Lawson Ave. at 543 Front Ave. Only. (Crossroads Elementary School). 5 �/w�� INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request from the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is first time construction. ........................................................................................................ PROTECT: RECONSTRUCT SIDEWALK W.S. WHEELOCK R1DGE RD. from E. Hoyt Ave. to E. Idaho Ave. at 1621 Wheelock Ridge Rd. Only. 5�) INITIATING ACTION: This order was initiated by a request £rom the property owner. EXISTING CONDITIONS: This walk is poured concrete with cracked and uneven panels. ..... . ................................................................................................... � ��f�l��l � Works - Sidewalk Division OFSIQNATUpE PAQES �n� ��r �- GREEN SHEE' � I� OEPARTMENT DIRECTOR " ASSIGN I�dTVATTORNEV `�-(� NUMBERFOR , ' . � M `� OpDEfl G I� BUDGEf DIRECTOR �r LIA/I I� MAYOR (OR ASSISTAN7) (CLIP FOqSIQNATUflE) � �ASSOCIATE Reconstruct & Construct Sidewalk in Wards 1, 2, 3, 4& 5(See attached list) o�_�y�,� NO. 102741 INITIAUDATE ❑ GTY CAUNCIL ❑ CIT' CLERK ❑ FIN. & MGT. SERVICES DIR. � Council Research em tn� pERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MU5T ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS: _CIVILSERVICECOMMISSION t. Hasthispei'soNfirtneverworkedunderawnUacttorthisdepartmeat?� YES NO — 2. Has this person/tirm ever been a city employ9e? _— YES NO 3. Does ihis person/firm possess a skill not normally possessed by any curren[ city employee? YES NO Explaln all yes answera on saparete sheei and atteeh to green sheet The problam "defective sidewalk" was caused by multipie problems, tree roots, poor subgrade materials, freefthaw cycles, service life limits, chemical additives, extreme temperature variations, etc. These problems occur on a citywide basis and must be addressed and corrected annually. Left uncorrected, the sidewaik condition would worsen to a state where it would be unusable and subject ta increased pedestrian injuries from falls and possible litigations. The community will benefit from ihis project because it wiil provide safe defect free sidewalks for its citizens. The sidewalk contracts are done by private contractors generating public sector jobs as a resuit. DISADVANTAOES IF APPROVED: Hisloricaliy, the sidewalk reconstructions have created negative feedback because of construction procedures and assessments. Property owners question the assessments, despite the fact that up to one-half the asses�Srr�e,ra�5lsiCity subsidized. Having to assess for walk reconstruction remains a coMroversiat issue. �,:;x�`�a���'� "' � �, v �; `� , p , ` .o- g a p d1 q p' � �'Ci i�; t�„ s.,°'°�' §' �.i) DISADVANTAOES IF NOT APPROVED: This option would allow the infrastructure of sidewalk stock to deteriorate, which in turn, will generate more personai injury suits, resulting in the expenditure of larger dollar amounts in repairs and replacement, as well as claim payouts. fOTALAMOUNTOFTRANSACTION$ ���»��" WST/REVENUEBUDGE7ED(CIRCLEONE) FUNDIN4SOURCE 99 "M -o�� 6 9 . °` 1 ACINITYNUMBER C99-2T752-07� FINANCIALINFORMATION:(E%PLAIN) � � 1 c, cra 99 - So,000 NO o�-a�.� CITY OF ST. PAUL PRELIMINARY ORDER ���ci�ni_ COUNCIL FILE N0. D��a4 By a,�P F' e o. 50000 Voting Ward_,1,2,3,4,5 In the Matter of sidewalk reconstruction and/or new construction at the following locationa: 500001 - 613-619 Selby Avenue, 642 Selby Avenue, 644 Selby Avenue, 1136 Montreal Avenue, 1160 Norbert Lane, 1175 Norbert Lane, 1463 Lafond Avenue, 288 West Cottage Avenue, 316 North Robert Street, 543 Front Avenue, 1621 Wheelock Ridge Road. *ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION RATES RESIDENTIAL RATES (One, two or three family structures) Reaonstruction (replacement of old sidewalk) -$10.06 per front foot for a five (5) foot wide walk and $12.07 per front foot for a six (6) foot wide walk. All other widths will be prorated accordingly. New construction (where no walk existed) - 100� of the actual cost estimated to be approximately $4.50 per square foot. Al1 corner residential properties will receive a credit up to the first 150 feet of new or reconstructed sidewalk along and abutting the "long side" of the property. M[JLTI-RESIDENTIAL(More than three family structures), NON-RESIDENTIAL RATES For new and reconstr.ucted sidewalk; 100� of actual cost estimated to be approximately $6.09 per square foot. The Council of the City of Saint Paul having received the report of the Mayor upon the above improvement, and having considered said report, hereby resolves: 1. That the said report and the same is hereby approved with no alternatives, � that the estimated cost thereof is *SEE ABOVE for estimated construction rates, financed by assessments and 2000 Public Improvement Aid. ra [�3 That a public hearing be had on said improvement on the 28�" dav of March, 2001 5:30 o'clock P.M. in the Council Chambers of the City Ha11 and Court House Building in the City of Saint Paul. That notice of said public hearing be given to the persons and in the manner provided by the Charter, stating the time and place of hearing, the nature of , the improvement and the total cost thereof as estimated. COUNCILPERSONS Yeas� Nays �Benanav ✓�1 akey I/�ostrom �leman Q��sCh�- x�r r i s ✓L a try eiter 6 In Favor �Against � 1'��1tV�� Adopted by Council: Date��_�f�� Certified Passed by Council Secretary � , — Mayor